Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
kevin32
Posted 1y ago in $ Bailout $ - Permalink - Locked - 9.7K Views
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
[deleted]
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1y ago
Guess she should have let the MAN she wants now to have been the one to knock her up then, instead of expecting him to be the janitor for a party she couldn't be bothered to invite him to.
Positive-Lifeguard80 1y ago
I see a 22 years old woman enjoying the decline - this is how it looks like and it doesn't look pretty - but it's not really a case of WAATGM.
The idea of her having "failed" is a reformed RooshV-tier assessment. She obviously doesn't adhere to trad-con values and doesn't go to church.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
This is a great illustration of their solipsism. What on earth does she think is remotely appealing to a man?
The distended belly that's full of a gestating cumshot from another man?
The bathroom selfie?
The demand that the new man ManUp!™ and "take care of" both her and the child she's having from the man she really wanted?
redpillschool Everybody tag him 1y ago
Imagine posting a pic in underwear showing off your irresponsibility and expecting a dude to come take care of you, and pretending you're not also a huge whore.
Like, not even trying to pretend she's looking for more. Here's an underwear pic.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
I bet she has lots of experience with sending those kind of pictures to men. At least when she isn’t pregnant, it might make guys like us look for a little recreational fun. Assuming she’s been tested recently, of course.
Baby bump? Absolutely nothing she can tell me will get me excited now.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1y ago
Not her problem. Doesn't care.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Can someone explain to me how you can be in a relationship of substantial length, like 2 years, only to break up after the baby has been made? After like a year, you should be thinking on whether you want to get married, or private married, or whatever.
Whatever. Marry before you carry and stick with the man that you carried for. Usually works out well for all parties. But hey, we have a depraved culture, why not just do whatever makes us feel good in 5 minute intervals?
Everpax 1y ago
You honestly think marriage would help in the current social climate? The only difference that makes is it turns a breakup into a divorce, potentially putting you on the hook for alimony even if you had a prenup.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Regardless of your attitude towards marriage, this girl got pregnant by a dude she was with for around 2 years, apparently with 0 commitment, or even stability, on offer. When she’s expecting, that’s the time that they should be growing together, not growing apart.
And that’s heavily on her. She let some man have his way with her for 2 years, now she is openly looking for another man to fill the daddy role.
Everpax 1y ago
Fair. I misinterpreted your "Marry before you carry" comment as a solution for her to avoid getting in her current predicament, rather than just using it as a test of commitment.
Either way, we don't really have enough information to infer the guy wasn't committed to starting a family with her before things went bad. Their relationship could have ended for any number of reasons, most of which would play out the same whether married or not.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Yes, but really, name something more biologically discouraged than having a baby with a man and then having him go away for whatever reason? There’s not much, beyond obvious things like self mutilation. In pre-modern societies, she’d either be dead or turning to prostitution.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
He's not advising men to marry, but rather chastising this woman for conceiving outside of marriage.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Correct. I mean I’m not going to tell a man to do it or not, but it’s kind of irrelevant to this argument. The point is that this chick was floating aimlessly in her relationship. But of course, still appeared to have had tons of unprotected sex. That guy didn’t need to commit, but apparently the next guy has to. Makes no sense.
Positive-Lifeguard80 1y ago
This is has been made possible with the invention of the anti-baby pill and this invention cannot be undone. There is no way to restore monogamous matriarchy marriage.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
You're missing the point.
The point is that she is irresponsible for conceiving a child without commitment/marriage, and completely, insanely unreasonable to expect the next guy to pay for some other dude's cumshot.
Which she has failed to use.
Positive-Lifeguard80 1y ago
That "irresponsible" is an moral assessment under a system, which no longer exists. It's gone. In the past there have been duels to restore honor in the case libel. These are gone, too. They only happen as a play in historical re-enactment now, where nobody dies.
Do you understand what's happening here?
She is a prostitute, she sells her pregnant body to pay for expenses. The customer is going to pay for play, not for someone else's child. This is not how child support works.
No, she made deliberate choice, there is no "failure" there. The problem is that the world you are assuming as a foundation to rate her choices doesn't exist anymore. And being red-pilled means to unplug and accept the new reality.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
It’s only a reality if you sit back and let it happen. Give it 20 years and a society full of unattached women, some financially destitute due to a life of debauchery, some childless and slaving away at dead end jobs with no pay increases thanks to their love of voting in “great reset” politicians.
Thomas Sowell said it best when he said things that can’t be sustained, won’t.
Positive-Lifeguard80 1y ago
Trad-cons still believe that things are going to go back to Roman-Empire Roman-Catholic Church model. They don't realize, that this is actually impossible now. So in the new reality things will go back to the pre-Roman era. Which looks nothing like the 2000 years after.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1y ago
Moral law is no more subject to the whims of individuals or trends in societies than physical laws. If I drop a Roman denarius it will fall at exactly the same speed as it fell when it was dropped by a legionairre.
The same is true of sexual morality, and people and societies that ignore that truth pay the price in utterly predictable ways.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Correct. Let’s not pretend that this is the first time in human history that the culture has gotten decadent and perverted. But constant bad decisions cannot be sustained.
Also of note is that the more primitive a society gets, the more traditional gender roles are embraced. Eventually these people will begin to collapse the system. We’ll see how decadent they want to behave once there’s no one left to save them.
Positive-Lifeguard80 1y ago
Blue-pilled trad-cons believe these "traditional gender roles" will be Roman Empire / Catholic Church gender roles (one man married to one woman, beta provider to housewife), while we are on the way back to ancient polygynic patriarchy based on tribal warfare.
The system is completely collapsing, not because these people being naughty, that's the blue-pilled trad-con narrative.
It's collapsing inevitably, because the beta providers keeping the system running are gone.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago Stickied
1) As @lurkerhasarisen has already pointed out, morality is eternal.
2) I actually was not moralizing, but rather assessing her to be irresponsible from a purely pragmatic, consequence-based standpoint.
Yes; you are derailing yet another conversation with irrelevant tangents.
Look, we can tell you're an intelligent dude.
However, consistently derailing conversations in an attempt to show this off isn't going to go well for you on this forum if you keep it up.
Please read the following from the sidebar before continuing here at WAATGM:
1) the rules, especially rule 2 ("this is not a debate sub")
2) "Understanding The Purpose of WAATGM" by the sub's founder, @Kevin32
There's a lot more in the sidebar that will help you acclimate yourself to this forum and be a good contributor. It can be viewed by hitting the little menu button at the top right of the forum page, that looks like a half black, half white square.
CC: @moorekom
Positive-Lifeguard80 1y ago
Understood. I figured interacting with this type of content on forums.red is not adding anything useful to my life, so I will take my discussions back to Reddit.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1y ago
You'll be fine here. Just stay on topic and within the intended spirit of the forum.
If anything, depending on where you go on reddit, the admins are likely to permanently suspend your account like they've done to me and many others.
Positive-Lifeguard80 1y ago
This happens when the baby has been made without HIS consent.
Your assuming that the pregnancy has anything to do with the "relationship of 2 years" this whore is talking about is just pure Blue Pill. Do you really believe, that she didn't use that app while having that "boyfriend"?
Monogamous matriarchy is entirely dead. Inventing hormonal contraception is like inventing a cheap mass market technology that allows you to print real dollar bills at no cost. Once it hits the market, paper money is obsolete. And that is what happened to marriage and it cannot be turned back either. Just like how you cannot unteach women how to read. Once everyone has a money printer, cash is obsolete and will never come back. Once every woman has a pill preventing her from getting pregnant, marriage is obsolete and will never come back.
So with the tradcon social order being dead, it's replaced with polygynic patriarchy. In that order a woman is either married to one of the very few patriarchs (beside his other wives) or just sells her body on the sexual market place using hookup apps. And the latter is exactly what we see happening here.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
You say that, until of course the woman gets pregnant. Unplanned pregnancy has skyrocketed since birth control has been founded. It’s almost like people think that they can outsmart God/Mother Nature/whatever you think is relevant here, and fail miserably.
I think there’s something to your point that she might’ve baby trapped the dude though. Relationship was on the rocks, so she poked a few holes in a condom and maybe took some fertility drugs in order to get pregnant. Then she really deserves an L, because she weaponized a child for her gain. That kid didn’t ask to be born to a 304.
Positive-Lifeguard80 1y ago
No pregnancy is unplanned. You have sex, you get pregnant. That was the order until the 1960s. And then marriage became obsolete over night.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1y ago
I would argue that HBC didn't kill marriage (although it eviscerated premarital abstinence and thus the ability of many women to pair bond with their husbands)... what killed marriage was the normalization of "woman always wins" divorce.
Positive-Lifeguard80 1y ago
Eviscerating pre-marital abstinence just eviscerated marriage. Just like the value of cash is based on the fact that someone else doesn't have it, but wants it, HBC just made the currency sex obsolete. That currency was previously only available inside marriage for both sexes.
Just LARPing pre-marital abstinence doesn't change the fact, that the currency itself is still completely worthless. It's just people pretending to live inside historical fiction.
Without HBC these divorces would have never happened and the respective court rulings would be just. However we just see judges assuming a pre-HBC world and applying court orders to a post-HBC world. That means, post-HBC LARP/re-enactment marriages suddenly get treated like real pre-HBC marriages.
[deleted] 1y ago
[--removed--]
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Yet another woman gets kicked out of Genghis Khan's harem.
GimmeTheUsual Jr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
Christ. You can tell with some squinting that she had a fairly decent body before getting knocked up, too.
How many are ruined this way? Its like every chick around me has at least one 'reminder' of her ex clinging to her knees.
Loneliness-inc LvL 99 Rogue NiceGuy™ 1y ago
You want to be a recipient of love and caring, but you don't know how to do that.
If you knew how to receive a man's love and caring, you'd be married to the baby's daddy.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1y ago
The truth is that she will get lots of respones, lots. There are loads of guys that want to smash pregnant women. It's always a popular category on porn sites. I quite like it myself - have had sex with pregnant women in the past, and its great. They feel great, they look great, and you don't have to worry about contraception!
But...that is all she will get. She'll only get men that want a smash n' dash.
The thing with women is that they are totally blind to how their subconscious works. She concious mind says "well, there are loads of good men out there...I've heard stores of guys who will raise others kids as their own....I've seen those hallmark movies where the great, good looking guy just chips in and works hard and looks after some other guys kid (emotional orchestral music playing in background)"
Subconciously, she knows that loads of men have a pregnancy fetish and that she will get loads of interest. She thinks that she will be able to snag a player by converting him into a carer. That it will start off as just sex, but then the guy will fall in love with her.
So...its an interesting dynamic. She is being a bit dishonest, because she is angling for a player and then she reckons she can convert him into a simp. And the guys that end up messaging her and going to have to pretend their 'nice guys looking for the one' ...but they'll quickly exit once they've had their fun. Both parties are going to dishonest about their intentions.
She better get used to smash and dash from now on, because that is all that is going to be on offer from the kingdom of man from now until about 43, and then she will be untouched until the she departs this world.