Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
Seagram7
Posted 1w ago in Epiphany Phase - Permalink - 1.3K Views
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1w ago Stickied
OP @Seagram7:
This is a decent post, as are most of your posts and commentary.
However, I have lost count of how many of your posts I've removed due to failure to comply with this announcement that also applies site-wide, rather than just to WAATGM (more on that in a moment).
And don't think I didn't notice the occasions when you'd simply repost something to TRP that I had removed from WAATGM in order to circumvent this rule. Example.
That stops. @redpillschool (website owner and head admin) as well as @Vermillion-Rx (site admin) have told me that my announcement (minus the WAATGM-specific language) was intended to apply site-wide, and they will be enforcing it as such.
I'm leaving this one up for now, mainly because I didn't have time to deal with it yesterday and the comments section is good. However, in the off chance the site is contacted by the copyright owner, down it comes.
On your next offense, the offending post is coming down and you will receive a 30-day ban from WAATGM. It's up to the site admins if that will become site-wide, but there's a strong possibility that it will (especially if you do that bullshit of just posting it to a different forum to circumvent the rule).
To you and anyone reading along: this highlighting of text is for the preservation of the website. This fucking matters. I've explained this numerous times when I've removed your posts, so if reasonable explanations don't get through, maybe a temp ban will.
CC: @moorekom, @woodsmoke, @houseoftolstoy, @Land_of_the_losers, @lurkerhasarisen, @deeplydisturbed, @ogrilla99, @goodmansaysfuckyou, @Impressive-Cricket-8, @MelkorHimself, @kevin32
Seagram7 Jr. Hamster Analyst 5d ago
Thanks for the warnings and giving me more chances than I deserve. I was around when TRP got quarantined. ASK TRP and MGTOW got deleted. I just kept laboring under the impression that this place wasnt reddit, that none of those blue haired and neck beards come here. I am underestimating the use of lawfare and to think they would leave us alone since we are not on their precious site anymore. I also thought that deleting the name and subreddit was enough, to be clear you also want that r/ gone too. Got it. I did not think even that was a big deal.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 5d ago Stickied
No, no noooooo lol. It's not about that at all.
You can leave the /r/ visible, as long as the subreddit name is gone. You satisfied that requirement.
Did you ever read the announcement I keep linking to? I'll copy and paste it for you below:
Click the link in the red text. It explains the requirement to underline, circle, or otherwise highlight some text in the screenshots that make it relevant to WAATGM, and to satisfy the "Fair Use: Commentary" part of copyright law.
It doesn't even have to be much; just enough that if some dipshit tries to claim copyright violations, we can truthfully say that it's been altered for commentary purposes and is thus fair use.
So from your current post's screenshot, we could underline any of the following:
both were really nice, kind men. But in different ways both seemed to almost have the adult version of "failure to thrive".
I'm so tired and so sad.
I'm almost thirty
most men in this age group seem somewhat depressed, and just plain unmotivated
Hell, there might be stuff someone else can highlight that I didn't think of.
But do you get what this is about? Can you at least read that announcement I've linked dozens of times that explains this in detail?
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 4d ago
@Seagram7
I'm not sure at this point if you need to see what our lawyer actually said, because you haven't followed the warnings on here or TheRedPill:
"Full photos without transformation, parody, or commentary are subject to copyright. The photo in the post very likely falls under fair use. However, I'd still recommend that any personally identifiable information including photos be obscured / removed to avoid dealing with potential defamation or harassment complaints. User comments that may post negative assumptions about somebody couldn't fall under defamation if you've taken steps not to identify the person in question.
I'm not sure 'aging blonde with a five head' is sufficiently identifying to support defamation, but obscuring personally identifying information is the safe way to go.
Generally you can defend fair use if the replication is not a complete copy of the original work and you've put effort into making a point or joke. The commentary of underlining may not be a massive amount of work, but it's significant enough to make the point that is being made which is beyond the original post. I would caution your users not to repost entire pieces of work, and certainly never without added commentary."
And this was what the site owner, and content policy maker, said @redpillschool :
So with my lawyer's words in mind here's my decision:
The post is okay, but blank out her face.
Given the spirit of WAATGM, I think any woman who lands on there will likely take offense. In line with our original no-doxxing rule, photos of people must be obfuscated to a degree in which somebody who knows them would not be able to recognize them.
The text portion seems to fall squarely under fair use, but as mods, be vigilant that ALL posts either include commentary or are blatantly parody. She wasn't wrong that she owns the copyright to the text.
(Emphasis mine)
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 4d ago
@Typo-MAGAshiv @moorekom, @woodsmoke, @houseoftolstoy, @Land_of_the_losers, @lurkerhasarisen, @deeplydisturbed, @ogrilla99, @goodmansaysfuckyou, @Impressive-Cricket-8, @MelkorHimself, @kevin32
I'll make a post on TheRedPill as well
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 4d ago
Yeah. It's not reddit, which is why we don't want to lose it to a rogue DCMA copyright claim.
Yeah... well one actually did 6 months ago, which was why we changed the rule 6 months ago.
Okay well we aren't swimming in cash. This site is a money pit. So we're not spending it on defending your posts if someone wants to claim copyright and we don't take it down, when you should have edited the image to our satisfaction in the first place...
It could be, if the collective brigade power of some retards want to try to make it one. We've only been a target since we launched on reddit...
Look man. You need to edit your images with a satisfactory combination of censoring identities (always) and underlines, some attempt at commentary such as typing, pasting reaction memes over the text, whatever makes it clear you are posting a commentary and not sheerly reposting someone else's copyrighted content as is.
If they posted it somewhere, and they see it here (especially cause r/WAATGM links here) and your post isn't different, they can bitch about copyright infringement, because according to the US laws, it is. "Fair Use" does not apply to re-posts with absolutely no fair use commentary on it (such as underlining key points, reaction macros on key points, or other visible commentary)
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 3d ago
Just to clarify something: we'd rather not have that at WAATGM. Just highlighting the relevant text in some way is good.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago
@Vermillion-Rx @Typo-MAGAshiv Take it from someone whose gone through the meat-grinder: It's tough out there. Reddit is awful. I got nuked for posting a public photo that was mislabled as 'intimate'. That sucks. Big time.
The rules are there for a reason and, not kissing ass, I respected the rules best of my ability because 40 years of experience has shown me. Say the wrong thing at work to the wrong person and you can lose your job (I managed to save mine, twice, via quick thinking.)
Sometimes, it would be nice to let the post speak for itself and even a desired goal of WAATGM but, sadly, there's copyright and hostile moderator issues at the other place. Markup everything, at least a bit, but you can leave a little bit that's not spoon fed. I like to let people figure a few things out.
"Let's be careful out there" -- Sergeant Phil Esterhaus
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 3d ago
Ah. Gotcha.
@Seagram7
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 1w ago
@Seagram7
Yes this needs to be followed everywhere on the site (memes excluded).
redpillschool Everybody tag him 1w ago
Yes, thank you @Typo-MAGAshiv. This is not a stupid rule to make people jump useless hoops. If we're re-hosting content it needs to be fair-use so we're not liable for copyright infringement. AS SILLY AS THAT SOUNDS.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 1w ago
Does this apply to X screenshots too I never thought about that
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1w ago
For anyone reading along: yes, we hate it too. We were ridiculing this crap even as we formulated the new content policy to adapt to how lawfare works.
Maybe if someone hits the Powerball jackpot and donates millions to the site's legal department, it can be robust enough that we can do what I originally wanted to do: tell any complainants with copyright claims to go fuck themselves.
However, we have to acknowledge reality and adapt to the world as it is, not how we wish it were.
mustangfrank1 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
This is an old post, but I thought it was related to the topic above.
The Story of Heidi
In an apartment complex that I lived in Houston, there was a loose knit collection of about 10-15 singles. We would meet at the pool on the weekends, and have informal parities. If one person knew of a singles event, they would inform the rest, and whoever wanted could attend. I even dated one of the girls in the group for a short time.
In the group, was an attractive girl named Heidi. She was a degreed professional in the oil business. And you couldn’t miss her. She was 5’11”, blonde hair, with blue eyes. Typical for a tall girl, she didn’t have much up top, but she have broad curvy hips and an hour glass waist. She, needless to say, she got the attention of single men.
One Saturday, I was catching rays and drinking beer with some of the other guys at the apartment complex pool, when one man I knew walked up to the group of us. He stated he had proposed to Heidi, and she had turned him down. He approached us in the off chance that someone might know Heidi and put the good word in for him with her. Months later, I was at my section’s pool of the apartment complex. There was a water polo game in progress, one man about 10 feet away me on my left, was playing boom box, and about 10 feet in the other direction were two girls from the group talking about how Heidi had rejected two other men's marriage proposals. I wasn’t getting all the details of the conversation due to noise at the pool and that fact I didn’t really care, so I don’t know if the two girls were jealous of Heidi getting the attention of these two men, or if these women were mocking these men as losers, due to Heidi rejecting them. But the point here is not only was Heidi getting the attention of single men, but marriage proposals.
Fast forward 12 years, one child and one divorce later on my part. A friend wanted me to join a dating agency. He would get a bonus if I joined, and I could join at a discount. I said before I join, I wanted to see what the single girls in the agency look like. I was given a binder of women 30-34 years of age. In the binder were pages of women. At the top of the page, in about 1 inch high letters was the girl's name, then below that a 2"x3" photo of her and below that 3 or 4 paragraphs that she wrote of herself. I started looking, when I got to page 7 or 8, I noticed the name Heidi. I took a good look, and it was her. I quickly scanned her paragraphs. I remembered a phrase of one sentence, it read, “34 years old, never married, no children.” I thought how could this be? I knew of three men who wanted to marry her, and in the 12 years that had passed there must have been more. How was it possible she never married given all the advantages she had? What dating parameters did she employ that failed her so miserably that resulted in her being never married given all the physical advantages she had?
In a social setting, if she were not the most desirable girl, she certainly was one of the more desirable girls. And I am here to tell you Heidi could have had absolutely any man she wanted, and I mean absolutely any man. If a poll had been taken by the single men in the complex of who would be most likely single at the age of 34, I am here to tell you Heidi’s name would not have been at the top of the list. What had she done with her life? How was it possible she never married? Did she think at the age of 34, she would have a bigger and better selection of single males than when she was 24? I suspect in her 20's, she had a male qualification list as long as her inseam, and if a male were lacking any one of these parameters, he was immediately rejected. She kept saying no to men, until there were no men to say no, to.
I also suspect that all during her early years, she was used to getting plenty of male attention, and assumed her future would be like her past. Why would it change? In her years 17-26, she most likely was the crème de la crème of women. But as she entered her late 20’s, much to her dismay, there were lots of younger girls, many prettier and more approachable, meaning shorter. At 5’11”, she was taller than 99% of the women, 80% of the men and at 28 years of age, older than 90% of both men and women in a single’s bar. She stood out like a sore thumb due to her height and age.
How her story ends? I don’t know. I didn’t join the dating agency. But it was Heidi’s actions and Heidi’s actions alone that made her single. I bet never in her worse nightmare, did she ever think she would be childless and single at the age of 34. She wasted her youth and fertility using extremely flawed dating parameters that she created and imposed on herself and refused to change in spite of years of obvious failure. I can’t say for sure, but I will bet a dollar to a dime, she was a heightist, which made her prospects to find a man even harder.
Updated 11-5-2019 by OP I had been looking at other sites concerning dating, and I discovered the term, Alpha Widow. An Alpha Widow is a woman who pursues Alpha males into her mid 30’s but does not catch them. This is my best guess as to what happened to Heidi.
I worked for an Oil Company, and Heidi worked in the oil business, as well. Once a year, OTC is held in Houston. This is where any company who has anything to sell in the oil business comes to show their products. I would get free passes to attend OTC and the various parties that happened at night. The weekend before OTC, the big dogs of companies would rent out beach homes in Galveston. In these beach homes, were high end parties, and only a few selected elite were allowed to attend. I was not high up in the OTC social order, but I remember Heidi telling a few people, at the pool, she had attended OTC parties in Galveston. She was associating with Alpha males of the oil business. I think she was an Alpha Widow, and why she was single at 34.
Seagram7 Jr. Hamster Analyst 5d ago
Thanks for the repost. I was looking for it to reread. To me, it is a great example of the lament of the modern good looking woman. I figure she was hot enough to fend off marriage proposals from most guys, but she wanted to play in the big leagues with the top tier alphas. The gigachads. I have no doubt that she was passed around at those oil tycoon parties and that helped with her delusion. She thought since she got a tycoon to fuck her, then she was at that status and attractiveness level to get him to commit. She had to find out the hard way that just because Chad fucks you, it doesnt mean he wants to marry you. an Alpha widow, because she got a Chad to fuck her, then nothing less than a Chad is marriage material for her. An old saying: Sex will get a man, sex wont keep a man.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1w ago
You know... at the risk of sounding like I'm tooting my own horn-- at every age of adulthood, I have always had my shit together.
Have I ever had bad years? Sure I have. But even during my worst years, I still had a lot of advantages. I never worried about paying a bill. I never had an arrest record or a bankruptcy or some kind of blacklisting or scarlet letter upsetting my existence. In some ways, I've been pretty lucky in life.
Hell, I've never gotten worse than a speeding ticket and that was only one time... I was driving a carless fat chick to her graduate school admissions interview and we were late. The whole story is pretty pathetic, actually. Not even a good car chase or a spike-strip involved, I'm sad to say.
By and large, when I interview for a job, I am accustomed to getting it. Not getting the job feels exceptional, even though the rejections probably outnumber the job offers. When I want to make a major expense or if an unexpected bill pops up, I have always managed to pay it in full without feeling the pain after. When life throws me a curveball, I have always managed to deal with it in some way, not always happily, but always managing to find a workaround or a compromise where half a loaf is better than none....
....so, yeah, I'm not too impressed by this woman's anguished bleating.
Such men do exist, but they're not tall/hot/flashy enough to be swiped right on. I have absolutely no doubt in my mind that this chick would take one brief look at me, and forget about me 2 seconds later.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Guys like you are why the system of "dating" we have today was always a bad idea. Traditional arranged marriages, where the father had most of the input, made sense because most fathers would see you as a prime catch for his daughter (an 18-24 year old virgin + some kind of dowry would be a bare minimum to get you).
woodsmoke Respectful reprobate 1w ago
As with so much else, the problem these women have is they assume their definition of a thing is the only acceptable one.
I'll freely admit I'm not a particularly ambitious man. I've never really cared about climbing the ladder at work - not least because I've yet to find any type of management position in any company that doesn't come with far more responsibility, stress and aggravation than the pay is worth, particularly for a dude who doesn't have a family for whom to provide.
That said, like yourself, I've always been pretty well on top o' things. I don't have much in the way of material possessions but, as a single dude, I don't need much to be content. Nor am I anywhere near wealthy but, again, I've plenty enough to cover my bills and, barring catastrophic injury or acts of God, any other emergency expenditures which may arise.
I know a fair few other guys in similar circumstances, all of whom have been passed over at one time or another by women looking for single men who measure up to the level of wealth and success found primarily in men who've had a good, dependable wife in their corner, backing them up and helping them build to their current level of prosperity since they were both 16. Naturally, said women never seem to notice that particular factor.
It also never seems to occur to them that, by those men's standards, they very much do "have their shit together." They've built a reasonably comfortable and secure life for themselves with plenty of time to improve and focus on the things they enjoy. The reason they don't own a McMansion in the suburbs or a new luxury SUV isn't necessarily because they can't afford those things, but because they don't want to. "The things you own own you."
Also, they're not chasing status because they're not a bunch of insecure bitches.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
And why should they be in the same boat? They don't have a woman to badger them to make tons of money to buy crap for the woman she doesn't need. Sounds like they're doing just fine. I'm glad you left them alone.
But that's not what you want, is it?
Heh, wait until 20 years from now.
Oh, so you're not a tired and sad victim anymore?
You will never be satisfied with any man. It's not a man's job to make you happy, and he certainly cannot do so by being "in the same boat" by meeting your financial or lifestyle standards.
The fact is, you don't know what you want, and like most women must be told. The nice, kind men you had the privilege of meeting are easy to please and would make great husbands. You are not worthy of them.
My wife considers it an honor to help me with things on your list, because that's literally her job in life. And she is not tired or sad. And for the record, I make well under $30k a year, so it's not about "having my shit together". It's about her attitude toward a man she is truly thankful for.
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Sorry 304, but times have changed, men have learnt that women who wasted their best years on hook-ups are not worth wifeing up, and that means that you get to remain strong and independent for the rest of your life.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
oh you feel overwhelmed, do you? Well, soon you'll be feeling rather underwhelmed. Trust me on this.
Seagram7 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
I think this is a good example of a woman reaching the epiphany phase because of The Wall. 30 is in a year and that means you cant say you are in your 20s trying to figure things out anymore. Now is the time to get a man, marry and have kids but this is an example of how she blew it in her 20s and now 30 is here the desperation and panic is setting in. It's actually hilarious how the power dynamic changes as women age. They think their good looks last past 25. Then suddenly they hit their 30s and realize no man wants to be with them. It's the ultimate karma.
She is going to regret the 2 good men that wanted her at some point. She is entering the phase when no good man will look at her. She's made the mistake of confusing "most men in their thirties" with "most men available to her in their thirties".
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago
Minor quibble, if you don’t mind: PLENTY of men would have her, but she’d have to work. She hates fixer upper projects, but also probably puts zero effort into “finding” men versus her youth of fishing by putting a bucket on a boat and waiting for the fish to jump in.
There are few incels or inspins, really. Incels can save up money and travel to countries to pay for professionals, inspins can learn some game, do some fishing, and set appropriate standards. Perhaps not land a 6’ Doctor but get some 5’10” nerd science geek at a physics conference.
I have offered my woman friends my services and they declined. Absolute idiots. If anything, I get free lunches by scoping out the conferences at the hotels near my work and then registering for them as an attendee and getting a badge and getting swag and food.
My wife’s friend married a handsome, but unambitious man but he possesses “nature” skills. He’s good with animals and nature. I suggested they consider him becoming a falconer. She thought they could just buy a falcon and go into business. It’s a passion to become a falconer but one could make a career out of it. She refused to support him sufficiently in that goal.
About 30 years ago, I befriended my landlord family at San Clemente who had a plump daughter who married a guy so she sent him to plumbing school and he did well. THAT WAS THE NORM for most women back about 80 to 40 years ago. They MADE MEN. That’s even the source of the term: “Behind every good man there’s a woman…” because the women were supportive back then. Not nags but helping him figure out how to get ahead, helping him get dressed, and so on.
This woman is LAZY. She doesn’t want to work to make the handsome men successful? She doesn’t want to work to find the successful, but socially unavailable men?
I don’t think she necessarily rode the CC for her 20’s. She was perhaps just another corporate nun blowing her prime fertile years waiting for Mr. Perfect to ride up in a limo with flowers playing opera music.
They need to “woman up”.
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
The best men she could have locked down in her early 20s are now at best, are only going to add her to their rotation (assuming those good guys became players cos of women like her), and at worse, will simply ignore her (which is the actual worse thing from a woman's prospective).
PoopBeast Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Women today don't choose men because they "have their shit together", at least not when they're young and attractive. They only start to care about that when their looks no longer give them the leverage they expect.
Case in point; this woman.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
You would be too if you were expected by society to marry a 30+ year old woman like, well, you. And/or they spent the last 10+ years dealing with women that like you probably ended up single for a reason.
They happy ones are those that realized that they don't have to conform to expectations and deal with your shit. So they naturally were able to regain the motivation to do literally anything else other than show up on demand to be your workhorse/retirement plan/trophy man.
Speaking of retirement, you have 3 decades and change left of life expectancy, better get to saving up.
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
In the old days, the reward for proving yourself as husband material is a virgin in her prime, but in the modern era, they often get ignored until at least their late 20s, and are expected to choose from wallbangers who have body-counts that would make an average whore from the 1950s gasp in horror, so it is no wonder why men are increasingly abandoning becoming marriage-worthy.
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Seems the younger generations of men are learning be quite content with just getting by and being comfortable. They don't need a million dollar house or a big fancy car. They are okay with only contributing the bare minimum to society, and of course, who could blame them? The less you make, the less they can take.
This is why she's pissed off. Young guys these days don't have to be ambitious. Which is why she pushes her "partners" to manage their budgets, start paying off those debts, and to get in shape. The more healthy and active they are and the less debt they have, the more she can exploit them to her own ends. They just don't want to play ball. They are "failing to thrive". Every man knows that every man can't be at the top. Some just want to be in the middle, and that's okay. It's just not good enough for her.
Well that's just too bad. She's 10 years too late. Now her clock is ticking, and she already has the Lonely Old Cat Lady Starter Pack.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1w ago Stickied
Giving you a long-overdue promotion to Junior Hamster Analyst for comments such as this one and your continuous contributions to the discussions at WAATGM.
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Hey, thanks Bro. Just doing my part to expose the plantation for what it is. I've been through a few harsh realities when dealing with women, marriage, and children. We need to look out for our younger men in today's society, where no man is safe. The day the light bulb finally comes on and everything starts to make sense is the day a man can say, "I am free."
woodsmoke Respectful reprobate 1w ago
I can't think of a single time in my life I've ever wanted to be the Big Man, whatever the context. The thought of living a simple little life and being forgotten within a couple generations has never seemed anything but perfectly reasonable to me. If it was good enough for 99.99% (repeating into infinity) of humanity, why shouldn't it be good enough for me?
That's one of the few things I tend to think Europe has a better handle on than we do in the States. Over there, as I understand things, it's not seen as any great failing to find your niche and settle in to a life of quiet contentment. Whereas American culture generally, if not disdains, at least doesn't have much regard for anyone who isn't racing to the top of the metaphorical mountain with every ounce of effort they can muster.
'Course, the net result of that is we're head and shoulders above the rest of the world in development and innovation, so I have to admit it certainly has its upsides as well.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
This is my work/life motto. I love getting government benefits normally reserved for single mothers! And why shouldn't I? If I work harder, it's a net negative for me and my family.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 4d ago
Have you considered working on a cash-only basis?
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 3d ago
That's the way I run my business! Mostly because I hate electronic forms of payment. Fees and spyware.