Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
w33fy
Posted 2w ago in Entitlement Princess - Permalink - 4K Views
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 2w ago Stickied
I almost removed this one because it's missing the second half of rule 5:
however, her statement that she's "never been on a real first date" is very telling.
Post approved as weekend material.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
ESPECIALLY since she's not a virgin.
How do we know that? If she were, she'd say so, women damn well know it ups their assessed RMV. Especially when she goes to such efforts to portray herself as pious.
So clearly her pussy been thru a few rounds of Tinderizing, and likely has had more dicks in it than a clown car. Which makes it very likely that this woman is a predator aping the dressings of a tradcon in order to entrap a man foolish enough to believe her, and is based on her message, angling to baby trap him pronto. Also of note is how her profile mentions NOTHING of what she brings to the table, just a bunch of demands. As usual. So the only thing positive she likely has going for her is being 19. That's it. That goes away with time. Buyer beware.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 2w ago
I’m not so sure. Frankly, I have no idea if this girl is a virgin or not, and I’m unwilling to speculate. I would certainly not definitively declare her to be a Tinderella simply because she didn’t preemptively deny it. (Would you believe her if she had?)
Let’s face it: 19 year olds say a lot of stupid things, and what she wrote is not inconsistent with what a “good girl” might write if she was a little naive (which most teenagers are).
I want to be careful about the rule against defending / downplaying bad conduct by women, but the point of that rule is to avoid white-knighting for women who meet the Rule 5 posting criteria, which this girl doesn’t. She’s not evidencing any deal-breakers, carousel-riding, or bad decisions… nor is she complaining about men from her past or men in general. She’s not asking for a bailout or demanding that the guy possess a basket of traits that are rare or unattainable.
Like I said in my mod note on Reddit, the only fault I find with her is her assertion that her body type is “athletic.” She’s not a serious athlete, but she’s not a heffalump, either.
Based solely on what we know about her, she appears to be doing most things right. She’s looking for a husband while she’s near her prime, she’s stressing moral character over a bunch of immutable physical traits, and she’s not demanding that the guy have a ton of money. She wants a guy with good morals who hits the gym and knows BLS (basic lifesaving): and she even expresses those as preferences rather than demands. Honestly, that’s not a lot to ask.
If we’re going to criticize a young woman even if she does what we tell her she should do, I don’t see how that’s better than what FDS says about men.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 2w ago
Although I was wondering about Entitlement Queen flair as well, she does have an overall entitlement attitude that is sadly all too common nowadays with the notion that woman is supposed to be treated as a "prize" and the man is supposed to "earn" or justify access to her. In particular, she claims to be religious and presumably "traditional".
What "traditional woman" used to mean, and it's in The Bible everywhere (as I was reminded at a recent wedding I attended) is that women are supposed to be SUBMISSIVE.
Ephesians 5:22-33 MEV Wives, be submissive to your own husbands as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, just as Christ is the head and Savior of the church, which is His body. But as the church submits to Christ, so also let the wives be to their own husbands in everything.
Women who say they want to "submit" to "strong" men misses the point of submissiveness: It's easy to submit to someone whose stronger than you, of course, but there's no requirement for it. A woman can submit to ANY man. Nothing is stopping them. If she wants to submit, she is free to do this at any time.
Even non religious women, such as the career women I recently posted about, complain they "need" successful men to "submit" to even as they still want to retain independence. As a consequence, both are childless as they strove to dominate men stronger than themselves.
Entitlement is the OPPOSITE of what Christ preached.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
Good point about submission. They only want to submit to someone who can give them a better deal all the time. They can never be worthy of such a guy as he deserves better.
Yesterday I went to a wedding. It was to say the least unusual. I was wondering about writing it up as it ties in with this point about submission. It was between an african migrant widow and mother of 4 sons and a western old man, father of an adult disabled child and brother of a circus freak madman. It looked like a family riddled with western weakness. He got a carer and companion, she got a visa and a foot in the door way for her kids. One of them was already dancing with a large western lady twice his age and weight. He strangely would not let her out of an arms length of him.
Anyway the interesting thing was that this wedding had an infestation of evangelical african preachers -male and female. The bride was keen on that sort of thing. I recall 6 of them spoke. Every one of them preached loudly that the woman must submit to the man. They were like a stuck record as they filled in for 2 hours while the ladies in the kitchen got the food ready and brought vast quantities of drink. It seemed to me they were labouring the point a little. Submission must have been said maybe 200 times, maybe more. On one level it amsued me greatly to watch the venue staff suffer huge cognitive dissonance as they had to serve these people they looked down on as bigots.
In the end a female preacher started going. Same story god help this woman to submit to her husband. But this time she then turned it around on the man. "God give this man a vision for life that this woman can submit to" (repeated dozens of time with encouragement for the audience to chant it too). At this point I realised why they were labouring this point. They knew what has been common knowledge for millennia -that wives should submit to their men. However they also saw that this strong woman who had raised 4 boys alone on few resources before gambling it all on a visa could never find this western benefit dad worthy of submitting to. Certainly, the bride resembled was a round smiling ball of very post wall femininity -as the preachers said the man was the answer to all their prayers for her -a bail out after expiry date. She should be grateful for this man's resources but honestly this was not a man a woman could easily submit to.
This was an extreme example but it showed how messed up the west has become by weakening its men and still telling them they have to carry everything. Somewhere balance has to be found. Men need to man up and women need to accept they can't have it all. They can't just as usual sit back and wait for men to do it all. Society however also has to back men. I can't see this guy being likely to make it work. No one but the mad preachers will back him if he tries to put his foot down. Education has not taught him how to put his foot down. If he remotely upsets her its domestic abuse, visa approved free house on the government. This guy is now tied to a grenade pin. Piss her off and she will leave and take half his stuff. Tell her off and she will take all his stuff. The woman is not bad but she is still a woman. Pray for this guy!
GimmeTheUsual Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
This story underscores how women eventually compromise when they realize their lure is fading.
I witnessed something on a smaller scale recently in reference to how the West has influenced men in a negative way. Guy at the bar, talking to a girl but after a bit tries to buy her a drink. She declines, but he forces the issue. When she realized that he was going to pay no matter what, she reversed course and started up the extraction engine.
This in my view was a negative because giving gifts of any kind when they haven't been earned is a surefire way to be put in the "get all his stuff" box. It isn't respect, just her wiring firing off and saying "okay, gimme".
I don't say this to peg the guy as someone who will always fail - just that we've made those mistakes and women are naturally inclined to exploit this.
Thanks for sharing that story, it was well written.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 5d ago
"What's your view on abortion?"
Christ, that's an insufferable kind of thing to ask. 50 years ago, it wasn't even a question.
What kind of "Christian" is this chick, anyway? See, I have to know if she's Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1879, or one of those damned Northern Conservative Baptist Great Lakes Region Council of 1912 heretics.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
All she would have to be is not fat to find a decent guy.
Doesn't need a degree, doesn't need to be interesting or cultured or intelligent, doesn't need to work out and be buff - all we need is 'not fat'
Apparently, that's not possible.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
"Please bench at least 200, because I weigh more than 200"
The golden rule of OLD is that head shots = land whale. if she were not over 100kg's, her profile would be literally just bikini shots. If she is fat by 19, she is going to be obese by 30.
Boar_excrement Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
30? I doubt she has that much self discipline.
sean_karaya Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
thankfully i am neither christian, nor do i bench press, nor am I american,
Justanaverageguy 2w ago
I can rep 225, 11 times but jd hard pass on this one. Never been on a real first date tells me everything I need to know. Used to whore around and now got holy but still wants the bad boy type.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
I'm sure she does pray to God all the time. I would if I were her. Divine intervention is her only hope.
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 2w ago
Athletic???? She's fucking fat.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 5d ago
She loves going bowling. She puts on a helmet and rolls downhill.
Boar_excrement Jr. Hamster Analyst 2w ago
I take it that is her profile name in the Intent line. That name tells me all I need to know to respond appropriately.
Immediately dismissed from all further thoughts and consideration.