Public service message: If you enjoy the content, please consider posting this link to the Reddit version of WAATGM since I cannot. It drives more traffic to this site, such as myself, and that's how the content creation happens. Please do your part: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_7FaWnlhS4&t=10s

Absolutely zero feminine polarity detected in this video

Staffing shortage. Is that what we're calling it now? At least it's more honest about what she's looking for: hired help.

She says that she is part of the first generation of women who can ask "does this man add something to my already great life?" BS. Every woman (or, in the past, her father / parents / family) asked that exact question. The only difference is what each generation of women categorize as those positive qualities. In the past, even if it was her father in an oppressive patriarchy making the decision for her, he was asking "does this man have good character? Is he able to take care of my daughter? Raise a good family that we would be proud of having my daughter join?"

Have the women of this generation come up with better questions? Or seek better answers? Well, the evidence is in the results: fewer marriages, higher divorce rate, fewer children, and most importantly, significantly lower levels of self-rated happiness in current generations compared to their mothers, with skyrocketing rates of antidepressants and antianxiety use.

What blows the mind of women like this is that men who are put together have the right to run the same analysis on the women out there: I'm not here to serve you. Are you someone who adds something to my already good life? I absolutely work to be someone who can be a positive in a woman's life, but I expect the same from my partner.

The perverse burden of our culture of excess wealth has produced a generation of worthless women.

They cannot do anything their grandmothers did, they kill their own children, they slave away in careers trying to be men, they take anti-depressants by the truckload while claiming to be happy.

This woman is trying to move the goalposts of what a successful woman looks like in the modern era. But the standard hasn't changed. Women still have only two jobs in life. Women still know what these jobs are in every culture and nation. Women still rate each other by their ability to do these jobs. And women who don't measure up in these areas still seethe with bitterness and resentment (and then cry themselves to sleep) when a woman with nine children and an intact, loving marriage walks into the room.

Women know this deep down. But rather than try to reverse course, most double down like the good SJWs they are.

You want to pretend like you don't need a man, like you're just totally happy being a career girl for life, self-sufficient and rich? Go ahead. Women like you make absolutely horrible wives anyway. It's sad, but more sad for you in the long run, because you cannot fulfill your role as a woman without a husband. By definition, you cannot be successful, and you will learn this the painful way.

"For man does not originate from woman, but woman from man; for indeed man was not created for the woman’s sake, but woman for the man’s sake."

I, for one, love this modern trend of women admitting they only see men as walking wallets. If having your own financial stability reduces your dating pool so severely that most women end up single, then you never really assigned value to love or companionship, it was always a covert financial transaction.

La dee dah, aren't we magnificent.

Excuse me, Miss, Is your back okay? You been patting yourself in the same spot for achieving basic adult mediocrity for a while now.

Aside from the nonsense she is spewing, her annoying voice and cadence is an automatic disqualifier. How many guys who banged her on a slow Tuesday quickly realized they didn't want to spend another 5 minutes in her presence?

The problem is finding someone whose presence would make our already good life better.

The problem is, there's only one Henry Cavill. The problem is, there is only zero men who can meet your standards. The problem is, the man whose presence would make your already good life better only exists in your imagination.

But do I actually like this man enough to build a life around him? And apparently, that question has resulted in a bit of a staffing shortage.

The question is, if this man actually did exist, why would this man who can live up to your standards even want you in the first place? What do you bring to the table, that he already doesn't bring to the table himself?

They have careers. They have apartments. They go on trips. They have hobbies. They have friends. They eat at fine restaurants.

They have so much. All these material things. They spend, spend, spend. Yet they are unhappy. Why? Women want to act like men, but women don't have what men have: a purpose. So they live their lives aimlessly, looking for a man who doesn't exist, in order to give them a purpose.

What's funny about the "staffing shortage" situation is that it is a direct result of men asking about women (in advance) the same question these women are allegedly asking about men.

And we know beyond all doubt men are asking the question first because men are the ones expected to initiate romance while women sit back and choose whatever poor schmuck fits their desires at the moment. Which means men literally have to do at minimum a risk assessment on whether or not her majesty is feeling receptive to an advance or not, and messing that up is a great way to cop harassment charges or worse.

So if the only candidate that women like this are getting are "unsuitable" this inherently means these women failed out of the application process early and don't even realize it because the role they have insisted on is entirely passive.

This is the drawback of being in the Chooser role - you only get what Performers are willing to show up and dance for your stale circus peanuts.

She is quite right. She cant find no man up to her standards. "OK Miss, so what is the problem here, why are you complaining? Men ain't no good for you. OK, next topic. You have more choice than any generation of women previously and you can't find what you want., well OK but can we change the subject please? cos I can't help you, neither can any of the other men out there."

You have just posted a job advert for a an extremely high calibre candidate and you are paying what? minimum wage if he is lucky and if you are in the mood. The advert also specifies provide own accommodation and pay your way, no expenses given. 99% chance it specifies as essential or desirable that you provide accommodation and expenses for the employer too. Cooking and laundry are the employee's responsibility too it says. On call 24/7 I see. Childcare will need to be provided too I see, if you decide to go that way at all. The job on offer is simply not worth the pay, so the candidates are not applying. This is not my problem. This is not the problem of any other man out there except perhaps your dad and only him because he can't help but worry. Its your problem. Either you offer a better deal or you stop advertising but don't complain. You are like