Visit the WAATGM forum to view and post content.
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this tribe is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
- 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate tribe.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Content Archive:
Related forums:

No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 16h ago
LMAO
Everpax Jr. Hamster Analyst 13h ago
The first image on its own is worth making fun of: women act like they're still oppressed despite modern society making their lives way easier than men. But comparing it to the second one, as if there's a cognitive dissonance at play, falls flat. I've played RPG games as a genocidal maniac, doesn't mean I wanna go out on the street and start murdering, or that I'd like living in a world where people can get away with that.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 12h ago
I thought about this as well but note that even guys who are anti-war but play FPS games, they don't specifically fantasize about LOSING in war. They fantasize about winning and "fragging" their opponents.
For this to work for feminists, they ought to be fantasizing about dominating men and indeed that's what there's a Reddit channel about: women mocking "nice guy" men who are loathed by women.
Everpax Jr. Hamster Analyst 11h ago
True, but women's sexual fantasies aren't focused on the losing aspect either. The part that gets them turned on isn't the dominance itself, but the idea that she's so unbelievably sexy that a man simply can't control his urges around her.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 9h ago
To avoid breaking Rule 2, will wrap (my side) up with these two further observations:
1) As you just said, they don't want to "really" lose. It's an unrealistic fantasy on their part much like pornos where a hot pizza delivery girl gives you a pizza and lets you "pay" for it via sex with her. This is even a joke (I love this line by The Dude)
"He fixes the cable?" https://youtu.be/bDDGZxb6YhM?t=219
When YOU play FPS's, you suffer the violence because you accept losing as part of the fun (unless you're one of those "cheat modders"!).
You also KNOW it's a fantasy. (Most) of us know that porn isn't REAL and that it doesn't apply to real life. That's part of the humor of this very site: How utterly delusional these women are expecting their actual fantasies to be real.
I'm reminded of Fight Club where young men are told to find inspiration in actually getting into real fights AND losing. That's "keeping it real."
2) The "cognitive dissonance" applies: You aren't a hypocrite preaching against war and then playing FPS games getting off on virtually shooting people.
Although, it is likely that this woman is actually living how she preaches and that's the source of her sexual frustration: I'm planning on a repost of an article I found where a feminist gripes that all of the liberal men are not as attractive to her as red-meat eating MAGA men.
mustangfrank1 Sr. Hamster Analyst 12h ago
I read a post years ago from a man who spend 5 years in prison and was out. He had the tough guy image, tats a few scars etc. Word got out he would role play with women, choking, tying them up etc. BTW The women would pay for these performances. They knew he would not hurt them, but was violent enough to make it seem real. Anyway, he wrote that a few of his clients were ardent feminists and had seen a few of them on TV at protests. All true, not making anything up.
I had 2 girls want me to tie them up for sex. I didn’t have any rope, so they were out of luck. BTW Do most men have rope to tie up women for sex?
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 8h ago
My understanding is a soft cotton or nylon rope is preferred; helps avoid friction burns.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 9h ago
I have a friend 20 years ago who used mountain climbing rope. He claimed it was good for that purpose.
mustangfrank1 Sr. Hamster Analyst 9h ago
If I am 22 again, I will stock up on it.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 5h ago
I have somewhere between 1/4 and 1/2 mile of the stuff still hanging about. My lady is always wanting me to throw it out as I will probably never go back to rock and mountain climbing. (She would like to put more unneeded stuff of her own there). Now I can tell her its definitely not going because I am keeping it to tie women up. That ought to silence her.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 5h ago
It all depends on who the male is and what the domination is. No to ordinary men being anything but service appliances, yes to the very top tier of men falling hopelessly forth you and dominating the hell out of you in a way that you like, that makes you feel very excited but entirely safe, appreciated and cared for.
No to reality, yes to fantasy. That's how the hamster rolls.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 1h ago
FACTS