Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
polishknight
Posted 3d ago in Single Woman Tears - Permalink - 1.2K Views
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:

polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 3d ago Stickied
Let’s ring in the New Year with an aging height queen! Someone please kindly post to the Reddit site since I am unjustly unable to do so myself. It drives traffic here.
Vmake.io watermarkremover.io are now paywalled (AND lying about it!!!) EzRemove.ai works.
Gentleman whose post I saw this on ran the numbers: “There are only 9,600 men in [her city] between 29-34 who are 6’2” or taller and only 3.15% of the population is on hinge meaning there are 302 men to meet her criteria.”
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 2d ago
Posted at Reddit
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2d ago
A year worth of good fortune to you, kind sir!
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 3d ago
I use Musicaldown.com to remove the identifying info from TikTok videos, and vdraw.ai to remove it from Instagram videos.
Thank you for the additional recommendation!
Lone_Ranger Live by the pork sword, die by the pork sword 3d ago
She is so dumb.
She is asking why men that have no need to be on apps are not on the apps.
It's like asking why are there no Rolex watches at the thrift store.
Dating apps are where you will find sub par guys and left over women. Does she not understand that? Does she think that the apps are some sort of amazon delivery service for chads?
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2d ago
I mean it can be, but only for women that are a particular ratio of hot and convenient. She looks and sounds like a pain in the ass, so she's not meeting the cutoff for even some one-night chad dickin'. At least not unless she makes it clear he can shove her face into the pillow while fucking her to get some silence.
So you know, standard woman issue like we all know. Expectations too high for what is on offer.
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 2d ago
What is she ACTUALLY complaining about?
I mean, it's clearly complaining, but what's the complaint?
More men should be on her gynocentric dating app?
More men should just grow up and be taller?
Men should change their age to meet her narrow preferences?
I don't get it........ I don't walk into a nunnery and then complain that none of the women meet my preferences of 36DD tits, aged 20 to 21 and only looking for a one night stand.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 2d ago
Maximal fantasy fulfillment hasn't fallen into her upturned palm? Probably, I dunno.
Ah, no I got it-- she's demanding that taller, handsomer, richer, taller, athletic, sexually virile, taller men be available at her fingertips upon demand. You know, the usual.
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 2d ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NwOslM8JN0I
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 2d ago
So the new standard is 6'2". That disqualifies me by 2". Peace out bitches!
JudgeSmales 2d ago
No question she limits herself with the 6-2 height requirement and 29-34 age parameter. But then she conveniently gives herself another broad disqualifier, saying all but a couple of her matches "were not cute, I'm going to be honest." Just admit you're attention whoring without saying you're an attention whore.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 3d ago
"I'm not that picky! I just eliminate well over 95% of the male population with some arbitrary metric they can't control!"
I wonder how many of these height queens realize how short Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise are.
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 2d ago
They have no clue. Women don't have the capacity to gauge height. All they know is substantially taller than me = at least 6'. I'm lucky in a sense because at 6' tall, I can get away with saying I'm 6'2".
Her: "How tall are you?"
Me: How tall do you think I am?
Her: "Ummm...6'3"?"
Me: You have a good eye. I am 6'3". Now, take off your panties.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1d ago
Heh, I've said similar many times before, but this one was one of my favorites.
GeorgeIII 3d ago
Don’t worry, I’ve already crunched the numbers with the female delusion calculator.
It’s actually 97.8% of men who don’t qualify. The only requirements I listed were age, height, and not already being married. No requirement for race or income.
https://igotstandardsbro.com/results?minAge=29&maxAge=35&excludeMarried=true&race=0&minHeight=187.96&excludeObese=false&minIncome=0
God forbid she wants 6 figures too…
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2d ago
Hell even if you remove/relax ALL criteria other than height and not married, 2% of men are 6'2" or taller.
She gave herself a 98% chance of failure out of the gate with one demand. And then the dumb cunt piled on more!
And she sure as fuck is not a top 1% woman herself, so she has no leverage to lock down Chadeus Mythicus Maximus IV, Esq, even if she somehow found him slumming it on an app instead of railing his infinitely restocking harem of supermodels aged 19-24.
If you remove even the not married requirement, it only goes up to 4.3%. So even her chances of being a side chick aren't good when insisting on that height.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2d ago
What's even more amusing to me about arbitrary height requirements: do you know how many tall dudes I've met who can't get laid? lol
PoopBeast Jr. Hamster Analyst 1d ago
I was about to say, just being tall isn't a golden ticket to vagina-land. Believe me.
It's kind of hard listening to some of the jokers on here who think that way. I would submit that it's gotten so bad today that you can be tall, and reasonably decent in every other way, but still struggle. It's like a gymnast routine where you can do everything right, but wobble a little on the landing and it's enough to lose. That's just the world we currently live in.
I submit that it's because most of the women who are single today are single precisely because they don't really value relationships, not necessarily because they're simply delusional, but I'm a lone, pathetic voice in the dark.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2d ago
Yeah true; she set her effective target range up for only a fraction of a percent of all living men with her spoken and unspoken requirements. Any man that can actually meet them has absolutely no reason to bother with her.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 3d ago
Technically, she eliminates 95% of the male population by her age requirements alone (which is reasonable, she doesn’t want to date a 70 year old) but still, that’s even before whether the men are single, in her socio-economic range, ethnicity, and so on. I often marvel at how happy I am to be married in that I only see a decent looking woman 3 or 4 times, on a good day, on the metro in a major metropolitan area.
Even before the apps in the 90's, conventional dating was broken because men used to ask out women at school (married before age 21!!!), work, and weddings. Logically, as most people married young, they were good venues to meet people because the cousin of your brother’s in-laws might know someone you could meet.
This woman is a great example of how modern women’s dopamine receptors are burnt out like men supposedly addicted to porn: If he’s not 6’2” movie star handsome (she’s about 5’6”!) AND has good game going on, she can barely “give him a chance”.
I posted on TRP an ethical hacker posted scammer honey pots to the dating apps of chad/staceys and while the Stacey got a hundred likes on the first day, the chad only got something like 5. Here’s the thing: Are sexually ambivalent women, who barely want to give you the time of day unless you put on a perfect show, attractive to ANYONE particularly if you’re Chad and you otherwise have choices?
We are in Universe 25.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 3d ago
29-35 is a tight fucking range. Hardly reasonable. Just less retarded than demanding 6' 2" and above.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2d ago
But in combination? Extra chromosome tier retarded.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2d ago
She didn’t state how old she is so I’m gonna guess maybe she just hit the big three zero. According to copilot, guys in the 29-35 range can set their “deal breaker” age at 30 and that will kill her in the matches as surely as a guy at 5’11.5 in many women’s.
If one wants to bust a height queen’s arrogance, tell her each year she gets older is like a man losing 1 cm of height. Sure age is just a number but so is height.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2d ago
Yeah I have a feeling she crossed over into the post wall bracket too, she does not have the expression of a woman who is in her 20's and the world is still her oyster because she still has mostly live eggs.
It's the expression of a self declared princess that just got deposed without even formal notice and is FURIOUS about it.
Just wait til she figures out that men even older than that are getting fed up and setting 30+ as a cutoff too. (Including every single tall one of every age because they know women of all ages want to trip and fall on their dick for that reason alone, and thus they can get away with it without reducing their match pool in any way that is painful.) The gnashing and wailing will be epic.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2d ago
As if they ever listen to the formal notices…
She did get a hint of this when she generously extended her age requirements by one year to no avail.
Her puzzlement may be that she doesn’t fully comprehend that these men’s requirements filter them out of her feed. I wasn’t sure of this myself so I asked copilot. The available top tier men are out there but don’t want her but she equates a man not wanting her as inconceivable due to a lack of up front rejection.
wswZtyqNGQ 2d ago
I'm really curious as to what IQ range you have to be in order to understand bi-directionality of wants. It's probably similar to the "how would you feel if you didn't have breakfast this morning" hypothetical-conditional reasoning, which has an IQ floor of 90 direct and 80 with explanation/leading. These are all above "moron" range, but still not consistent with the functional ability to drive and hold a conversation simultaneously.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2d ago
I think a lot of it comes down to socialization/societal incentives.
If a man acts like a sociopathic monkey, he risks getting his neck stepped on, metaphorically or even literally.
If a woman acts like a sociopathic monkey, she risks getting awarded alimony and child support.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2d ago
Or worse: verbal encouragement
yaaaaasss, queen! You go, gurl! *crown emoji, painting toenails emoji*