Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
polishknight
Posted 18h ago in The Big Question - Permalink - 140 Views
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:

JudgeSmales 1h ago
"Where are all the top-5 percent men?" She was getting closer to her true feelings when the video ended.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 54m ago
Although this is weekend content, it's likely she means commitment because she can get sex with the men with "potential" if she wants. There are hot and/or rich guys who will have sex with her if she hits the bars or even facebook marketplace but I do understand that she didn't say so explicitly so there we go.
This makes things difficult because women use code in womanese to say thngs such as "generous" (golddigging/meal whore), "knows how to treat a woman" (doorman servant), "confident" (can pass my shit tests) and "good man" (someone who will be there when I want them to be even as he has choices otherwise.).
In a manner of speaking, the last does make sense in that men, like women, who have choices can afford to "choose". Women will often say "Men are worthless that's why they have to pay and commit to me!" but then gripe that 'men don't want to commit". They live in a delusion and we have to wait for them to have a gaffe and literally say what they're doing.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 18h ago
Someone please be kind to post to the reddit site because I cannot, it will help drive traffic to this site.
Initially this was rejected by @Typo-MAGAshiv for weekday and told to post for weekend content:
"Rule 5, @polishknight. Even though she asked a version of The Big Question, she's not clearly seeking commitment. She said nothing about marriage or relationships. Please repost this weekend, flaired the same. CC to those who already commented: @StrongWoman CC to fellow mods I've seen active recently: @houseoftolstoy, @woodsmoke, @Land_of_the_losers, @deeplydisturbed"
I had read Rule 5 and, flawed programming mind, read "OR" but not "also" in that she's entitled but not clearly seeking commitment. I shall note for the future and hope to not make the same mistake.
@infidel I saw @Typo-MAGAshiv reply to you when the post was taken down but don't have your original comment in my notifications feed to repost. Please repost your thoughts.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 10h ago
I received your tag, but the post isn't showing up in either the main forums.red feed or the WAATGM individual forum feed.
Tag @redpillschool @Vermillion-Rx (Edit: just checked the WAATGM feed, and this post is visible there now. It's still not visible in the main forums.red feed. )
Also, I replied to @infidel in his post which was also removed for the same reason as yours. He never replied to yours.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 6h ago
It's strange that when I post, I see it if I go to the sub-folder such as "The Big Question" immediately but it doesn't show up on the main feed. A few hours later it "pops" in. It may be that my chrome browser it out of date?
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 5h ago
This wouldn't be an issue on your end, but rather at the website.
Edit: just checked the WAATGM feed, and this post is visible there now. It's still not visible in the main forums.red feed.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 18h ago
Reproducing this comment from @StrongWoman before the weekday posting was taken down:
There seems to be a misunderstanding, lady. The "men with potential" are the young men you reject(ed) along the way. What you are looking for is a man that already has realized his potential and has all the results (money, status, character, behaviour, ...). The interesting thing is that men are actually looking for women with potential: on the younger side, not bitter, able and willing to raise a family with you, etc. So at the same time they reject the men with potential, while claiming to be looking for exactly that, while they on the other hand potentially blame men for actually looking for something with potential instead of taking what has already passed its zenith and picking up the pieces. It seems like as if women are somehow prohibited by the universe to use words according to their meaning.