• Register
  • Sign In
  • Main Forums
  • What's Hot
  • TRP.RED
  • Tribe Forums
  • TheRedPill
  • Tribe Management
  • Create New Tribe
  • Manage My Tribes
  • Find New Tribes
  • Recent News
    • Forums in BETA!
      Visit our Development Updates tribe to discuss redesign, features, or bugs!
Sort By Hot
  • Hot Score
  • Newest Comments
  • Old Comments
  • Top Comments

Forums.Red / WhereAreAllTheGoodMen / Single Woman Tears

I can't even find a man who has mutual feelings for me to take me to dinner.
9

polishknight

Posted 1y ago in Single Woman Tears - Permalink - Locked - 11.9K Views



Permalink
    
Permalink
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago Stickied

Mod note:

Re-flaired as "single woman tears"; here's the writeup on the "early bird" flair.

5
    
Permalink
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago

I appreciate that. I thought 26 was right on the cusp plus her general demeanor (and dating since 14 or so :-)

6
    
Permalink
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago

She sounds fat/so visibly ran thru and damaged that of course Trust Fund Thaddeus ain't having none of that.

Maybe Bitch-Icarus should stop trying to fly so close to the sun.

11
    
Permalink
Impressive-Cricket-8 Founding member of FapGPT 1y ago

Bitch-Icarus

I love this forum.

4
    
Permalink
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago

...and we wish you weren't such an insufferable bitch, but there you go.

Seems your friends have no trouble, hmm, what is that elusive denominator pointing to. Oh right, accountability isn't your strong suit.

9
    
Permalink
wswZtyqNGQ 1y ago

This is what always happens when women fuck out of their league. If only they had listened to Omar:

Eh, a lesson here bae: you come at the king you best not miss.

6
    
Permalink
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1y ago

The problem most of these women have is that if a woman want a king she needs to be a queen.

Too many scullery wenches think they’re queens.

Any 26 year old woman can get male attention. Any 26 year old woman who takes care of herself can get a lot of male attention. If she’s not doing that, that’s on her. If she takes care of herself and also cultivates a feminine demeanor she can get a lot of attention from high MMV men. If she’s not doing that, that’s also on her.

In short: the common factor in all of her problems is her. At 26, she’s at the tipping point where the power dynamic for relationships shifts from female-advantage to male-advantage. By being in situationships that went nowhere from 14-26, she squandered her time in the catbird seat, and going forward she’s the one who has to make the effort: she’s a seller in a buyer’s market.

That’s likely to require a major attitude adjustment on her part, and my guess is that she has a lot of work to do before she has any chance at all.

In short, she has to do four very hard things that she’s probably never done before. 1) She has to make the changes to turn herself into the kind of woman that high MMV men want. Depending on how undesirable she is, that may take a lot of time. 2). She has to take a serious inventory of her own MMV, which includes a realistic assessment of what she brings to the table as well as the weight of her baggage. Inherent in that is the requirement to realistically compare herself to her competition. 3) She has to adjust her expectations of what she can get with regard to men. She’s not going to get a man with significantly higher MMV than hers. 4) She has to get used to being the one to initiate rather than “putting herself out there” and passively waiting for high MMV men to approach her. That means she has to get used to what we’ve all experienced as men: lots of rejection.

9
    
Permalink
oowiw Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago

then I met someone I really liked, but of course with my luck, he didn’t like me at all

You’re right, she is inserting luck into a simple league differential - she imagines that there is no connection between her really liking him (dating up) and him not liking her at all (dating down).

His treatment of her is showing her that she’s not in his league, and that’s too painful a thought to bear, so her brain short circuits it with the idea of “luck.”

7
    
Permalink
Maturin_nj 1y ago

For many guys, the power never shifts. Those usually infused with BP dogmas.

They rarely adjust their attitude. I always required a really good attitude from the start. Hugely important and not mentioned enough. Hags in their 50s and 60s have the same demanding attitudes and expectations. 50s and 60s have checklists lol.

6
    
Permalink
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago

The problem most of these women have is that if a woman want a king she needs to be a queen.

They're also forgetting another important fact: "the queen is just the kings bitch" - Patrice O'Neal.

8
    
Permalink
Einsamer 1y ago

At 26, she’s at the tipping point where the power dynamic for relationships shifts from female-advantage to male-advantage

I don't think so. I think the tipping point nowadays is really 30 for many, with some exceptions (like those that excessively drink, sunbath and age quicker). At 30 the decline is already in progress, but 30 is also hitting the girls mentally AND technically (cause many men set filters on apps for below 30 on apps).

So if she's struggling with 26 then 30 will be her total doom. I doubt she will recover.

PS @ admins: please fix your (most likely) PHP code. It just cuts off my reply when I use a "greater-than" character. I wanted to say less-than-30 and used that character and the rest of my text disappeared.

PPS: please don't use PHP. It sucks.

4
    
Permalink
redpillschool Everybody tag him 1y ago

I didn't have any trouble with adding > nor < >

1
    
Permalink
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago

It's not PHP, it's an archaic text editor using something like wiki markup.

3
    
Permalink
redpillschool Everybody tag him 1y ago

We use Mark down with the same syntax as Reddit.

3
    
Permalink
redpillschool Everybody tag him 1y ago

Actually the issue might be if you start a line with > we do use markdown here. Greater than starts a quote.

This is a quote with a preceding >

2
    
Permalink
Einsamer 1y ago

Let me try that. I'm gonna write "apps for below 30 on apps" with the greater-than symbol here: apps for

1
    
Permalink
Einsamer 1y ago

Yep, see - it's getting cut off. Even the word before the symbol gets cut off. And it also wasn't starting a line.

1
    
Permalink
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago

PS @ admins: please fix your (most likely) PHP code. It just cuts off my reply when I use a "greater-than" character. I wanted to say less-than-30 and used that character and the rest of my text disappeared.

PPS: please don't use PHP. It sucks

Tag @redpillschool - this nerdtalk is directed at you

4
    
Permalink
redpillschool Everybody tag him 1y ago

It should accept < these > just fine.

1
    
Permalink
redpillschool Everybody tag him 1y ago

And it did. I'm not sure what he's talking about

1
    
Permalink
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago

Beats me, breh

You all are speaking Nerdglish

3
    
Permalink
Einsamer 1y ago

It should accept < these > just fine.

1
    
Permalink
Einsamer 1y ago

Funny. it does. It should accept

1
    
Permalink
Einsamer 1y ago

So when the < symbol is followed by the number 30 (or probably any number) without a space it happens that it disappears.

1
    
Permalink
Einsamer 1y ago

One more try: test

1
    
Permalink
Einsamer 1y ago

Yeah, so what I did is to write "< b > test < / b >" without spaces and as expected, it probably filters that out to prevent html injection. But it should instead replace it by "& g t ;" (without spaces).

Aha: this is also how I can write >30 now. :-)

2
    
Permalink
[deleted]
1
    
Permalink
redpillschool Everybody tag him 1y ago

Yeah that's likely what's happening. We filter html out first, and then convert special chars to html representations of chars ( i.e. & g t ; ). Anything resembling an html tag would be removed before converting to special html codes.

After that, we parse it for reddit-style markdown, which can lead to some unexpected outcomes.

I'll ask the dev if it's wise to switch to convert to special chars first, then it would solve your problem. My understanding is that it would also print html tags in readable (but not executable) form, which isn't dangerous. I suppose that would help if somebody wanted to discuss html .. like NERDS!

2
    
Permalink
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago

NEEEEEERRRDS!

1
    
Permalink
oowiw Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago

Theory: preselection is the reason she envies her friends’ relationships and yet can’t bring herself to date similar level guys.

When Brad is on Jennifer’s arm he’s preselected, she sees Brad and goes “why can’t I have a relationship and a boyfriend like that.”

Then when she meets or accidentally swipes on Brad, sans Jennifer’s preselection, she goes “ugh if he’s all that’s available I’ll try again another time.”

This would explain how women whose friends are of similar MV simultaneously want what they see with their friends, but reject guys equivalent to their friends’ guys.

A less charitable alternative would be she secretly thinks she’s better than her friends and settling on an equivalent level guy would collapse that fantasy.

Finally we can add the problem all gamblers face - the longer the losing streak the bigger the win has to be to finally end on. If a Chad finally picks her to settle down it will all be worth it, she can retroactively make up for her losses and then some. So she stays at the table; maybe even looks for stuff she can pawn to keep pursuing the win that will make it all better - that will change her self image from tragically behind to a genius all along. (I can relate to this feeling as an entrepreneur.)

10
    
Permalink
houseoftolstoy Unchivalrous Christian 1y ago

You are not wrong about preselection playing a role, as I recall there was a study that showed women having more interest in a man when they found out he was married. Though I will argue that many of the taken men are indeed succeeding since they are just overall more attractive on average in the dating market. If a man is a catch and wants to have a relationship, he will have less difficulties finding one than the man who is not.

7
    
Permalink
Pic889 1y ago

Finally we can add the problem all gamblers face - the longer the losing streak the bigger the win has to be to finally end on.

This, again, this explains why single moms add more and more stuff to their list of requirements as they age. They more they screw up their lives, the more requirements the mythical AlphaBucks Chad who's just a swipe away has to meet so they won't have to admit that they got taken for a ride by the roulette. Problem is, you can't beat the house, you can only stop the loss before it's too late.

6
    
Permalink
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago

And the House is Mother Nature and Mother Nature isn't a feminist.

6
    
Permalink
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago

nature is a tool of the patriarchy!

5
    
Permalink
sean_karaya Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago

What was the thing women tell us? That is we valued female friendship, there will be no friendzone lalalala?

Now is your time to value male friendship?

Also what happened to the bears? Why dont you ask them for mutual feelings?

10
    
Permalink
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago

What caught my eye about this one is she claims to have been in 2 long term relationships since (calculated) the age of 16.

When women shame chads such as Leonardo DiCaprio dating 19 year olds is "women that young don't have their brains fully developed yet" but yet they are given the keys to the kingdom when most insurance companies wouldn't trust them to drive a car.

This is why, in the past, dating was heavily chaperoned by the parents (usually at home) or they were required to go out on group dates. it was tough for teens to wait to have sex but they were expected to hold out at least until the late teens or early 20's.

What changed with "the pill" was the notion of having serial monogamy (at least at first): It became the norm for young women to have sex with someone they weren't engaged to because they were expected to get married after finishing college presumably to someone else. Serious dating, where a man wasn't considered to date a daughter unless it was clear they wouldn't mind him as a future son-in-law was vetoed as "too controlling".

It's from these hook-ups that the army of single mothers have arisen from: From relationships that would have been utterly verboten 50 years ago. These truths have been long forgotten by most. It's just "normal" now for most young women to ride a CC, even a slow one, until their mid-20's or later.

9
    
Permalink
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1y ago

the age of 16.

It’s even worse than that. She says that she’s been “single” for two years (in reality she’s been single her entire life), and that’s after two “long” term relationships that lasted a total of ten years. Since she’s 26 now, that means that she started seriously dating at 14.

The typical 14 year old girl can’t divide compound fractions, yet the OP was already in a multi-year relationship.

8
    
Permalink
oowiw Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago

First relationship was probably HS sweetheart, ended around the start of undergrad.

Second relationship probably started sometime in undergrad, ended sometime around the end of grad school and entry into the labor market.

4
    
Permalink
Maturin_nj 1y ago

Perhaps they're starting to catch on that men aren't marrying anymore. Young men have been schooled in the manosphere on the pitfalls of marriage. Some of these women are in the dark ages thinking young men of today are as stupid as their boomer dads.

9
    
Permalink
BobbingForBunions Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago

For generations, women were considered the prize. Men felt lucky to marry them.

Men have since wised up. They've begun to ask an important question:

"Do the benefits of marrying this person outweigh the risks related to my money, time, freedom, mental health, and reputation?"

7
    
Permalink
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago

Until about 200 years or so ago when chivalrous entitlement of women was catching on, and even up to about 60 years or so ago, it was marriageable men that were treated with respect and value. "Nice guy" traits that are mocked today were well valued back then because they were recognized as rare. Not all men could afford to support a wife to stay at home all day or were even "marriageable". Not only that, but women back then were properly educated about The Wall and how women over 25 had a significant disadvantage on the dating market.

Marriage was valued because the majority of women did not have sex outside of it. Many hotels didn't rent to unmarried couples and even in the 1980's, some apartment buildings offered marriage discounts. Early socialist (different than today's socialism) enacted polices where companies resisted laying off married men so that families wouldn't suffer hardship. (Watch the Natalie Wood film "This Property Is Condemned")

We have a family friend whose daughter is about 27 and she had lived with a guy for 5 years or so before breaking it off. He didn't want to marry. Why should he? He didn't risk a divorce and he was enjoying all of the benefits.

7
    
Permalink
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1y ago

Some time in the late 80s my wife and I went to check into a hotel, and the lady behind the desk (the proprietress, I assumed) gave us the side eye and asked us if we were married. We were, but I got the distinct impression that she wouldn’t have rented us a room if we had said that we were not.

(FWIW: I don’t wear a wedding ring.)

That struck me as odd even then, but it was in a small town in flyover country.

6
    
Permalink
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago

Funny flyover story to share: I had a crazy redhead attorney girlfriend back in 1993 and she was traveling through Arkansas on the way to Branson and needed to fax something. So she stopped in Hope or something like that and asked a woman: "Could you tell me where there's a fax machine?" and the woman responded (southern accent) "What's a fax machine?" and she said "It's a machine you put in documents and it sends them to somewhere else" and the girl responded: "Oh, you must need western union. There's one around the corner."

4
    
Permalink
pancakesforbreakfast 1y ago

Everything she says is rationalization of someone who wants to have her cake and eat it too.

If she ACTUALLY wanted a relationship, she would change herself and her expectations. Instead she follows her feelings like a blind bat, and hopes to have a convenient boyfriend who is there to take care of her feelings while still living life like a party girl.

Sorry, that only works when you're in college and hot.

7
    
Permalink
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago

she would change herself and her expectations

self-improvement is a tool of the patriarchy!

5
    
Permalink
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago

What caught my eye is how she doesn't even think about being a wife and mother. Terms like SO(significant other), partner, etc are all ways of avoiding objective reality.

8
    
Permalink
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago

"I just want to find my person!"

What, not a husband?!

8
    
Permalink
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago

May as well be saying my slave. Because that's what their rhetoric stinks like, it's akin to a mid 1800's plantation owner absolutely aghast that men dare to aspire to be something other an unpaid servant.

8
    
Permalink
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago

Men are these (privileged) ATM machine bodyguards who get the privilege of conditional sex with such women provided, of course, she "likes" him. She needs the "chemistry" of course.

I liken this mindset they have with the classical porno movie premise: A gorgeous pizza delivery girl knocks on the door and a guy answers it and says he doesn't have any money to tip her. She says that's ok and she'll give him the pizza for free if he has sex with her where she does everything possible to please him.

It's the ultimate fantasy, isn't it? I think of heaven being this place with harps and chatting up your ancestors but for me, I'd want to go through all those scenarios.

6
    
Permalink
PoopBeast Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago

No explanation for why she's not interested in the guys who are interested in her. None of the relevant details someone would need in order to help her, and therefore no chance of any actual outcome in response to her post. Just a standard, unadulterated, boo-hoo-fest to strangers on the Internet...

...God, women are tiresome...

9
    
Permalink
houseoftolstoy Unchivalrous Christian 1y ago

That would require some introspection and a realistic self assessment, which can be difficult for those who just want to be a victim. She is just upset that she cannot get what she wants, and would rather hold out for an unrealistic standard instead of coming to terms with her own standings in the dating market.

7
    
Permalink
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago

She acts like a dude, and then complains that masculine men don't want to date her. I wonder why...

6
    
Permalink
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago

of course with my luck

I guess you're just not lucky. Better step aside and let the lucky girls play the game.

7
    
Permalink
houseoftolstoy Unchivalrous Christian 1y ago

I can't even find a man who has mutual feelings for me to take me to dinner.

All I get are the guys I have no interest in.

Classic case of the woman aiming too high and having her singleness self imposed because she is not willing to go work with the guys who are showing interest. Everyone who finds themselve in this scenario regardless if they are a man or a woman needs to ask themselves questions such as:

Am I attractive enough to those I find attractive? If not, why, and can I change it so that I am more attractive?

Am I too unreasonable with my standards and expectations?

Answering these questions can either put you on the path of self improvement or on the path of pragmatism in how you approach seeking relationships. Not addressing these questions in any way just means you are most likely to repeat the same mistakes over and over and end up perpetually single like this woman.

5
    
Permalink
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1y ago

The real key to success is to combine self improvement with pragmatism. As men, we know that because - from a very young age - we have no choice but to live it (or accept the consequences of not doing so).

It’s different for women because during their formative years they can get away with not doing either. The epiphany comes when the power dynamic shifts from female-advantage to male-advantage in their late 20s. That’s when people shift from seeking fun experiences to seeking marriage. Since women are the gatekeepers of sex and men are the gatekeepers of relationships, many women aren’t faced with the consequences of their lack of self improvement and pragmatism until they are well along the path to spinsterhood.

I can understand why the Epiphany Phase is so shocking to the ones who waited too long.

6
    
Permalink
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago

Her post is amusing in that she (thinks) she demonstrates a limited pragmatism. Quote "I'd rather have a great bf who forgot to call me for the hour". She probably hears her friends bellyache about such petty nonsense but that's what married women do (ahem, I know this personally...). Women love to find things to gripe about because it's a power move for them among their friend cliques. "She complains about these things showing she's finding ways to keep the man on the defensive. That's what HVW do!"

If my wife ever STOPS nagging and being always nice to me, that's when I check my tea for polonium.

So if the perfect guy appeared, she wouldn't bitch if he went an hour without calling her (at least for the first year or so). Take THAT Mother Theresa!

On the other hand, she's still griping about not getting paid dinner dates. They might (yuck!) ask her out for coffee! The horrors!

It's like a porno where a hot girl knocks on your door and offers you a free pizza if you are willing to have sex with her and you check out the pizza and... it's Papa Johns. Sorry, I have standards.

6
    
Permalink
wswZtyqNGQ 1y ago

If my wife ever STOPS nagging and being always nice to me, that's when I check my tea for polonium.

A day without constant systematic emotional abuse is a dreaded day. - Husbands

I can't even...

I just can't...

Fuck humanity!

4
    
Permalink
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago

I understand and if someone told me 20 years ago what I signed up for, I may not have gone through with it. That said, I wouldn't undo it: She has given me a lovely daughter and has remained committed to the marriage, earns a living, and works hard around the house. Part of her nagging is due to her high work ethic: She can't relax. On the other hand, I have friends whose wives were, er, the relaxing type and they divorced their husbands looking to suck them dry with alimony and child-support.

In other words, it's tough to find what our fathers back in the 1970's supposedly had, yes? Loyal, obedient women who mostly kept their mouths shut, working hard in the home, and even worked part-time?

I know from my own parents they bickered ALL THE TIME, worse than my wife, right up to my father's death at 67. The "true" "traditional" wives, I think, ended perhaps back around say 1940 or so with the advent of going-out dating. When women expected to be wined and dined and treated like "ladies" is when this whole mess brewed.

I only have second-hand stories, but my grandmother who was married in 1930 was supposedly ultra obedient to her husband.

If you want a laugh, watch The Jetsons where it portrays futuristic life with George Jetson working 14 hours a week (and his wife complaining about it), Jane would go shopping at the mall all day while she had a robot maid (with a rather, er, problematic accent) do all of her chores. They lived in a sort of home in the sky. It's amusing that the feminists who were in the upper privileges of housewifery thought of this as oppression.

3
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

Created By kevin32

Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.


706 Members

Public Tribe

Unsubscribed
Post to WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
Chatroom
TRP.RED Tribe

WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar

We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.

In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.

Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.

But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.

Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.

The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.


Rules of conduct:

  • 1. No shaming men for any reason.

  • 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.

  • 3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.

  • 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.

Rules for submission:

  • 5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)

  • 5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)

  • 6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.

  • 7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.

  • 8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.

  • 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.

Recommended reading:

  • Understanding The Purpose of WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

  • Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards

  • OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone

  • Mate Selection for Modernity: Studies show that the more a woman achieves and the higher her expectations grow, the lesser the pool of eligible mates available to her.

  • r/FemaleDatingStrategy advises women to delay sex with good men but freely give themselves to fuckboys

  • Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society

  • Dalrock - They’re back in your 20s where you left them.

  • Kevin Samuels - You're Average At Best

  • Paul Elam - Where the Good Men Went

  • Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me

  • WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.

  • Michael's Story

  • u/where_muh_good_mens' Story

  • "What Happened to All the Nice Guys?"

  • Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.

  • Feminism has succeeded

  • Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore

  • Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?

  • "I’m 43 and Alone – Can I Find a Good Man?"

  • To The Guy I Left In The Friend Zone For Too Long

  • To The Man Who Will Love Me Next

  • The Truth Behind the Increasing Social and Economic Disparity of Modern Society and Why Good Men Are The First To Leave

  • The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market

  • Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel

  • The Life Story of Carol

  • Memes

  • Complete list of resources here.

Link Flair:

  • The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"

  • Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.

  • Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.

  • Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.

  • Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.

  • Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.

  • New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.

Content Archive:

  • https://theredarchive.com/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

Related forums:

  • WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
Back to Top © 2025 Forums.RED All Right Reserved | Page generated in 0.0226 seconds.