Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
Created by kevin32
Visit the WAATGM forum to view and post content.
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this tribe is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
- 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate tribe.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1d ago
There is no double standard: A woman's preference is all that matters.
See? It's a single standard, perfectly consistent across the board.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 1d ago
Sure, she's entitled to her standards but not her results
6'3" King wasn't having it
Everpax Jr. Hamster Analyst 23h ago
Exactly, the idea of a double standard is incompatible with women's solipsism. They literally cannot grasp the double standard, because they don't see men's preferences as equivalent to theirs.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 23h ago
Men's preferences are just annoyances.
What, you want someone to listen to you? Ridiculous.
Now it's time for her back-rub.
No, that's too high. Lower. Lower. LOWER. Lower... TOO LOW!
That's too hard, you're gonna leave a bruise. No, that's too soft. No, that's not right.
YOU'RE DOING IT ALL WRONG!
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1d ago
Hilarious.
Because not only is fatness disgusting and ugly, it's an extremely easy way to tell if you are a glutton and lack self-control. UNLIKE height, weight is a barometer of character, especially as you get older and your metabolism slows down. Secondly, it's an indicator of how you will look in the future. Women often get fatter after locking down a man.
Similarly, tatoos are a choice and a good indicator of the type of girl you are - mentally unstable, bad attitude, rebellious spirit, high body count. These predictors work enough of the time as to be reliable.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 1d ago
I specifically saved this image for that golden line of technical language and I am waiting to use it on a chick
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 20h ago
This particular meme/line has been going around for so long that many women are even aware of it and it doesn't have the same pull anymore. They'll assume the guy's question about the weight is tied into him being sensitive about his height.
What I think would work better would be to answer 6'3" and then otherwise appear perfect but then use their game back at them and disqualify her over something petty such as her being a dog person rather than a cat person like you or vice-versa.
I'm kicking myself on not doing that on a job interview with EDS 30 years ago. The phone interviewer was an asshole who literally didn't say "hello" when I called him but rather "What was your GPA?" I gave him an honest answer (it wasn't great) and then he proceeded to rake me over the coals. I regret not telling him: "3.8" and then appearing to be the otherwise perfect candidate but then telling the recruiter (I was on good terms with) that it wasn't going to work out because their benefits package was insufficient. I would then at least be paying it forward.
woodsmoke Respectful reprobate 14h ago
Or simply throw it back in her teeth without the equivocation.
"Why does that matter?"
"Because being 6'3" means I don't have to entertain fatties."
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 11h ago
Oooo...good one. I'm going to use that!
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1h ago
I just want to expound on this for any newbies that are skimming threads instead of reading the sidebar like they should be:
The beauty of this is that any woman that gets offended by it is either fat or way more of a snowflake pain in the ass than it will ever be worth the effort to smash even if not fat.
It aggressively filters time and effort wasters.
Now, if one is an AFC (average frustrated chump), this looks like a horrid idea/form of failure. You just blew a chance at some pussy!
Well, newsflash newjacks, sometimes "failure" is the desired outcome. When you have actually handled your shit and have become a man with a plethora of options, the worst thing you can do isn't to blow your chance at some specific pussy. It's to waste your time on trying to Pussy Password Puzzle specific pussy that could have been spent literally anywhere else. Because you have more and better options.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1d ago
Not really much to say here. Men have preferences too. Women: either face that fact or live frustrated in denial.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1d ago
Yes, but men's preferences are all crazy and unreasonable.
All a woman wants is her 6'4" rich cowboy astronaut handyman vegan nonviolent sharpshooter with all the right progressive political stances.
Wait, you're all of those things but you wear white tube socks?? Ugh, total deal-breaker. Hard pass.