Visit the WAATGM forum to view and post content.
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this tribe is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
- 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate tribe.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Content Archive:
Related forums:

polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1h ago
Public service message: If you enjoy the content, please consider posting this link to the Reddit version of WAATGM since I cannot. It drives more traffic to this site, such as myself, and that's how the content creation happens. Please do your part: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlC5DEp2EOQ
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1h ago
Done and done.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 33m ago
Thank you, kind sir!
The other platform has its flaws, but sadly it does have a massive user base. I'm thinking we should perhaps come up with a standard link to explain not all content is posted there such as:
Note! Not ALL WAATGM content is on Cheddit! If you enjoyed this post, you'll need to click here: https://www.forums.red/i/whereareallthegoodmen
To see all of them!
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1h ago
It’s peak female privilege that she thinks that a man has “nothing to lose” by making an unsolicited pass at a woman he doesn’t know.
In her “meet cute” fantasy, the man is always someone she finds attractive. If some Poindexter walks up to her after Yoga class and asks her out, it’s HIGHLY PROBABLE that she’ll decline, at which point the outcomes within the context of the class range from “permanently awkward” to “told to never come back.” On the other hand, if she’s one of the MANY women who enjoys humiliating men in-person or online, he can lose a lot more than access to a hobby.
She’s young, reasonably attractive, and has a nice rack that she’s obviously not shy about flaunting. She risks absolutely nothing by approaching any man she finds attractive, so it never occurs to her that only a vanishingly tiny percentage of men share that privilege.
mustangfrank1 Sr. Hamster Analyst 47m ago
I think you are being generous on her behavior. She would reject the 5'8" accountant for the 6'2" bad boi with MS13 tated on his face. This would be her selection process.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 35m ago
I chuckle at the dishonesty: She alternates between saying "it's not a big deal" and flying bird hands as she cries about what a burden it is and how she wishes men could go back to The Old Ways.
After all if it was so easy, then she wouldn't be "so sick of. it" after only just doing it 3 times AND not getting a positive result. Also, she has to lower her demands either in dreaming of a man (she desires) doing the task and, get this, asking her out for coffee (which he pays for). If she got approached 3X in the last 3 days, she would then start calling coffee dates "cheap" and "lack of effort" (again.). She recognizes that being approached is a huge power position and she hates that the men she desires have, as He Man would put it: The Power.
Ironically, I think this is actually better for our gender roles if the women are required to be submissive, beg for dates, and then happy with whatever dribbles the "leader" offers her as this dominance automatically makes the man more attractive in her eyes.
So when she says what men "should" be doing, in disgust when men don't do it, this is an indication that she doesn't yet want to even be honest or respectful for the burden she wants to dump on us: "He's lying! You can tell from his stance he's aggressive-dominant" https://youtu.be/j6g3UoKxTI8?t=152