Visit the WAATGM forum to view and post content.
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this tribe is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
- 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate tribe.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Content Archive:
Related forums:

polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 21h ago
Public service message: If you enjoy the content, please consider posting this link to the Reddit version of WAATGM since I cannot. It drives more traffic to this site, such as myself, and that's how the content creation happens. Please do your part: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlC5DEp2EOQ
@Typo-MAGAshiv flaired as Bitch for now. Weekend content because, well, she doesn't appear to be looking for commitment, does she?
Folks, I have another matchmaker post, but I think we've had enough cowbell for now so enjoy these superior ideals!
Everpax Jr. Hamster Analyst 20h ago
That's a lot of vitriol against men coming from someone who installed an app in hopes of getting in a relationship with one, she out there trying to lure bees with shit.
Do she genuinely think a good man will read that and think that's just what he's looking for? Or is it an act of self-sabotage, so that when the lack of likes from being a borderline middle-aged single mom becomes evident, she can tell herself men can't handle a strong independent woman who don't need no man?
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 17h ago
Intentionally or not, she is filtering out men with self respect with her vitriol.
Because only a man utterly lacking such would put up with the situation and attitude she is offering. Or one that knows he is attractive enough for most women to abandon their stated principles for at least a time while he gets to dip his wick.
The latter man of course will simply lead to her being back on the app with even more vitriol and if still fertile another trophy for her failure to figure life the fuck out and that she needs to offer men more than anger and expectations and that she needs to confine her attentions to men that would actually stick around.
I pity the poor fucker that tries to make the woman that she is now happy. Just a future divorce waiting to happen, and that's if he is lucky.
mustangfrank1 Sr. Hamster Analyst 4m ago
she can tell herself men can't handle a strong independent woman who don't need no man?
You are correct.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 14h ago
"This person meets all your preferences?" Did you specify someone conceited and entitled who has no tolerance for perceived mediocrity or alternative view points?
To be honest it reads like a shitpost. Wow she sounds understanding and fun! Who could resist the opportunity to disappoint her?
Perhaps her future will remain female, having filtered out all the men.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 3h ago
My little sister made a similar profile on match and got a beta husband. I (think) I may have saved it at the time on my SCSI drive but I'm uncertain. Maybe AI someday can help me find it...
They believe that it's impossible to "filter out all men" and they're often correct. Think about the ego boost that must give them almost like a Superpower. She can be utterly contemptuous and insufferable yet she'll still get swipes. A normie decent-human-being guy can craft the most careful profile imaginable and... crickets. And these women KNOW it!
I chuckle at her brag that she's (almost) 5 years sober. Nearly all of us have done that without breaking a sweat. "Incredibly successful" means she manages to somehow keeps the lights on and the blonde child fed. Essentially, any man whose accomplished what she brags about is utterly "mediocre" by her own definition. She's a Woman and That Alone makes her a Goddess.
Her face is meh and in a decade, she'll be as invisible as us "mediocre" men. Paying the bills won't merit some kind of participation trophy when she's judged by a sullen teenager who has carefully studied her and figured out how to be insufferable at a higher level.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XaZM7V988RE&t=67s
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 12h ago
I am a strong, independent MAN. I've built an incredibly successful life for me entirely on my own, and one day might allow a quality WOMAN to exist in it. Not in any rush, because honestly, most WOMEN are a disappointment. I am a firm believer that the future is MALE. I will not tolerate any mediocre or anti-male WOMEN.
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 10h ago
You go guy!
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 5h ago
You read this from a man and it actually sounds plausible.
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 10h ago
k
[deleted] 8h ago
[--removed--]
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 5h ago
Yep, her future is definitely going to be female only
mustangfrank1 Sr. Hamster Analyst 6m ago
Yep, her future is definitely going to be female lonely
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 2h ago
LOLWUT? She got Angry Retarded Feminist Syndrome.
mustangfrank1 Sr. Hamster Analyst 5m ago
My superior ideals tell me to avoid her. I already have one asshole, I don't need 2.