Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
polishknight
Posted 1y ago in Dual-Mating Strategy - Permalink - Locked - 7.5K Views
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
ogrilla99 Pez "The Pussy Dispenser" Pimp 1y ago Stickied
I think the age is a key. She's 31. In OLD, your matches drop off a cliff when you hit 30. Because lots of desirable men her age set their filter to below 30. The only men interested in 30+ year olds are either 30+ year old men who aren't super desirable, or 40-50+ year old desirable men.
She says she's had 4 relationships and countless flings in ~15 years of being sexually active. IOW, she's used to seeing a never ending parade of great matches on her tinder profile that she could pick and choose from. Then all of a sudden, she turned 30 and the spigot turned off literally over night. She's left wondering "WTF? Where all the hot rich men that used to message me all the time?" Never realizing that OLD filters are merciless and make no exceptions.
The guys in her age who are still matching with her now are either rich or hot, but no longer both. She has to decide. She decides on rich. But even an ugly rich guy is no fool. He'll use his wealth to pump and dump hot gold diggers, but no way is he risking half his wealth on marriage to a woman who's proven incapable of maintaining a long term relationship. He'd rather sow his oats with her, and then, when he's ready to marry, pick someone less attractive who nevertheless has better character and is more likely to stay with him for the longhaul.
She is doubly fucked. Her age has made her invisible to hot rich guys. And she doesn't want to marry a hot poor guy (she's fucked plenty of them, but knows they can't provide her the lifestyle she wants). But rich guys don't want a woman with her past.
So what are her remaining choices:
That's about it. The guy that could give her a Kardashian lifestyle while rocking 6-pack abs is dating 22 year old supermodels (Or, in the case of Leo DiCaprio, 19 year old ones :-). His OLD filters don't even allow him to see her, much less decide to take a chance on her.
She has 4 more years to come to her senses and grab the best guy she can get (a decent-looking but not hot, middle class to actual low upper-middle class -- not her conception of it -- , decent guy in his mid- to late-30s who's a little boring but will be a good husband and father. And that's the best she can do). In 4 years, literally on her birthday, her OLD feeds will undergo another massive transformation, which she will not like. And it won't matter if she "looks younger than her years" or is now willing to "settle" for one of those guys who used to show up on her feed but is now gone. Computers don't make exceptions and don't care about your sob story.
Einsamer 1y ago
Exactly that. Time is playing against her twice: her looks falls apart and her counterparts are catching up in experience so she can't easily manipulate and abuse them anymore (ofc, from her perspective her behaviour is just normal and natural).
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Dudes in their 40s and 50s aren't looking for women in their 30s unless they are short/fat/broke/beta/clueless/etc. When I was looking for profiles to post here I start with age 28 and up and it's just an endless parade of fat single moms and damaged women. If I were going to get a woman for LTR I'd set my search criteria 18-28. This woman would be invisible to me for the rest of her life.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
Hilarious but I'd add that search engines are ruthless against men too. Women regularly mock men for being 5'11 instead of the full "6 feet". "Age is just a number". So is height!
She always has the option to do what men have had to do: Learn game, how to handle rejection, make approaches (LOTS of approaches), and be charming and put your own ego in check to achieve personal goals.
All that requires TREMENDOUS introspection and self-criticism which tears down your existing ego requiring you to build a new one up in the face of unrelenting social criticism. It's probably the toughest thing a human being can do.
Her situation is analogous to this: You win the lottery and blow it during your 20's on first class travel and high priced restaurants. "Experiences". You reach your 30's and now you're broke and you have to schlep it like everyone else and bust your tukas studying and then competing to TRY to get rich and even then, you're just hoping to strike it lucky because tons of people fail.
Women are exceptionally cruel to socially disenfranchised men engaging in mocking and dehumanizing them. It must be quite humbling to have blown your genetic lottery winnings only to wind up with guys like, well, me. In my 50's, it feels just frikken great to be able to talk to (formerly) young, pretty women as equals, or even as a Patriarch. It feels, just, great.
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Nah, guys like you know you can do better so she really only has guys that are desperate.
GimmeTheUsual Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Can confirm.
Women have their minds blown when you don't do what all the thirsty dudes do, lavish them with compliments, play the 'jester', etc... They're so used to life on easy mode that when a guy looks at her and says "no thanks" when she asks you to buy a drink, it totally effs up their haughty self-image.
Former 'hot' girls are pretty insufferable, and its great just knocking them down a peg by treating them with the equality they preach about. But again, men have ground through life being scrublords and knowing what they are capable of. We're not handed things. So we handle independence much better than some chick who falls off a cliff in popularity.
The best punishment as I'm sure you are aware for a hot girl or formerly hot girl is simply ignoring her. I've had chicks tap me on the shoulder/interrupt me because I've done this. They can't comprehend that I'm not actively eyeballing them (I did, but my sideglance skills are unmatched, lol) and they insert themselves in my reality - or try to, anyway.
Just expanding on your excellent elaboration, brother.
SpiritualEnema Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
This is exactly what the “Karen” phenomenon is; a former average/to above average looking woman who has lost her pretty privilege who is still trying (unsuccessfully) to enforce it. I think it’s hilarious.
The wall is undefeated.
Chad_Bodmor 1y ago
A woman with an extensive sexual history and an attitude that she's "settling" is on the top 10 list of worst possible marriage partners. There is like a 98% chance the marriage either ends in divorce, or the woman resents the man because she had to settle so she makes him miserable for not being the man she actually wanted for the rest of his life.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
I'm going to put this out there that women's minds work in strange ways. In the past, women were expected to settle and they were exceptionally happier than they are today because they were told to find ways to make a marriage work, rather than find something to gripe about.
I've been to huge, wonderful bourgeoisie weddings where one would think that the bride got literally EVERYTHING she wanted including a $8000 dress she can burn after one day's use and they STILL got divorced later. I know a total Chad whose wife cheated on him and he only found out because she cheated on THAT guy with some other guy and that guy got revenge by snitching to him.
Life is really what you make of it, so to speak, so "settling" is actually an admission by the woman that she's not "entitled" to everything she wants.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1y ago
So financially well-off men want younger, RICH women?? Huh. Does she need to drive a flashy red sportscar too? What's it take for a gal to get noticed nowadays??
And I love the shaming: are you "man enough" to accept a woman with a past?? Yeah, and are you too chicken to to eat this dead bug I found baking on the pavement??
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
You cannot fight an enemy that you don't believe exists. Women do not believe in the wall, so it takes them by surprise EVERY SINGLE TIME.
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Sorry sweaty! I got married and so did all my upper middle-class friends while you were partying. We were all good looking, had stable careers, and were ready to marry when we finished college around age 24. We then spent several years vetting out women like you who balked at being a wife and mother. By the time I was 30 I had spent 5 years vetting my wife and 2 years romantically. She got the ring. She's a winner and you're a loser. Loooo-hoooo-zerrrr-herrrr!
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
This thread is a GOLDMINE of insights. Consider that back in the old days of oppression, college was considered to be the 2nd tier of courtship with high school being the first (largely for the working class). A working class woman perhaps in her teens would find a sweetheart, stick with him, and after he got a decent job and showed he could handle his liquor, they’d get married at age 21 or so. On second tier were the bourgeois women who got “MRS degrees”. Later, feminists would mock such women, but college was a great place to meet “upper middle class” men in his most vulnerable state. He’d be lonely and, back then, with a reasonably high male:female ratio on campus, she’d have her pick of reliable men to “go steady” with. Instead of hitching her wagon to some guy in high school, she could wait a few more years and grab him in his (very) early 20’s.
The third tier was the workplace. That even if slept through high school and college, she could flirt with the young men, again with high male:female ratios when women were “oppressed”, and nab one of them with “traditional dating”. He’d be on his best behavior so that he wouldn’t ruin his work or social reputation.
But Anita Hill and later METOO (in case men didn’t get the message back in the 1990’s) ruined all that. College is a battleground where a man can be thrown out for “bothering” a girl in class. All the easy ways that women had to easily nab reliable men were undermined by their own behavior and political action or even just indifference and apathy.
Women never really liked the dating apps because they’re unromantic but now even they are increasingly forced upon them due to their own lack of social skills and having burned all the bridges to conventional dating.
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
True and the stats support it as well. Average age of marriage for men was something like 25 back in the 1950s. Now it's more like 31. I think there's an economic reason for that but ultimately it's the women who decide which men are "economically attractive".
Whenever I see one of those posts by women asking where decent single men are I always answer in their friend-zone or the engineering college. Do they listen? Hell no!
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
I'll be blunt for the studio audience: Women that have to resort to dating apps/social media to find commitment are fuckups, and anyone not drinking the Jonestown Kool-aid knows it. And the older they are, the longer they've been doubling down on their fuckups. The only question is how bad of a fuckup they are.
The average man at least has the excuse of the necessity of building his social and economic value first to be seen as a valid choice to women. Which takes time and effort. An average Plain Jane woman can show up as a 19 year old debt free virgin with no tattoos and get premium billing by default, the only effort on her part needed is not actively fucking up her life. Just don't be a fat drug addicted slut that lives beyond her means. That's it.
Back on the topic of profiles, the pro tier strat for men would be to search female dating profiles and social media to vet women he has met in real life - and just having one at all is a demerit, then of course covertly information mining it for whatever indiscretions she will inevitably confess indirectly as well.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1y ago
Yeah but, like, what modern woman wants to be like that? You want her to wear a nun's habit and say Hail Marys all over the place, too?
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
Hey don't kinkshame me!
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Nuns in Nappies 2 is his favourite movie!
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
100% agree. I've always thought that women on OLD are basically broken. The crazy thing is, they have no idea that they are broken. They think the world is broken. The insist that 'all men' are broken. That men don't want to settle down, that they don't want to have families, are afraid of commitment. It's such a strange world view. In psych talk, you would say that the 'ego' part of their brains has taken over and is spinning narratives that are increasinly hard to believe in order to protect the mind from hurtful feelings. This is the delusion that I frequently mention. The delusion protects the ego.
Because the truth is this - mean are not afraid of commitment, they are not reluctant to settle down and men do not hate the idea of having kids. These stupid women ought to go to a maternity hospital or wedding venue and open her eyes - every day, thousands of men get married and have kids. Just NOT WITH YOU.
They are not afraid of commitment, they are just not interested in you.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I’m 37 soon, I read all of this stuff and I’m still engaged to a woman about a decade my junior. I’ve Never been afraid of commitment. But I saw no value in pursuing a romance with a woman who has nothing but a mediocre career and declining looks (and of course, little to no social skills).
I remember when I was 32, I agreed to a date with a 31 year old that I met online. She was behind me in, well, everything substantial (I made more money, I was in better shape, I owned a home while she lived with her parents, etc). She still couldn’t even bother to be friendly.
I actually knew many people that she knew (we went to the same college). I can reliably tell you that she’s still single and childless. At what would be 36 now.
A younger woman may be stable and simply expanding her radius (like a 24 year old woman interested in an older guy could go to a site like match and be perfectly nice). But these older women, it’s almost always not a matter of whether or not they’ve red flags, it’s how bad the red flags are.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I feel like I've met that woman you described on that date a few times! They're not a total mess (not a meth head on the streets doing blowjobs for money) but they're just going nowhere. At 30-35, they 're just living a random, pointless life. It's amazing how so many of them can get to 30-35, be earning decent money, and none of them seem to own property.
I've met and dated loads of these women. They just seem to breeze through life. I dated one particular woman, aged 34. Earned in the top 1% of the population. But rented. Didn't even own a car. Didn't actually have a driving licence. No pension and no savings. Did things like fly to Paris (from London) to get her haircut. Bought handbags for $X,000 even though she already had Y number of handbags already.
Why do modern women behave this way? Because the back up plan is you.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Yup. I’m not sure if it’s because women feel entitled to their current living standard, or just are irresponsible, but unless they’re making an income that is damn near impossible to spend, they’ll find a way to spend irresponsibly. That’s obviously fine if you’re also investing responsibly (at least 15%). I know that if I made stupid amounts of money, I’d work on a car collection. Buying an $85k C3 Corvette to look at, not exactly a wise investment. But hey, you’re allowed to have nice things.
But, these women don’t really pay attention to that part. They just spend.
Doricel 1y ago
"Why men don't want the town bicycle? It's must be because of their FrAgILe MaScULiNiTy"
NotaBene Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
The problem is that you think a man not wanting you is "fragile" when in fact that is a strength.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
Well duh, why pay full commitment price for dying or dead eggs? Men don't exist to give you something for nothing, princess.
Most men low key know the imputed demands that a rich bitch will have when it comes to the expected quality of life (and social status) that a man will be expected to provide when it comes to any form of long term relationships.
Sure a rich woman might be willing to get dicked down by Muscles McBikerThug, but she's going to inevitably get unhappyyyyyyyy in a LTR since he does not provide the status she craves and security is not a big enough concern to keep her stupider instincts in check.
Plus, without some overwhelming compensation elsewhere, like being exceptionally fit or famous/high status, men also know that women tend to treat men that are economically lower on the scale than them like absolute shit by default, whether they intend to or not.
That being said, smart men don't want a walking debt magnet that cannot be relied upon to be fiscally responsible either. We're not your fucking pay pig slaves.
No shit you stupid cunts. Not like women are marrying or fucking Quasimodo looking dudes either, unless he is stupid rich and/or a dictator of a nation.
Women have no right to whine here at all, they are far more fickle, shallow, and materialistic than men by far. So smart successful men are going to pick their commitment candidates very wisely. Either make the cut or fuck off.
"I'm not racist, but..." [says something racist]. That's the tier of sophistry on display here. She absolutely still cares.
"I am looking for a sucker that will overlook what a onesided deal I am offering"
Problematic_Browser Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
It's time to bring back the Red Pill Truths™ commentary, because this one is full of them.
Red Pill Truth: An attractive unmarried woman is either a virgin or a carousel rider. Given the sheer access to men, she had the opportunity to choose any relationship path she wanted.
Red Pill Truth: women want families and stability. Most of them will admit this, but the carousel gives too much free dopamine and attention to quit and do the things that give them their preferred outcomes.
Red Pill Truth: hypergamy is undeniable. She could find an average man who will settle down with her. Her looks haven't deprecated enough to push her off the market entirely, but she still believes that she can date the tier of men that she was fucking when she was 7 years younger. Hypergamy prevents her from accepting the men who would accept not only her diminished value, but her sordid past.
Red Pill Truth: men want young and pretty women, and women know this. Not many will outright admit it, but watch their actions - everything they do is centered around presenting an image of youth, beauty, and fertility.
Red Pill Truth: men of value do not give commitment to sluts. This woman knows this, and she knows that she has to begin the long chain of neverending compromises to stay relevant ("So I've decided not to care about the man's looks"). One of her specific requirements is that her
victimfuture husband be accepting of her past.Red Pill Truth: Shame, insults, and guilt are the tools that women employ when they can no longer use their sexuality. Whenever a woman wants something, her first method is her sexuality. When that fails, she has to rely on other methods. If you start hearing "intimidated", "scared", or she starts challenging your manhood, it means she wants something from you but she isn't hot enough to get it.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
A few analysis of the above Truths: 1) Corporate nuns are in-between in that they spend their 20's pursuing their careers thinking that this entitles them to high status men later (nevermind why we know that's false) OR they simply believe their youth lasts into their late 30's. 2) Corporate nuns or party girls take it for granted that (quality) beta-bucks will always be there because they see how easy it is for men to hit on them. They put off family and stability thinking it will be there later. They're drilled by the grrl power society to focus on their academics "just in case" she doesn't find a provider male which becomes a self-fulfilling prophesy. They don't want to "miss out" on their career thinking family is a given. 3) Hypergamy requires pragmatic rejection of romanticism. What this means is looking at what you get, rather than how you got it. This woman, for instance, could find such a man if she accepted the burden of learning how to make approaches, dealing with rejection, and developing personal charm.
Funny story: A woman friend of mine remarked that I wasn't one to criticize female hypergamy because I married a much more attractive woman than in my "range". While she had a point, I did put in the effort to meet this woman and improve myself to make that relationship happen. Hypergamous women don't just want to mooch off of a man after marriage, but even prior to the relationship as well by wasting their prime years that such men are approaching them. She's not ONLY selfish AND lazy, but also WASTEFUL.
4) Strangely enough, young women dress to look older. They gob on makeup when it's not necessary. Many of them treat their bodies like it's Halloween and they want to play something else, they aren't, as a "costume party" to impress other women, mostly. But agreed that when they go to look for a man, they will strive to look youthful and put on the makeup for that purpose essentially with the goal of looking like a 18 year old trying to look 25 as compared to a 35 year old trying to look 25. 5) She's chasing the market down. She's willing to "not care about the man's looks", but I really don't believe her. She's probably reduced her looks demands from "chad's over 6'2" down to "at least as tall as me plus 2 inches". This is a compromise, granted, but I am stunned at the time I researched competitive male dating profiles years ago and saw a doctor's profile at 5'5" and the guy was great in all other respects.
Here's another problem with hypergamy: It only works in an up market. If houses in a market are going for $500K, you can list it for $520K and get some desperate buyer to grab it because he worries in a few months he'll pay $540K. Then, the market turns and those same buyers don't feel a sense of urgency when a hypergamous person lists their home at a bargain! ONLY $505K!!! Hey, she reduced her margin of hypergamy from $20K down to $5K. Why isn't it moving? She KNOWS that her price always went up in the past!
It's not ONLY women who think this way. I've seen business owners and investors make the EXACT same mistake.
6) And this is the big one: Women don't just employ shame against men (mostly against insecure men) to try to shame them into commitment, but rather against other women who are insufficiently hypergamous. A happy wife who married that 5'5" doctor will get mocked by her friends who are miserable with their Tyrone baby-daddies who don't pay the bills or living alone because "they couldn't "find" the right man". I pointed out to my wife to remember that ALL of her friends have personal problems and there's a reason for it due to their personal choices.
My wife's friends finally, after nearly a decade, have come around to start showing open respect to me as a paternity figure. I don't fret about their judgements and call them out on it, and they now come to respect my wife's drama-free life.
That's the sad part of all this: These truth's are often finally realized by women in their 30's and 40's (or beyond) when it's TOO LATE to capitalize on them. "Maybe I should learn to lock barn doors BEFORE the cows get out!" Life can be cruel in giving women their genetic lottery prizes first, and the brains on how to spend it afterwards.
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Word on the street with the youth is that red pill is now endemic amongst boys and men. This is coming from field reports submitted to Strong Successful Male on youtube. They don't know it's red pill and I don't know where they're getting it from but these truths are out there which changes everything. We're way past the shaming days of calling men incels and misogynists to dismiss red pill truths. Purple pill failed miserably to reconcile red pill with female supremacy. God pill seems to be going strong but is a small group. These truths are just out there.
I think it may just be that in a world full of lies, people seek out the truth and find it anyway. For example, I get my manosphere news from Rollo on youtube. I get my Ukraine war news from some Ukrainian on youtube. Stuff like that. Anyway, it doesn't bode well for CC riders.
Boar_excrement Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Wrong sweaty! Toxic femininity is everywhere. And men have decided that no relationshit is better than a bad one. Men have standards too. And we are logical creatures.
So, I ask you sweaty, why buy the cow when it is a whore?
wswZtyqNGQ 1y ago
Lemme steal that one from you.
GimmeTheUsual Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
...or perhaps more graphically, why buy the cow when it wanders up half-naked and shoves a nipple in your mouth?
Maybe too gross, lol.
Problematic_Browser Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Ooh I'm taking this silver bullet and saving it for later!
sean_karaya 1y ago
How many of the men aren't man enough to do accept women with a past?
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 1y ago
This is a spoof post.
Women are not as self aware as this purports to be.
Things women never say:
"I've had lots of hookups and enjoyed them" - women know that men don't want ho's.
"A man ready to marry me is hard to find" - women never say something that makes her look bad, they have to blame men
"men want younger women" - women never admit this, they instead blame men for it while saying they shouldn't do it
"so I've decided not to care about a man's looks" - women rarely admit this either.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago Stickied
Back on reddit, I'd have removed your comment under rule 3 and told you to make your case for it not being real via modmail.
However, since there's no modmail here (tag @redpillschool!), and since we don't have the droves of bloopie shitstains eager to pile on and accuse us of faking everything, let's discuss!
Go through our archives, especially anything flaired "dual mating strategy" or "cock carousel rider". They say that shit all the time. They apparently subconsciously think that since they hate virgins and don't mind a high notch count, the same must apply to men.
Hell, we had a post just a few weeks ago in which this hobag with major TCS got triggered and ranted and raved at the very idea that any man would care about that. (Edit - here it is)
That statement still blames men, and as you read further, she says men are "afraid".
Dude, they can't blame and shame men for wanting younger women unless they first admit that men want younger women. And they admit it all the time. Many live in denial, but plenty admit this. The entire beauty industry is dedicated to making them look younger, FFS.
This one is semi-rare, but it does happen. We've seen other posts in which sheng nu marvel that even though they stopped going for hawt guys, they still can't secure commitment.
insufficient evidence to declare "fake". Post remains up.
SeasonedRP 1y ago
When I read the post, I had the same reaction as mattyanon (that it was a spoof written by a man) but who knows.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
CC: @Lone_Ranger, @polishknight
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I wasn't advocating for it to be taken down, just remarking that the choice of syntax makes me believe that this was written by a guy. Of course I could be wrong! It's just a feeling.
nicknack 1y ago
I don’t think you should take it down even if there is a chance it’s fake, the discussion about why it’s probably fake is the most interesting part of this thread.
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 1y ago
he is talking about removing my comment I think?
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
I was talking about removing your comment at the beginning of my reply to you. I left it up for discussion purposes, and because you at least made your case instead of just going "faaaaaake!" (which is annoying af).
at the bold-faced part at the end of my reply to you, I was talking about the post. We have removed posts proven to be fake.
I think @nicknack paddy-whack was talking about removing the entire post.
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 1y ago
Your post is very different.
I am saying women do not generally publicly show pride in having fucked lots of hot guys.
Your post criticises men for caring about body count. Very different thing.
Absolutely, but they generally don't admit they are too old, instead they attack/blame men as being wrong rather than stating it as fact.
Balance of probabilities I believe it's fake, but it can't be proven either way.
We're here to discuss, noone is going to take it down, it's all ok.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
Some do. Some don't. They aren't a monolith, after all.
Kind of like how some women are absolutely repulsed at the idea of fucking a dude significantly older than her, and some are open to it, and some even prefer it.
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 1y ago
I like those latter type of women ;)
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
Scandalous!
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I think the women that are open to older guys are admit that they prefer them, are just being more honest. The women on social media shrieking about the men going out with younger women being 'predators' are simply dishonest. They'd love an older gent to take an interest in them. I just don't believe that they are genuinely repulsed at the idea at all. The only thing they are repulsed at is that no men are interested in them at all.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
I was talking about younger women who are grossed out at the thought of getting with an older dude.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Hi Typo - It's been my theory for a while now that many (most?) young women seem to go through an 'older guy' phase. It seems to follow a familiar pattern.
I've benefited from this dynamic a few times. When I was about 43 I found myself divorced and was quite happy to find that were women half my age that were DTF. They all said that same thing - that men their age 'were a disaster'.
They were basically trying out the older gent route. I get the feeling nearly all young women try it at some point.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I think you're right - it's click bait. You spotted it from the language. They would never say 'A man ready to marry ME is hard to find' because it contains the faintest whiff of failure on behalf of the woman. It implies that its only ME that they would not marry, that men might instead be interested in other women. Instead they would write:
"Men don't want to settle down, they just aren't interested in long term relationships"
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
This appeared to have been sourced from an IT forum where a particular immigrant community hung out hence the "I've come to realization" rather than "I've come to THE realization" as an American speaker might put it and men want "younger, rich, and prettier women" which largely doesn't apply to western men (western men are ok with a woman being pretty, but not rich.)
Indeed, the concepts of chivalrous patronage of women including men being happy to marry down in wealth is largely absent in foreign cultures (hence mind blowing to travel and experience these in the raw, highly recommended.) In foreign cultures, it's not uncommon for a successful man to reject a pretty, but poor woman in favor of an plain looking, but wealthy one (with a dowry.)
I think the next stage of cultural evolution in the states from MGTOW will be Chads insisting upon marrying only wealthy women.
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
No that's the culture in places Western women go for foreign men. Go watch the documentary Bali Cowboys. It's very eye opening. In the states, the next evolution is well under way as anti-feminism. All these tech layoffs recently are diversity, equity, and inclusion jobs that are loss leaders for companies.
AurelianWay Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
The modern woman screams in pain as she strikes you. If she has such a low opinion of men why would she want to settle down with one and marry? Obviously she's looking for the beta bucks bailout but these women are so ignorant to the market forces that we all have to deal with (SMP/RMP).
DextroShade 1y ago
She lost count of how many different dicks she took and only now at 31 she's ready for marriage. This is of course followed by the usual shaming language directed at men who don't want to pay brand new Lamborghini prices for a 2002 Honda Civic that's been used in the demolition derby. Most women are soulless NPC's who all repeat the same lines.
And the pushback to men being accused of being "scared" or "fragile" because we don't want to wife up a whore should simply be "We are not scared, we are disgusted because used-up whores are disgusting."
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
Yeah it's like accusing someone of being scared of a pile of cowshit because they refused to step in it.
That's not scary. It's just disgusting, unpleasant, and of no benefit to do.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
It's safe to stop reading at this point on both of those questions. They're examples of very basic manipulative language. It's very rare that anyone, especially a woman, has your interests in mind when they insult your manhood.
Once you learn to see through it, it becomes comical to you. I say this frequently,, but it's like stupid kids daring each other to do something dangerous or stupid.
"Go on! Eat that dog turd! Whatsa matta? Are ya chicken? Buck-buck-ba-GAWK!"
Her entire screed is nothing but "I want this, I want that, and anyone who doesn't give it to me isn't a real man". There's zero mention at all of why a man would want her for anything other than something casual. All downsides, no upsides.
"I gave myself away so many times I can't even count, but if you don't ManUp!™ and marry me, then you are the problem!"
Pic889 1y ago
When you hear the following:
The essential reply is: "Sweety, those men are manning up just fine, just not with you"
Notice how this is true regardless of whether the man is looking for sex or commitment. Both of those count as "manning up" and none of those involve women like her.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Excellent. As you say, once you see it, you'll see it everywhere. Sometimes they want us to 'man up' and accept modern women, sometimes they tell us to 'grow a pair' or 'stop being afraid' or 'not be intimidated'. They have many phrases to imply the same basic meaning. They think that if men don't want them, the fault is with men. Because the alternative is UNTHINKABLE. It would literarily be a thought crime.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
In the past, the use of terms "boy" and "man" were used empathetically or respectfully depending upon context. Rather than shaming him as "man up", it would be "what a great man founded this city" and "the boys of the army deserve respect" may sound paradoxical today, but it meant that these men had been through PTSD and needed support from their families. With feminism, the two words are used largely to scorn or shame nearly exclusively: "Boys are so hyperactive compared to girls in schools" or "Men have oppressed women throughout history". It's amusing, therefore, for women to think that men should be shamed into meeting their demands via "man up" when most, as (literal) boys spent their formative years hearing men shamed as oppressors. Also consider "fragile masculinity" shaming even as she demands men be protectors and providers. Men are told they're weak inside, but shamed as not being "real" if he's not strong?
On the other hand, the terms "girls" and "women" are used interchangeably as Mary Sue "girl power" terms or "woman" as a sign of respect and achievement simply for reaching a particular age. It's no wonder that this one is confused in that as she became older, she should be powerful by default since her whole existence has been "empowered" by definition. She's "strong" because she wants to be provided and protected for whether she's successful or not.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I suspect she is misunderstanding the situation when she says 'men want younger, rich and prettier women'.
Go and look at the back catalouge of a wedding photographer. You will be struck at how many of the brides in the pictures are not very attractive, and thats when they have spent 3k on a dress and have had professional hair and make up, and photographed by a professional. Many of them fat and ugly. My conclusion is that men are not really hung up on younger, prettier women.
I think that men are actually less superficial than women. Men are varied and want lots of different things from women, but what they seem to want most is a partner that makes them feel good, that is a genuine partner.
So many the OP has no idea how to make a man feel good? Maybe she is an unreliable, selfish, self indulgent bitch? Just saying.
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 1y ago
What I don't get is how women demand a man be 6 foot tall with a 6 figure income, but then claim men are shallow.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
that is just that start of a long list of requirements, that are two numerous to list here. The wonderous thing about the 'long list' approach is this - on some level women must be aware that what they are asking for is man that is about 1 in 1000. So by definition, there are 1,000 women for every one fo those guys. BUT...at the same time they also believe that 'there is someone for everyone'. That every woman should be able to find her dream man. That it's just a question of 'putting yourself out there'. They buy into the 'field of dreams' mentality.
That's the mystery. They believe two directly conflicting things at one time. It's pure Orwellian double think.
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 1y ago
The "someone for everyone" thing is just wishful thinking. You compete or you die alone, that's the reality.
Right :)
It's clear that they can't think straight..... some of their delusion does actually benefit them (when men rescue them from their shit), but they get addicted to it.
Self delusion is like a short term addiction to compensate for a shitty life.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
The traditional wedding gown appears to have been designed to draw attention away from the woman's face and figure and rather to the dress itself. In the Bible, Jacob was tricked into marrying Leah by the father-in-law rather than the girl, Rachel, because of her veil.
I think the wedding dress mafia cartel has finally been broken in the states. My wife could have brought a wonderful dress from Eastern Europe for $300 but instead, we just got her a white cocktail dress which was fine. Nowadays, they can be bought online for a fraction of the price of the local salons where brides appear to compete for how much money they can waste on a dress for a single day. All branded "wedding" stuff: cakes, venues, catering, is marked up compared to if you host a "business event".
Edit: If you want a cheap wedding cake, order an "anniversary" cake.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago Stickied
true - the wedding industry is a con. My wife also bought a second hand white dress (not a wedding dress) for our wedding. I was wearing a jacket that I bought for £8 from a charity shop. People that spend big sums of money on a wedding need mental health help. I would recommend to any young man that they tell their LTR flat out, at an early stage: "we are not going to have a big wedding. The budget for our wedding is 3 figures, and not a penny more. If you're not on board with that, I'm out. The reason for this: we going to invest in a home, not a party. We're going to take that £30k and spend it on a property" If your girlfriend isn't ok with this, and leaves you, then you know she just had wedding fever. She wasn't interested in a building a life
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
It's worth understanding that prior to the last century, weddings were meant to celebrate two families coming together for personal and business benefit. As in-laws, they would help each other out and this also encouraged the couple to stay together in that if her brother-in-law had gone into business with her cousin, the family would look down upon her if she got a divorce in that they were literally "family" at that point. Also, weddings often were a fertile ground for the young folk to scout out potential marriageable spouses.
The father-of-the-bride would approve the union, of course, but also either pay for the wedding in that if she married rich, it was the LEAST he could do and if she married a poor, but handsome/nice guy, again, it was (literally) the least he (would) do. Fathers didn't want to get stuck with spinsters so the families would push the daughters to marry earlier, the better.
Old style weddings emphasized good food, drink, and dancing for all the relatives to remember their own weddings (and happier times, apart from funerals) rather than just blowing the money to impress. The modern tradition of diamond engagement rings was made up by DeBeers cartel.
NotaBene Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
And he didn't figure it out until the morning after, heh.
When I got married at 20 we didn't know what we were doing, you are sold the lie that you have to have an expensive wedding, and you don't stop to think there are other options. We were foolish then, but at least my wife is extremely frugal now. Good trade I guess.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
The interesting aspect to that story is that in the wedding vows, at least modern, the bride is expected to be addressed by name "Do you, Rachel, take this man to be your lawful wedded husband?" Now granted in Biblical times it was probably quite different, but I would think if he lifts the veil and someone else is underneath that, he has a right to call it off then and there.
It reminds me of the joke about someone who eats a meal at a restaurant and returns it for being undercooked after he's eaten about 90% of it... :-)
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
We're the romantics trying to be pragmatic, and women are the pragmatists pretending to be romantics.
GimmeTheUsual Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I once was talking to some dude and we were discussing men/women differences, and I said something along the lines of "men are the true romantics", some chick heard me say that and IMMEDIATELY jumped in with "that's bullshit" -- and I didn't even ASK her, lol.
Women really hate it when you break through the programming and suss out shit. I ignored her and kept talking, lol.
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I've noticed more women getting emboldened to the point, like you said, that they will yell at strangers and use one-way aggression against men. If I did that kind of stuff I'd get my teeth knocked out. Time to withdraw protection from these women.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
This is because a key element to hypergamy is dishonesty. If you admit that you only want to be friends with people cooler than you are, say, then your cool friends will ask themselves why they want to be friends with you? Psychopaths succeed in holding other people to moral standards while they possess none whatsoever to hold them back. This requires deception, first and foremost.
What angers psychopaths is when they get taken advantage of by another psychopath or at least someone who beats them at their game: "How dare that guy I was trying to marry and take his money exploit me for casual sex?" In their magical thinking, that they're snowflakes ENTITLED to better treatment than average, they feel in a continual state of emotional victimhood also known clinically as "narcissistic rage." This further inflames their notion of entitlement but also insecurity causing them to further increase their demands beyond what is attainable (ironically, hypergamy itself is a moral system, albeit a selfish one.)
The hypergamist agrees to a philosophy that they'd rather die alone, even if it doesn't benefit them, than "settle" and marry someone whose "beneath them" albeit would make their life considerably better. A (young) man sees that marrying a hypergamous woman whose slightly below him (and STAYS THERE!) is a win for him. Yes, he puts in 51% out of 100% but they both share in the 100%.
"Romance", at the highest level, is the notion that an emotional, intimate relationship carries lifetime benefits. It's someone to connect your youthful memories to in that I remember fun things I did back 20 years ago, but sharing those memories with my wife makes them more "real". When I look back on those memories with her, it's like I'm in an emotional time machine. I see her as she was 20 years ago. This is the problem hypergamous women face in their 40's in that as they market themselves to older men, these men will see mostly a woman getting older rather than a married man 'romanticizing' his young wife as forever young.
Psychopaths are some of the most successful, brilliant, and even admirable people in our history but for the most part, like the majority of athletes or aspiring actors who burn out, they are our biggest losers and the most miserable. And rightly so.
Cardinal Lamberto to Michael Corleone, Godfather III: "Your sins are terrible. It is just that you suffer. Your life could be redeemed, but I know you don't believe that. You will not change."
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
One can look it at through the lens of being a Prisoner's Dilemma enacted at a societal level. The cooperation outcome/strategy used to be enforced with immediate punishment, but now it is not, and we have several generations now of women overwhelmingly picking the Betray option (because they do not face immediate punishment for it) that men no longer have a reason to expect them to pick otherwise. And men get a far superior reward for also picking Betray (or at least a far lesser punishment) than they would for picking Cooperate while women renege.
Sure, women might get to enjoy the short term benefits of their Betray choice, but after their peak they lose out drastically compared to if they had stuck to the Cooperate option, since the game is not a one and done, but rather a continuous series of interactions and consequences.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
great use of game theory. I would add the following - we can't be too harsh on women for choosing 'betray' because we (as a society) have incentivised the betray option so heavily. It's not accident that over 88% of divorces are filed by women 35 to 45. Divorcing a man who is earning well while you have a few dependents results is an automatic lottery women for women it the west. It's a slam dunk. There is no argument against it - if you are drunk whore that is banging the gardener, you'll get the house, the kids, cars, pension and a life of monthly payments to finance a legacy of bad decisions and sloth. It's an incredible deal.
We created the incentives, we cannot now stand back and blame those that choose this fantastic deal. The only solution, and I mean THE ONLY solution is to remove the incentives to betray. You would see a dramatic and instant fall off in divorce rates.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
I absolutely can blame them. I didn't vote for the incentives, and I share no blame in their creation. I refuse to infantilize women by not holding them accountable for their choices. They are adults, they are capable of choosing better, they bear the onus of not doing so.
California effectively decriminalized petty theft below a certain dollar threshold, and I still blame people there that steal. The lack of punishment does not make them not a bad person. It just makes them a bad person that did not get punished. I absolutely blame them too and want nothing to do with them.
That's what these women are. Bad people that are not getting immediately punished.
And outside of moral judgements, turning a blind eye to that behavior has some really shit utility in the long run. So there's the secular angle if you really need it.
However, the incentive system does need corrected. Imagine if the income of both spouses were tracked (we already have that info on the tax paperwork, even when spouses file jointly) and used to calculate the % contribution each spouse had to the commingled asset pool - and you could only get paid a maximum of whatever % you contributed to the final pool of assets at the time of dissolution? If you sandbagged and only brought in 10% of the total earnings throughout the marriage, that's all you are getting in the divorce....10% of the total assets. All of a sudden being a dependapotomus/gold digger isn't so lucrative. Running up a bill and blowing all the assets just reduces the payout for everyone, giving the courts incentive to look upon that poorly. Keeping the breadwinner happy becomes a priority. Oh, and custody defaults to whomever has the greatest income. And welfare benefits cap at 2 children.
Then we could still keep the no-fault divorce in case there is a truly intolerable situation, but it's not a free for all on the wallets of people that became breadwinners in good faith anymore.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
There are many ways we could improve the current divorce laws. The set of incentives for women to divorce are so stupendously stupid that its a amazing that anyone stays married any more. At this point, I don't know why young women bother going to university to study things like medicine - a far better thing to do would be to go to a School Of Divorce, where you learn how to find and marry a high earning man, and then divorce him. They'll make more money that way. In some respects, this is what has happened. Women tend to shy away from STEM subjects, because they difficult and boring and mean that they will have to work in real jobs that are demanding and tough.
Most of them choose 'colouring in' (art history) or some such nonsense, marry a high earner, push out of few sprogs and then demand a divorce. Until we find a way to disincentivise this behaviour it will not change.
Incentives matter. If the government handed a £100,000 reward for every dead body you brough to the police station, the murder rate would not remain the same.
ogrilla99 Pez "The Pussy Dispenser" Pimp 1y ago
Upvoted for bringing game theory into a discussion about modern women!
P.S. I guess women are upset men are playing the tit-for-tat strategy, not knowing or not caring that it beats all the other strategies out there.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
Yeah if these women were smart, they'd realize cashing out early and sticking with a Cooperate deal would net the far more profit over their lifetime, as the Betray/tradeup/hypergamy track benefits men far more due to them being able to wait far longer for better deals than women can.
The REALLY smart women would be openly grateful that any men are willing to show up to the table and exercise Cooperate or even Betray in a civil manner at all, as men could en mass reject the that set of social contract choices entirely and start running things like the less civilized parts of say, the Middle East or Africa do.
First World Patriarchal social contracts were for women's primary benefit, not ours. And they are obscenely stupid to renege on them. Men's benefit is primarily convenience, not necessity. We can do tournament mating, but the energy spent there is energy not spent on keeping society running at the standard everyone is used to.
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
They're only upset when they're 30+ and their SMV is tanking hard while men are peaking(and the men know it). So they resort to Church where they think they'll find a guy that doesn't know his worth but Church guys who want to get married do it in their 20s and don't want a born again virgin leftover wife. So then they move on to reddit and end up here in this forum.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
It's so transparently obvious what those women have been up to when they spent puberty until 30+ or they became a single mom (whichever happens first), never showing up to Church except maybe on holidays, and then "suddenly" start showing up every Sunday and every other Church event.
They will never be sorry they made bad choices. They are only sorry that those bad choices did not work out as planned.
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Yeah it's like actually a thing now to go to church to find hoes for sex.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
Yup, it's primo location to run provider game on copper diggers. You just have to change venues periodically since the fact is, people will get pissy that you are winning too much at the Penny Sluts.
Kind of like being good at card counting and casinos. You're not supposed to beat the House.
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Lol I'm actually good at card counting in casinos. They always get pissy and send out a special dealer with a six deck stack that is changed out after every 3 hands. Crazy the lengths they go to to keep a guy from winning $8/hr.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
I find it strange they don't just use a machine that shuffles a single deck EVERY hand. It's not like this is a rocket-science machine.
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
They do that. Each 6 deck stack is pre-shuffled by a machine. I just leave because the juice ain't worth the squeeze. Another fun trick is to go in on a busy night like New Year's and act like a noob on slots so they give you winnings quickly and then just leave with your winnings and go to the next casino. I went in with $20 and walked out with $80 an hour later from hitting 5 casinos.
Impressive-Cricket-8 Founding member of FapGPT 1y ago
Her finances are hardly of any consequence. But yes, prettier and younger; if only you had come to this realisation while you were still there...
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 1y ago
Oh no, me and other men not wanting to have a girl who's been dicked by countless top SMV men to the point where she can't adequately bond with us and always misses her time on the carousel, who wants to pop a few kids out of me under a stable roof with our money, but without all the hot alpha sex you gave out in your prime, is fragile masculinity
Oh no, why can't I find it in me to man up for you?
AurelianWay Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
"So I've decided not to care about the man's looks."
Must be fragile masculinity when a man doesn't want to marry a woman who only sees him as social security.
GimmeTheUsual Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Women only care about rights when it applies to them. If some dude is not being treated well, they're fine just glossing over that because hey, fuck that guy, he isn't me! Tee hee!
I'm glad Red Pill exists and is spreading because it saves a lot of dudes from getting sucked into the time-waster trap this woman represents, not to mention pillaging his resources.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Why don’t men like women with a past? Because the entire concept of marriage is an exchange: a woman receives the support of a man, while a man gets exclusive access to sex and reproductive activity with her.
This can work well for a virgin, or even an otherwise low body count woman. There’s still an inherent pair bonding ability. But for a woman like this, we can see that she will freely give sex away to a man if he’s “hot” enough. So what’s special for the man who would eventually be her husband?
ogrilla99 Pez "The Pussy Dispenser" Pimp 1y ago
Men with a future don't like women with a past.