Visit the WAATGM forum to view and post content.
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this tribe is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
- 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate tribe.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Content Archive:
Related forums:

No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 10h ago
First date with = Didn't let him hit it.
Second date with = Indicated she might, but didn't let him hit it.
Third date with = None. Bitch ain't putting out without a ring on it.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago
Public service message: If you enjoy the content, please consider posting this link to the Reddit version of WAATGM since I cannot. It drives more traffic to this site, such as myself, and that's how the content creation happens. Please do your part: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlC5DEp2EOQ
You can all thank the X algorithm for this one.
pofkaf 1d ago
So many first dates, only a handful of second dates. Either her standards are too high, or tons of guys just pumped and dumped. Either way - red flag!
Everpax 11h ago
You can tell from her facial expressions which guys she was planning on letting plow her, and which ones were just a free meal ticket.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1d ago
Golly, given that she was surely splitting the bills 50-50 every time, she must've been spending a fortune!
...she, er, was splitting the bills 50-50 each time, right??
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1d ago
Sometimes I really hate how streamable automatically loops the videos.
I was thinking "good God, how long is this?!" and it turned out that I had already started over again at least once.
Hah.
Anyway, she's hot for her age. She'll keep getting first and second dates easily. I highly doubt she'll get any commitment anytime soon.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago
I disagree she's hot for her age. To each his own...
I think what must be frustrating to her isn't that she's not getting commitment but not even getting on a girlfriend track. For average men back 30 years ago, getting a girl on a girlfriend track was the ideal situation: You got sex and companionship without much further investment or work. You had to go out occasionally but in "cost per orgasm", it was quite economical.
Modern women such as herself don't want to state a desire for commitment because of their hardline negotiating tactic of wanting men to always "lead" with the first move. This is all well and good until the default benefits the man. When a woman doesn't press for an engagement and that's A-ok with him.
Now, however, not even a 3rd date despite a plethora of choices. It's like someone starving to death at a mall food court with a credit card.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago
Thing is, even if she put herself on the pump and dump track with her initial screening of what men she agreed to go on a date with, normally after so many dates, eventually at least a few would be willing to test her out for the GF role if for no other reason than morbid curiosity or a sense of romantic masochism.
That NONE have offered tells me her menu is so lackluster to engage with that no man wants a repeat trip to her all-you-can-eat salad bar.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1d ago
Its always important to view things from the other end of the telescope. We think of meeting new women as men do. A new woman is someone you want in your life. Someone into whom you will invest time, care and energy (as well as probably money). You may have worked hard with time and energy to get the date at all if you are not a top 20% guy (and lets face it 80% of us aren't if we take a hard look at ourselves)
I could not be bothered to watch it twice to make sure but I counted 22 first dates in 6 months. It's basically a once a week thing for her on average when we consider the second dates. She is the girl you are courting. You are her Saturday evening meal.
How much does a man spend on a first date these days gents? I don't know. I only ever really went on one real "First date". She paid but I wasn't into her. I knew all the others well and before we ever went out anywhere and we had already agreed we were an exclusive item, so I never tried to do anything to court them. What is 22 times the average cost of a first date -clothes, travel, food, entertainment? That's how much she wastes with this pointless behaviour.
We also need to consider the cost of the dates to he -clothes, hair, makeup and such. This will be considerably less than the male wastage but it will still be a huge millstone to her. It will hold her back in life.
This sort of pointless self indulgent dopamine seeking is a giant burden on western society.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago
Back in the 1980's, women made a big deal about their hair and makeup to rationalize men paying for dates and I considered it a cheap excuse on their part, but... considering how slovenly many women are nowadays with face piercings, awful haircuts, and duck lips to impress other women, I'm almost tempted to say men should pay for dates if only to incentivize women making an extra effort to look presentable.
When I got ready for a date, I never looked at it as a burden but rather, well, as an effort to impress the other person but also as you observe, because it was a potential pivotal moment in my life. Nearly every family began with the man and woman getting themselves preened for the first formal meeting. So it was special to me and I rather enjoyed it in its own right shaving, carefully applying neutral cologne, putting on my finest clothes.
All that said, I still see the notion of the "cost" of a date for a woman as a rationalization. Quite frankly, I have only 3 outfits in my wardrobe that are for special high value occasions such as job interviews and dates. 3 good suits. 3 nice combos for formal dates and so on. Most women can wear what they wear to work and look perfectly fine for a date. If anything, looking like the Homer Simpson Makeup Shotgun actually makes it worse: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DI1HRqoOefD/?hl=en
Your observation further illustrates her problem: Her attitude that it's just another Saturday Evening Meal undermines her ability to learn anything from the encounters. Because she doesn't "plan dates", she just goes each week perhaps being drained slowly emotionally from each failed encounter but doesn't put in an effort to learn anything. A man whose money is on the line and sees his "plans" come to naught, will learn something each time.
Jaime Lannister: As Robb Stark did to me at Whispering Wood. There are always lessons in failures. Olenna Tyrell: Yes. You must be very wise by now. Jaime Lannister: My father always said I was a slow learner.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1d ago
As if she doesn't do that shit every time she leaves the house, whether to go to work, go shopping, hang with her besties, etc.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1d ago
Its true they spend money on outfits at any excuse but they really do get excited about dates.
I think its a huge dopamine hit for them being desired, getting picked again and getting taken for a treat. Then they just add to the hit by buying something too.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago
You probably heard this story from me before, but I'm sharing it again because old men love to retell stories.
A fallen chad childhood friend of mine, let's call him Geoff, fell hard for a hard-to-get girl who had him wrapped around her finger. He paid all the bills while "her money is her money".
She went shopping at Nordstroms ("Nordies") 1X/week. She'd get an outfit that she could imagine looking great in and go home and see the closet was full so she'd pick an outfit that she wasn't planning to use right away and put it in the basement. This went on for.3 years.
Geoff went into the basement and found, visualize this!!!
The basement full of barely handled Nordstroms outfits rising to the ceiling. Hundreds of outfits.
My wife was in tears. "He should have called me! Nordstroms has an UNLIMITED return policy! I could have backed a U-haul there and made a killing!!!"
JudgeSmales 1d ago
The video is meant as a humble-brag, but it's more like a self-own. "Look how many men wanted to take me out -- and all in a six-month span! Aren't I awesome?"
But the fact that she couldn't use her various feminine assets (OK, her lone asset) to get beyond a second date is very telling. (Or maybe she did jump in bed with some of them and was found ... wanting.)
She clearly is addicted to the dopamine of "dating" a new person (or just free meals). Otherwise, I challenge her to cite one legitimate reason why every one of those men was inadequate for an ongoing relationship, sending her back to the app for a new prospect. "We just didn't vibe," is not a valid excuse for all of them.
Since simple math would indicate that not all of those Hinge hookups were Chads, my guess is a lot of thirsty Steady Eddies and Hopeful Hermans were merely given the honor of paying for her dinner.