Visit the WAATGM forum to view and post content.
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this tribe is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
- 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate tribe.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Content Archive:
Related forums:

polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago Stickied
Someone please post this to the Reddit site since I cannot do so. It will drive much needed traffic to this site.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1mo ago Stickied
From rule 7:
This screenshot is clearly cut off, but I'm granting you an exception. Partly because of all your contributions over your time here, and partly because it's Christmas.
fröliche Weihnachten!
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
I appreciate the act of Christmas kindness. You have a point. https://youtu.be/3vB9U2hx6Qg?t=56
I hadn't clipped it myself but it appears that this was posted from someone who took that screenshot from his phone completely (note the navigation options at the bottom.). Next time I'll post it under Weekend Content. Damn! (oops!) I thought I had some Kosher weekday content going. :-)
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1mo ago
It's fine for weekday. She's seeking commitment while also being entitled or unreasonable.
The requirement that screenshots tell the full story is in effect whether the content is weekend or weekday. I'm just giving you a pass on this one for the reasons previously stated, and because her profile is just so awful.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
Yeah even the partial story told by her pic alone is horrid enough to make a point.
[deleted]
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1mo ago
Rule 1 buddy
Lone_Ranger Live by the pork sword, die by the pork sword 1mo ago
I'm guessing a post of mine was deleted - can't rememeber what it was now....apologies!
MentORPHEUS TRP Endorsed 1mo ago
Boob men need not apply. Even at full term, she'd have to pad an A cup.
Can't imagine who would bite on this offer. ????
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1mo ago
Maybe he could pretend her distended belly is a giant boob, and her outy belly button a nipple.
MentORPHEUS TRP Endorsed 1mo ago
Blech! I think even the hardcore foot fetish cohort would be all, " that's sick! Like wtf is wrong with you, bruh???"
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
Brings needs and bills. You might get sex a few months down the line. Wearing nail varnish while pregnant suggests she is number one priority even over her child.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1mo ago
Apparently this app doesn't allow men to select "not pregnant with some other dude's kid" as a preference.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
I still think dating apps could make money hand over fist if offered the ability for men to "anti-like" profiles (which would effectively shadowban those profiles or at least put them at the bottom of all match queues once enough accumulated) for a surcharge. Even 50 cents per anti-like would churn in millions.
And the same service could be offered to women with no fear of them using it because they'd have to pay for it with their own money.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
I'm reminded of the John Nash theory on cooperative economics. In a competitive society, we undercut each other and the dating apps are an example of that: Men engaging in thousands of likes try to compete with other men doing the same resulting in narcissistic women who quickly become unusable to anyone. Negative likes would perhaps help fix this problem.
I am amused at the concept of women being asked if they want to pony up to punish the 80 percenter men they despise who dare to bother them. Since they get literally hundreds of swipes from men, they'd result in disproportionate revenue for the apps if they went for it and perhaps they would for a time. Women DO pay out money believe it or not, Have you ever been to a shopping mall?
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
Sure, but they'd effectively be paying to get less attention, akin to paying to have men unable to buy them drinks. A decent chunk of them aren't on dating apps for the most honest of intentions, and mass kicking men out of the attention pool goes counter to that. Hell, it would deprive them of material to complain about later by drying up the supply of inept messages.
So I don't think women collectively would lean on the feature too hard just like how Bumble had to accept that women are fucking lazy at initiating.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
It's a fun thing to hypothesize over, but women's reasoning is delightfully contorted. Consider this classic scene in the B film with Sandra Bullock: "Love Potion Number 9"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoW0jIk48O4
She gripes about Radio Shack managers hitting on her (which tickled me to no end because I miss Radio Shack terribly!) but she continued to go there. Their actions, words, and even self-mental image are utterly out of whack.
To brag to their friends about getting 100 losers downvoted is something they might be willing to pour money into.
Heck, it might kick off secret algorithms in the dating apps to deliberately match these "losers" with such women just to monetize the unlike clicks.
As we both know, women hate initiating due to their fragile egos. Something that shocked me was when an anti-scammer put out bait profiles to try to trap scammers on dating apps, he created ideal honeypots: An attractive woman and hot guy. The attractive woman netted hundreds of swipes within a few hours but the hot guy? A mere dozen.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1mo ago
If I were single and using apps, I'd pay for that.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1mo ago
The app won't allow you to select "triple amputee", "periodontal swelling" or "congenital hydrocephalus" either.
If you were into those kinds of things, I mean.
Now "chronic bowel inflammation" on the other hand- ring-a-ding-ding!!
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1mo ago
I legit have IBS.
Is that close enough?
Lone_Ranger Live by the pork sword, die by the pork sword 1mo ago
Irritable Donkey Syndrome, more like.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1mo ago
More like, "irritated at Donkey syndrome"
Lone_Ranger Live by the pork sword, die by the pork sword 1mo ago
How is everything in the swamp Typo? Happy xams to you btw.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
I saw some facebook or youtube video of some guy who went out on a date with.late term single mother-to-be and even went to her house to build baby cribs and the 2nd week date he helped deliver the baby. Apparently she got knocked up by someone who didn't want the kid so she decided not to abort it.
This begs the question, of course, that if a guy is pro-life, then (question for the group), do such men have a moral obligation to date single mothers whose birth control failed?
We live in an era of normalized pre-marital sex. My parents were virgins when they married back in 1961 and that was largely the norm. The concept of women giving men harsh shit tests, screaming about harassment, and so on and free dinners wasn't the norm back then. Women sent a LOT of signals, men made awkward approaches, and dates were ALL "cheap" as courtships were long.
Today, if a man is putting up with nonsense or paying for a lot of dates without making a move eventually, heck, the women will get the ick from his beta behavior. So women getting pregnant out-of-wedlock is common today due to birth control failure. It's something I intend to advise my daughter on.
So yeah, this woman is basically advertising similar to when I put my wife's 20 year old Nissan Sentra on the market with busted motor mounts and a gasket kit for $1,200. It was quickly snatched up by a country couple. Perhaps there's some guy out there who will hit this if she's appreciative. Not for me, and most here, but somebody.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
"If"
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1mo ago
No. No one owes a stranger anything.
You mean "failure to use birth control".
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
Aside from abortion, there's few 100% effective contraceptions. I know women who got pregnant despite their best efforts, emphasis on THEIR best efforts but still. The pill can be complicated to use and requires discipline and look at who we're talking about. Even then, it has failure rates. I personally used spermicide condoms, always. Here's the way to show that contraception is not 100% safe:
In the film Fight Club, an advanced woman in the stage of AIDs asked the group if any of them would be willing to have sex with her because she was lonely and offered them all condoms. None took her up on the offer.
If it's not safe enough to protect someone from HIV, how can they be an absolute guard against pregnancy?
"No one owes a stranger anything".
As someone who likes to consider myself a moral person, and for Christians especially, morality is a concept of self-discipline where we do owe others certain actions. Note: This is utterly self-imposed, but the obligation is there nonetheless. I treat strangers with dignity and good manners because that's my personal code. Indeed, it was the feminists who threw out the morality codebook as they degenerated into chad chasing sluts and meal whores/golddiggers and now gripe that there are no gentlemen left.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1mo ago
1) abortion is most emphatically not a contraceptive. Conception has already occurred. A human life now exists, and the selfish mother wants to have a "doctor" or other "medical" "professional" murder her unborn infant by breaking open the skull and vacuuming out the brains. It's fucking murder, and incredibly barbaric.
2) abstinence is 100% effective. The birth control pill is too, if it's used correctly. My wife told me back when we were dating and I was still seeing other chicks that any woman who says something like "oops, I'm pregnant! I must have forgotten my pill that day, tee-hee!" is lying her ass off, and stopped taking her pills weeks before. A human body takes a while to get the hormones back on track after stopping something like that.
wrong, wrong, WRONG!!!
that's one of my favorite movies, and I only know a few even better than I know that one ("Office Space", "Princess Bride", "Wayne's World", "Big Lebowski").
That woman had cancer, not AIDS. She was advanced terminal, and knew she was dying. What she said was (paraphrased some):
do not misquote "Fight Club" at me!
good day!
But yeah, no one took her up on the offer for several reasons: most of them were also dying of cancer (it was a cancer support group), and so they didn't have the energy. Also, she wasn't very attractive; the Narrator described her as "Meryl Streep's skeleton". On top of that, taking advantage of such a situation just feels all kinds of wrong. I can't think of a rational reason why; I mean, you'd be granting her dying wish. But it just feels wrong, you know?
Anyway, nothing to do with contraception or protection from STDs.
No.
I'm a Christian myself (I'll admit, not a very good one). We treat others well because God commands us to treat others as we would like to be treated. That doesn't mean we owe it to them, because they haven't earned it.
NPC070201 1mo ago
Would just like to point out, NONE of us are very good Christians, but God loves us anyway, despite that.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
Darn it! I thought Chloe was dying of AIDS. Thanks. Wonderful film.
I didn't meant to imply that abortion was a contractive although I appreciate I stated it sloppily. Just that contraception is not 100% perfect. Fair enough?
Nonetheless address my point please that condoms are not 100% safe. Regarding the pill, my wife is skeptical as well about a friend whose girlfriend "got accidentally pregnant" but I happen to think women are just stupid a lot of the time. How do I know? Don't ask!
My point being that the economics of modern dating: Men wining and dining women and giving them massive dopamine attention is dependent upon pre-marital sex hence why women are getting knocked up out of wedlock and why abortion is an essential Plan B. I'm not saying the morality is good, but that's what it is.
When I left the USA and went to actual sex workers, I found it liberating to be with women to sleep with without bastardizing normal relationships. I courted my wife for marriage, but normal courtship today is for sex and THEN for marriage hence why I think it's tragically broken since about 1975 or so.
There are numerous films about the Disco era such as the classic Saturday Night Fever (actually mostly a serious film) as well as The Last Days of Disco as well as some others. Yes, there was the 1960's Austin Powers days but I think it was normalized when Disco came out and dance clubs where men and women danced together went away.
I have friends who are into ballroom dance. It's a totally different mentality.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1mo ago
I never said they were!
I said abstinence and the pill are 100% effective in preventing pregnancy.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1mo ago
Long-term relationship?
More like late-term preggo-ship, amirite?
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
Press 1 to doubt
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
LOL wut?