Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
Created by kevin32
Visit the WAATGM forum to view and post content.
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this tribe is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
- 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate tribe.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2d ago
Just didn't want them badly enough to not not be a side piece in the Oval Office lul. Funny how refraining from trying to adulterously suck and fuck her way up the socioeconomic ladder was somehow not a choice.
One of the few great things about the Information Age, is it is a LOT harder for a woman to escape her actions since everything is recorded in 4K. Figuratively. Sometimes literally.
Because let's be real, there are like hardly any men over 45-50 in the US who don't know who this particular cocksucker is - and it for sure tanked any relationship prospects she had. And of course men younger than her typically were not going to be options to begin with.
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 2d ago
Yeah, being a side piece to a married man in the oval office doesn't quite fit with the whole "I want to be married" thing.
It's almost like she's not telling the truth :)
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2d ago
I am of the opinion that lots of guys are cool with this. I am. But I’m short and broke. Nearly any woman can get married if they have reasonable standards. The irony if her statement is she was raised to want a fancy wedding but also trained in shit testing men on dates. I read a guys account who dated her. She was tepid and pleasant and paid her half of the date and said she wasn’t interested.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2d ago
And those are not the guys she wants - she clearly by her actions wanted a man with status and power. The issue is she is radioactive from a PR point of view to any man with political aspirations/status. And a woman as nakedly aspirational as she showed herself to be can't be trusted to stay faithful, or at least maintain the plausible appearance of such. Which is a problem when one of the requirements of a wife to a politician is to know when to keep her fucking mouth shut.
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 2d ago
They can't all get married now. Too many men are averse to marriage because they know what a terrible deal it is.
Well, that's one date.... .that's fair enough. That's an uninterested woman who is playing fair.
I've no idea what the rest of her dating life looks like...... but I bet it isn't pretty in the cold light of day.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago
Here's a way of putting it:
If you're out on a date with a woman and she was attractive enough to go out on a date with, and she was pleasant and kind and friendly, would you be so uninterested you wouldn't want a 2nd date with her?
This "chemistry" nonsense means such women either are utterly shallow and/or simply dislike men overall and need to be gamed/entertained to avoid "turning the channel" because she's bored.
Normal men are boring. We don't exist primarily to be interesting, engaging, and entertaining unless we're politicians or celebrities. Bill Clinton, whatever we think of him, would be an interesting guy to spend an evening with.
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 22h ago
"chemistry" is just mutual attraction.
if that's not there, she's not interest....... she can say "no chemistry" as an excuse for too short, didn't pay, anything.
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 2d ago
Who in their right mind will wife her up? No one that's who.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2d ago
I wouldn’t mind. She gave head. So what? She likely has a low body count. It’s ironic that she wound up a corporate nun because she’s the ultimate alpha widow. She couldn’t top being a mistress to a president. Hypergamy blowing up in her face. Pardon the pun.
PoopBeast Jr. Hamster Analyst 2d ago
"Mom...Dad... I'd like you to meet my new girlfriend..."
GeorgeIII Jr. Hamster Analyst 2d ago
The act was her choice.
The consequences weren’t.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 2d ago
Did I read that correctly, that she’s still contemplating getting married and having kids… at 52?
Not only doesn’t she have a husband; but she doesn’t even have any prospects. Even if she met Mr Right today, she would be looking at trying to give birth with one of her frozen eggs in her mid-50s. That ship has sailed.
Is this what passes for “educated” these days? No wonder her party openly admits that they oppose voter ID on the grounds that their core constituents are too stupid to get them.
I also note that they refer to her as an “activist.” They don’t say what kind of activism she does, but it doesn’t matter. Let’s face it, the country is filled with activist spinsters whose stories are not being told. The difference between her and all of them is that she’s famous for being the (in her own words) “Special Assistant in Charge of BJs” in the Clinton Oval Office.
Obviously she didn’t prioritize the things she said mattered most to her, which demonstrates that she didn’t want them all that much, and now she’s cooked. No quality man with any self respect will wife her up, and no man that would have her would interest her.
One of my favorite “Demotivation” posters says, “Some people’s purpose in life is to serve as a cautionary tale for others.”
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago
She's a media privacy advocate such as controlling one's social media data that platforms are allowed to share without your knowledge, for example.
She has a bourgeois background. Becoming an intern for the white house required some pull and it requires a parent to pay for the kid's apartment. This prices out the "normies" such as us. She then went to very nice universities.
Getting eggs frozen is almost as much an accessory for such women as designer handbags, shoes, and the latest iPhone. It means "the normal clock doesn't apply for me! I could always hire a surrogate!" but this begs the question:
So what?
Top tier men don't want an aging woman who will have a kid via surrogate. They don't know if the eggs will survive thawing. It's funny that these women want tall men to "feel safe" but yet can't understand men might want a young woman to know if he emotionally and financially invests, he can be a father to his own children.
And what good is it to thaw them out now? As a single mother by choice, she's just another loser. Yes, she'll have a LOT of company now with other bourgeois leftover women, but it's still the walk of shame. Kids are a pain to take care of. It's funny how they gripe about "mental load" blah blah blah as if being a single mother is easy, even if she has the money for it.
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 1d ago
"It was not by choice"..... it's possible she actually can't have children in the conventional sense. Maybe she can produce eggs but doesn't have a properly functional womb, so she gets her eggs frozen so she can go the surrogate route.
That's how it reads to me, but she's female so who the fuck knows.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1d ago
That may be, but I understood her to mean that having kids is off the table for her because she’s too old. Even if she started the dating / engagement / marriage / pregnancy / baby thing right now, the odds of her wrinkly old uterus successfully gestating a child to term are microscopic.
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 1d ago
So point to me on the doll where Bill Clinton cummed on you. Yeah, that's what I thought, you nasty whore. You're definitely no Marilyn Monroe.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago
lul it would look like a pony jar meme.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago
I now wonder if this contributed to her inability to pair bond for 30 years. I know, "duh!" but hear me out.
It's not the men's fault. Plenty of men have wifed up sorority sluts who sucked off entire college football teams. The issue is that she's KNOWN for giving good bjs. She did this in private for Bill.
After it went public, she became known as BJ girl and this shames the MEN she's with in HER eyes. She thinks to herself: "Why would I want to have a serious relationship with a loser who would want a public whore such as me?"
This also explains why modern women increasingly want gigachads: They lack scruples and are ashamed of it so they want a gigachad to wash away their shame. "Nobody can judge a woman badly if she has a rich, handsome guy on her arm."
BobbingForBunions Sr. Hamster Analyst 20h ago
Groucho Marx vibes ("I don't want to belong to any club that will accept me as a member").
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 3d ago
Public service message: If you enjoy the content, please consider posting this link to the Reddit version of WAATGM since I cannot. It drives more traffic to this site, such as myself, and that's how the content creation happens. Please do your part: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlC5DEp2EOQ
Stumbled onto this one this morning. She had previously said she "kept her personal life private". Now we know why: She didn't have one. What does everyone think? Sure, she gave a famous guy BJs but she actually had a low body count compared to most career women.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2d ago
Low body count isn't everything. Let's not be autistically monofocused about that, because it isn't the only thing that matters. She made a series of choices so stupid that it eclipsed anything else she could do for the rest of her life.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 2d ago
Cross posted to R/WAATGM.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago
Thank you!
[deleted]