Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
kevin32
Posted 1y ago in Dual-Mating Strategy - Permalink - Locked - 11.1K Views
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1y ago Stickied
Notice the age. I bet she went out and got intentionally knocked up because she was afraid of missing out. Learn to spot the red flags gentlemen. It can save you numerous headaches.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
That, or she's lying about a casual hookup and was trying to lock down a Chad who was spinning her as a plate and/or "semi-casually dating" her or whatever stupid label people put on relationships/situationships in which there is sex other than marriage.
I remember a talk I had with one of my exes, who insisted I don't wear a condom (and I fully acknowledge I was stupid for going in raw). I told her "don't go thinking that if you get pregnant, that it means I'll marry your ass".
Problematic_Browser Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
No woman gets pregnant accidentally.
They willingly decide that they want to risk carrying a baby. A 5th grader can tell you how babies are made. These women know full well the end result of unprotected sex and they choose to forego the dozens of birth control options because they don't give a shit if Chad knocks them up.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I smell a lie as well as you typo. Women are usually coy about their 'hook ups'. I'm guessing that this woman has been involved in a long running situationship that has resulted in a pregnancy, and the guy is not interested. Her gut feeling is to find some beta bucks and then carry on shagging the bad boy for the tingles.
I think that she is delusional - I do not believe that there are any guys out there that will fall for this. I really hope not.
Seagram7 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Wanna bet? The beta thirst is very real. There are men out there that are so starved and so desire the companionship of a women, that he would wife her up given the chance. Her problem is the type of guy that would commit to her is the type of guy she wants absolutely nothing to do with.
Her post is actually thought out. Her tits are to grab your attention and make you want to lust for her; and her narration is suppose to flip your instinctive desires to protect and provide and save m'lady. You are suppose to be the white knight that saves her and gets those tits at the same time.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
You may be right.... I really hope not, for the sake of the simpy beta that actually tries to have any sort of relations with a woman like this. It will not end well.
Seagram7 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Like I said, the guys willing to wife her up are creepy, icky, incels that she wants nothing to do with while all Chad wants from her is a pump and dump. How quickly the shaky foundation of a relationship built on lust crumbles.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
Proverbs 30:20 would have an apt description of her that those of a more religious bent than I would appreciate.
Women like this lack character. They have neither discipline nor shame, and will betray you to satiate their urges with no guilt.
Oddest-One-Here 11mo ago
An unfaithful 304 will slurp on a fuckboy's pork sword, wipe the cum off her lips and then exclaim, "I am not to blame, it's his fault".
NotaBene Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I love the book of Proverbs, it's timeless. Chapter 5 is a whole chapter warning you against this type of woman. It's over 3,000 years old and still applicable. Solomon had 700 wives (and hundreds of concubines) and knew what he was talking about. Ignore his advice at your peril.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1y ago
I wish I could say that this couldn't possibly be real, but we live in clown world.
On a scale of 1-to-10 where ten is the outer limit of craziness that actually happens, this is about a six.
I'm pro-life but I have to wonder why women fight so hard to keep abortion legal if a woman who just found that she's pregnant from some guy whose name she may not know is looking for a step-dad rather than an Uber.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
Not wanting to make this an ideological argument, but you expressed puzzlement over why women fought so hard to keep abortion legal:
In market economics when you incentivize something, you get more of it. I read a pro-lifer arguing that we needed to extend the welfare state to help single mothers to justify the morality of prohibiting abortion which is perhaps why many women fought for abortion rights in the first place: as a negotiation tactic. I often heard feminists (figuratively say) "You claim to care about the lives of unborn children? Get out your wallet!"
It's a pity that we don't see profiles from chads that would say, unironically or not to troll: "6'2", executive at X, Master's degree. Looking for healthy feminine woman, kind and submissive, non-feminist, hard work ethic who cooks and cleans ideally from a wealthy family who will provide a dowry." If he's a 1 percenter, that's one percent of the women out there. Take those men out of the market and get them "huge tracts of land" they deserve.
NotaBene Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Assuming that kind of guy even exists, he wouldn't be so stupid as to advertise on those platforms. The amount of weeding would be prohibitive and depressing, nor could you determine what were lies from a profile.
Being rich, I would just enlist the help of servants to find a suitable girl, like King Xerxes 3,000+ years ago:
"Then the king’s attendants proposed, 'Let a search be made for beautiful young virgins for the king, and let the king appoint commissioners in each province of his kingdom to assemble all the beautiful young women into the harem at the citadel of Susa. Let them be placed under the care of Hegai, the king’s eunuch in charge of the women, and let them be given beauty treatments. Then let the young woman who pleases the king become queen...'"
This is how the rich find a suitable woman, they don't post "profiles" anywhere.
No-Stress-Cat 1y ago
I'm going to have to try this...
nicknack 1y ago
Bill Gates and Bezos could do this, but they choose to date post wall botch-jobs. That just shows you the kind of people that run our society.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1y ago
I've heard that argument but it leaves me unmoved. Just because I think murder should be a crime doesn't mean that I should be responsible to provide food and shelter to everyone who hasn't been murdered. I can think that theft should be a crime without taking on the obligation to ensure that nobody is ever without having all their material desires met. I can be against cruelty to animals without sending all my extra cash to the Humane Society and filling my house with unwanted pets. There's a much simpler solution, anyway: don't get pregnant if you don't want a kid. It's not like avoiding pregnancy is difficult. In fact, except for rare cases of forcible rape resulting in pregnancy, a woman had to actively perform an action to get pregnant.
I agree with you about the "Chad" profiles, too. Men with options (who understand their options) screen for top-tier women already, but unlike sub-par women who post laundry lists that exclude 99% of men, those guys just quietly pass on women who don't meet their standards rather than going on OLD and demanding 20-year-old, debt-free virgins with no tattoos who were raised to be wives. Their profiles would be banned instantly because "patriarchy"... or something.
oddbelt987 1y ago
Exactly. You can be against homelessness without having to personally provide shelter for every homeless person out there.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
They sure did. Even in unprotected, casual sex, it’s really not that difficult to know when the event that could cause pregnancy is about to happen (to put it in family friendly ways). Pull out. If you fail, get a plan B.
Fact is, a woman that is this chick’s age, she has about a 63% chance to get pregnant in the next year if she’s “trying”. Which means tons of unprotected sex. The odds of getting pregnant from one “oopsie” is not high. Which means that this woman was likely having a ton of unprotected sex.
So yeah, claiming we need to financially support single moms better to discourage abortion. How about they just…stop letting strange men that they barely know shoot up the house? The whole reason that we have a ton of single moms to begin with is because the state offered women all of the benefits of a husband without any responsibility from her.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
What if he doesn't want to get married?
What if he wants to...
SING?!
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Look, you stay here and make sure HE doesn't leave.
NotaBene Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Put on that suit!
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Agree with you PK - don't want to make this political. But...why can't she give up this kid for adoption? There are plenty of 2 parent households that have the time, energy and money available to raise a child well. There is a long waiting list of parents to adopt. Doesn't have to be a termination. But no, we have to fund trailer trash women like this through welfare to raise kids in unsuitable conditions that then turn into criminals and drug users.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
I am keeping this non-ideological and looking at it from a market consequences point of view. We often hear that there are long lists of parents ready to adopt, and the challenges they go through, but I wonder how long that list would be if the floodgates were opened and more women put up their kids for adoption and requirements were loosened.
Consider that the ideal adoptive family: A married straight couple who wants to raise someone else's kids, is increasingly rare nowadays as men go MGTOW and many queens drop out rather than go through rejection. Lesbian and gay men couples might comprise a majority of adoptive parents in the near future.
In answer to your question: Because modern women are selfish, duh. They don't want to live with the guilt of wondering what happened to the child they gave up as they go through milestones. I know a woman like that and she said that she'd see a store window with a nice display and think "That boy would be 5 now and he'd like that' and she'd break out in tears.
A Polish woman I chatted about on this said that she believed the mother should keep custody, no matter what, even though I explained to her that bad mothers are worse than adoptive parents. She is in love with the "mother wolf" mythos and importance. Like in The Bible: Some women would rather kill their offspring than give them up.
And another factor is the entitlement: They're used to beta males bending over for them so they think they're entitled to the bailout because "real men" should like doing that. The chivalrous society has sent that message to them pretty loud and clear and I heard a boomer at a book club meeting say he wanted to chide the Zoomer gen men for not "stepping up".
Highly recommend "The Pre-Persons" by Philip K who apparently got hate mail from Ursula K Le Guin over it. You can read the short-story for free if you google it.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
There is a long list of suitable parents that want to adopt because so many people are infertile. It's surprisingly common. When you add in the fact that the average age for marraige for women is now 31.5 and that by 30, 90% of women's eggs are gone, its amazing that anyone is able to have kids within wedlock at all.
It may seem that more gay men / lesbians / trans people are adopting, simply because these types of arrangements make the headlines. The reality is that there are not nearly enough babies to supply the number of stable, 2 parent, straight, married couples out there that want to adopt. Most of them have to resort to the modern version of the slave trade - they have to purchase brown babies from abroad.
Before we had welfare, it was very common for straight married couples to adopt. It was normal practice. You didn't even need to be that rich, just any kind of a good home is better than being brough up by a single mother who was either in the workhouse or on the streets.
Because thats' what it means when you get rid of welfare. Single mother meth heads of course would PREFER to keep their children, but I don't see why we all need to pay tax to fund womens poor choices.
oddbelt987 1y ago
In this day and age of uber-wokeness, adoption agencies actively target non-traditional families. My MIL (who fostered dozens of kids over the years) finally said enough's enough and stopped fostering when the adoption agency she partnered with (one of the largest ones in the US) told her that a gay couples would get preferential treatment over straight couples.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Yeah, we're living in a clown world. I've got nothing at all against gay couples. Nothing at all. The issue here is that the adoption agency has prioritised the tingles that they get from amassing wokeness points over and above the welfare of the children. Thats it in a nutshell. The adoption agency likely does not give a single solitary fuck about gay people, what they care about is being able to posture up as a good SJW. At the expense of the welfare of vulnerable kids.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
I think I addressed some of your points above (in that there's simply less straight couples out there anymore, and this trend is accelerating) but let's consider this obvious observation:
The readership here is aware of the reasons why a man who busts his hump to become successful and acceptable to women doesn't want to wife up a single mother and raise someone else's kid.
Is this emotion going to be different with adoption? Instead of raising the kid of the single mom, he adopts instead. I chuckled about them "purchasing brown babies from abroad" when there are plenty of single mothers with brown babies of their own looking for a husband. :-) Saves a lot of time, yes?
I think that single mothers in the past probably got married more often than now because they largely were war widows and such and men were treated different both at work and in the dating scene. Times have changed.
Besides, even back then, there wasn't really a shortage of adoptable kids. Did you ever see "Annie?"
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Hi Polish, the straight, married, infertile couple are usually mad keen to adopt. I personally know a few of them. The story is usually like this - couple fall in love, get married, try to have kids but somethings not working - then they BOTH decide to adopt. They both arrive jointly at the point where they decide that they would like a child in their lives. So yes, its very very different from asking a guy to get with a woman who already has a child, from a different relationship.
The desire to have a child is something that is awoken within a man usually within a relationship of intense emotional love. Its actually quite rare to meet a young man that is single that wants to have a kid - usually the man is looking for a mate, then finds a suitable mate (still not interested in children) then gradually falls in love and then and only then does something happen - he starts to soften in his heart, he looks at other babies and finds them cute, he may also be more responsive to 'lovey dovey' things like soft toys, baby talk, cuddling etc. The act of falling in love with his mate has awakened his paternal instincts, and they try to have a child. I expereinced this myself - I spent my teens and 20s trying to NOT get my mate pregnant, and then all of a sudden, fell in love with my partner, and decided that I wanted a child.
This is the reason why a married, committed couple looking to adopt is a totally different scenario than a single guy looking at a woman on OLD and seeing that she already has a child, and thinking 'nope'.
AurelianWay Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Adoption by couples is something that men may be more receptive to because neither partner has dna from the adopted child. He has no paternity but his wife has no maternity so she can't use the kid as a leveraging tool and the guy doesn't feel cucked.
Pre feminism, men that adopted or took on single moms had authority over these children. Contrast that to modern day where men are just supposed to take on all responsibilities and have no authority.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
Valid points, but observations/questions: 1) Would you, personally, at age 40 and single be interested in wifing up an older woman and adopting a baby of another race at significant expense?
When you say "may be more receptive to", that's relative but it doesn't make it very strong outright. Men (may) have a generally weaker urge to raise children than women. Funny story: About 25 years ago on match, I saw a profile from a 35 yo woman saying she had just adopted a baby from overseas. I chuckled because this didn't make her much more appealing to me than if she had been a single mother. "Welcome to the adoption party, fellas! BRING MONEY!!!!"
2) Single mothers don't use children as a leveraging tool (although they sure would like to try!)
And that observation gets me to thinking how modern women tend to believe ANYTHING about themselves is leverage. "I like watching Netflix! That makes me attractive! I "own" a home! That makes me attractive! I like to eat out (at his expense). That makes me attractive!" The solipsism is extraordinary.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Me personally? I would NOT be interested in purchasing a baby of another race at the age of 40. I say purchase, because that is what it will be when you are 40 and do not already have kids. No sane adoption agency will give a baby to a couple in their 40s who have not already raised some kids.
Raising kids is way way way harder than you think it will be. As a society, we are totally delusional about this: at aged 40, you are WAY too old to start having kids. Babies require immense amounts of energy. By 40, you have missed the boat. Nobody wants to say this becuase they are worried about offending people - the problem with our ages is that feelings are more important than facts.
Doubtless someone will pipe up and say 'I had a baby in my 40s and I was perfectly fine...etc etc' and they are missing the point.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
I suppose I am missing the point. My own experience is that having my daughter at age 50, I have less energy admittedly than younger, but I also have wisdom as well. Actually, I'm jealous of friends who have their parents help out (in their 60's) because senior citizens are often really good with babies. Note that this is experience/wisdom that comes from growth rather than just growing old as many 40 something women are still mentally teenagers. Men and women age differently in terms of how they handle children and I think my wife would have an easier time as a mother if she was younger because if she gets tired, she gets angry when the child is acting up and her parenting skills deteriorate while if I get angry, I simply put the child in her room for a "timeout". The problem, as I said, is that our two parent Leave-it-to-Beaver model was really based upon the 1950's middle class as compared to most societies with extended families that helped each other out. My grandmother back in the 1940's ran a charity "new mothers" at a Polish-American church where the church women helped young mothers with basic parenting to make it more manageable. There were married mothers, of course, with the husband working.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Hi Polish - I'm not critising you at all.
When I said 'someone will miss the point' what I was anticipating was that somebody would say 'well I did that and I'm ok' ....in other words they are saying that beause they have found an exception to the rule, then the rule cannot hold true. This is basically a logical fallacy of our age, and its very pervasive.
I'll give you an example - black people are on average, quite a bit poorer than white people. The average white family has almost 10x the net worth of the average black family (2016, link below). So it would be fair to say that one of the main problems, if not THE problem facing black people in the USA is that they start poor, which means worse education outcomes and a much higher liklihood of criminal activity.
But the world has moved to such a place that 'describing reality' is basically hate speech. We are so befuddled by wokeness, and the idea that feelings are more important than facts, that we are no longer able to find the answers to social questions because we are not even allowed to state the questions any more.
Everything is personalised, and we are not longer allowed to say things like 'black families are generally poor'. Regardless of it being true, we dont 'like' the fact that it is true, so we 'blame the messenger' and regard the truthful description of a reality that we dont want as something that is unwanted in itself. We have moved from a position where we previously didn't like the problem, to a position where we don't like the description of the problem.
If I went over to reddit right now and started a thread about how the real problem for black people is not the police or racism, its poverty, and backed it up with hard data from rock solid resources, I can guarantee you what will happen;
A whole load of people will pile on me for being racist because they think that pointing out that black people are poorer ipso facto meant that I think that black people are inferior. (messenger shooting)
A whole load of other people will say i'm racist AND deluded because Barrack OBama is black and he is rich. Jay Z is black and he's rich. XYZ is black, and they're rich. So, I'm an idiot, living in the past, and black people are not slaves picking cotton on the farm any more, so I'm wrong AND racist. (using exception to disprove a rule)
You see how far we have fallen as a society? Discussion of the problem is not allowed, not possible. Personal experience of an exception to the rule means the rule is wrong.
What you did just then was you personalised the proposition by saying that YOU were 50 when your daughter was born, and all is well, so it cannot be that having children later in life is any less good than having kids younger. this is using the exception to disprove a rule which you find 'unappealing'.
I'm 100% not against you here. I'm simply saying the following
we'd be better off having kids younger, because the modern method of delaying childbirth (later marraige etc) is leading to worse outcomes.
https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2020/02/27/examining-the-black-white-wealth-gap/
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
I don't want to break a rule and be argumentative, but rather clarify what I way saying, if you don't mind. I agree that it would have been BETTER if I, and my wife, had been younger when I had my child. Agreed. But there are tradeoffs, particularly for men, in that men mature with age so I'm satisfied with my parenting. For women, this is less so since in the modern era, older women are often less capable of patience with children (and others) than when they're younger. Just my anecdotal observation, for what it's worth.
SpiritualEnema Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Women love the “step up” term, but it looks like a giant step down to everyone with a functioning brain. Not keen to nurture another man’s gestating cumshot.
Be an adult and take responsibility.
nicknack 1y ago
When I was 21 my friend introduced me to his girlfriends newly pregnant friend. This girl was gorgeous, and got fucked by some guy who ghosted her or was married or something. She wanted to keep his alpha seed of course. I actually took her out on a date because she was hot and I wanted to fuck, but she rejected my sexual advance as I was a low value guy then (no job, skinny fat). I still wish I could have pumped and dumped her though, she was a baddy.
Edit; I just looked her up and some dude married her and had 2 kids with her, seems to have fully adopted the first kid as his own. She’s still really beautiful, so I guess this was the compromise he made to have a “trophy” wife.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
you dodged a bullet buddy. Honestly, beautiful women are not worth the trouble.
I'd rather a good woman over a beautiful woman every day.
reignoferror00 1y ago
Modify the old computer "Abort, retry, fail" to abort, adoption (put up for), "woman up" (step up yourself, raise it all yourself, you go girl! you don't need a man, you can do anything!)
Loneliness-inc LvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 1y ago
33 year old post wall hag with baby rabies, gets knocked up by some hawt dude and now needs someone to buy her chubby tummy and pancake tiddies.
I'll bet her hair and temper are short and she'll be a pain in the neck to try to please.
Pic889 1y ago
Because nothing says "serious woman looking for a serious man to 'step up' and be the dad" like a cleavage pic front and center.
She is totally not lying to herself with this profile: "No, I am not on OLD because I want to be plowed by Chad (or failing that by whoever really), I am really looking for a dad for my future baby here".
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1y ago
A dual mating strategy requires dual advertisements! Boobies for Chad and Tyrone, heartfelt words for your filthy ilk.
Cereal boxes try to turn a similar trick. Nutrition and price for mom, cartoon mascot for the kid. The kid pays nothing and gets the toy inside! Joke's on you, mom! Tee-hee!
Pic889 1y ago
Nah, no man will see her profile on an OLD app and think "this profile totally convinced me to 'step up' and be the dad for this woman's future child". A man's first and only thought upon seeing that profile on an OLD app will be how to smash. Whether the man will pretend to care about the future child is up to the individual.
The kind of woman who ends up featured in this sub tends to lie to herself: "I didn't take a $250,000 loan to go to a 4-year all-expenses-paid vacation, I am studying Gender Studies in college", "I am not Chad's sidechick, I am in a situationship with Chad and it will evolve into a full-blown relationship someday", "I am not an Alpha-Widowed inspin, I just have high standards", "I am not on OLD because I want to be plowed by Chad (or failing that by any man really), I am really looking for a dad for my future baby here", you get the point.
nicknack 1y ago
Never heard it like this but true as it gets. It’s a 4 year vacation, and this applies to even the more respectable degrees.
Pic889 1y ago
It depends on the degree really. If it improves your prospects in the job market, you may come out ahead eventually. You can also go to some state college instead of an Ivy League university to cut costs.
But you will be surprised by how many people out there carry hundreds of thousands of dollars in college debt (which cannot be shed during bankruptcy) while working minimum wage jobs because they thought their Gender Studies or African American Studies or Art History degree is somehow an investment.
This is why the recent tech layoff will hurt the Gender Studies / African American Studies crowd the most, because their dream of getting a job at a Silicon Valley company as "HR Director of Diversity" where they get paid to make life miserable for any white male that happens to work there and impose hiring quotas while contributing nothing to the company's bottom line have just been dashed. Now that advertisement money is tight, companies are trimming the fat and non-productive HR positions are the first to go. Never mind that the dream itself was always a lie, since very few get to attain such HR jobs.
nicknack 1y ago
I completely agree with you entirely, my point is more so focused on the “vacation” part of it. When I go to a different city to party and explore / find myself, I call that a trip or vacation. These kids, mostly women, are living a life of vacation while “off at college”. Student debt + mom and dad push off the pains / costs of real life and students leave college more delusional about life than they were going in.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 1y ago
Yeah I'll step up, step the fuck up the stairs past this, miss me with that bullshit
Chad_Bodmor 1y ago
Heh. At least straight forward.
"Willing to prostitute self for a father to my illegitimate kid"
I mean if you have some father chops, and you're in a state that doesn't have those stupid "kid saw you as a parent" rules you could take this chick on as an STR to MTR (depending on her enthusiasm for the service job she has) for some relatively cheap sex, BC she ain't going anywhere for a while.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
I have to the the pedantic fucker that points out that unlike a professional whore, the chances of her providing sexual reciprocation commensurate to the financial support contract she is angling for is nil. Because modern weddings are aptly described as a binding contract for men but not for women.
Sure, she might start off with a pussy free for all, but once the ink dries, or you've been around enough to have the legal duties of a "fatherly role" imputed upon you, that sex is also going to dry up just as fast. Because she no longer needs to put out (to you) to continue to get a financial payout. And guarantee one this shameless will have no issue trying to love bomb or socially blackmail you into signing a marriage contract before her Chad spawn drops too.
This is why one should never even think of marrying women unless they are well vetted and from a social and family background of a higher status and wealth than anything else they could achieve on their own that will disown them in an instant should they renege on the marriage contract in any way shape or form.
Chad_Bodmor 1y ago
That's why you don't marry her, ever. As long as you can walk out the door and leave her behind she'll keep working it like she's trying to suck start a Harley. That's why I said STR to MTR material only.