Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
polishknight
Posted 2d ago in Single Woman Tears - Permalink - 1.5K Views
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:

Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 23h ago
It will never cease to amaze me that women think their strategy rejecting men is a smart bomb that only targets icky creeps and betas.
They are so loud and proud of not only rejecting men but using the full forces of culture or law to punish men who dared approach or escalate.
It's not a smart bomb, it hits Chads and Brads, too. And those guys just let women come to them now instead of chasing pre-fucked pussy
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 9h ago
Less of a smart bomb, and more of a carpet bomb.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 9h ago
Exactly. They should deploy then accordingly
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2d ago
Someone please post to the reddit site because it drives traffic here.
I've noticed a trend in most of the videos I find of complaining women of bird hand movements. Is this a thing now?
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2d ago
It's a great indicator of which women to have zero positive regard for.
NPC070201 1d ago
Yes, it is. Bird hands are a massive red flag. They are right up there with septum piercings. AVOID.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1d ago
Done.
Whoo man, I'm the only one posting to Reddit lately.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1d ago
Too many of us got permanently suspended!
woodsmoke Respectful reprobate 1d ago
I don't really see bird hands there, at least not as defined by the Ho Math video to which @No-Stress-Cat linked.
This woman is just gesticulating as she whines.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 10h ago
She did a variant around 0:16 through 0:20 or so.
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 2d ago
BOK BOK BOK BOK BOK....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3e5v3zQlpI
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2d ago
Fucker beat me to it!
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago
@No-Stress-Cat What a video! Bookmarked!
GeorgeIII 2d ago
Easy answer to her suggestion: #MeToo
I guess she could always just approach herself instead of whining… nahhh, that’s a crazy idea
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago
Geezer phrase warning: Back in my day...
Anita Hill exploded on the national scene back in 1991 along with massive corporate HR policies chilling interactions between men and women in the workplace. Many men got reprimanded or fired for a "reasonable woman" standard that essentially was that of a church lady. I personally dodged a reprimand from a spurious charge made by a woman who had it in for me but she was a former marine and that blew her "reasonable woman" standard instantly.
After all, if a guy asks out a girl in the workplace and it goes wrong, in that she gets angry he dumps her or something like that, she could make up some offense and get him fired.
It's astonishing how men have been expected to adapt to post-feminist society such as know how to wash our own dishes, do our laundry, change diapers on babies, and so on but the women absolutely REFUSE to approach men, risk rejection, or pay for dates. We are reminded that women owe us absolutely NOTHING. This woman's rant is amusing because she later says "people need to approach more often" but she means "men need to approach" because she doesn't want to. She sees the world in terms of men having the burdens and is angry that men aren't doing them. Oh well... It's almost as if men don't owe her what she wants.
I accepted women as they are when I was 32 but with the caveat I accepted myself as well. No apologies if I didn't wash enough dishes. My wife tried to complain a few times about it and I reminded her: Our relationship exists because of my efforts.
GeorgeIII 1d ago
You can bet that any man who doesn't meet her standard and does approach will get a rude and humiliating rejection too.
What she really means is 'men who I find attractive should approach me' should approach more often. You know how it is: if you aren't at least an 8/10, go fuck yourself. Any man who is a 7 or under is subhuman.
Lastly, in a post-feminist society, adaptation is a tool of the patriarchy!
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 1d ago
HR: "You've been accused of sexual harassment."
ME: I don't know who it is, but I don't think my husband would approve of any of these nasty sluts anyway.
HR: "Are you telling me that you're gay?"
ME: Yes, and I want to file counter charges of harassment based on sexual orientation. Obviously, the only reason this woman is accusing me is because I won't sleep with her. Which means the only reason I'm being accused is because I'm gay. Surely, you don't want to fire me because I'm gay, DO YOU?
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1d ago
I think I was 17 when that came about.
In the school computer lab, with me having a mischievous streak, a friend and I changed one of the computer's error sounds: Instead of the usual warning noise, it would instead play a recording of Anita Hill clearly saying "LONG DONG SILVER."
Within a day or two, the teacher in charge of the lab took my friend and I aside and gave us a warning about playing "inappropriate" pranks in the computer lab. Instead of playing dumb and refusing to take responsibility, I decided to say, with a shrugging gesture "But it's in the Congressional record! It's part of the public testimony!"
I was made to remove it and restore the computer to normal.
Bah, fools! I bet they heaped similar punishments on Galileo.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago
I'd say you hit the lottery in terms of sanctions. I know of guys who ultimately got drummed out of school or lost their jobs for similar level actions.
It's smart you made a legal defense, however, instead of a simple admission of guilt or, worse, apology. A friend of mine did that where his remark was even more innocent than yours and they utilized his apology as a confession and dropped the hammer on him.
Also what likely saved you is that it was high school so, as kids, it's difficult to get kicked out of high school even now.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 2d ago
Third wave femtardism inc. #me too is a real boner killer but I still maintain that market fundamentals have the real say long term
Market fundamentals suggest modern women are a liability not an asset to most men. So why would you go chasing expense and trouble in your life?
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2d ago
Because swiping right on Tinder or other apps is faster and allows men to bypass one layer of Cunt Shielding, wherein even non sexual interactions with women have a risk of a rape accusation like that one poor bastard that made the mistake of of stopping to help a woman whose vehicle was broken down.
https://archive.is/AMsbu
Communicating via an app dedicated to non platonic interactions removes one of the layers of plausible deniability that women otherwise are prone to abuse when accusing men of things like sexual harassment or worse.
Which means men, given a safer and faster alternative, even if only slightly, stop approaching in person.
(On a related note: don't stop to help women on the road. Call the police to report a stranded motorist and move the fuck on. Let the bitches sweat or freeze in bad weather for a few generations to let them relearn why they need to cunt patrol each other.)
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1d ago
I agree, today's version of the Good Samaritan is a phone call to the police where women are involved, especially in very blue states where the laws are crazy.
I stopped once for a girl, she was out of gas. Refused my help even though the gas station was a couple miles away. I stopped once for a guy, and he was thankful and accepted my help instantly. We jumped his battery in the sub-zero temps and he got home fine.
I think what I learned is that even when you try to help a woman, you are always wrong somehow. Not all the time, but enough of the time.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1d ago
It can get even worse. This dude never even interacted with this psychotic bitch who accused him; she only did it because "he looked creepy".
https://archive.is/7k5mG
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 5h ago
[whoops was thinking about the wrong article]
You know, I am mildly shocked that the grocer didn't have some form of security cam footage that could have been subpoenaed if for no other reason than to absolve themselves of liability for an accidents with carts and vehicles.
Edit: it's interesting that they mentioned her family with dementia. I assume it was a way to generate sympathy, but I've seem to recall that various personality disorders can also be a precursor to more classical signs of dementia as well.
So she might literally be suffering from an early form of dementia. Doesn't make her any less dangerous to others though. If anything it's worse because that means she does not have control over it.
Like how a rabid dog no longer has control over themselves. We don't give such a hugbox.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2h ago
?
Were you originally searching for my news story when you posted yours? Not sure what you mean. And even if so, yours was pretty fucked up too. No good deed goes unpunished!
That's how they exonerated him. The police compared camera footage and data from her cell phone, and realized things couldn't have happened the way she had said. When they confronted her with that, she confessed.
She said that the mark on her face came from her grandmother throwing something at her due to a fit from dementia.
I think she made it up, and struck herself to make her allegations more credible.
Exactly lol
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 51m ago
I had another initial reply when I posted but was looking at an article where the accuser was visibly anti-boner material. So I may have been making a comment at the time that her face was evidence that he did not rape her - bitch too uggo.
Like, not even "desert hot" material. Worse.
Damn how the hell did I miss that part, must have scrolled down too fast. Doesn't help that my adblocker seems to only be partially working on that site so there is some animated banner gobshite in the way. Glad they at least investigated properly though him getting held for a month is bullshit. He better have gotten paid some form of restitution.
[deleted]
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 2d ago
Do you remember all the women who stood up for men, all the women who said "all this metoo shit has gone too far", all the women who said "men have every right to go up to a woman" and "men can talk to anyone they like" and "men have rights too" and "men shouldn't be prosecuted for being normal" ?
Nope, me either.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 22h ago
There are some women channels popping up over the last couple of years or so in which they do that.
It's nice to see it, but it's too little, too late.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 21h ago
They're around. Some are "controlled opposition" or apologists trying to get the feminists to not be TOO rabid man hating and just keep it in an ideal state of men working hard but getting table scraps to get by and others genuinely are upset about it, even as much as we are, and they get called "pick mes" and some even are quite successful with it.
After all, they're going to get more clicks than men in general anyway but with a topic such of this they stand out more than the usual femoid ramblings.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 10h ago
The cynic in me suspects they do it for money, especially since just about all of them have monetized YouTube channels and Patreons.
And again, even if they were absolutely genuine, where were they at height of PoundMeToo, while all the feminist banshees were shrieking that "women never lie about this sort of thing!" and "believe all women!"? I don't recall any women loudly speaking up against that bullshit.
Too little, too late.
wswZtyqNGQ 6h ago
Of all people, Bridget Bardot did! And she got railed by all women for it: https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/brigitte-bardot-denounces-feminism-metoo-movement/
(She's the one and only though, so the rule stands.)
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2h ago
That article and what she said were both from 2025. Most of the damage was done around 2013 or so.
too little, too late!
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 2d ago
The risk is too high.
The reward is nothing but a waste of time, resources, and energy.
I'm good, thanks.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1d ago
Yeah, I also could have met a makeup-laden hoe with too much fat and emotional baggage, who thinks she can henpeck a man instead of submitting to him.
And no, we can't bring that back. It was never a good system. Neither is "dating" in general. It's always been doomed to fail. Last time we ever had anything close to good was before the 1900s. Then we sent the fathers to factories for insane hours and killed them off in pointless wars.
The system is perfectly designed to give you the results you're getting
wswZtyqNGQ 1d ago
Remember when women were feminine and submissive and lady-like and didn't have 15 acres of body tats on their skin and were actually worthy of being approached? Can we go back to that?
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1d ago
no :(