Visit the WAATGM forum to view and post content.
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this tribe is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
- 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate tribe.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Content Archive:
Related forums:

polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 17h ago
Public service message: If you enjoy the content, please consider posting this link to the Reddit version of WAATGM since I cannot. It drives more traffic to this site, such as myself, and that's how the content creation happens. Please do your part: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlC5DEp2EOQ
I used to surf near this location myself. Warm water near the power plant turbine discharge. If you "get" my reference, please don't squeal it out due to Rule 4. Thanks!
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 14h ago
Um, ok...
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 5h ago
Just after posting, I zoomed in on the unedited photo and observed she has a nose ring that was obfuscated by the sunlight angle. Pity, I try to keep that detail in but, like, we all know it was there don't we?
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 13h ago
The more arbitrary hurdles a woman lists off, the less and less she is worth jumping over all of them.
And that's before considering her age, or the grammar and shitty tats that just scream low class trash.
Oh and the stupid body piercing in her chest that is practically guaranteed to catch on any clothing that doesn't leave her tits out to flop all over the place like a strip show sponsored by the AARP.
MentORPHEUS TRP Endorsed 8h ago
Rofl... my reaction to all that tatted skin exposed to the harsh poolside UV flux: if this is her at 40, by the time she reaches 50 she won't look a day over 70...
Heaviuh_Things 10h ago
Also the incongruency: why care so much about all of that, including my income after taxes, when all she is after something "casual"? At 40 years of age, no less...
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 9h ago
Same reason she has her tits on display probably. Quote somewhat related:
Even if she's not officially a whore by formal occupation, she likely is a form of one by circumstance and action.
I ain't even mad if a woman is a outright whore. I get mad when she's not honest about it. Because that usually also involves getting charged more than her services are worth. Like someone trying to pass off a lemon only fit for salvage as a working car.
PoopBeast Jr. Hamster Analyst 12h ago
I like where it says "Exact match: this person meets all your preferences"
Why thanks, generic dating app X! Job well done. You can kick back, take it easy now. This is exactly what I was looking for!
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 11h ago
Is it possible that she couldn't even be bothered to cut the ex /cuck out of the picture? What does the guy with the chest tattoo lying next to her think of this?
How lazy and entitled can you be?
I think she probably wants casual because she has other cucks on a string.
mustangfrank1 Sr. Hamster Analyst 11h ago
All that is missing from her demands is a pony and a Ferrari. WTF?
NPC070201 10h ago
Yikes and yikes. Hard pass.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 6h ago
I used to drive a Subaru. It was a sturdy car which didn't give me many mechanical problems and handled well in winter conditions. What's her problem? It's not pricey enough?
Would an Oldsmobile be a bigger turn-on? How about a Kia Sportage? Would a Mazda 121 be better?
Seriously, I don't understand this list of demands from this rapidly-aging poultry who seems obsessed with your socioeconomic status and brand-consciousness above all else.
I dunno about you, but when I want to just casually meet somebody, I totally care about what type of sedan they drive, their child support obligations and tax bracket.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 5h ago
Gotta ask: How many of the other items on the checklist do you have? 1 point each.
I have a dear jarhead friend who surfed at her location but he didn't have any of the other criteria (on the contrary, his ex had to pay HIM child support!)
She really is out to not repeat her "mistakes". Turn tables? Is that a red flag?
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 3h ago
I fucking love my Carollas!
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1h ago
She would probably look down on a man for having a Suzuki Sidekick despite those being pretty decent vehicles from what I understand, and based on her appearance far better than what she could afford herself with legally obtained funds.
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 4h ago
Military chick. In the same category as women in nursing, or the police. You know what I mean.
Roman numerals convert to 2004 - 2011 - which coincidentally comes up as a Black Metal norwegian band "Tsjuder" (Reference: https://music.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL2Nk4QJF-SVczA26d1NgQeGx_J5r2-UyP)
Or maybe she just has it to commemorate her barrack whoring, who knows. She fucked a bunch of military dudes, now has them on the "ick" list. Every item on that "do not apply if you are" requirement screed is what her past was - porn-addicted military DJs who love guns and drive Subarus. (lol)
That is a trainwreck from outer space, man. Better nuke it from orbit, just to be sure.
JudgeSmales Jr. Hamster Analyst 3h ago
Tell us you've got a repeatedly-excavated cavern between your legs without saying it. She should leave the dating apps alone and just move straight to a gunrack full of fist-sized dildos, if she hasn't already.
TJMS 2h ago
It's quite possible she's pricing herself out of the market intentionally, as an ego-cope for her dwindling SMV.