Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
polishknight
Posted 1d ago in $ Bailout $ - Permalink - 347 Views
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:

polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago Stickied
Someone please post this to the Reddit site since I cannot do so. It will drive much needed traffic to this site.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1d ago Stickied
From rule 7:
This screenshot is clearly cut off, but I'm granting you an exception. Partly because of all your contributions over your time here, and partly because it's Christmas.
fröliche Weihnachten!
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 5h ago
I appreciate the act of Christmas kindness. You have a point. https://youtu.be/3vB9U2hx6Qg?t=56
I hadn't clipped it myself but it appears that this was posted from someone who took that screenshot from his phone completely (note the navigation options at the bottom.). Next time I'll post it under Weekend Content. Damn! (oops!) I thought I had some Kosher weekday content going. :-)
MentORPHEUS TRP Endorsed 1d ago
Boob men need not apply. Even at full term, she'd have to pad an A cup.
Can't imagine who would bite on this offer. ????
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1d ago
Maybe he could pretend her distended belly is a giant boob, and her outy belly button a nipple.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1d ago
Brings needs and bills. You might get sex a few months down the line. Wearing nail varnish while pregnant suggests she is number one priority even over her child.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 21h ago
Apparently this app doesn't allow men to select "not pregnant with some other dude's kid" as a preference.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 7h ago
The app won't allow you to select "triple amputee", "periodontal swelling" or "congenital hydrocephalus" either.
If you were into those kinds of things, I mean.
Now "chronic bowel inflammation" on the other hand- ring-a-ding-ding!!
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 5h ago
I saw some facebook or youtube video of some guy who went out on a date with.late term single mother-to-be and even went to her house to build baby cribs and the 2nd week date he helped deliver the baby. Apparently she got knocked up by someone who didn't want the kid so she decided not to abort it.
This begs the question, of course, that if a guy is pro-life, then (question for the group), do such men have a moral obligation to date single mothers whose birth control failed?
We live in an era of normalized pre-marital sex. My parents were virgins when they married back in 1961 and that was largely the norm. The concept of women giving men harsh shit tests, screaming about harassment, and so on and free dinners wasn't the norm back then. Women sent a LOT of signals, men made awkward approaches, and dates were ALL "cheap" as courtships were long.
Today, if a man is putting up with nonsense or paying for a lot of dates without making a move eventually, heck, the women will get the ick from his beta behavior. So women getting pregnant out-of-wedlock is common today due to birth control failure. It's something I intend to advise my daughter on.
So yeah, this woman is basically advertising similar to when I put my wife's 20 year old Nissan Sentra on the market with busted motor mounts and a gasket kit for $1,200. It was quickly snatched up by a country couple. Perhaps there's some guy out there who will hit this if she's appreciative. Not for me, and most here, but somebody.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2h ago
"If"
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 18h ago
I still think dating apps could make money hand over fist if offered the ability for men to "anti-like" profiles (which would effectively shadowban those profiles or at least put them at the bottom of all match queues once enough accumulated) for a surcharge. Even 50 cents per anti-like would churn in millions.
And the same service could be offered to women with no fear of them using it because they'd have to pay for it with their own money.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 17h ago
If I were single and using apps, I'd pay for that.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 4h ago
I'm reminded of the John Nash theory on cooperative economics. In a competitive society, we undercut each other and the dating apps are an example of that: Men engaging in thousands of likes try to compete with other men doing the same resulting in narcissistic women who quickly become unusable to anyone. Negative likes would perhaps help fix this problem.
I am amused at the concept of women being asked if they want to pony up to punish the 80 percenter men they despise who dare to bother them. Since they get literally hundreds of swipes from men, they'd result in disproportionate revenue for the apps if they went for it and perhaps they would for a time. Women DO pay out money believe it or not, Have you ever been to a shopping mall?
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2h ago
Sure, but they'd effectively be paying to get less attention, akin to paying to have men unable to buy them drinks. A decent chunk of them aren't on dating apps for the most honest of intentions, and mass kicking men out of the attention pool goes counter to that. Hell, it would deprive them of material to complain about later by drying up the supply of inept messages.
So I don't think women collectively would lean on the feature too hard just like how Bumble had to accept that women are fucking lazy at initiating.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 7h ago
Long-term relationship?
More like late-term preggo-ship, amirite?
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 4h ago
Press 1 to doubt