Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
- Main Forums
- What's Hot
- TRP.RED
- Tribe Forums
- TheRedPill
- Tribe Management
- Create New Tribe
- Manage My Tribes
- Find New Tribes
- Recent News
-
-
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1w ago
"Let's eat good everyday and travel the world together..." "...on your dime." she did not mention.
Lone_Ranger Live by the pork sword, die by the pork sword 1w ago
she did not need to mention.
She wants a rich, nice black man. That will be obsessed with her and drop everythign to travel the world, on his dime.
And pay for her two daughters.
This is going to be a cinch!
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 2d ago
I'm sure there are any number of family-oriented professional sports stars and kindly rap artists who will respectfully take care of her if she jumps into bed with them quickly and easily enough.
I mean, it goes without saying that a black man who is a lawyer, architect, academic, clergy or other kind of professional would be far too humdrum for a gal who demands excellence. And let's not even consider the accented adjunct faculty member from Rwanda! He might even wear glasses! ICK!
hhhhdmt 1w ago
Jesus. I wonder if there will ever be a cultural change. We have birth control pills. How do you get pregnant twice at such a young age, presumably out of wedlock? How?
Why don't mothers teach their daughters to use the pill? How is this possible?
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 1w ago
A kid at 21 and at 23...... that's not even that young.
Lone_Ranger Live by the pork sword, die by the pork sword 1w ago
that is the perfect age, medically and biologically. If you want healty children, without autism, down syndrome and other defects - 18-21 is about the sweet spot. This is just medical science - we have known if for a long time, and we choose to ignore it, bceuase medical science has become so woke.
It's very easy to track these things, and we have huge data sets. Age of mother and birth defects are very very simple and reliable data points.
Yet we continue to support a system that encourages women to give birth LONG after the ideal time.
Because Matriarchy
hhhhdmt 1w ago
I meant young in the sense that she was unmarried.
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Because single moms only know how to breed single moms. If there was a dad in the house, he'd be having "The Talk" with Junior, and letting him know that if he got his little girl pregnant, he would *oils double-barrel shotgun* blow that thing off.
woodsmoke Respectful reprobate 1w ago
Her being pregnant at 21 wouldn't be a problem as long as she were married. It would be laudable, in fact. The idea in most Western cultures that one's late teens or early 20s is too early to be having children is a significant part of the problem.
Also, the profligation of hormonal birth control and the fact it's routinely pushed on adolescent girls who've no business even thinking about having sex yet is it's own monster and has caused it's own problems via knock-on effects and unforseen consequences.
Frankly, the pill should be tightly restricted to short-term use based on particular circumstances. It should never have been approved for general consumption, let alone allowed to become a cultural institution.
Many of our current social woes have their root in the Enlightenment, the Industrial Revolution or both, but the reliable decoupling of sex from pregnancy in the '60s really kicked the decline into high gear.
hhhhdmt 1w ago
I understand traditional rules, sure. My mother got married at 20 to my dad and is still married. I was born 2 years after my parents got married. So my mother was 22 when i was born.
There may be some downsides to birth control but in a individualistic society, you need the pill. Most women are not going to get married at 20-23 years old even if they have a great man available.
So the least women can do is get on the damn pill.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
@woodsmoke My theory is that it wasn't only the pill, but also the notion of women no longer considering marriage to be an imperative in their 20's to focus on "having a career" or "waiting for the right man" to approach and game her. I lost my virginity to a corporate nun virgin who was 10 years my senior (she was 31). Most Awkward Sex Ever yet quite memorable.
The great selling point of feminism was the notion they could do what "men" (namely, top 5% men, or "real men") did and have sex only with hot people. It wasn't only The Pill but also this notion of entitlement that they didn't "need" men so they could just make demands of men without any gratitude or reciprocity.
Up to the end of The Golden Era of feminism, say, 1990, it was possible for a Gen Xer girl to find a plentiful supply of Boomer men to marry up into while they got affirmative action jobs and affordable housing, education, healthcare, and cars. You name it. It was like Pax Romana. They'd slut it up in high school or college and then go out with a beta male who asked them out at work.
Then the 1990's happened: The gradual collapse economically, Anita Hill and 20 years later, MeToo, and the hyper LGBT that kicked in.
MAGA seems to have elements that finally are in tune with what the real problem is versus the Reagan conservatives and Libertarians whose heads are in the ground like ostriches. Is it too late though?
MentORPHEUS TRP Endorsed 1w ago
At worst it gave rise to social changes with predictable friction. But, it spared humanity from a devastating population bomb from modern medicine at last making it normal for two of 6 children to survive to reproductive age. Before this, several pregnancies per woman was a survival imperative for the human race. With modern medicine, limiting it to average slightly below two per woman is the new species survival imperative.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
My paternal grandmother was amazing. She only had 2 pregnancies, but she was amazing. She ran a church charity, raised 2 kids, and supported a husband with a stroke due to a hard life back in 1950.
I knew many people from that generation. What a generation! I had a former member of The Hitler Youth at my Vegas wedding (with her Jewish husband).
Such wonderful women. I have high standards for women and I hold my wife and daughter to their standards. I need to call two of them that are down and out due to medical issues.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1w ago
I'm fairly certain that postwar generations generally accepted that since children in the Hitlerjugend had been children at the time, and since there were numerous parental and social pressures to be in that organization, they were not really considered to be as the same category as, like, the personifications of consciously-chosen evil that Nazis are seen as today. Like Pope Ratzinger, for instance, or West German foreign minister Genscher. The denazification of postwar Germany was rather thorough, with certain exceptions being rather noteworthy.
Instructive is the very different treatment accorded to the postwar Japanese war criminals. Compared to Nuremburg, the Tokyo war crimes trials were a bad joke, the sloppy proceedings of which the Dutch and Indian panelists would later write about at length.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
Those two examples are interesting in that I read that Pope Ratzinger was a conscientious objector while Genscher was merely a conscripted teenage soldier. There's some bitterness among Poles that "denazification" of Germany wasn't as thorough as it was portrayed with many authority figures being given amnesty to help fight the cold war, Von Braun among them, but also Adolf Heusinger and Heinz Reinefarth among many others. Nonetheless, the culture of Nazism was prohibited with all displays of Nazi insignia banned.
I happen to think we'd benefit from such a ban here because such displays provide the left with justifications to attack all ethnic Europeans by association due to the public marches by them.
My WWII era father was bitter towards the Japanese for much of his life. One story he told me is he was at the USS Arizona memorial and an elderly Japanese man asked him to take a (film) camera photo so my father "cut off his head". I think it was rude to do because for all he knew he was a Japanese who sympathized with the Americans. He did NOT do this to one of the Japanese Americans who had fought for the US during the war, however.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1w ago
Your dad's animosity is understandable, given the weight of everything that had happened in that time. The famous liberal jurist Earl Warren, who'd played a major role in pushing for the internment of Japanese as governor of California, had (only) privately expressed remorse later in life. In public, he'd never expressed anything of the kind.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
I would love to have seen what happened with the population boom without the pill. I think there would have been more famine but people have managed to regulate their reproduction in the past. When a culture gets decadent, its a bit like mouse utopia. The females go off sex, some of the males stop trying for sex.
A good example is the Roman ius trium liberorum instituted by Augustus the first emperor (before Rome's power had even peaked). By then things were already so bad in the upper classes who were failing to reproduce that he was offering any woman who had three children the right to be freed from her husband's guardianship. It didn't work, the old glorious families died out because they just stopped having children.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
The Pill fueled the sexual revolution because even though it was not reliable, it was PERCEIVED as such which is what mattered. I have many childhood friends who got paternity trapped because their girlfriends said "they were on the pill". Heck, this even happened with a dear friend of mine whose future wife got knocked up in 2009.
Without The Pill, the only reliable thing for men to do would be to use condoms every time and there's an effectiveness limit to them: The majority of normal women are turned off by them in that they want the feeling that the "sex just happened" so they don't feel slutty and the time it takes for most men to figure out how to get the wrapper off, wrap his unit, and such, the excitement fades. Rushing contributes to failure in that perhaps it won't be wrapped properly.
Then there's also women's own rational concerns (ok, nevermind let's not forget who we're talking about!), seriously: Knowing that they depend upon men using condoms to avoid pre-marital pregnancy, most women in the 1950's didn't engage in the "traditional dating" paradigm as we know it: "Dinner dates" or hanging out with hot guys and 3rd date sex. Instead, "cheap" or group dates were the norm such as Vanilla Cokes at the Woolworth's or bowling.
The decline of the Roman empire was blamed on many things including their wonderful lead lined pipes and the same for us: Corporate profits are driven by a combination of outsourcing and importing cheap labor and consumers. The USA's population has grown consistently driving up the cost of living while lowering wages which doesn't help for working natives' birthrates.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Agreed. I would add that the liberals decided to stop the pill being birth control -for married couples who had enough children and could not afford more at the time (as it was envisaged) and made it "pregnancy prevention" to fuel their revolution. This was serious mission creep for which the equipment was not fit.
Birth control was initially only available to married couples. Its not designed for singles or unstable couples.
The pill is very successful if used by a stable couple who don't want more children and in the rare chance it fails, well the couple are experienced parents and all will be well. Its not for boosey floosies who don't have reliable habits or for single women desperate to land a high value father for the family they want to start at any cost. It does not protect against diseases either. Condoms are well worth using if you want to bang skanks and want to greatly lower your risk of a dose but they are not really good for couples who actually trust each other.
As it is, there is no good "protection" for promiscuity.
I have always told my children and any young men I have worked with "When you learned to shoot, were you told you can point your rifle at anything you like so long as the safety is on? No. So why do you think a cock is safe with contraception? Point it at something you don't mind hitting or keep it in the slip."
"Protection" is a myth. Risk reduction is the reality. The liberals continue to miseducate kids. Its actually not OK if its consensual. Its OK if you have or want a family, otherwise its a low risk, but probably one that will cost you money and heartache too.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
I don’t know if it’s true, but I heard that St. Thomas Aquinas was in support of legalized prostitution as a “sewer for sin” in that you need a sewer, but you don’t want to run it through your living room. By the same token, young men want to have sex before marriage or when they aren’t capable of marriage and there are some women who enjoy hoeing so why not give that element of society a “safety valve”, so to speak? I think this is (one reason) why Europeans are generally better adjusted than Americans on sex.
To your point, the golden age of dating, from 1900 to 1980 or so, was when men and women married young and had strong social circles and networks allowing men to approach safely (it would be some girl he knew for years from school and church) and the women didn’t sleep around for fear of “getting a reputation”. This notion of a man approaching a woman in the wild, taking her out, and dopamine clown-gaming her is a relatively recent PUA phenomenon.
The PERCEPTION the pill works helped to empower women to do something formerly frowned upon: Slut/hoe it up. For the Chads, she could ride the CC until her 30’s and then “settle down” while milking the betas for “traditional dates”. The desire for women, particularly those with feminist/trad-thot entitlement attitudes, was even more overwhelming than for us men for The Playboy Lifestyle.
I don’t blame only the liberals on this. Conservatives encourage women to hoe it up because they engaged in similar behavior and even rationalize it as such that it’ ok as long as the daddy warns the boys with a shotgun.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
I think Aquinas and Augustine make sense on prostitution and sluts in general. They do fulfil a useful role for society. Some women are natural hoes and they love to hoe. I think that has been the way through most of human history -there are bad girls who ease the problems of the world and good girls you have families with. Contraception makes it easier to deal with the bad girls. I just would have kept it away from the mainstream unless they were already married. Bad girls could get it on the black market but I would not have the situation where normal girls can be put on the pill at 14 by a doctor for the only reason that it lets them climb on the carousel.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 6d ago
I have a problem with black market medicine for a variety of reasons. The current woes are due to a variety of historical causes including the largest: affirmative action for women in education and the workplace combined with feminism/chivalrous entitlement for women.
Most women were told to not bother “settling down” (or even “settling”) until they sowed their wild oats AND “hoeing”/golddigging was so normalized that a father I was chatting with said he wanted his daughter to insist upon paid dates.
I lost my virginity to a 32 year old virgin corporate nun (the sex was awkward) because even by 1990, social relations between men and women had to severely degraded.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 6d ago
I think in a society you have what is legal and what is tolerated. I think we could find a way to tolerate a semi legal market in big pharma produced contraceptives for slags -off label prescriptions for over 21s for example or just non prosecution of users. Think how many anabolic steroid and peptide users there are quietly buying their gear from China with almost no real issues. We are talking millions of people buying untested compounds or compounds that were never invented for performance enhancement and the governments of the world turn a blind eye. Buying the contraceptive pill which is very well tested would have hardly any problems. People will get the compounds they want. Its what society encourages that is more important. You should not have a situation where you 14 year old daughter can go and get prescribed the pill without your permission because liberal values.
Those blue pill fathers who think they are protecting princess by making her horridly entitled are really a problem. They are aiming to create blue pill hell 2.0, where women give nothing but their presence and demand huge amounts of money and time from men they earn equal wages to. My good lady shows me endless videos from these morons saying "this is what we should be telling our girls!" I am horrified. "Do you want them to be using pussy power to exploit the men they are aiming to build a life with? Don't you want them to be loved as a helpmate not resented and an entitled adult baby?"
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 5d ago
I think you helped state where I'm going with this: If a father raises his daughter poorly and, heck, isn't even present at all, such mainstream restrictions on contraceptives are meaningless. The djinni is out of the bottle regardless.
I regularly, but in context/scope, have discussions with my daughter regularly since she was a toddler. She knows "mommy and daddy made her", and so on. I ask her to observe how other people live, successfully or not, and to consider how they got there.
Heck, part of the humor of this forum is observing how aging women suddenly discover, if out of the blue, that their youthful advantages don't last forever and what matters in life. Yes, plenty of people told them but nobody that they'd listen to.
I strive to maintain my daughter's trust and respect, keep an open dialogue, and as importantly, give her a happy childhood with solid discipline so she doesn't feel a need to be consumed by the society around her.
wswZtyqNGQ 1w ago
And that's the reason that Rome lasted so long: nobody followed the "Lex Augustii". Since Rome was a massively unequal society and would be against advancement and ambition, without elite replacement it would quickly fall to peasant rebellion. But the elites refused to reproduce (no matter how much Augustus threatened and complained) while the poor multiplied, allowing for significant advancement of the ambitious poor to become the new elites. Rome had an inherent escape clause for everyone (at least in theory) and therefore maintained stability for centuries.
Right now there has never been such low social mobility in the civilized world since the rich and poor both have the same low birth rates. Except as of the recent few years we're starting to go back to the old effects of poor people having more children. Call it the "idiocracy effect" if you want, but the only people having children now are the very stupid and the very religious (who are usually the same people). As such, we are going to have a new social mobility for the stupid and/or religious who will dominate the elite classes for the next century.
Idiocracy, here we come!
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
If someone could be kind to post this to the reddit site since I cannot, that would be appreciated. I've tried not to be boring and make you laugh.
StrongWoman 1w ago
So she has two brown babies and is looking for a third one?! I mean, not that I care about her, but why are women like this?
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
I think she gets one thing right. She doesn't want boring men. This trainwreck with a obsessive freak is not going to be boring. That's for sure.
What does she, who rejects white men, tell her kids about their being half white?
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
She never said baby daddy isn't in the picture. I'm sure he's lingering around somewhere.
Lone_Ranger Live by the pork sword, die by the pork sword 1w ago
of course. All of her baby dadies and their homies are bangin her on the reg.
She is not looking for more nigaz to bang her, she is looking for a pay pig.
Maybe could black up and pay for her? no? you cheap mother fucker.
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Hahaha! Unfortunately, I don't quality. I'm too fucking white. I guess I could try blackface and see if she'll bang me on the reg.
Lone_Ranger Live by the pork sword, die by the pork sword 1w ago
Don't forget the gold tooth, and to slap her around a bit, take money from her purse when she's in the shower without even 'axing' her.
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Broke ass single mom wants the luxury life from a RICH man who is looking for a package deal. She's never traveled before, because if she did, she'd know the nightmare of the logistics when it comes to traveling with children.
Her 2 kids are black and she don't want any questions.
Correction: She's looking for a RICH CLOWN who is looking for a package deal.
Correction: She's looking a RICH BETA CLOWN who is looking for a package deal and will worship the ground she walks on and be completely submissive to her every whim, and pay for her every desires.
No mention of what she offers in return. No mention of what her daughters need. It's all just HER HER HER.
This is the type of woman who's children will abandon her when gets old and frail, leaving her all alone, and the day they discover their mother was found with her cats having eaten half her face off, will have her cremated, her ashes flung in a ditch somewhere, and happy to split any inheritance they may or may not have.