Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
polishknight
Posted 2w ago in The Big Question - Permalink - 5K Views
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 3d ago
More like a High Cost Woman that is not worth the price you would pay for her.
UpsideDB Sr. Hamster Analyst 6d ago
I'm too tired to write a long post, so I'll leave it simply, what do you bring to the table? What do you think makes you a high value woman? Because you're off to a rough start with personality, and if you're talking about "single forever" you're probably at least 30, so you aren't at your peak looks either.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
If your product is not shifting at the price you set, then you have only one conclusion: your product does not have the value that you thought it does. To find the true value of your product, you need to lower the price until demand meets supply, and then the market will clear.
Economists love auctions because they say that the clearing price reveals value. The only value anything has is the clearing price. Lots of people don't get this at all. It makes zero sense when a realtor says 'That house was worth $2m but they sold it at auction for $1.1"
The auction revealed the value. There is no other value than the clearing price. The house was on sale at the realtors for $2m for 5 months, and it didn't sell, so the only true thing we can infer from that is this: that house was not worth $2m. (otherwise, it would have sold).
This 'high value' woman has not sold, so the only thing we can infer from this is that she is not worth what she says she is worth.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
Interesting analogy which begs analysis.
I'm reminded of my wonder at how well salesmen were paid at my old company more than the actual engineers who made the product. An auction house, similar to OLD, only works in a context of those who peruse the wares via that medium. It's tragic how many wonderful things are sold for below their actual value (not using that term ironically in context of what you said) or even not sold at all and disposed because they couldn't connect with the buyer who genuinely valued it.
I'm reminded of this story I've read online. You probably came across it before: https://medium.com/get-inside/know-your-worth-da0eb6ad4c61
Such women want men to do EVERYTHING including sales. The only "salsemanship" skills many of them have is their literal youth (when they had it) like a walking billboard. On dates they are often insufferable and even putting a profile online is something they barely put any effort into.
I try to advise women friends that they should actually read games books written for men because they carry infinite wisdom on personal salesmanship. "Elderly chat" allows me to make friends and build connections throughout my life.
My father, RIP, was a salesman for Lifesavers for 30 years of his life. He often joked about what a tough job it was but it allowed him to live a middle class lifestyle.
Edit: Here's a youtube video I've posted here before. You may have seen it. Here's a woman who engaged in saleswomanship to enhance her value, I dunno, but 4X. Simply incredible. Merely by doing the basic work that most men do: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6wG_sAdP0U
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
you're wondering why the salesmen get paid more than the 'actual engineers'?
Easy question: because its much easier to design a product than to sell one. You get paid for doing things that others can't do.
Sales is the highest paying job in the world. The average CEO, or VP is actually a salesperson.
The best quote I have heard on this is this; "Talent is as cheap as table salt"
You can buy engineers, designers, accountants etc for peanuts. The real skill in life is how tell a story, and how to sell a story. If you can do that, you'll be rich.
I knew a CEO (this is going back about 20 years) that couldn't open his emails. He got his secretary to print them out for him every morning. Guy was pulling in 7 figures a year, and was barely able to start his computer. technical skills are worth nothing.
Can you sell? You're never going to be go hungry.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Hi Polish - good to see you again
I have heard variations of that car story a few times. Sometimes its about a bottle of water (in the supermarket, in the airplane in the desert etc) and how it can have different values.
This is all about market failures - where there is no transparency etc. I think you are somewhat missing the point - and perhaps even falling into the very same trap that these 'HVW's are falling into:
they are explaining the fact that they have not been snapped up (sold) with the excuse that the buyers are incorrect. That they have not met 'the right guy'. They cling on to the dream that the market is wrong, and that they just need to 'put themselves out there' so that they can meet the right guy, and then the right guy will pay the right price.
The issue is that they have already met the right guy many many times in their lives. But the right guy (the same value as they are) doesn't give them tingles. That is the issue.
The car story that you sent, is probably the worst bit of advice any father could give to a daughter. it is telling her that she is a princess and that the only thing she needs to do to find her prince is keep looking. its a b/s fantasy that has many women clinging on to the dream of a prince until they are past 40 and worn out from the CC.
SpiritualEnema Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
I was going to respond with something similar. So many women out there believe they are that rare, highly sought after asset. No amount of market data can convince them otherwise.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 5d ago
I appreciate your points but hear me out, please: Sure, the problem with such women today is they think that if just The Right Man comes along, he'll recognize her as The Queen she is.
As @Lone_Ranger points out, she already got the high price for the "car" but she didn't like the buyer. She wanted Chad. But also, when such women say they can't "find a man" they really mean the man didn't approach her. In the story I quoted, the daughter had to actually schlep herself to all those places.
That's why I cited the youtube story: Here was a frumpy woman none of us dream about and she got a tall professional man to wife her up because she actually put in an effort. To them, the "right man" is supposed to make the effort while she acts like a piece of furniture (table). The Car Club guys should pull up in front of her home and then wine and dine her before making a $100K offer for her 30 year old Yugo.
Eff Dee Ess is nothing new: It's BS 1950's dating strategy: Withhold sex from sexually insecure but financially secure men while pulling in free gifts from him (to increase his emotional investment) and then reel him in for commitment. It works but (largely) only on sexually insecure men or when she doesn't have liabilities (ugly, obese, single mother, etc.).
The tragedy for the corporate nuns I met in the 1990's was that they really did have the $100K car, so to speak, and just went to their corporate wageslave job, shopping, and then home and wondered why nothing happened. One of them was a 35 year old virgin when I met her.
It amuses me when I got to professional conventions that are 99% men, it's almost like ComicCon but filled with men with actual jobs, and my wife's single friends gripe to her. One of them met her future (ex) husband at a disco. He turned out to be a drunkard who couldn't hold a job.
Back in the 1990's, the aging women back then were a lot smarter. One ex back then was a yachting enthusiast and chuckled most of the women at the yachting events were fishing for rich guys.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
So out of 10,000 men, one has the potential to meet your standards. You think that man isn't already in demand by all those "good women" you mentioned? You think you're "high value" enough to win his commitment?
Great, no one is stopping you.
That's exactly the problem. A woman has two jobs in life, one of which is "revolving" her life around a husband. You are failing at life.
Glad to be one of the 99%, especially if it keeps women like you away. So many bullets avoided by being all three of these.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
"Unimpressive, cheap and bloody annoying"
Good catch. I also found that terminology rather a bell-the-cat moment for her in that she revealed why the few men she desired may have found her insufferable:
"Unimpressive": She expects men (with options) to entertain and "woo" her. She's easily bored. "Cheap": We all know what this means. "Bloody annoying": She can't stand men who are human beings who do ANYTHING out-of-place. Imagine if Karen and the gunnery sergeant from Full Metal Jacket had a baby.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
@moorekom @Typo-MAGAshiv @whytehorse2021 Would someone be so kind to post this to the Reddit channel?
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2w ago
I've been permanently suspended from that shithole way longer than you, newbie!
Here, I'll tag a few whom I know could crosspost it there (and have been active relatively recently):
@woodsmoke @Land_of_the_losers @Impressive-Cricket-8 @Overkill_Engine @Vermillion-Rx
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 2w ago
I would otherwise be willing to crosspost it but I go overboard on protecting my account from the reddit overlords.
Since I'm lead modding TheRedPill I'm not willing to risk the account (as frivolous as their strikes are, of which i have zero)
houseoftolstoy Unchivalrous Christian 2w ago
@polishknight
Got it covered:
https://www.reddit.com/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen/comments/1h0wvey/any_advice_for_women_like_this_who_cant_seem_to/
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2w ago
Thank you
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
Thank you.
houseoftolstoy Unchivalrous Christian 2w ago
This supposedly "High Value Woman" needs to consider the following possibilities:
a. She is NOT a high value woman
b. The Female Dating Strategies she is using not only do not work but are counteractive to her getting a good relationship
c. She needs to make her standards less narrow if she wants any relationship
Many women on FDS think that if they set the price of a used car to that of a brand new car that people will think it must be more valuable by the virtue of the price tag. But they only pricing themselves out of the market because the guys that fit their standards of a high value man are going to have far better options than these women who have nothing to offer but their inflated egos.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 2w ago
I realize that I haven’t been active here in months, but I seem to have a bit of time and no distractions at the moment. More on that later. As for our FDS lass here…
I tire of this nonsense: by every sensible measure, marriageable men outnumber marriageable women by a significant margin. Almost any way you slice the demographic pie, there are 105-120 marriageable men for every 100 marriageable women, depending on which group you’re referring to.
Any woman who is truly “high value” is spoiled for choice for men at or above her level. The problem, of course, is that these women don’t have high value, because value is always and only determined by the buyer (in other words: by men). The toxic, obese, man-hating, gold-digging sisterhood at FDS doesn’t get a vote: yet they tell each other that they’re all “Queens” who deserve a man who is in the top 20% of multiple independent traits that every other woman desires.
I’m not a fan of the notion that some men are “top 20%’ers” (or 10%, 5%, 1%…). Let’s face it: nearly every man is in the top quintile in some trait that women find attractive. The short guy might be good with money. The poor guy might have a great sense of humor. The bald guy might make a great husband and father.
These shockingly ordinary (as worse) women run into scarcity because each one demands a man who’s in the top quintile of multiple categories, and very few of those men exist. And here’s another thing: those guys aren’t necessarily good prospects because they don’t have to cater to what women want. They certainly don’t have to put up with an average-at-best woman with a bad attitude.
— break —
As for my absence: I’ve been dabbling in the political subs lately (we seem to have dodged the most recent bullet), and I’ve been up to my eyeballs in a college course I’m taking during a slow season at work. Other than that, I’ve been spending my free time in “receive” mode rather than “broadcast” mode. My course is almost complete, but starting in January my job is set go balls-to-the-wall at least through the summer.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
I think this post was wonderful nonsense: So much entitlement and delusion packed into 8 sentences:
1) Wants 1/10,000 men even as she recognizes that there are many other women similar to herself competing for them?
2) Claims to have “everything” but wants a (non “cheap”) man to provide for her.
3) “Enjoys” FDS which calls for her to become LESS available to men (to drive up price), but wonders if “some” won’t “find” a “worthy” man. Finally 4) She wants “good” sex.
FDS is basically gold-diggers who withhold sex from men who lack sexual options in order to procure commitment and resources from him. FDS, if done correctly, would be about targeting, say, the 21st man out of 100, a top beta who provides “ok” sex in addition to all the other goodies she wants.
I rented a room from a pop psychologist who wrote an FDS style dating book and she tried to tell me: “Men trade money for pretty women and vice-versa”, the Gentlemen-Prefer-Blondes rationalization. I pointed out to her that women such as herself didn’t want short guys and she stuttered.
To use the line from Frasier: You can’t use sex to get what you want if sex is what you want.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1w ago
A woman who thinks her RMV entitles her to a man who is in the top 1% of the top 1% is either an incredibly good catch or off-the-charts delusional. The fact that she’s going to FDS to air her woes tells me which one.
If I’m right about the pitfalls of the “top x%” mindset, she’s chasing a ghost, anyway. I think we can all acknowledge that there are certain traits that are generally associated with high RMV: being tall, being rich, having game, having style, being funny, being smart, being handsome, being fit…
Different women will weigh these differently, but a man who is in the top quintile of all of those could have nearly any woman he wants, and many of them would be willing to share him in preference to having an exclusive relationship with a man who stood out in fewer categories.
So if a woman with an extreme case of delusion makes up her mind that she won’t “settle” for a man who doesn’t excel in every category - while being willing to forgo all of his other options - she is destined for the grocery store aisle that has cat products and boxed wine.
(I’m suddenly reminded of the poem, “To His Coy Mistress” by Andrew Marvell.)
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
Yup.
Decent women don't need FDS. And decent men don't need a FDS-goer either. Like I observed on the other site, if a man wants a materialistic whore, he can go to the redlight district to rent one for a night and get a better deal while at it.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2w ago
You mean Kamala as President?
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 2w ago
Indeed I do. Kamalama-Ding-Dong would have been a disaster. There are things I dislike about President Trump and his policies, but putting him next to her is like comparing Marcus Aurelius to Hank Johnson.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Heh absolutely agree. Worst presidential candidate in history, and I'm not just saying that because she's a woman.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Objectively speaking it is true. If I had to equate her to a historical figure, it would be Lyndon B Johnson; a party favorite who had no real grassroots support beyond fitting their political message for the time. The difference being that Kamala had never actually won a real political race; her original win as AG of San Fran was an astroturf from the local media, and every other job she received came as a hand picked candidate for a safe D seat.
If this were a sane electorate, she would’ve lost by Mondale margins. As it stands, we’ve a way to go. But her defeat is a good start.
AbusiveFather1 1w ago
can you share which course?
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1w ago
Emergency medical services. I test for my state certification in December, and my plan is to volunteer for the foreseeable future as I have time. I would have to lose my job to consider doing it professionally, and that would require me to take additional training that I don’t have time for.
AbusiveFather1 1w ago
are you considering getting into the medical field (if you're aren't in it right now)? and what is your current job, if you don't mind me asking?
i ask because i myself am trying to get into healthcare and a lot of people go through EMS as a stepping stone (if not the end goal - as a paramedic)
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1w ago
After I retired from the military I became a contractor doing military stuff. My job has nothing to do with medicine. This is a complete break for me. I spend most of my time at home: there is no office for me to go to. When I have missions I travel to military installations to conduct training with a team of my fellow retirees.
EMS courses require near-perfect attendance, and it was just a happy coincidence that I had a break in my travel schedule long enough to get this class in: the small number of missions I had didn’t conflict with my classes. I don’t know when - or if - I’ll get another gap while I’m doing what I do. I have no intention to stop working as a trainer, so this may be as far as I go. EMT is next, and then paramedic if I find a way to continue.
From what I’ve observed (which isn’t much), the people who go into EMS are mostly on the “first responder” career track rather than the “clinical setting” track, but I know people who started in EMS and transferred to clinical practice. I’m not on a “career track” at all: I could retire tomorrow if the boredom didn’t kill me.
Obviously there’s a fair amount of overlap between EMS and other healthcare specialties, especially if you take classes in stuff like anatomy and physiology, medical terminology, chemistry, and biology. So if you start down one path and decide to switch, it should be fairly straightforward.
The difference is that EMS is all about, “What can I do to stabilize my patient and keep him alive long enough to get him to a higher level of care?” The hospital / clinic is the higher level of care. EMS personnel are generalists, whereas clinicians tend to specialize.
An ambulance crew might respond to an octogenarian with chest pain, then a kid who broke a leg by falling off a roof, then a woman giving birth, then a tweaker who’s overdosing on fentanyl, then a car crash. A pediatric nurse, however, only works with sick kids, possibly under the direct supervision of a physician.
Boar_excrement Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
I volunteered as an EMT-B decades ago. Before meth was an issue. It was an interesting experience. You get a personal invitation to the worst day of someone's life. But, you get to see some awesome people in action. And you get the chance to make an actual difference rather than a theoretical one.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1w ago
I think that’s a big part of what drew me to EMS in the first place. I view using one’s God-given talents for good as a moral imperative.
It sounds like you got pretty far into it. My state doesn’t have EMT-B as a certification, so I looked it up. Now it’s EMR, then EMT, then Advanced EMT (which roughly corresponds to what you were), and finally paramedics at the top. Advanced EMT represents a LOT of schooling, and followed by board certification testing.
Assuming I pass my boards next month I’ll only be an EMR, and I’ve been taking classes for about four months (and I’m still not done). And that doesn’t include the Medical Terminology class and the Anatomy and Physiology class I took as prerequisites. I already have a masters degree in an unrelated field, so I didn’t have to take any “fluff” courses. Even so, just getting the lowest level of EMS certification has taken me two additional semesters.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
Where is your value to a man? This is the question. You may have high value to yourself but where does this come to a man?
Women who are genuinely high value will be snapped up by quality men. These women bring what a man needs -companionship, emotional support, good sex, nurturing and domestic tasks, an understanding of give and take in relationships. They want to bear and raise him children. They don't drain him financially, they might even add to his wealth.
Just be one of these women and you will never be lonely.
SpiritualEnema Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
You misogynist! How dare you imply that a woman needs to offer something of value, or anything at all to a man! Her value is simply being born female! A woman’s role in this modern world is to receive only, never give. Ok, maybeeeee a good woman will give of herself to her children, but only the female ones. The male children are just future misogynists in training. Many thanks to the democrats for absolving us of our reproductive responsibility via late term abortion access so we can weed out all the future misogynists once their socially constructed gender is assigned by the Medicaid appointed OBGYN. Now go give yourself 100 lashes and continue worshiping at our feet you dog.
The nerve of some men, trying to mansplain to powerful strong, independent women.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Will repeat "I am not cunt worthy" 100 times a day.
But the thing about late term abortions is that they only weed out future democrats. Every female foetus aborted would almost certainly have been a democrat, probably even been vegan and had brightly coloured hair at some point of immaturity. If it were not so repugnant I would support the idea of late terms abortion on practical grounds -it reduces the future democrat load on the planet. The one thing late term abortion is pretty bad at is weeding out so called misogynists. These generally don't have democrat mothers -because they were raised to think for themselves.
derdeutscher 1w ago
I agree, it sucks for women. Sure they can get quick fuck from some loser who is happy not to have to jerk off alone again. But to get it on with any man who knows his worth, is not so easy. Because these men are not desperate. And luckily also not stupid.
Which brings me to my next point..why shoud that kind of a man choose woman who thinks she is "high value"?
Any woman who says that is full of shit. Aaaaand also combination of having too high standards, being gold digger in disguise, having inflated ego,or classic one: she is not interested in single men, just in men who are married, and she hopes guy will leave his wife for her (probably pinnacle of female idiotism).
Number of men appropriate for healthy marriage and family was never so high as nowadays. Women who cant find a man nowadays and complain about it are stupid, I dislike them openly, and I am happy that wall can not be avoided, it is god damn constant thats going to hit these cows heads hard.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1w ago
She's filtered 99.99% of the men she meets. Oh wonderful.
With numbers like that, she must be the hottest woman who ever lived.
I shit on a plate and put a $50,000 price tag on it. That's a $50,000 piece of shit, a pity that any would-be buyer is too stupid to agree.
GimmeTheUsual Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
I'm glad these women filter out everyone.
Its the only way to remove their retardation from the gene pool. So, you go, girl. Natural forces take care of the rest. The societal pendulum is already swinging back, successive generations rebel against what came before, as it ever was.
It gives me hope, and for that I'm thankful this holiday.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1w ago
I just love how self-declaring "high value woman" inarguably makes you one.
That is just so excrementally typical of the kind of mind which would seek out FDS.
Me, I'm a chicken fried steak on grilled rye with a side o' cole slaw sprinkled with paprika.
Impressive-Cricket-8 Founding member of FapGPT 1w ago
God, I really need that laugh.
First sentence and we've already established you're not high value. No time wasted!
Hardly. And the fact that you're irremediably single should give you a hint.
Boar_excrement Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Markets are efficient. That includes the sexual market and the relationship market. So, she can look at her actual market valuation and suck it.
JudgeSmales 1w ago
Precisely. This is a simple concept that women are seemingly incapable of understanding, whether we're talking about relationships or financial topics. The buyer, not the seller, determines the value of a commodity or service. It has always been thus.
By the time women should have become "motivated sellers" (wall approaching), they instead dig in their heels deeper and keep demanding the same price they were asking 10 years previous.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1w ago
I once had a salesman try to convince me to buy something I had no use for (I don’t remember the details). I declined the offer, and he got genuinely upset that I wasn’t buying what he was selling.
He thought I was crazy because I was passing up on getting something for far less than what it was “worth.” The problem is that he thought it’s worth was determined by the price tag (before it went on sale). He said something like, “I’m willing to sell this for $500. Why won’t you buy it? it’s worth three times that!” I replied, “Not to me. I wouldn’t use it, so its value to me is $0. In fact, I’d be stuck with something I wouldn’t use, so it has negative value as far as I’m concerned. You would have to pay me to take it for me to break even.”
The hags at FDS don’t understand that concept. They think that a bad product becomes a good product by slapping a high price tag on it, then - like the salesman whose offer I declined - they get upset when qualified buyers laugh at them and walk away.
Men don’t generally do that. From the moment we’re born, our place in society is made abundantly clear… and we find out early that our value is tied to our usefulness to others. If I collected my toenail clippings from the trash can, declared that I would sell them for $1,000,000, and then told people that I owned a million dollars worth of assets, nobody would take me seriously. If I managed to get a loan based on my declaration I could be prosecuted for fraud. Yet that’s what this woman is trying to do. That’s what FDS teaches.
There’s a reason why high-status men have traditionally demanded dowries: a man who wants to preserve his wealth has to be paid to take on a liability (especially one that permanently precludes accepting all similar offers).
JudgeSmales 1w ago
So true. In olden days, fathers knew their daughters had little to offer other than their fertility and homemaking skills. Since most women then did not work outside the home, they were probably a net negative in strictly financial terms. Thus the dowry incentive.