Relationship Philosophy:
Quality, not quantity.
moorekom
The thought occurs it may be a good idea to check that list, perhaps update the info if it needs it. I'd love to volunteer myself, on account of I'm the one bringing it up, but I barely have time for a quick 5-minute browse ever 2 or 3 days lately and that ain't like to change for the next month-ish.
I suppose if it ain't been done by then I'll see about circling back to the issue, assuming I remember to do so (I won't, but hopefully something will come up to remind me).
@moorekom, @Land_of_the_losers @Impressive-Cricket-8
Not sure who else is active recently and still has access to that side o' things.
Rest of her comment:
Traumatic.
So, my question is this - are you ok with that? Are you ok with being that kind of influence in the world? Someone who hurts young women in a way they will never recover from?
Or, are you willing to spend “2 months to get up someone’s skirt,” and have it be a genuinely enjoyable, reciprocal interaction?
@Typo-MAGAshiv I was able to find the thread with that key phrase and as it turns out, that was me who corrected her that she is the one getting fucked. I did not even remember this one.
Below is my response:
We are both glad we sowed our wild oats.
Sorry to disabuse you of your fantasy, your husband sowed his wild oats. You had it sown into you. These two situations are not the same.
My presence here on Earth, however small, will be a good one.
This is your entire argument condensed to one sentence. You feel bad so it must be bad.
If you wish to continue this discussion when your mute expires, start with a well thought out, rational reply with links to the "evidence" you have claimed repeatedly exists. I doubt that will ever happen because you are here to grand-stand and enforce your opinions on others, but I will stay open to the possibility that you are trying to argue in good faith.
PS: Oh, your post in niceguys encourages brigading and breaks sitewide rules for brigading and niceguys sub's rule 9. I see that you did not read the sidebar there as you did not in our sub.
This is one of her comments in reddit:
I was an escort for a few years as a means to pay for and survive through my education. I was very good at it. All repeat customers who would routinely fall in love with me. I perfected the art of conversation and seduction. But it’s all an act. And, frankly, a traumatic one.
Those years of escorting still haunt me in myriad ways. All of these men believed I was having a great time with them. Truly, sometimes I would orgasm. But it was never pleasant for me. Never.
When someone pays you for sex, you spend the evening with a wretched knot of anticipation in your gut. “I have to kiss this man soon. I have to touch this man soon.” Even “attractive” men were repulsive to me because of the inescapable and forced nature of the interactions.
Read More@moorekom try searching the term "wild oats". I distinctly remember her saying that both she and her husband had sown their wild oats when younger, and @sleepyweaselisawake corrected her that she got wild oats sown into her.
She was another woman who bragged about how much sex she's had over the years, which we told her was like a man bragging about how many women he's bought dinner for.
We all took turns roasting her
Of course.
Amy Farrah Fowler
I did not find this thread. I see he is mentioning it in another thread though.
I do not remember that one.
she first came in screeching about concerns for all the violence we supposedly cause by having a few laughs, and brandishing her scientific credentials.
We all took turns roasting her while reassuring her that we do not promote or condone violence.
IIRC, @goodmansaysfuckyou was the one who dug up her post or comment about her previous prostitution, and @lurkerhasarisen was the one who started calling her "Amy Farrah Fowler". I bet if you searched the modmail for that, you'd find the thread.
She kept coming back after being banned and muted (multiple times).
That really doesn't narrow it down much.
@Typo-MAGAshiv I do not remember that one. The one that clearly stands out to me is a woman with whom I was experimenting game tactics on (for shits and giggles). She kept coming back after being banned and muted (multiple times).
@polishknight Widows have a reason to be unhappy and resentful. WAATGM does not feature widows who are widows by no fault of their own and are complaining about how much dating has changed or how much she misses her man. This woman is the opposite of that picture. She is fair game.
@Vermillion-Rx this is making me want to get back on reddit and dig up some of the classic doozies we had in the WAATGM modmail
CC: @lurkerhasarisen, @moorekom: remember the prostitute-turned-scientist who was "so concerned" that we were causing violence? LMAO!
@polishknight vcards for not tagging me or @woodsmoke!
What do you think of widows?
Depends. Generally, they won't be good fodder. Some, however, are excellent fodder.
I told you before about Dr. Kerry Kerr McAvoy.
The one in your current OP, though, is really just whining about how men prefer younger women. I could kind of see it as a weekend leftovers post.
CC: @moorekom, @lurkerhasarisen, @Land_of_the_losers, @Impressive-Cricket-8, @deeplydisturbed (I think that's everyone I've seen active lately)
27 Followers
Quality, not quantity.