Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
Created by kevin32
Visit the WAATGM forum to view and post content.
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this tribe is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
- 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate tribe.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
TJMS Jr. Hamster Analyst 2d ago
What's it called when a woman taps her fingernails like this while talking?
We have "bird hands," but what's this? Is it the chicken pecking at corn kernels?
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 5d ago
Public service announcement: If you enjoy the content, please consider posting this link to the Reddit version of WAATGM since I cannot. It drives more traffic to this site, such as myself, and that's how the content creation happens. Please do your part.
@Typo-MAGAshiv Sort of Big Question but since she didn't phrase it as a question, flaired Single Woman Tears. This is nonetheless part of my backlog series "chivalry queens" who are griping its gone.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 4d ago
She's not complaining about being single. It fits "The Big Question" but only as weekend material. Reflaired accordingly.
On a different note, I could have sworn I posted this chick already. I did a quick dig through my history though, and it seems that I didn't. Hmm. I must have seen her on a reaction video on YouTube and meant to find her original later to post, but never did.
I really need to stop procrastinating, one of these days. You know, when I get around to it.
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 4d ago
lol, "getting around to it" has spared me from unnecessary work my whole life.
I think men in general have that wired in our brains, as conserving energy for what matters would be important in the gotta-spear-this-mammoth times as well as now.
StockImagination 5d ago
foid logic : men do not treat me like a princess (because she is ugly and annoying) so therefore men are princesses.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 5d ago
Oh no! Hold the press! Her Ladyship is upset!
Yeah sorry princess, no one cares if you think it's horrible. It's reality, and your hypocritical attitude and moral outrage will just make it worse for you.
This is the result of generations of male oppression at the hands of the feminist matriarchy. We're in the "bad times create strong men" area now, and you're not going to be pleased when we dismantle your power structures and reinstall the universal, timeless patriarchal norms that used to keep your sex in line.
No, we want to be treated like the kings we are. Your job is to get behind a man, stick with him for life, raise his children, keep his castle neat and clean, and support him in every way possible. Welcome to the new world order.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 4d ago
Well aren't you just the cutest little optimist!
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 4d ago
I think she has a point. Men have stopped treating women as special. They are treating women as equal.
Why is that Miss? Well I would say its because women are not special any more.
Women used to be special for men because they brought good things to them. Now the best you could hope for is sex when she feels like it. So women are not worth it any more. That means that men will no longer be special for women.
Treating women as equal is a legal requirement but actually its more than the average specimen has earned. Women are a net loss to individual men and to society as a whole. They are expensive, they produce stress and drama, they want men to do half their job plus the men's own job and they still don't produce enough children to replace the population. Below average positive contribution, above average net contribution.
Miss its only just starting. Get used to men leaving the elevator first. Get used to paying men to move your heavy things too.
BobbingForBunions Sr. Hamster Analyst 4d ago
Me when I hear women complaining that men no longer treat them special:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X0IPjZDoB9U
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 4d ago
I think you got some of your phrasing backwards, and/or meant to say something else at some spots.
Did you mean that women won't be special to men? Or maybe that men will no longer treat women as special?
No, in the aggregate they're a net negative.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 4d ago
One is an error, the other is what I meant.
I meant negative contribution not net. I may have tried to write net negative? Anyway error in typing.
I did mean "Men will no longer be special for women" I thought that the reader would infer "by choice from a principle of fairness and in order to avoid a significant net less by being good to someone who is not by any means net good to you in return"
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 4d ago
One of the great things about being a passport bro is seeing how some concepts are universal (hardware) versus cultural (software).
In many countries, chivarly is reversed with the women carrying water while the men walk with them smoking a cigarette. A Polish friend visited Turkey and his host asked him to observe: "Look at the plaza during the day. Men playing chess, petting cats, drinking coffee. The women are at home cooking and cleaning. This is the opposite of the west where the malls are full of women spending money." Istanbul is a city I really want to visit soon and hang out with all the cats!
It's because women, being the weaker sex, are subjugated in The Law of the Jungle. It's funny when feminists pulled this for decades "Short or broke men are WEAK so who cares about you!" I was reading some comments by supposed ugly women complaining that men treated them with contempt. Perhaps that has happened, but men have been experiencing dehuMANization for decades, even centuries, under gynocentric chivalry.
Bangkok 4d ago
Bee in turkey few times, it is not living there so my insight is limited. You cant see that many Turkish women around unless quite young. The young ones can easily dress as sluttty as 1st world girls And being carried on scooters in minis and high boots once 6|7pm hits (way better than cars as physical contact is guaranteed).
Indeed there is many men spending time together in local mini clubs playing chess cards and importantly backgammon. In other places like forecourts etc as well.
I am seeing a woman that is v close to this clulture and after being semi pain at the start now she insist on carrying shopping even if it weighs 20% of her body, most often insisting to pay for groceries even if there is nothing for her and oferring to pay for petrol if I would take her for a hike.
Sample is n=1 so I lack wider confirmation.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 4d ago
After 60-plus years of women demanding that everyone pretend that men and women are functionally interchangeable, and colonizing every formerly male venue, why is she surprised? We told them this was going to happen, and they insisted that this is what they wanted.
People who complain that “men aren’t men anymore” and are disgusted by the current generation of men need to build a time machine so they can go back and bitch-slap the suffragettes.
JudgeSmales Jr. Hamster Analyst 4d ago
Suffragettes, or bull dykes as we call them in modern terminology. I am a student of history, and the group term happily adopted by suffragettes was "new women." Not a bangable broad in the bunch. Every one of them looks like their nickname was Sarge, as we called one of the dykiest teachers at my high school decades ago.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 4d ago
So much to love about her shaming ploys. Feminists used to shame men who used feminine terms to shame other men and disempower women "Men calling wimpy men sissy shows they are misogynistic!" I suppose they had a point but it begs the question: Feminists themselves are misogynistic in that they usually categorized themselves as both helpless victims of The Patriarchy and yet also in need of socialist bailouts from it.
Bookmark AND PDF save this URL. It shows: as a group, women pay no net taxes!!! https://motoristoppression.wordpress.com/2016/11/03/32/
In other words, without a western style welfare state, feminism quickly collapses. Heck, even the feminists BRAG about this as they say "That's why passport bros go to developing nations where women NEED them!" Exactly.
And what do "equal" feminists contribute to society? On the low end, criminals that attack and prey on women and ruin our cities. On the high end, via DEI, aging hypergamy women who don't have children. Both ends are reverse-darwinism like the opening scene of Idiocracy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sP2tUW0HDHA
Anyhoo, back to "the princess". She calls men who simply want "equality" as 'princesses'. That the men simply treating women like men, which is what feminists claimed to have wanted, are spoiled, entitled, or childish but yet women who are even moreso this way are to be admired for their "standards"?
It's particularly amusing when the woman is so entitled, and obnoxious, that the shaming ploys are unlikely to work on anyone, even the most thirsty of men. Like the Princesses of the 18th century who lost their heads, it was due to arrogance, the notion that the peasantry should be happy to toil in the fields without a literal bucket to piss in.
It only makes it that much more delightful for based men to act "ungentlemanly" and "sassy" as one put it recently.
Everpax Jr. Hamster Analyst 4d ago
Notice how she lists a bunch of examples that essentially amount to men not giving women special treatment just because gender (a.k.a. treating women equally), then wraps it up with "and then they have the audacity to go 50/50", as if she's pointing out some kind of hypocrisy?
The death of chivalry and splitting the bill are not contradictory concepts, they're part of the exact same ideology: that men and women are equals. Men are more than capable of opening their own doors and paying their own bills, so if women are equal then they should handle those things too without throwing a tantrum.
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 4d ago
Drizzle Drizzle.
You're not even old enough to know what chivalry is, little girl.
Chivalry died long before you were born and baptized in the Toxic Pool of Feminism.
Have a few more anti-depressants and bask in the equality that your foremothers created.