Visit the WAATGM forum to view and post content.
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this tribe is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
- 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate tribe.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Content Archive:
Related forums:

polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 5h ago
Public service message: If you enjoy the content, please consider posting this link to the Reddit version of WAATGM since I cannot. It drives more traffic to this site, such as myself, and that's how the content creation happens. Please do your part: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlC5DEp2EOQ
RIP Scott Adams.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 4h ago
I could have sworn I'd seen that one back in the 1990s. Maybe I'm mistaken.
Hell, just a paradox of hypergamy. A woman doesn't even have to be "strong and independent" to run into this!
And yes, RIP Scott Adams. He was s big influence on me as a teenager in the 1990s. I read most of his books (yes, actual books and not just collections of "Dilbert" comic strips), and even though I was only a teenager at the time, I was starting to realize just how dumb most people were. He correctly pointed out that even the smartest people are idiots outside of their specialties, and would do well to remain humble and not haughty.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2h ago
I'm reading through "Win Bigly" right now. It has some fun takes on insights I had already made but I appreciate the different perspective.
I posted a WATGMA commentary on this topic here: https://www.forums.red/p/whereallthegoodmenare/324971/the_paradox_of_strong_and_independent_career_women_hypergamy
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2h ago
Edit: oh, this is new.
Crap, I either missed it or did what I frequently do: said "this looks interesting, but it's long, so I'll get back to it later" and later never came.I still have catching up from the most recent few days to do, so I'll
try to read that even later.add this one to the queue.First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 3h ago
The overestimation of value form the female perspective.
She thought she was calling the shots and that he was going to have to jump high enough to meet her bar.
He figured he could settle for her and got on with it. She didn't even have to be grateful, just not too demanding...
I said something similar to my first wife She was giving me a list of why she picked me because of all she wanted in life with the undertone of "and you are lucky, you better match up and deliver" and I said "I just thought. You'll do" Didn't go down well. Got reminded of it frequently but still gives me a smile.
30 years later I have well and truly learned my lesson. I would never say that to a woman now. Now I would say "Sounds a bit much for a mere mortal like me, sorry"
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2h ago
My wife and I often banter on this topic. She has a very Soviet era view of things so it's a lot of fun. When she complained a few times about me not doing enough housework, I pointed out to her that this very relationship exists because of me. I wasn't shaming her, but pointing out that it's like how people don't appreciate the powerline guys who risk their lives to literally keep your lights on. That her life as she has it now, our family, lifestyle, everything, was due to me not only doing the legwork in the relationship in the beginning but even before then building myself up to be a husband and father. ALL I ask for her is to not screw it up.
She appears to get it.
Sometimes she won't do something I'll ask (wink) and I say in Groucho Marx style: "Would you do it for Prince Harry?" and she gushes as she dreams of marrying the prince and says "yes, I would" and I say that if she can do it for Prince Harry, she can woman up and do it for me. Then she laughs and says that Prince Harry married a nasty divorced woman and I acknowledge that, but there's only so many dumb Prince Harry's around, yes?