Visit the WAATGM forum to view and post content.
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this tribe is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
- 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate tribe.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Content Archive:
Related forums:

Lone_Ranger Live by the pork sword, die by the pork sword 1w ago
Oh no, a woman with no husband, is facing the possibility of not being able to be a mum at 44.
How could she have avoided this terrible fate?
It's a scooby do mystery.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
Public service message: If you enjoy the content, please consider posting this link to the Reddit version of WAATGM since I cannot. It drives more traffic to this site, such as myself, and that's how the content creation happens. Please do your part: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlC5DEp2EOQ
SOURCE NEWS ARTICLE!!! https://archive.ph/dZzsy
There's a legion of volunteers doing their part! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6yT7lJHyfEc
PoopBeast Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
Heh... I know for a fact that I've seen modern women on the internet (on things like the Whatever podcast) actually use the assertion that "women create life" as a justification for all kinds of ridiculous special treatment in society and relationships. It would always make me wonder to myself; "they do know that a man is also required to have children, right...?". Now, I know that most of the women who say these things are just are ditsy bimbos, but it somehow always felt significant to me; like a fleeting, microcosmic insight into how women think - that they have a monopoly on the creation of life. The reality that this one shows is that, one way or the other, men are absolutely something they'll have to regard if they want children, even if they didn't regard them back before they needed IVF. For these women, it must really hurt when they occasionally run up against a wall like this that they absolutely must have a man in order to solve.
It's actually heart warming to see one get smacked in the face with the realities of biology. Thanks for posting this. This one's a feel-good story for me.
Oh, and sorry bitch. My pure, white seed is reserved only for lazy morning wank sessions and late night MILF porn
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
I just had a discussion on X with an entitlement queen who tried a "table" rationalization:
"Women create life"
I then asked her: "So men shouldn't need to pay "child" support if she's the one making it, yes?"
It also makes them uncomfortable: "Doesn't this mean women are worth less the older and less fertile they get even if she otherwise has financial/educational success?"
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 2w ago
Oh no, a white woman can't get exactly the right brand of sperm on demand.
Oh no. Oh no, halt everything. Everyone rip their robes. Don the sackcloth. Heap the ashes. Black armbands for everyone. Oh no...
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
Women don't need men, right?
Obviously, "the right person" (Top 10%) isn't going to come along for her homely-looking ass anytime soon.
They claim that science has discovered they could split and merge eggs, with a 100% chance the baby is a girl.
So, why doesn't she do that then?
Also, good luck to all my non-white Australian brothers hoping that the mother doesn't hunt you down for child support.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
No Chad seed genes to raise her offspring further up the ladder in the gene pool.
A tacit confession they damn well know that they have little to no real barriers to reproduction on themselves to ensure quality. Ergo, quality is a man's job. This one was just caught out by the delusion that she could just resort to a designer baby if she could not get a build-a-butler to show up.
Well guess what ladies, if men aren't willing to even show up they often aren't going to be willing to "nut" up either.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
My wife and I adopted a gorgeous half-Persion/half-Exotic female cat. She's sweet and now 17 years old. She hadn't been spayed and I was considering breeding her because she's so lovely (and pardon the pun) exotic but upon research, I found out what a challenge it could be: After all, most pet owners get their cats spayed/neutered early on and with males in particular, it's desired because they "spray" or pee around the home. So it's tough to find a "stud cat" out there.
I learned about the etymology of the term "pick of the litter": A stud cat owner would let him get "down" with your cat but they would get the "pick of the litter", the finest kitten. From then on, whenever my wife said something charming, I'd say she was "the pick of the litter" and she'd chuckle. Our little private joke.
So my point being that "studs" have value and in the past, it was men who were hypergamous. Knights held the doors open for "ladies" who fathers would offered huge tracts of land as a dowry.
I think the shortage of white sperm in the article has to do with certain regulatory and market restrictions that have killed the, er, market. A limit of 5 children per donor because when B&B in the past would sire a hundred kids, there was a good chance of inbreeding happening. Think of it: If 100 of Perth's inspins and lesbians get the same tall PhD guy's sperm, there's a good chance their offspring will breed with one another.
Then also there's the cost of clearing them: Genetic tests for abnormalities although I read that some of these men had abnormalities after all. Are they really PhD's? And then many 6'3" young guys with PhD's may not be into this.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
Yeah almost like they have the combination of better options and intelligence to realize that they should not rely on the Australian government to protect them from predatory future child support claims.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
The unbearable whiteness of sperm!
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 2w ago
My sperm has always been a black, oily, tar-like fluid which forms into a semi-sentient creature that oozes into the gutters and consumes human flesh at night.
That's why I've never worn a condom. They just get angry at me.
IceNineWithLime 2w ago
Looks like we've finally found the true source of the black goo from The X-Files.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 2w ago
Where do you think they got the idea from?
It's too stupid to have come from the mind of a science fiction writer.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
So you're the reason Tasha Yar is dead!
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
Should have included a photo. A man from another country would probably do the job for her if she was averagely fit and didn't act up for the evening. So long as he lives abroad he should be safe from the child support.
I have a mate down her way at the moment. He has wasted god knows how much on whores over the years. Sure he could fit her in.
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
I could be mistaken, but in all cases I heard whenever the donor of the sperm is sued for child support, it has always being a white man, this would heavily disincentivize white men from donating.
Lone_Ranger Live by the pork sword, die by the pork sword 1w ago
there is no point in suing people with no money.
Everpax Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
I'm not really knowledgeable on the subject, but aren't there legal protections in effect when you donate sperm through a clinic? Is the suing just a hail mary that requires the man to be stupid enough to not be aware of the law?
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
Well, see, those protections are just like the protection of a prenup. Even an otherwise iron-clad one that both parties agreed too with completely legal terms at the time it was signed still risks being thrown out/"revised" if a woman cries hard enough at the right judge. And the State has an automatic conflict of interest in the verdict because it does not want to be on the hook for the child's costs. Just like what was done with marriage.
So the only 100% safe protection for a man from child support claims is to not impregnate a woman and not have your identity known by her to also avoid false paternity claim attempts too.
And then these bitches blatantly just hunting for a retirement plan because they don't want to work until they are 65+ wonder why men are avoiding them like the plague.
Everpax Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
Ah, got it. No surprise why there's a shortage among certain demographics then. To donate you'd basically have to be so poor that when they find you they won't think it's worth going through the courts.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
And women absolutely care about the career/status of the donor if they can get that info. So they are stuck with donors they will not accept and potential donors they want but who have no reason to donate due to every other option being better for them.
Just like the regular dating market.
user84893093748959 Jr. Hamster Analyst 6d ago
You're overlooking the biggest risk that the legal protections from the state disappear, because the state changes the law counter to what it had been in the past.
The first observation from this is that the law is not morality.
Secondly, how much do you trust the state to not break a promise or to not lie directly?
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 6d ago
I literally spelled that out two comments up (and in another comment upthread within the post as well). Any legal protections given to sperm donors will go the fuck away the second women cry hard enough.
JudgeSmales Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
Did she check Amazon? She could probably get some custom-DNA white-man jizz delivered to her front door by 5 p.m. this afternoon.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 2w ago
For the low, low price of a six-pack of Miller Lite.
Dorballom08 2w ago
BBC for the win ????
On serious note, it's inevitable. Once you go down the unnatural and artificial path, it gets harder with time. Now maybe woke government will start white sperm farms to support IVF industries. The only long term sustainable solution is to go back to traditional way of life based on faith, culture, family and tradition.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
I mean, this silly loon is 44 and trying for IVF when she's already so old that the natural path is basically gone too. Have a feeling she spent her 20's and 30's taking it for granted that she could always get steak that was too juicy and lobster that was too buttery and now can't get either of any quality.