Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
polishknight
Posted 1mo ago in Leftovers - Permalink - Locked - 4.4K Views
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago Stickied
Part 3 of a series. Part 1 is the post that this Carol is responding to here: https://www.forums.red/p/whereareallthegoodmen/322347/i_m_a_single_mom_who_is_ready_to_give_up_on_men_because_they Part 2 is a another comment to the post here: https://www.forums.red/p/whereareallthegoodmen/322348/this_literally_made_me_cry
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago Stickied
Their offer is akin to demanding full price plus tip for a steak dinner that someone else has already eaten all the meat and left only bits of fat and gristle. And it's been sitting in the fridge for a week before being re-served.
And then being shocked and appalled when no one wants to buy. HOW DARE THEY!
Oh and you find out partway through the offer that the prior diner (who ate for free) had hepatitis and slobbered all over everything.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1mo ago
The fact that she thinks that men have a lot of sexual options tells you everything you need to know.
Only a small percentage of men have numerous sexual options without 1) having ridiculously low standards AND 2) offering some level of commitment.
As always, when women complaining about the mating market say “men”… understand that they’re talking about Chad.
Gilles 1mo ago
It's gospel at this point
Problematic_Browser Sr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
Women, en masse suffer from the sharpshooter fallacy - they see men (i.e. chads) with unlimited sexual options and they extrapolate that onto all men.
They also simultaneously hold the belief that most men are beneath them, but the hamster is a master of doublethink to the point that it would make the Inner Party proud.
And the greatest irony is that this is the direct outcome of unfettered female preference - they willingly put themselves into the harems of top-tier men and ignore the other 80% of men.
Oh well.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
IMHO, that's not quite how the sharp shooter fallacy works.
"The Texas Sharpshooter Fallacy is a logical fallacy based on the metaphor of a gunman shooting the side of a barn, then drawing targets around the bullethole clusters to make it look like he hit the target. It illustrates how people look for similarities, ignoring differences, and do not account for randomness."
The TSSF is a very common bias. It hinges on the fact that the 'sharp shooter' paints the target after he has fired all his shots. In essence, he is infering a pattern where there isn't one, because his selection of data points is highly non-random
If you wanted a good TRP example, a simple one would be this:
"There are no good men out there, they are all trash, they only want sex and they cheat on you"
This is the conclusion that sluts come to after 20 years on the CC. They genuinely think that 'all men are like that' because their selection of men is non random. They only have sex or even notice men that are douche bags, so they are painting a target on a non-random selection of men. They fail to see this most simple of sampling errors.
Sluts think all men are trash because they are only interested in men that hate women.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
Yup, and 99% of their dating woes could be resolved if they simply chose to date on their actual level.
But they don't, so they deserve the misery they cause themselves.
NotaBene Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
spits Heh, the ol' Texas Sharpshooter fallacy, eh?
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
@Lone_Ranger made the observation a few posts back about how women see things in terms of "feelings" particularly when it relates to men. Men are supposed to fix and solve things for them so they instantly absolve themselves of actionable responsibility.
@lurkerhasarisen Consider the subject line: "I can't FIND many men who are looking for more than just sex" There were probably people who told her "You can find lots of guys such as your nice-guy friend for example" and she'd respond: "He doesn't count."
I love this scene in King of the Hill where Hank attempts to explain to Luanne that merely because her trailer tipped over, it nonetheless still exists:
https://youtu.be/VcJHDIoyAqE?t=9
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
When I play that King of the Hill video, there is something missing at 0:09
What is it @polishknight ?
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1mo ago
The video is set to start at 9 seconds. You can start from the beginning as well.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
I got that.. I was trying to do a funny little quiz thing.
The thing that is missing at 0.:09 is that Luanne doesn't have a tramp stamp.