Visit the WAATGM forum to view and post content.
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this tribe is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
- 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate tribe.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Content Archive:
Related forums:

polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 6h ago
Public service message: If you enjoy the content, please consider posting this link to the Reddit version of WAATGM since I cannot. It drives more traffic to this site, such as myself, and that's how the content creation happens. Please do your part: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_7FaWnlhS4&t=10s
@Typo-MAGAshiv please adjust flair accordingly if needed.
Anyhoo, this is the OP post so it's not shortened or anything. Further "why" will be shown tomorrow as she'll be a returning guest under a different flair!
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 5h ago
"Men are intimidated by my unblemished magnificence"
throwaway_old_guy 4h ago
Wouldn't it be funny if her name happened to Sephora?
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 4h ago
When I was a kid, I watched the Donna Reed Show-- re-runs, obviously-- on Nick at Nite. Donna Reed had to have been the perfect housewife & mom.
Yes, it was anachronistic and an idealistic fantasy. She was married to a doctor and had a spotless house. There was no real conflict or drama, all the plots were simplistic and I assume she & her husband slept in different beds. She could be stern with her kids when they were doing something silly and the plot was over and done in about 23 minutes. But as wives and moms go, I'd say she was just about the ideal. She was an unrealistic fictional representation, yes. Such perfection can't exist.
But for women like that in the link, I assume she'd see one episode of that show and start vomiting.
throwaway_old_guy 2h ago
I can't imagine her response to "Leave it to Beaver" or "I Dream of Jeanie".
The other side of it would have been "My Three Sons"
Everpax Jr. Hamster Analyst 4h ago
Ah yes, overqualified for men. Her pussy's simply too advanced, technology is not there yet.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 2h ago
She's a being of pure light, evolved far beyond you filthy ape-like things.
Go pick fleas out of your hair or bang rocks together or whatever you do.