Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
polishknight
Posted 2w ago in Epiphany Phase - Permalink - 3.3K Views
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago Stickied
Someone (PLEASE!) kindly post this to the Reddit site because I cannot.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2w ago Stickied
I second this plea.
Taking a quick peak at the subreddit, I see that the most recent post was from @Land_of_the_losers and was 10 days ago.
For all that we want anyone still using that shithole site to move here, they need to see that there is activity here.
So pretty please, one of you who still has reddit access, crosspost some of his stuff from the last few days.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 2w ago
I'll do it.
Like, might as well.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2w ago
Thank you
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2w ago
Tag @Overkill_Engine, @Vermillion-Rx, @mustangfrank1, @BobbingForBunions, @redpillschool
That's everyone I've seen active in the comments of his most recent posts whom I'm sure still have reddit access
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2w ago
@houseoftolstoy you've been active here recently
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 2w ago
I have reddit access but I am treating my my main account and mod account with extreme caution
I've not posted in WAATGM which has a different target on its back than r/TheRedPill
I do not have enough certainty or familiarity with your sub to take a chance on Reddit's overlords
My sub has enough flack as is otherwise I'd happily post
I just don't have enough XP with your guys sub and I'm practically solo modding ours
Edit: it's know how paranoid I mod there in the upper echelons so I am keeping it within my wheelhouse atm
The stakes are too high on my accounts in case one gets banned
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2w ago
Booooo!
throwaway415 2w ago
ah, women ☕
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2w ago
Huh. Did @redpillschool finally fix it so that emojis work in the forums?
????????
Edit - they were there until I refreshed the page. Weird.
throwaway415 1w ago
idk i just copied and pasted it from an emoji website since im a boomer and i dont know how else to make them on a laptop
remember back when we called them emoticons
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 2w ago
Any woman even thinking about their career has already lost the race at the finish line
A woman focused on her career might as well be the equivalent of a man being blue pill
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
Exactly. They can have family and a career, but they have to put the family first and then focus on the career later when the kids are grown and gone.
Unfortunately, the reality we live in has flipped to Opposite World.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
A career has always been a man's domain. Any woman with a career is acting like a man. They have a right to do this, but it is always foolish, always a better purpose for a woman to devote her life to.
Even when the kids are "gone", there is still so much for a housewife to do just being an excellent helper of her husband and keeper of his home. Imagine if women suddenly devoted the same effort and energy they put into working for some man into being skilled wives. Do you know the skills women used to have? I could list you a ton of things my wife has learned to do simply because she works hard at home instead of at a job.
Another way to put it: Any woman with a job outside the home is necessarily neglecting her duties at home - or at the very least not living up to her true potential.
It's very difficult to communicate the virtues/skills of the excellent housewife if you have not seen one in action, but I'm reminded of the meme: "Remember what they took from you."
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2w ago
Pragmatically speaking though, in most states you will want your wife to work at least part-time. If you fucked up and got married in the first place (as I did), it's in your interest to prevent alimony in the event of a divorce.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
IMHO, letting your wife work is a factor that leads to divorce. A wife should be dependent on her husband for everything possible - wisdom, money, luxuries. He is her Chad and Brad.
You're not wrong on a financial and risk-aversion level, and when I was 20 and married wifey worked full-time while I finished school and played MMOs. Nice life for me, but it wasn't healthy for the marriage.
My current solution to avoiding being a financial target is just to stay poor. What are you gonna take from me if I don't have it? But that's another story.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2w ago
All the thousands of users at MRP who ended up staying married vs the thousands who got divorced, there didn't seem to be any correlation between whether the wife worked and whether they ended up divorced.
However, the ones who worked were less able to use the court to pilfer ex-husband's paychecks.
Keyword should. What should be and what is are often at odds.
An ex-wife can still be quite dependent on ex-husband for money and luxuries, while spurning his wisdom, thanks to the powers of the court.
Most divorce courts will see a SAHM and a workhorse dad as an arrangement to be continued post-divorce. She still gets to stay home and raise the kids, and he has to continue to pay.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
I'm amused how The Flintstones, Honeymooners, and Jetsons portrayed what we regard in the modern era as the nuclear family with the SAH mom and father going off to work at an office or factory as timeless and universal from caveman times to flying cars.
Women usually worked near to home because of logistics, but in the old time that meant they worked in the fields along with the men or prior to that, gathering nuts and berries. Families tended to live together rather than the idea of a young couple buying their own "nest", like a bird, and settling in a single family home or even apartment.
Due to mass immigration and feminism driving down wages while raising the cost of living including competition for housing, the nuclear family dream is increasingly out of reach for most ironically putting it back to where it commonly was before: Men and women living in their parents’ basements is the return to the historical norm.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
No one should get married under the state for that reason alone. I was more commenting on ideal relationships. Women and financial freedom don't go well together - it's where we get that meme "my money is mine, your money is ours".
Yeah, I know, I speak idealistically, using platitudes and impossibilities. I realize it doesn't always happen this way. But I remain hopeful and idealistic for the sake of the boys.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2w ago
Strongly agree, and I frequently feel foolish for having done so
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
Not necessarily. 10 years would be sufficient to get the youngest child into school and then she could at least go to school part-time and then later work full time.
The problem is that as much as feminists said they wanted to remodel society around the career women, they instead forced women into the mold of the typical male career path: We bust our fannies in our 20’s to graduate college and to set ourselves up in industry. It’s tough to reinvent oneself in our 30’s and 40’s although I know men who did it.
Ideally, we’d drop the affirmative action and instead have programs for women (and men!) in their 30’s and 40’s to go to college when needed and re-enter the workforce. Unfortunately, since the 1980’s, the corporate culture is to exploit young American workers with ageism common. They prefer immigrant indentured servants. I’d say the USA workplace is as bad now as the USSR in the 1980’s.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
I think this is a really good idea. I think women often have the luxury of a man's support later in life (if they have been wise). They then do not need to study very hard all at once and then work hard for the rest of their lives. They can study quietly and conscientiously over time and work a bit. This in my experience is what they would prefer to do. Its just not possible if you have been single all your life but with a man, once the kids are raised its totally possible and I think far more fulfilling as by then you really know what you would like to do with your work life.
As ever society needs to stop saying "men are the best, to be the best too women need to copy men" When women try to do this, they will always fall short and then demand to be made up to the same level by men. Women will always fall short at being men, because they are not. We need actually to value women more, not men less
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
Sadly, chivalry does value women more but in the form of goddesses, or in the modern era, as sexual beings. Men are told we’re all supposed to be selfless superheroes or wealthy entrepreneurs. The movies and media are partly to blame in that I think film roles were more human back before the Blockbuster era of the 1960’s onward.
“Women will always fall short at being men”
As do most men to be “real” men. I get what you mean by needing to value women more (or by what we here would like women to be): Kind, empathic, maternal, supportive. Ironically, the romanticism of the chivalrous period combined with the idealism of feminism has left us with few in that role. We’re an atomized society of corporate serfs and oligarchs pursuing material and social status. I started to realize something was severely broken about our society back in the 1990’s.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
I agree. Where you say "what we here would like women to be" I think we need to be realistic. Women will never be what men want them to be just as men will never be what women want them to be. Somewhere we need to work to both meet in the middle and compromise on our differences. Its just so out of balance now.
The male model is what is so valued because it gives greater access to the money from a career. money is a hugely attractive thing to women who are naturally not strong of themselves and whose innate neediness drives them to gather security and status. Women can use the power of money to gain what they desire. The whole of society has become about money (and governments shearing people of their money like shepherds shear sheep of their wool . They say they do it to protect and serve us. However in the end the model serves itself.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
I had a thought about this in how society "value" men and the answer, of course, is that it largely doesn't hence why so many young men are refusing to "man up". Becoming successful often means just getting a target on your back for alimony, false accusations, and “privilege”.
The argument often made by supposed conservative pundits, such as Tomi Lahren and Laura Ingraham who complained that men needed to "man up" simply because women and society WANT them to. Not that these women would feel any obligation to reward men for doing so in a significant manner.
Imagine men saying women need to shut up and clean the kitchen because society needs them to and to try to shame them.
Regarding money: a society that’s focused solely upon the acquisition of power and money is the hallmark of low trust and barbaric cultures. When someone approaches you on the subway, you expect they’re either out to rob you, beg for money, or some other agenda.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
I agree. I would add that its actually a sign of young men's strength not weakness that they are simply walking away from the paths to easy financial success -like college degrees- and walking away from the outward signs of male success like a wife, mortgage and children. They are strong enough alone.
My lady says "These young men are weak. Where will my daughter ever get a husband?!" I tend to think the young women would just have to up their game to get a man who knows he can live without a wife to seal his manhood.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
As my pseudonym indicates, a literal Polish knight would ONLY refer to a woman as a “lady” if her father offered huge tracts of land in exchange for her hand in marriage. We live in such a messed up post-modern western culture, that we’ve reversed hypergamy: It was MEN who used to marry for money.
Outside of Castle Wawel in Krakow, there’s a Cave of the Dragon, a tourist attraction, with a legend that a POOR young boy wanted to marry a princess so he tricked the dragon by offering it a goat (I think?) stuffed with explosives which the Dragon ate and died.
Anyhoo, I have a daughter and here’s what I’m going to explain to her: She not only has to “up her game”, as you put it, but have one altogether aside from acquiring a case of narcolepsy. The “game” of playing “hard to get” worked back when women were picked up in their limited communities between the age of 14 to 20 at church socials and family introductions. Of COURSE they were weak. These young men were literally a year or two off from being kids themselves. My parents were 23 years old when they met which practically made my mother an old maid at the time.
Women who don’t know how to fraternize with men, to generate a social network, or go to the places where the men they desire are, will be left behind and replaced with 3rd worlder migrants or bear kids for some fraudster and become a single mother.
Wintergreen 2w ago
Imagine all the states and even countries that contain men whose penises have frolicked around in this woman’s most valuable asset. And then someone is supposed to MARRY her???? Her pussy is in a thousand countries!
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
She's already nearly half a decade late for panicking if marriage and children were ever something she wanted. Any sensible man is going to take longer and longer to vet a woman the older she is, because it is in his best interest to do so - because "experienced" women generally only get better at hiding their bullshit instead of ever actually fixing it. At her age range that going to be at least 5-7 years, which means if she is not already a few years into being vetted, she is stuck hoping for a hail mary buzzer beater or marrying way the fuck down from what she could have achieved with a bit of sensible urgency earlier on in life.
Unfortunately this woman and many like her lack the critical thinking/mental muscle to realize that. And looking at her video, it's clear why - she's been able to coast by ever since puberty on having tits, a working vagina, and not being grossly obese. Guarantee she's exploited more than one man as a foody call or drink/entertainment subsidy service. [PSA for men - this is why your wallet needs to stay closed far tighter than her legs, especially in the casual dating phase. Not doing so just creates mealdiggers. If you feel your only option is to lead with your wallet, just go pay a whore - she'll be more honest.]
So yeah, she's going to continue to fuck around until her mid 30's and then be flabbergasted when the pool of suitors that she is willing to see as options completely dries up.
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
If a woman isn't married by 23, she's a spinster. If she still isn't married by 27, she's a thornback.
Feminism lowkey teaches women that they are too young to be married before their thornback years.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
Peak fertility is 14 in women, and peak beauty is like 16-18. Useless woman is useless, and at least a decade too late. Hilarious that they make fun of men for not "growing up" when they can't even fulfill the basic functions of a woman.
I read somewhere once (may have been here) that if a woman is worried about her biological clock, she was already out of time years ago.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
She is like a drug addict. She knows she would like to stop, just not quite now.
Freedom is a great drug for women, freedom to go off and feel special. Western women have the luxury of this but feeling special doesn't not make you special. That's the problem with entertainment drugs.