Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
Created by kevin32
Visit the WAATGM forum to view and post content.
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this tribe is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
- 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate tribe.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 8h ago
Public service message: If you enjoy the content, please consider posting this link to the Reddit version of WAATGM since I cannot. It drives more traffic to this site, such as myself, and that's how the content creation happens. Please do your part: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlC5DEp2EOQ
@Typo-MAGAshiv This doesn't qualify for weekday content apparently, but I'm curious: Is it because the matchmaker told the story? Rule 1 does apply since she's looking to have kids with him?
Used Mac-screen recording with physical-audio patching and a sticky-note posted over the title to save time from using “free” watermark removal tools with all kinds of paywalls but had a problem with editing so had to repost. Lessons learned. If anyone knows of a good "free" watermark remover, please do let me know!
The title is taken from where I found it elsewhere and I thought it was clever so giving credit where it’s due. Happy Friday, everyone!
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 6h ago
Yes.
You mean rule 5.
I've used Musicaldown.com for years, and it's actually free rather than "free".
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 8h ago
Due to having to pull the post, reposting comments:
@Vermillion-Rx I'm glad these know it all boss babes are becoming spinsters because they decided to pick a man's career path while maintaining a woman's sexual strategy Good luck with that
@Typo-MAGAshiv Weekend material. Good stuff, though. These matchmakers discussing how demanding and unrealistic their female customers are have become more and more prevalent in recent years, and they never cease to amuse me.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 3h ago
Will repost
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 4h ago
Standard post wall woman pricing herself out of her desired market.
Sadly, I think the only reason the matchmaker realized how contradictory her clients demands were is because she has a job that literally requires her to think about other people's wants and needs in order to be successful in the short and long term.
The average woman however can get through her teens and twenties basically being completely oblivious to any wants or needs outside her own if she's pretty enough or men are desperate enough. And so most end up like her client, being on the wrong side of 30 and failing to grasp that a successful man is not going to accept a woman that is both old and fully intending to be a sandbagger.
She can be young and low earning, or old and high earning, but not both old and low earning while demanding high quality of life at his expense. Too many negatives for nothing positive in return.
These women are expecting an Old Money lifestyle while bringing none of the family trusts, properties, and socioeconomic connections that make it possible much less sustainable.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 3h ago
I'm glad these know it all boss babes are becoming spinsters because they decided to pick a man's career path while maintaining a woman's sexual strategy Good luck with that
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1h ago
This is a good find as it shows something we talk about lots from the female perspective.
Hypergamy can't be have your cake cake and eat it. Ladies you want to marry up. It makes perfect sense that you want to be able to have your children, be a good mother and stay at home and not lose your lifestyle but you do have to consider what you offer in return. Self assessed "average looking" boss babe brings what? Well money. What else. Has she been educated to be a good woman and mother? Has she got good genes? Has she got habits that will make her a happy homemaker who will bring joy to her husband?
So basically miss, you are useful at doing what you have trained to do. Stick to the career and buy a cat. You have no education in homemaking but you think you deserve that role? Its like a housewife saying she wants to be a consultant surgeon.
They talk about the value in educating women. I agree but for what? To be men? Ok (though I doubt you will do it as well as most real men) but then don't expect a woman's life. Why don't we educate women to be women?
Treadmill 1h ago
She is so deluded by her fantasy that she fails to see the basics of home economics. She wants to be a stay at home housewife, with a husband and kids. Yet she also wants the same material standard of living that she has a a high-earning woman. She claims that for that reason, she wants a husband who earns the same as her.
Except that is not enough. He will obviously need to earn way more than her, as his income will be supporting at least two people. So her requirements are even less reasonable than they appear at first. It is essentially not possible. What she wants is akin to winning the lottery.
Realisticially, there are two options for modern women, neither of which she is willing to choose. The first is to become a stay-at-home wife, but accept that you will have less money than before. Cut out the expensive vacations and fancy dinners. This is still doable on a single income and many men would be happy with such an arrangement. Alternatively, you keep working so you can keep your material conditions.
Unfortunately for them, these women are clearly choosing the secret third option: Stay single and hope to one day win the lottery whilst bitterly complaining about men.
As an aside, it bothers me how ready she is to give up her career. She must have studied and worked hard for it, yet apparently she doesn't care for her work at all. Where is the sense of duty to her field, her coworkers, or her patients? A male physician would never be so callous.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 54m ago
Granted, most men, physician or not, simply do not have the realistic option of using their gonads as a source of economic security like even a frumpy woman does.
What the problem the woman in the OP has is she is wanting way more than just economic security while offering less than younger more fertile women.
What she should have done is back when she was in her 20's she should have glommed onto a promising pre-med and suck started him into giving her a wedding ring.