I don't have any sympathy either as she had a good man who wanted to start a family with her but she was too selfish, now her self is all she will have.

It reads like she was just a side piece to a busy man who didn't want kids with her.

This woman was common back in the early 1980's. I suppose that men now would feel lucky to have merely lazy, irresponsible women as compared to ultra-entitled and obese as they are now. They weren't bad looking back then, mildly hypergamous, and if you were a "good boy" and rolled the dice, you have a 2/3 chance of having a family with them and it working out to retirement. Hmm, basically like my wife. :-)

And that's ok in that (knock on wood) I have a lovely daughter and things have worked out (so far) and that's what us men accept if we want a family. There are no guarantees and you do your best, dive in, and hope for the best.

But this woman, like many, just expected that men should take care of all the important stuff while they "find themselves" or blow their 20's, and then even 30's, just not thinking about the future AT ALL. I didn't have a biological clock but I did regular evaluations of my life. When I hit 30, I did some calibration of my frame (not elimination, just calibration) and then in another 5 years, some more. Women such as this are like Rip Van Winkle who go to sleep when they're 18 and wake up at 38 and decide "Hmmm, maybe I should try to get married before 40?"

Even now, like another biological clock ticker featured, it's not really all that bad for her. She would have an easier time finding a good man at her age than I did when I was 35 and met my wife. "Good man" meaning that he wouldn't be tall, perhaps wouldn't have a glamorous career, and wouldn't jump through perfect game hoops but if she put in the effort, she could get married and have a child in under 2 years. The problem is such women lack the mindset to engage in the effort to do so.

There are (few) "real" inspins or incels, really. Given guidance and a willingness to put in the effort, most men can get laid if they can get a passport and put about $1000 aside for "professional services". That's like the price of 10 dinner dates.

You fucked my username up again, so no.

But you do get some vcards on the trp.red side of the site!

In all fairness, as a father of a 7 year old girl, I have "no life" like I did in my 20's. Back in my 20's, and something I want men to know now, it was so cool to enjoy so many neat things. I watched so many great independent films on VHS tapes and did geeky things and there's little time for that as a father. Work and do homework with my daughter, deal with the daily disasters, and pray to get through to the weekend.

It's tough to tell someone that just as they reach adulthood and independence, well, time to now blow that time raising a child. Women have it made in one regard: In their 20's, they have MAXIMUM power to marry and have kids but it also means giving up those 20's and 30's. In their 40's and 50's, they can do those cool things. I have friends who are enjoying that now as empty nesters. They go on cruises, they have hobbies, and such. But it's hard to see that future in their 20's particularly if as a woman they can get Chad cock and free meals for 15 years.

As a 58 year old father of a 7 year old, I just had a wonderful moment. My wife was being a brat and yelling at my daughter (because she is emotional, what a surprise) and I came over and calmed the situation, and told my daughter that it was going to be ok, I loved her, and how to handle it. Today, she said "It's ok. Mommy apologized afterwards" and kissed me.

"natural female desires" used to mean being kind, and loving, and appreciative of men. We haven't had natural femininity for 400 years but rather this chivalrous nonsense of women as entitled princesses.

No unmarried woman is happy.

I've seen it time and time again, the "strong independent woman" is a veneer that breaks down into "why will nobody love me" after one too many martinis.

The sad part is that they can't confide in anyone - girl code demands that the ruse persist and they can't tell men because - unsurprisingly - we just shrug (because we know how consequences work). They're left to bear the weight of their choices and forced to act as if it's liberating them instead of crushing their souls.

In order to bet, you need someone to take the opposite position and be willing to put money behind it. You'd have better luck finding someone willing to bet that the sun goes around the earth.

LMAO