Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
kevin32
Posted 1y ago in Cock Carousel Rider - Permalink - Locked - 4.3K Views
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
houseoftolstoy Unchivalrous Christian 1y ago Stickied
When you are in any negotiation, no matter what it is that you want, the other party needs to get something that they want. When you are unable to offer what the other party wants, then you have little or no power in the negotiation.
This most certainly applies to relationships, as a relationship (especially marriage) is not just a one time deal. Marriage is (supposed to be) a lifetime commitment, and even without marriage in consideration, a long term relationship is a large investment. Do most men want to make a large investment of their time and resources into a woman who does not offer him what he wants? The answer is of course no.
Shaming men and trying to say that they are "the wrong men" for having that answer will not change the real desire of men to want a woman who has not given away sex to many other men. Complaining about analogies and claiming that they are not applicable does not change how men actually perceive slutty women. An analogy is really only a tool used in attempt to explain a phenomenon, and is does not necessarily have to be perfect to be performing that proper function. The analogy itself does not alter reality nor does it's accuracy have any bearing to whether or not something is actually happening. So any attempts to try and refute an analogy are in vain if they are not first confronting the reality which the analogy is trying to explain.
That is where this woman an so many other sympathizers get wrong when they try to refute the key and lock analogy. They focus so much on the alleged flaws of the analogy (and often do a poor job at that) that they fail to address the actual reality that men do not want slutty women. Not only that, but they also fail to understand the dynamics of how men with high N counts vs women with high N counts are perceived by the opposite sex. Which is why they provide the cringey rebuttal analogy of the pencil and pencil sharpener. The problem with this analogy is that it fails to describe reality. Are men who are considered "slayers" punished in the sexual marketplace? Besides some rare exceptions, they are not. Women, on the other hand, will report how so many men refuse to commit to them when they find out that they slept with many men previously. So the key and lock analogy fits quite well, while the pencil and pencil sharpener one substantially fails.
Focus less on the minute details of an analogy, but rather look at whether or not the analogy conforms to reality in general before you judge it's merits.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
This ditzy dame didn't even have which sex was the lock and which sex was the key correct ("if a woman is a key to you"). She was so flustered at the very idea that this mattered, that she didn't even think about what the analogy meant.
(Expecting someone like her to think? Yeah, I know.)
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
Wonderful analysis about analogies. People who pick them apart are simply trying to avoid addressing the point made. The key-lock analogy is useful in several ways in that a "lock" protects or guarantees resources in that women trade their sexuality for non-sexual things from men. If a woman isn't looking to engage in such commerce, then the "lock" isn't necessary and many men in that regard will not mind her body count whatsoever. For example: OF girls who date their clients. Her client isn't going to mind that tons of other men want her and this even makes him feel privileged but the question is: does she want him?
The fact is there are few (true) inspins or incels. For (most) incels, there's professionals, old MILF's, and gaming single mothers to get one's personal needs met. For inspins, there's lowering their standards and engaging in actual work that can land them a husband.
The lock-key analogy also explains a funny monkey experiment on youtube where a researcher rewarded good monkey behavior with some minor treat, like a peanut, while a monkey in the cage right next to him got a banana for similar effort. The poorly rewarded monkey refused to perform tasks anymore out of jealousy. So the reason why men judge women poorly for being quote, easy, unquote is women themselves set that standard.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
Unless you're referring to a recent duplicate, that experiment was a long time ago, and had rewarded chimpanzees with pieces of cucumber. The chimps were happy with the reward, until they rewarded a new chimp for performing the same task with a grape. The original chimps got excited, performed the task, then received pieces of cucumber again. They got visibly upset and threw the pieces of cucumber at the researchers.
IIRC, the purpose was to see if they had a concept of fairness.
Nah dude. It's because of the need for paternal assurance, and a woman with a history of being loose with her sexuality is unlikely to remain faithful in marriage.
Positive-Lifeguard80 1y ago
They are. Not as much as women are depending on the cultural context, but it still locks them out of a substantial part of the market according to scientific studies:
https://imgur.com/rM3iFCE.jpg
It should be no surprise that the low n-count demographics pair up with each other and that the n=31 poster trying to find a non-fake virgin is on a futile quest.
houseoftolstoy Unchivalrous Christian 1y ago
There is something I should clarify. For the "slayer" that wants to get a long term relationship, perhaps he may be punished as you say. But keep in mind what men like this are looking for versus women. A man who is simply seeking sex and gets sex gets exactly what he wants. A woman seeking a commitment but giving out sex far too easily does not get what she wants if she is only getting sex. I do not know how often men who mainly seek out sex later choose to pursue a long term relationship, but I am going to guess that more women than men ultimately would be upset at the possibility of not having a long term relationship in their future. This factor makes women more punished by having a high partner count than men given that the outcome of being single in later years is a greater detriment to women than it is to men.
I should also note that I do not condone sleeping around by either men or women, but rather that I am laying out my observations of the consequences of the number of sexual partners.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
One of the Chads I know should give classes at The Learning Annex. He married a rich woman. She's pretty (not super hot, but pretty) but her family is loaded. His descendants will never know a day of poverty in their lives for generations to come.
Women have a strong preference for appearances so a Chad wouldn't be able to get women to enjoy giving him courtship gifts like women demand, but marriage is another matter and that's the big prize, isn't it? Looking back, even humble me, if I could go back in time dating the corporate nuns in the 1990's, I'd have bought them a nice dinner, gotten laid, and after doing the ritual mating dance been set for life with a woman who outearned me.
The notion of man as a provider and protector for women is based upon chivalrous patronage, not Patriarchy. A friend of mine went to a non-chivalrous nation where the guy said "Observe: In the west, the women are at the malls while the men work. Here: The men are out playing dice and drinking coffee while the women work."
Positive-Lifeguard80 1y ago
There are too many guys on RP platforms looking to that "religious virgin to marry" after being the "slayer". Including one posting to forums.red, who got upset about getting lied to about virginity (AWALT).
This also affected prominent figures from the Manosphere, who suddenly turned Orthodox monks after they've been on a mushroom trip.
So WhereAreAllTheGoodWomen version of WhereAreAllTheGoodMen does indeed exist...
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
It’s simple, women say yes to sex. I even made fun of my girlfriend last night because she didn’t want to stop by my house before meeting up with friends of mine because “we’d end up having sex and she doesn’t want to have to get ready again”. I retorted with the fact that the sex is her decision, not mine. I’m a dude who hasn’t been socially neutered, asking us if we want sex is like asking the Pope if he’s Catholic.
All jokes aside, it’s evidence of how these things work. Pretty much every dude who is out and about and doesn’t have a significant other (and some who do, let’s be real) is down for pound town unless there’s some serious reason not to. So if a woman has been loose with it, then yes, it matters a lot to a man who would prefer just one higher quality woman, versus a roster of slores.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 1y ago
This is speculation, but she sounds like a woman who has learned from experience that revealing her body count causes men to leave her because it's too fucking high.
She sounds like a woman who thinks it's "stupid" to talk about body count because her body count is indefensible and so she reacts like this to blame the asked for treading into waters that might lead to her justifiable abandonment
Just speculation. Seems like her opinion on the matter is probably more shaped by experience than belief system
ClitaurusRex 1y ago
What a vapid sloot
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
“Go talk to your sister”. I would so that she doesn’t end up like this girl, getting triggered at the mere thought that men of high repute that just want a nice girl to settle down with may care if you’ve given it up to 100 guys before.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1y ago
She has got fucked a lot.
Problematic_Browser Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Oh it's apparent. The very nature of her defense would give it away, and that's before seeing her crazy eyes.
dongking 1y ago
Jesus, bodycount in the hundreds and complete nutter. What a fucking catch.
Pfizer 1y ago
I will just relate to topic. You'll get all flavours. If she can lie with out batting an eyelid then you stand no chance. If she is poor lier but led about it many times in this specific area shell be better.
John Navarro "what everybody..." and "fucc files" book. Good combo for reference.
chadinthemaking69 1y ago
She seems nice
Positive-Lifeguard80 1y ago
checking if she using birth control.
benzino 1y ago
Why? Some girls with bf use daily pills so they get their hormones regulated and get better skin. If you're getting ran through, isn't it better to use condoms and avoid STDs?
Problematic_Browser Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
This is grade-A bullshit and you believed it
benzino 1y ago
I said some girls with bf use it when they have a bf. If they are single and using daily then there's likely something she isn't telling you.
Nobody answered my question though. Isn't it better to use condoms and avoid STDs when you slut around? That's what prostitutes do.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Yeah that was what feminist chicks used to tell me to justify BC usage. Because apparently women were just suffering nonstop before the advent of pills that screwed up their menstrual cycles.
Positive-Lifeguard80 1y ago
A woman uses birth control so she can have consequence-free promiscuous sex. There are no other sensible reasons to fuck up the menstrual cycle becoming permanently sham-pregnant and ruining her fertility, other than to thot around.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Yeah, it’s really easy to not get pregnant. Don’t sleep with random dudes. If you have a dude that you like and he’s committing to you, pull out when you just want fun and leave it in when you want to make kids.
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Could you imagine having to spend time with this insufferable kunt?
GimmeTheUsual Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
"Get fucked" she says, over and over...
That is what she's replaying in her head, over and over. Yep, she's totally a raging whore who needs to deflect from the fact that she's "paid with the knees up" a bit too often.
Also, the look in her eyes as she addresses the camera has that crazy stare to 'em. The kind of eyes you see hovering over you at 2am when she's convinced herself that you're cheating (even if you weren't) and she's gonna do something about it. To you.
Problematic_Browser Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
This woman has been fucked a LOT
Loneliness-inc LvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 1y ago
L.O.L