Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
Created by kevin32
Visit the WAATGM forum to view and post content.
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this tribe is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
- 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate tribe.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago
Public service message: If you enjoy the content, please consider posting this link to the Reddit version of WAATGM since I cannot. It drives more traffic to this site, such as myself, and that's how the content creation happens. Please do your part: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_7FaWnlhS4&t=10s
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 1d ago
Absolutely zero feminine polarity detected in this video
ogrilla99 Pez "The Pussy Dispenser" Pimp 1d ago
Staffing shortage. Is that what we're calling it now? At least it's more honest about what she's looking for: hired help.
She says that she is part of the first generation of women who can ask "does this man add something to my already great life?" BS. Every woman (or, in the past, her father / parents / family) asked that exact question. The only difference is what each generation of women categorize as those positive qualities. In the past, even if it was her father in an oppressive patriarchy making the decision for her, he was asking "does this man have good character? Is he able to take care of my daughter? Raise a good family that we would be proud of having my daughter join?"
Have the women of this generation come up with better questions? Or seek better answers? Well, the evidence is in the results: fewer marriages, higher divorce rate, fewer children, and most importantly, significantly lower levels of self-rated happiness in current generations compared to their mothers, with skyrocketing rates of antidepressants and antianxiety use.
What blows the mind of women like this is that men who are put together have the right to run the same analysis on the women out there: I'm not here to serve you. Are you someone who adds something to my already good life? I absolutely work to be someone who can be a positive in a woman's life, but I expect the same from my partner.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 5h ago
Usually, the rational response is to offer higher pay and/or benefits instead of whining into a camera about the lack of decent applicants.
...come to think of it, seeing how some employers go on business news networks to whine about the lack of good applicants, the answer "be a better employer" never enters their minds either. And the interviewer never says "No, there are workers out there, they just don't want to work for you. You can't offer minimum wage and expect Dr. von Braun to show up in a lab coat to build Apollo rockets."
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago
The strong-and-independent woman trope means they regard men as WORTHLESS on our own. They need to get something from us and regard a relationship with men as a burden, by default. Yet even so, they'll still need men to "protect" them or "provide" to "feel" safe but don't expect even base gratitude because that will require submission or even an entitlement, for the man.
And that's feminism in a nutshell isn't it? A society that is based upon entitlement for women without obligations.
Even so, the best they can do is sure, they can be proud they can pay their own apartment bills or even go to expensive restaurants but that carries about as much bragging rights as us bragging we can whack off to porn.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1d ago
We're bringing back the oppressive patriarchy in this family, and yes, those questions are very much on my mind.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1d ago
The perverse burden of our culture of excess wealth has produced a generation of worthless women.
They cannot do anything their grandmothers did, they kill their own children, they slave away in careers trying to be men, they take anti-depressants by the truckload while claiming to be happy.
This woman is trying to move the goalposts of what a successful woman looks like in the modern era. But the standard hasn't changed. Women still have only two jobs in life. Women still know what these jobs are in every culture and nation. Women still rate each other by their ability to do these jobs. And women who don't measure up in these areas still seethe with bitterness and resentment (and then cry themselves to sleep) when a woman with nine children and an intact, loving marriage walks into the room.
Women know this deep down. But rather than try to reverse course, most double down like the good SJWs they are.
You want to pretend like you don't need a man, like you're just totally happy being a career girl for life, self-sufficient and rich? Go ahead. Women like you make absolutely horrible wives anyway. It's sad, but more sad for you in the long run, because you cannot fulfill your role as a woman without a husband. By definition, you cannot be successful, and you will learn this the painful way.
"For man does not originate from woman, but woman from man; for indeed man was not created for the woman’s sake, but woman for the man’s sake."
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 19h ago
The male rogue characters of Romancing the Stone and Tangled both dreamed of riches so they could enjoy lives in luxury, alone. It also reminds me of Indiana Jones: https://youtu.be/zi5Z6rNU9Hw?list=RDzi5Z6rNU9Hw&t=124
It's amusing that both of them are similar to Strong and Independent Women, yes? This was a movie romance dream and part of American materialist culture. A successful man could do as he pleased unburdened by social "gentleman" constraints. He certainly wasn't going to take care of crying babies in the middle of the night.
These movie genres then have the man "falling" in love via serendipitous circumstances and near death adventure!
These women are oxycotin junkies. They want men who are going to "sweep them off their feet" but yet, unlike Luke Skywalker who left home because his caretakers were tragically murdered, they aren't going to undermine their comfortable bourgeois lifestyle.
They don't "get it" that this is a MOVIE FANTASY. A trope. A joke, even.
They also lack empathy and basic adult common sense to consider that the kind of man their hypergamy finds acceptable doesn't "need" her either. Note that in Tangled and Romancing the Stone, the women's presence offered HIM hypergamous riches.
Everpax Jr. Hamster Analyst 22h ago
I, for one, love this modern trend of women admitting they only see men as walking wallets. If having your own financial stability reduces your dating pool so severely that most women end up single, then you never really assigned value to love or companionship, it was always a covert financial transaction.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 18h ago
La dee dah, aren't we magnificent.
PoopBeast Jr. Hamster Analyst 18h ago
Excuse me, Miss, Is your back okay? You been patting yourself in the same spot for achieving basic adult mediocrity for a while now.
JudgeSmales Jr. Hamster Analyst 15h ago
Aside from the nonsense she is spewing, her annoying voice and cadence is an automatic disqualifier. How many guys who banged her on a slow Tuesday quickly realized they didn't want to spend another 5 minutes in her presence?
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 7h ago
The problem is, there's only one Henry Cavill. The problem is, there is only zero men who can meet your standards. The problem is, the man whose presence would make your already good life better only exists in your imagination.
The question is, if this man actually did exist, why would this man who can live up to your standards even want you in the first place? What do you bring to the table, that he already doesn't bring to the table himself?
They have so much. All these material things. They spend, spend, spend. Yet they are unhappy. Why? Women want to act like men, but women don't have what men have: a purpose. So they live their lives aimlessly, looking for a man who doesn't exist, in order to give them a purpose.