Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
- Main Forums
- What's Hot
- TRP.RED
- Tribe Forums
- TheRedPill
- Tribe Management
- Create New Tribe
- Manage My Tribes
- Find New Tribes
- Recent News
-
-
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 16h ago
My lady loves to complain that there are no good men to marry our daughter. The men in the west are "useless, selfish and lazy" apparently (translation -"not blue pill and trad con enough").
I tell her its because women took away the prize of a devoted submissive wife so men stopped training to reach for it and said "do it yourself dear". Why jump through hoops and sacrifice for someone who simply is not worth it and who has the power to take away everything you have strived to saved.
I prefer to ask where are the women with potential who are also ready to commit to a life under the care and authority of a good man?
If the prize is not there, a man will not leap to reach it.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 15h ago
They're out there, but women now have to actually "find" them versus sitting around waiting for the perfect man to ride up on a white pony. Prior to the modern dating paradigm, women were expected to be the caretakers, not gatekeepers, to relationships. They would network relentlessly: "Does your hairdresser have a friend who knows someone who would be a good husband? Can they introduce us?" Then Disney came out with Sleeping Beauty which modernized the Grimm fairy tales of feudal entitlement: "A prince with inherited land should be noble and have infinite funds to entertain you on the backs of serf labor!" Diamond engagement rings are a symbol of this amusingly: An ad campaign pushing overpriced mined rocks from slave 3rd world labor.
Men who provide/protect for "ladies" aren't "kings", but rather serfs and the women act accordingly instead of being grateful, instead nagging.
I didn't marry a "lady". I got a Soviet proletariat wife who doesn't nag like an American woman, she barks like the drill sergeant in Full Metal Jacket.
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 16h ago
As always.....
"Where are the six foot tall men with 6 packs and are millionaires who will do everything for me and adopt my children".
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 16h ago
Putting a ring on women with potential, if they feel like it.
No ring on offer? Men are assessing you as either useless or an outright liability for anything past a situation-ship. And this woman in particular isn't anywhere near good enough looking to score a trophy wife spot, and her nails and tacky glasses and home decor are giant blaring indicators that she will indulge in conspicuous consumption while offering nothing in return.
And that much can be gleaned before even hitting play on the fucking video. Her actual bloviating doesn't improve her position.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 5h ago
Posted on Reddit just now.
JudgeSmales 1d ago
"Where are all the top-5 percent men?" She was getting closer to her true feelings when the video ended.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago
Although this is weekend content, it's likely she means commitment because she can get sex with the men with "potential" if she wants. There are hot and/or rich guys who will have sex with her if she hits the bars or even facebook marketplace but I do understand that she didn't say so explicitly so there we go.
This makes things difficult because women use code in womanese to say thngs such as "generous" (golddigging/meal whore), "knows how to treat a woman" (doorman servant), "confident" (can pass my shit tests) and "good man" (someone who will be there when I want them to be even as he has choices otherwise.).
In a manner of speaking, the last does make sense in that men, like women, who have choices can afford to "choose". Women will often say "Men are worthless that's why they have to pay and commit to me!" but then gripe that 'men don't want to commit". They live in a delusion and we have to wait for them to have a gaffe and literally say what they're doing.
hhhhdmt 1d ago
mediocre 30 something woman thinks she is some quality catch.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2d ago
Someone please be kind to post to the reddit site because I cannot, it will help drive traffic to this site.
Initially this was rejected by @Typo-MAGAshiv for weekday and told to post for weekend content:
"Rule 5, @polishknight. Even though she asked a version of The Big Question, she's not clearly seeking commitment. She said nothing about marriage or relationships. Please repost this weekend, flaired the same. CC to those who already commented: @StrongWoman CC to fellow mods I've seen active recently: @houseoftolstoy, @woodsmoke, @Land_of_the_losers, @deeplydisturbed"
I had read Rule 5 and, flawed programming mind, read "OR" but not "also" in that she's entitled but not clearly seeking commitment. I shall note for the future and hope to not make the same mistake.
@infidel I saw @Typo-MAGAshiv reply to you when the post was taken down but don't have your original comment in my notifications feed to repost. Please repost your thoughts.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1d ago
I received your tag, but the post isn't showing up in either the main forums.red feed or the WAATGM individual forum feed.
Tag @redpillschool @Vermillion-Rx (Edit: just checked the WAATGM feed, and this post is visible there now. It's still not visible in the main forums.red feed. )
Also, I replied to @infidel in his post which was also removed for the same reason as yours. He never replied to yours.
[deleted]
woodsmoke Respectful reprobate 9h ago
My bookmark loads the WAATGM forum sorted by new and I've never had any trouble seeing the posts as they appear, at least as far as I'm aware. I'll try to remember to check my notifications first next time and see whether I encounter the same issue.
@polishknight @Vermilion-Rx @redpillschool
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago
It's strange that when I post, I see it if I go to the sub-folder such as "The Big Question" immediately but it doesn't show up on the main feed. A few hours later it "pops" in. It may be that my chrome browser it out of date?
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1d ago
This wouldn't be an issue on your end, but rather at the website.
Edit: just checked the WAATGM feed, and this post is visible there now. It's still not visible in the main forums.red feed.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago
I was wondering if it was "me" and my posts for some reason. Perhaps how my browser handled cookies or something like that. I have noticed my posts take about a half day to appear on the main site feed although it is inside of the flair feeds.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 20h ago
I hardly ever view that. Generally only when I'm trying to find a specific old post.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 15h ago
When I didn't see the post show up in the main feed, I did exploring to the flair feeds simply to avoid posting it twice.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2d ago
Reproducing this comment from @StrongWoman before the weekday posting was taken down:
There seems to be a misunderstanding, lady. The "men with potential" are the young men you reject(ed) along the way. What you are looking for is a man that already has realized his potential and has all the results (money, status, character, behaviour, ...). The interesting thing is that men are actually looking for women with potential: on the younger side, not bitter, able and willing to raise a family with you, etc. So at the same time they reject the men with potential, while claiming to be looking for exactly that, while they on the other hand potentially blame men for actually looking for something with potential instead of taking what has already passed its zenith and picking up the pieces. It seems like as if women are somehow prohibited by the universe to use words according to their meaning.