Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
- Main Forums
- What's Hot
- TRP.RED
- Tribe Forums
- TheRedPill
- Tribe Management
- Create New Tribe
- Manage My Tribes
- Find New Tribes
- Recent News
-
-
[deleted]
WokeDown 6mo ago
-have six figure salary, count the change columns, just like her baby daddies
-4 fit in the trunk alone
-six pack in fridge
-sure
-my nigerian friend will send that ring right away, just help me pay for shipping
-six foot taller than what?
Sorry, was gonna sign right up but then I decided to do something fun instead, like feed my hand into ghe meat grinder.
houseoftolstoy Unchivalrous Christian 6mo ago
I would not marry any woman in less than a month upon meeting her, even if she was the ideal and perfect woman. This woman, on the other hand, not only is not that kind of woman, but she comes with quite a list of requirements for a woman with no buying power. It is like someone with no job, no cash up front and a 300 credit score expecting to be able to sign off on buying a brand new Porsche right off the lot.
Pic889 6mo ago
But keep in mind there are "buy here, pay here" dealerships that will get the kind of person you describe in a salvage-titled Boxster with more miles on it than a space shuttle as long as they are willing to sign on loan with 20% APR. This allows the kind of person you describe to pretend they are rich (when they clearly aren't).
Similarly, there will be men willing to pretend they are the ideal would-be husband for this woman and will even pretend they want to adopt her two kids from another man, but in reality they are fuckbois who want to smash and dash. This allows her to pretend she is entitled to everything she wants. How long until she adds "sick and tired of games" to her bio?
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 6mo ago
Damn, looking for an 11' 10" dude. The tallest man in the world was 8' 11".
Pic889 6mo ago
A "6-figured" salary? That's one hell of a beer belly in order to appear "6-figured" (when looked from the side). And how can a salary have a figure anyway? Only people can have a figure.
Women trying to feign class but failing to type simple words are the funniest.
SpiritualEnema Jr. Hamster Analyst 6mo ago
I am a single mom.
Here is a list of my outrageous demands.
Ma’am this is a Wendy’s.
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 6mo ago
Its funny because just the 6 foot and beyond demand puts it at about what, 4% of men or something?
And the guys that make that much and are in shape sure as fuck don't need a used up chick like her. Holy fuck.
I know we have a lot of posts like these, but sometimes I have to wonder if they're trolling. I know, they aren't. They're that crazy.
mustangfrank1 Sr. Hamster Analyst 6mo ago
She: I thought this was "Make a Wish."
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 6mo ago
Suitable car? How about one of those 21-passenger yellow buses that the "special" kids used to take?
EmpireCrimson 6mo ago
The level of desperation required to even consider this, is off the charts. She has two kids, doesn't want to raise a blended family, and wants 4-6 bedrooms? So you have to take her elderly parents too? GTFOH. That says nothing for the 30K ring and a marriage in a month. Each bullet point was more delusional than the one before it. That was a good laugh, thanks for posting.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 6mo ago Stickied
Dude, be mindful of rule 1:
The use of the man-shaming slur "simp" is rarely going to go well here.
Do keep your focus on the Carol rather than some hypothetical man.
EmpireCrimson 6mo ago
Is there some way for me to see the post? I'm pretty sure that I implied that her "demands" were beyond the reach of nearly any person who might be a symp - in context, I don't think I shamed anyone (maybe her, but we're not certain she has any shame).
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 6mo ago
The line that violated the rule was:
It's using a shaming term to describe a hypothetical man.
In WAATGM we keep our focus on the woman.
The rest of your comment was good. I can restore it, if you are willing to edit out the man-shaming portion once it's restored.
EmpireCrimson 6mo ago
I think that's a rather pedantic application of the rule, but I see it from your point of view. Go ahead and restore the comment and I'll edit it accordingly. I haven't edited a comment on this site before, but if the interface makes it clear on how to do it, I'll take care of it.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 6mo ago
Comment restored.
The menu to edit is accessible via that vertical 3-dot button to the right of your username at each comment.
EmpireCrimson 6mo ago
Edited. Thanks for the heads-up on the button.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 6mo ago
Was her baby daddy a 666 or does she need an upgrade for heavily used goods?
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 6mo ago
It's funny how single fathers are considered not good enough for single mothers, despite the fact that single mothers are so needy even if they sometimes pretend that they don't need a man.
Pic889 6mo ago
No, you don't get it, she can't "settle". As long as she keeps her requirements high, her dream man will eventually descend from the sky and marry her and adopt her 2 kids from another man.
mustangfrank1 Sr. Hamster Analyst 6mo ago
I didn't know Jesus was looking for a wife?
wswZtyqNGQ 6mo ago
If Jesus knew what these modern women would be like then He would have thrown the first stone at Mary Madeline.
JudgeSmales 6mo ago
"No single dads. Your money shouldn't be going to YOUR kids, it should be going to MINE ... I mean OURS ... or something."
[deleted]
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 6mo ago Stickied
Dude, be mindful of rule 1:
The use of the man-shaming slur "simp" is rarely going to go well here.
Do keep your focus on the Carol rather than some hypothetical man.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 6mo ago
Ok, sorry, I will try to remember. Would "the last man must have treated her as a princess who had no responsibility and totally spoiled her" be a suitable alternative?
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 6mo ago
Eh. It's still blaming a man (who might not even exist) for her behavior.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 6mo ago
OK I will try to keep to the rules. I appreciate that you are a mod and I need to play by the rules.
Is this rule up for discussion at all? I am not sure its optimal for balanced and full discussion of entitled behaviour. I hope you can also see from other things I have posted over time that I am not against the spirit of the place.
What I fear is that this rule is basically just a copy of feminist rules where we "never blame and never shame women" (when actually women's behaviour often plays a contributing role in men's negative behaviour towards women. Feminists can never discuss the real problems because they are stuck with this tenet of their church ("its always a man's fault").
If this forum is just a place where we laugh at entitled women, then fair enough. Men get enough crap in life. A bit of a laugh is good for us. But if we are actually discussing the combination of hypergamy (innate female driver that is actually healthy for the species) and entitlement (learned behaviour) then at some point we will find men's past behaviour has had some hand in the lack of regulation in hypergamy that has led to the development of this entitlement (whether through legislation or through men feeding bad habits of entitlement in women).
When we see a badly behaved dog or a child having an unnecessary tantrum we tend to say "bad owner never set boundaries", "parents never taught them to share/ lose/ wait patiently" Its not all about the child's innate bad character or the dog's innate aggression (which usually has a role in it too) but its about the past interactions they have had that has tolerated these behaviours or even rewarded them.
I suppose I am asking how serious is this forum intended to be and how seriously do we want any outsiders to take us when they find it? I can learn to play along and have a good laugh but I was trying to be a bit more serious too in discussing balanced reasons for these behaviours.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 6mo ago Stickied
No. All the "discussions" that led to the creation of this rule were finalized before I even created a reddit account, let alone got invited to the mod team, which means waaaaay before our migration to the dot reds. This rule is essential to the culture of WAATGM.
Yes. Part of why you're flaired.
Here, read:
PSA: We are not here to shame beta men. by @moorekom
"NO SHAMING MEN FOR ANY REASON" is Rule #1 For a Reason by @lurkerhasarisen
Be sure to read the comments at both, especially any from mods (green flair)
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 6mo ago Stickied
Addendum:
PSA: Stop blaming men for women's bad choices. by @Loneliness-inc
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 6mo ago
I will do my best to work with it.
I can see why they did it but I wouldn't have done it that way -at least I would not not have gone so far. I think it strangles rounded discussion and opens us to the very accusation of one sided bias that we level at feminists.
However, we can't all ask to have the world our way, so I will try to fit in.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 6mo ago
I disagree. If anything, your statement here will get those accusations.
Remember it well. Women are adults and they have to behave like adults. If they don't, that's a reflection on them. Not an enabler. A drug addict has to take personal responsibility to break out of their addiction. Treating women like children is a dangerous hubris that is going to end up costing you.
cc: @Typo-MAGAshiv
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 6mo ago
Thanks for your reply. I appreciate a reply from one of the people who set this one up.
I agree that women must be held to account .They have a vote and society has given them the equal rights which they complained for. So they must bear equal responsibilities.
To use your drug addict's responsibility analogy, we also must remember that while a drug addict has to accept personal responsibility for his actions, society has to accept responsibility and change if it is giving a drug addict benefits and social acceptance to enable him to continue his antisocial habit. (Oregon really let people down by enabling them to carry on their damaging habits).
Problems and responsibility exist on the individual as well as the wider level and there are a lot of blue pill enablers of very poor female behaviour out there. It would mostly stop simply if the culture demanded it to stop. It has not been such an issue in the past and is not such an issue in other cultures. This is a western problem starting in the 20th century. Men enlarged the franchise and accepted the false doctrine that men and women have equal capacities (when modern science shows them to vary in many ways), without demanding equal levels of personal responsibility. Men have failed here. Drug addicts rarely demand to be held to account, they ask for more enabling. While enablers are there, they usually carry on. The enablers need to stop to fix this problem.
This thing needs attacking on two fronts -the personal responsibility of women and appeal to the concept of equality of responsibility under the law and the responsibility of blue pill society to face up to what it is doing to people with the consequences of white knighting.
This is your site mods and I am not coming to break the rules in protest. I hope to be accepted as a useful member but I do think there is some inconsistency here.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 6mo ago
It will stop when it is deemed unacceptable and low status by most of the society, which you cannot control.
Again, this is not in your control. Focus on what you can do. Demanding that someone has to fix something is what women do. We do what we can to help ourselves.
Again, your demand to society to meet your expectations will be ignored. Focus on yourself and what you can change. Work on yourself and enforce your boundaries in your own life.
You are considered a useful member, which is why you were flaired. There is no inconsistency. I hope you understand the reasoning behind the rule better now. It is the fundamental tenet of the red pill community that we transform ourselves to get better results. What is expected in this community is that you do not put down other men in your quest to do so.
ObliviousDuck Jr. Hamster Analyst 6mo ago
Congratulations! You've reached delusion level 5. You now have unlocked a new "6", as in: "6 bedrooms house."
PoopBeast Jr. Hamster Analyst 6mo ago
In other words, "I'm a bitch. Here's what I want..."
mustangfrank1 Sr. Hamster Analyst 6mo ago
All the above will happen when Hell Freezes over.
[deleted]
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 6mo ago Stickied
This may be a violation of Rule 3 which I think was set up to prevent outside naysayers from questioning the legitimacy of the posts. We live in such an era where we see things that are unbelievable to many of us 25 years ago.
I recall back then a 35 yo woman posting she had just adopted a child from the third world and was looking to date. I was flabbergasted. Later on, it would become increasingly common for pregnant women to be posting personal ads.
In an era when The Pig Woman Experiment proved that a literal pig woman could get dozens of responses from otherwise decent looking men predicated that entitlement was going to go off the charts. This ad will still likely get more responses than a normie male with a job and no debt would receive.
I saw a recent analysis of the OKCupid study that showed that men age 18 to 80 responded to profiles from 24 year old women while women's responses to men's profiles was close to their own age. Men who hit on women with either Powerball chance of success or way beneath their standards out of loneliness feed women's validation. Disco clubs are similar: When I went back 30 years ago, it wasn't uncommon for women to go out with their friends to dance with each other and just ignore and mock the men that approached them. When I turned 21, I found I hadn't been missing out on anything when I saw what was going on.
I have a relative who posted an ad similar to this. She wasn't as delusional, but it carried the same mocking, demanding tone and she eventually married a "nice guy" who responded. Everyone agrees that he's a saint to put up with her.
The "free market" enthusiasts who proclaim that everything solves itself fail to appreciate that it will take multiple generations, perhaps even a societal collapse, for the "market" lesson to be learned sort of like a junkie only checking into rehab after they're lost everything EXCEPT their addiction.
That said, I found it interesting that her height is 5'10" and she's demanding a 6 footer which is quite common for women of that height who would probably treat the 6 footer as a shorty because she "can't wear heels".
JudgeSmales 6mo ago
"who would probably treat the 6 footer as a shorty because she "can't wear heels".
How many times, really, does the average women wear heels nowadays? Twice a year, maybe? Unless they're wearing heels to Walmart with their ratty T-shirt and pajama pants.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 6mo ago
Women are TERRIFIED of being judged by other women, even for a moment. If she has to wear (yuck!) FLATS out to an event while some shorter girl is wearing spiked heels with a man whose still taller than her, she gets resentful. Remember: he's only (slightly) taller than her so he deserves ZERO gratitude.
Same thing with "strong, independent" career women who earn $200K and find a man who earns $205K. She's doing HIM a favor by being with him (he should still pay for dates) but she shouldn't be grateful because... wait for it:
HE'S DOING THE BARE MINIMUM!!!!
The "bare minimum" is being (slightly) taller, higher earner, smarter, and such than her. She doesn't NEED him.
NPC070201 6mo ago
My bad, I wasn't trying to break rule 3, it's just hard for me to wrap my mind around women being this delusional.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 6mo ago Stickied
A) that's because you still have a bit of that instinct and cultural conditioning to think that women are magical creatures of pure goodness who fart rainbows and shit diamonds
B) Just a start, and be sure to check out the commentary:
Fatty with height standards is terrible at guessing height; ties in nicely with my previous post of the pregnant strumpet wanting 9"
Yet another hobag who's pregnant on tinder. This one doesn't know how averages work. Or maybe she's right, and there's no average IQ, but hers is still low.
NPC070201 6mo ago
Yeah, you're probably right. I went monk mode a few years ago and don't interact with many women anymore,unless they're a server or retail worker or something like that.