Visit the WAATGM forum to view and post content.
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this tribe is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
- 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate tribe.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Content Archive:
Related forums:

polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2h ago
Public service message: If you enjoy the content, please consider posting this link to the Reddit version of WAATGM since I cannot. It drives more traffic to this site, such as myself, and that's how the content creation happens. Please do your part: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlC5DEp2EOQ
@Typo-MAGAshiv (barely) qualifies for Rule 5 (seeking commitment) since she wants a "relationship".
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2h ago
...anymore.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 26m ago
Back when dinosaurs roamed the earth, I noticed it dried up career women's panties to mention I was dating with intent for marriage. I wasn't dropping it to sound "chivalrous" or anything like that, but simply a statement of my own desire and ethics. I knew guys growing up who got girls knocked up so I didn't want to sleep with someone I wouldn't want to marry (unless she was a professional, of course.)
Her paradigm (was) this: She wanted a hot boi party clown to entertain her. Some bad boy so she gets excited. Then after a couple of months or exactly 1.2 years, HE brings up marriage of course (after she drops subtle hints) and he "insists" they go out and look at diamonds and then he "surprises" her.
Sheesh! This modern rom-com thinking of women makes the pizza guy who gets a hot chick to give him head in exchange for her not paying for the pizza porno seem realistic by comparison.
Here's a great analysis for why rom-coms are more stupid than porn: https://youtu.be/9qHeMuztXjU
Not only that, but she likely doesn't make any "effort". Effort also dries up their panties. So the guys who pass her passive-aggressive shit tests likely pass because they really only want sex from her.
So my point being is that even if the perfect beta bucks were to reach out to her, and pass her shit tests, she'd likely still next him and then complain.
PoopBeast Jr. Hamster Analyst 48m ago
"How do people actually get into relationships?"
Well, historically by men doing all the legwork and being willing to brave rejection for women that they used to assume were worth it.