Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
- Main Forums
- What's Hot
- TRP.RED
- Tribe Forums
- TheRedPill
- Tribe Management
- Create New Tribe
- Manage My Tribes
- Find New Tribes
- Recent News
-
-
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. about a month ago
OP @NewReligionOfSociology and anyone else: for future reference, when it comes to articles, we strongly prefer an archived link via archive.is so that everyone can read it in its entirety rather than just screenshots.
In fact, it's even specified in the rules. Here's rule 7 in its entirety, with what's relevant to this post in bold:
I'll leave this up, partly because we've featured the full article before and partly because of the comments so far, but we will be removing future posts featuring articles that are just incomplete screenshots rather than archived links.
CC: @moorekom, @Kevin32, @lurkerhasarisen, @Woodsmoke, @houseoftolstoy (I haven't seen anyone else active recently; if any of you have, please tag them in a reply).
Comment Stickied by Moderator
Loneliness-inc LvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ about a month ago
Agreed
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla about a month ago
@land_of_the_losers
Lone_Ranger about a month ago
CT is one of the most beautiful women in the world. Lets leave aside the fact that she is 47 for now, because there are lots of men about her age, that don't want to have children. Maybe they already have a few and are now divorced and are single. So why is the one of the most beautiful women in the world, also rich and successful, not able to get a date? Is it because men are useless and do not have any balls? Again, I'm going to say ignore the age issue, because there is no reason why a woman of 47 can't be great looking and great in bed. I speak with experience. It's not the age thing.
No. Its because nobody that she wants wants her. KS said it best - "The kind of men that you want don't want you". Here is something that CT said in her own words in an interview;
"“I feel like I’m in a place in my life where you gotta come with a lot of game,” she said. “Not the kind of game that we think of. The kind of game that’s like: ‘My life is really good, so you better be able to bring that and maybe better,’ because I just won’t accept anything less.”
This is the age old SIW delusion - she is rich and successful so she thinks that she is entitled to a rich and successful man. The penny has not dropped. Rich and successful men do not want demanding, nagging, confrontational, masculine, argumentative, egotistical women. We would much rather have a woman that was average to nice looking but was submissive.
As a moderately successful and wealthy man of 52, and I had a choice between
a) Charlize, rich and successful, total pain in the ass, controlling, demanding, my way of the highway OR b) Average looking, average body woman that was submissive, pleasant to be around, supportive, non-argumentative, non-confrontational, romantic, etc
I would pick b) every time.
TLDR: She has morphed into a man. The men that want men already have a great market to choose from, its called the gay lifestyle. There are zero men that want what she has, and she is still blaming men for this situation.
Comment Stickied by Moderator
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed about a month ago
Sad part is she could still get a committed man even in her present state if she simply dated on her level.
The catch is she is unable/unwilling to admit what her level really is. And that the vast majority of men, including those that she looks down at, are actually far above her right now.
Even without her glaring fuckups at the being an attractive woman game, one simply has only to look at census data per age group and realize that by around 30-35 years old, more women are alive than men which means that absent all other considerations (thus steelmanning their situation), women over 30 are in the realm of needing to compete for men instead of the other way around, but most grossly fail to realize it because they spent the first 30 years being coddled massively when it comes to sexual dynamics in society.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed about a month ago
(Minor) quibble: Such women aren't really "men" but rather a "toxic masculinity" type of man that women gripe about. Successful woman hypergamy can be equated to a successful man who dates "down" and then insists the woman sign an iron-clad pre-nup where she gets ZILCH from the relationship other than being with him. Yet, many of them wind up voluntarily joining chad harems rather than date down and then collectively blame men as "all like that".
There was this weekend content a few months ago where this woman griped that the successful man she dated expected her to pay for her own economy class ticket to go on vacations with him while he sat up front. Some guys griped "If you're seeing someone, you should share with them" but if the roles were reversed, this woman wouldn't see him to begin with or she'd expect him to foot the bills for dates even if he earned less than her. My position: If she doesn't like it, date a poorer man.
CT's quote above is almost literal hypergamy (equal or MORE than me) meaning that the man is in a constant competition with her. Heck, if he's supportive of her, he may wind up with her not "feeling" anything more for him after she "levels up" in the vernacular of that mindset. She also illustrates that she values men's companionship at literal zero since she'd rather remain alone than give even one erg of energy more to a productive relationship.
Such women define "man up" as serving her interests. In this post-modern post-chivalrous era, "man up" will increasingly mean asserting our leadership rights including women no longer defining our masculinity for us.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed about a month ago
Haha it could be worse for her, she could only get to be the hole he smashes while he is town, and would not even get an invite to go wherever, much less even told about his plans. So many women take that deal because they are too enslaved to their hypergamy to date on their actual level and end up eventually getting tossed/replaced.
Like, ladies, if you can't even get a concubine/mistress spot with a guy, perhaps one is flying a little too close to the sun? Maybe fly a bit lower before your wings melt and you drown in the ocean?
sean_karaya about a month ago
I must have serious problems then. She looks like a short haired lesbian
Lone_Ranger about a month ago
Yeah, she has done the hollywood thing of making herself as ugly as possible to men, because all straight white men are pigs, so if they like you, that must mean that you are tool of the patriarchy. So... its no longer ok to be attractive to straight white men. But have a look at pictures of CT before she drank the feminazi Kool-aid. She was blessed with the most extraordinary genes. She could have had any man that she wanted. But no, she choose to morph into a whining little bitch-man, a synthetic gay man and purchase some children from the third world.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed about a month ago
20-25 years ago she was stupid hot. One can get a lot of mileage out of youth and a body that still has glow and elasticity, even with a short haircut.
She did not gather her rosebuds while she may, and this is the outcome. Now even long flowing hair would not save her.
GimmeTheUsual about a month ago
Its funny. Either women hit the wall and go invisible, or they turn into a man -- in terms of thinking guys like women because of their income, assets, etc...
We can't fuck your degree or your house/car, so it doesn't work out so well for them. She was hot, now HE'S not.
Lone_Ranger about a month ago
I bet you that while she was young and hot, she was completely unbearable. It's only partly their fault - the real reason why they are so insane is because we (men) and society in general makes them that way. They are given everything far to early and far too easily. Honestly, this is why I would encourage young men to avoid 'hot chicks'. They are just toxic.
Lone_Ranger about a month ago
You're correct, but it goes deeper than that. It's not just the fact that she is 47 and rich that she can't get a man. Women make this mistake all the time. They say things like 'Oh men are awful, they only want thin young women'. And they carry on moaning until they die alone with their cat, not understanding what men want. Here's what they need to understand:
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed about a month ago
Sure, I was mainly just pointing out that she wasted the very obvious value she had. Like I said, women can get a lot of mileage out of youth, assuming they use it wisely. She did not.
Or at best we do care about it, but in a different way than women do. We see a woman's wealth obtainment as an imputed demand instead of a benefit. Oh she makes 200K? Well you better make 300K+ or she's automatically going to treat you like shit, assuming she deigns to speak to you at all, etc.
It's like how every time a woman makes a point of stating her height, we know that she is wanting a man taller than her. Any manlets that commit the misogyny of being the same height as her may as well not be human.
Lone_Ranger about a month ago
It's always a useful exercise to reverse the genders, just to stress-test if this is reasonable.
Imagine if a MALE hollywood actor, aged 47, spent his 20s, 30s and 40s sleeping around, stating that he would never get married, didn't 'need a woman' and then as his looks faded and was not getting much work any more, started dressing as a woman, purchased two black kids from Africa and said that he was 'shocked' at how single he was. Imagine that this hollywood actor male also stated that women 'need to grow a pair of tits' and ask him out on a date.
I'll tell you what would happen if a male actor made those kind of disparaging remarks about the genitals of the opposite sex: he'd never work again. We live in a femocracy guys.
Loneliness-inc LvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ about a month ago
We haven't even met yet and already she's insulting my manhood.
We're off to a good start
DextroShade about a month ago
She's going to die alone, no man at her level wants her.
Lone_Ranger about a month ago
At her level? Dude, I don't think the garbage man wants her. (no disrespect at all to Sanitation workers). No dude wants her. I would rather switch teams than go out with her.
NewReligionOfSociology Jr. Hamster Analyst about a month ago
I liked this news item because it's such a clear-cut case of showing that when women shame men for supposedly not being marriage material, it is in fact their way of misleadingly expressing that they aren't being pursued, not a lack of male quality. This is often hidden in online discussions because people can lie about where fault lies, obviously.
Vermillion-Rx Jr. Hamster Analyst about a month ago
Now. This is just speculation, it's not like I have any basis for it or anything reasonable like that.
But maybe chopping off all your feminine locks to look like an androgynous trans boy lugging around another man's kids (adopted or not) might be a deal-breaker for high value men
Lone_Ranger about a month ago
Adopted? I think not - those are purchased. Adoption agencies in the west almost never give children to adopting parents that are a) unmarried and b) don't already have children. The interests of the child come first - so the adoption agencies in the west will always preference a stable family background - which means that a married couple that already has 2 children will be first in line to be able to adopt a child.
When you see a single celebrity like CT with two dark skinned children, you can be sure that she purchased those children from 'an agency' in the 3rd world. It's basically slave trading. And nobody says anything.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed about a month ago
And given the figurative skeletons that keep being found in the closets of neoliberal hollywood socialites, one can safely assume much worse than just slavery.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed about a month ago
I'm also amused at the literal WAATGM profiles and posts generally featuring women who could, with so little effort, improve their standing in the dating market. If a man griped that he couldn't get action, but he wore old jeans and hadn't shaved, it wouldn't be unfair to ask him to engage in a few basics to improve his chances significantly. They can start with removing "headgear" face piercings, dye their hair an attractive color in a pleasing style, dress femininely and cover up tattoos (or get them lasered away or at least apply foundation to hide them).
It is wonderful that even a top Hollywood actress gripes WAATGM when she is better situated than most of the people on the planet to get what she wants with the minimum amount of effort illustrating why women on the lower end, living with her mother while raising some other guys' kid, doesn't stand a chance.
nicknack about a month ago
I would date her just to flood followers to my Instagram, then springboard to an 18 year old. Also to know I fucked Charlize Theron every time I see a Dior ad or a movie of hers.
Lone_Ranger about a month ago
I'm hoping this is a joke, because ...'flood followers to my instagram'? Are you a woman or man?
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed about a month ago
This very line demanding men "man up" and do what she says, is an illustration of the problem with pseudo "traditional" feminine values. It's not that women are submissive and will allow the man to lead, but that he should do what she demands while she sits around and provides him feedback in the form of complaints.
A good example of this is a girl I asked out back when I was young: She was a friend-of-friends and I took her out to a movie and asked her "What do you want to watch?" and she said, quote, "Whatever you want to watch." I picked Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2. It was not... the ideal date movie. She griped to her friends how horrified she was with my choice but... if she had a sense of humor she should have laughed about it.
If I could go back in time, I wish I had developed game and sufficient flirting skills to recognize these types of women, get them to the point where it would be trivial to ask them out and... break off and walk away. Just at least a few times. Show them what it's like to be teased or to treat relationships with western women as casually disposable as they regard ours.
For the record, I found women in non-western, traditional cultures to be more transparent, open, and honest with men than the "submissive" passive-aggressive behavior by "traditional" women in the states.
NotaBene about a month ago
I don't follow actresses, is this mudshark supposed to be an attractive woman?
I'm not at all shocked, she has never been and will never be a successful/valuable woman.
whytehorse2021 about a month ago
I think she's in a bunch of chick flicks. She's like some kind of poster child for feminazis. She got knocked off her pedestal by that Hermione chick.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. about a month ago
A) she was very beautiful when she was young.
B) she was successful in Hollywood, but not successful at being a wife or mother, as she never was one (those kids are adopted, and adopting children without both a mother and a father is a terrible thing to do to kids).
NotaBene about a month ago
How well women do these two things determines their success as women. This specimen has screwed up both.
Problematic_Browser Sr. Hamster Analyst about a month ago
IDGAF what you say (because it's a reflection on you), but "mudshark" is just a coded way to call someone a "nigger lover."
NotaBene about a month ago
There's a big difference between someone who:
1) Judges people on the basis of their character 2) Capitulates to woke agenda by virtue signaling her rejection of her own race, and shoving her choice in your face.
Obviously I mean the latter. If a woman felt that there should be more immigration, that's one thing. But if she adopts five Mexican children and expects you to raise them all, and puts them in all her pictures to virtue signal her "inclusivity" and adherence to liberal agenda, you see where that's a red flag, no?
Problematic_Browser Sr. Hamster Analyst about a month ago
I understand what you're saying, but it didn't really address my point.
You don't have to respond regardless - it wasn't an admonition, just a note of caution about the words we become accustomed to saying and how people may perceive you.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. about a month ago
I always used it to mean a white woman who "prefers" (usually exclusively) black men, without any malice towards the men. Sometimes these women will switch back after they already have kids who show what the woman's real preference is.
I'm fine with someone being open to dating/marrying outside of their race (and have dated outside of my own), but someone who exclusively prefers a race other than their own always struck me as odd, as though they hate their own.
I'd have thought you'd be fine with the term "mudshark", considering what I'd seen you write about white women fetishizing you. Is it really that bad?
Problematic_Browser Sr. Hamster Analyst about a month ago
Oh it doesn't really bother me one way or another. I only bring it up because we have to have discipline about what we let enter our lexicon - using words that have meanings we may not fully understand in the wrong situation can have consequences.
Problematic_Browser Sr. Hamster Analyst about a month ago
As an aside, I'll agree that women who date/marry exclusively outside their race are damaged on some level. As you accurately pointed out, I'm not a fan.
whytehorse2021 about a month ago
Single for 10 years? Sounds about like most men's 20s. I didn't have to worry about it in my 20s because I would fuck washed up old women like Charlize.