When you are in any negotiation, no matter what it is that you want, the other party needs to get something that they want. When you are unable to offer what the other party wants, then you have little or no power in the negotiation.

This most certainly applies to relationships, as a relationship (especially marriage) is not just a one time deal. Marriage is (supposed to be) a lifetime commitment, and even without marriage in consideration, a long term relationship is a large investment. Do most men want to make a large investment of their time and resources into a woman who does not offer him what he wants? The answer is of course no.

Shaming men and trying to say that they are "the wrong men" for having that answer will not change the real desire of men to want a woman who has not given away sex to many other men. Complaining about analogies and claiming that they are not applicable does not change how men actually perceive slutty women. An analogy is really only a tool used in attempt to explain a phenomenon, and is does not necessarily have to be perfect to be performing that proper function. The analogy itself does not alter reality nor does it's accuracy have any bearing to whether or not something is actually happening. So any attempts to try and refute an analogy are in vain if they are not first confronting the reality which the analogy is trying to explain.

That is where this woman an so many other sympathizers get wrong when they try to refute the key and lock analogy. They focus so much on the alleged flaws of the analogy (and often do a poor job at that) that they fail to address the actual reality that men do not want slutty women. Not only that, but they also fail to understand the dynamics of how men with high N counts vs women with high N counts are perceived by the opposite sex. Which is why they provide the cringey rebuttal analogy of the pencil and pencil sharpener. The problem with this analogy is that it fails to describe reality. Are men who are considered "slayers" punished in the sexual marketplace? Besides some rare exceptions, they are not. Women, on the other hand, will report how so many men refuse to commit to them when they find out that they slept with many men previously. So the key and lock analogy fits quite well, while the pencil and pencil sharpener one substantially fails.

Focus less on the minute details of an analogy, but rather look at whether or not the analogy conforms to reality in general before you judge it's merits.

It’s simple, women say yes to sex. I even made fun of my girlfriend last night because she didn’t want to stop by my house before meeting up with friends of mine because “we’d end up having sex and she doesn’t want to have to get ready again”. I retorted with the fact that the sex is her decision, not mine. I’m a dude who hasn’t been socially neutered, asking us if we want sex is like asking the Pope if he’s Catholic.

All jokes aside, it’s evidence of how these things work. Pretty much every dude who is out and about and doesn’t have a significant other (and some who do, let’s be real) is down for pound town unless there’s some serious reason not to. So if a woman has been loose with it, then yes, it matters a lot to a man who would prefer just one higher quality woman, versus a roster of slores.

This is speculation, but she sounds like a woman who has learned from experience that revealing her body count causes men to leave her because it's too fucking high.

She sounds like a woman who thinks it's "stupid" to talk about body count because her body count is indefensible and so she reacts like this to blame the asked for treading into waters that might lead to her justifiable abandonment

Just speculation. Seems like her opinion on the matter is probably more shaped by experience than belief system

What a vapid sloot

She has got fucked a lot.

Jesus, bodycount in the hundreds and complete nutter. What a fucking catch.

I will just relate to topic. You'll get all flavours. If she can lie with out batting an eyelid then you stand no chance. If she is poor lier but led about it many times in this specific area shell be better.

John Navarro "what everybody..." and "fucc files" book. Good combo for reference.

She seems nice

Apparently a good way to tell if a woman is promiscuous is

checking if she using birth control.

Could you imagine having to spend time with this insufferable kunt?

"Get fucked" she says, over and over...

That is what she's replaying in her head, over and over. Yep, she's totally a raging whore who needs to deflect from the fact that she's "paid with the knees up" a bit too often.

Also, the look in her eyes as she addresses the camera has that crazy stare to 'em. The kind of eyes you see hovering over you at 2am when she's convinced herself that you're cheating (even if you weren't) and she's gonna do something about it. To you.

This woman has been fucked a LOT