She want's a "progressive" guy, this was a must it seems. But she also included the well known code word "Chemistry". So, she wants a limp-wrist, low-T, woke, soyboy Chad Thundercock then. Sure, many of those on the ground.

LoL. After being on this forum for so long, it's so easy to decode posts like this and cut through all the BS.

First, she asks what happened 2 years ago. Umm, let's see, you're thirty one. So... 2 years ago you were 29. Don't these girls realize that the falloff in interest in OLD is not linear and gradual like it is in real life? It's sudden, with massive dropoffs at ages 25, 30, and 40. 2 years ago, after the clock ticked over to 30, she lost a massive chunk of her OLD dating pool literally on midnight of her birthday. And yet, she thinks it's somehow "the demographics of the app" that's making it hard, rather than "the demographics of the user". ROFL.

Second, she moved out of NYC 2 years ago, and now only works there 2x / week. She had to increase her radius to 50 miles to include the City. IOW, she now lives ~50 miles away from NYC aka the fucking boonies. What desirable man in Manhattan (because let's get serious, a "career girl" with "standards" isn't dating some dude in Queens) wants to deal with the logistical hassle of dating a bridge-and-tunnel girl when there are a million girls right on the island? If she lives 50 miles away, then even on the 2 days a weeks she's in the city, she's looking to hit the road (or get on her train, most likely) by 7 at the latest if she wants to get home at a decent hour. Arranging meetup times with someone like this is only slightly less difficult than dealing with a single mom. Why bother?

It's one thing to look for someone within 50 miles if the guys living 50 miles away are also willing to date in that large radius. IOW, if it's a rural area all around, and no one can find enough people locally, then everyone is willing to travel. But just because you're willing to travel 50 miles doesn't mean your potential partner is. And in NYC, people are so snobby, they won't even date outside their neighborhood, much less deal with some commuter from upstate NY or Jersey. Limiting yourself to just the Upper East Side (for example), still leaves you with thousands upon thousands of potential dates. No one is interested in Carol from Connecticut.

And finally, in her 20s, when she was hotter and living in the city, she was fine just fucking around. And now, in her 30s, 50 miles away, she wants to find a husband, kids, etc. As we've seen countless times, women start making bigger demands just as their value starts plummeting. I'm not surprised she found 75 men to date her (and countless more to fuck her in ONS, fuckbuddy setups, etc) when she wanted that. And now she wants something much more valuable, and she's wondering why she's not seeing the same success.

Bottomline, it's a tale as old as [modern, feminist] time: woman focus on their career aka ride the carousel in their 20s (sidenote: why can't women focus on their career and a LTR/marriage at the same time? They spend plenty of time dating/fucking around, so it's not like they don't have the time to pursue a real relationship. This woman dated 75 men in her 20s. That's a lot of time that she wasn't "focusing on her career" that she could have dedicated to finding a good man instead, if she wanted to). Then try to stick the landing and end up with a good man at the last possible moment.

In this person's case, she didn't stick the landing: her last possible moment happened 2 years ago. 29, living in the city, chances are decent for finding someone. 31, living in the sticks yet still pining for a hot city guy? Not gonna happen. And her lack of self-awareness of her situation won't help her. Hope the extra 2 years of carousel riding are worth the 40-50 years of loneliness she traded it for...

She never mentions what exactly are her dealbreakers. If her dealbreakers are "Must be 6 feet tall and make $200k+/year.", she's already excluded most men, and the men in that category pass EVERYONE's "dealbreakers".

Like one of my fav channels bumper music says - "The Wall!, The Wall!, No one on earth can make it fall!!"

If a 30-something (probably lying about her age, of course) can't find anyone to pair up with in super-progressive NYC, (she wants the same 'values'), then she's gonna have to look in the mirror - because the problem is staring back at her.

Honestly I would love a AI-Generated show about bints hitting the wall, (to avoid permission/legal problems, etc..), and their overall useless activities until they finally hit rock bottom. Shouldn't take much computing power at all.

Seeing some deluded girl throw herself around her mostly empty condo would be quite the healing balm for my masculine soul.

Hm okay, now if anybody can tell me how I get this fancy screenshot posting done I'd be glad. Also I am somewhat uncertain if it fits, the specimen above isn't explicit in her question, but it is strongly implied. So just in case it fits, I'd like to also comment on that find:

still feel the dating pool is too small

Like in the title, she surely is right, that's what NYC is known for. When I think 'small town', I think New York! Maybe she should try Tokyo, Delhi or Shanghai? Maybe even Beijing might suffice... barely.

90% of the men have dealbreakers

straight from the horse's mouth, anything below top 10% isn't good enough. As saint Kevind said "you can't make this shit up"

shocked that men go from LTR to LTR

Surely she expects a virgin like herself?

gone out with >75 men

Never mind. And I'm sure a high percentage of those she gone 'all out' with.

career took priority in the 20ies

Sure it does, you go girl! But surely, you also wanted just to have your fun, hmm honey?

dating just for fun in her twenties, not with a relationship in mind

carousel noise intensifies

She then goes off to list her dealbreakers, which doesn't even seem too outrageous. On the surface. Of course, we know that 'taller than me (5'7) means at least 6 foot some. Monogamous and progressive also doesn't mix well - isn't poly the thing now? Attraction and chemistry - muh tingles. So original and new.

Now why is it she literally can't find anybody? Is it the small dating pool? The demographics? Her dealbreakers? It doesn't even cross her mind it might be a typical 'Osi layer 8' problem. Aka PSIFOC (problem sits in front of computer), for the non nerds (are there any?) here.

She ends her mad ravings insightful analysis with the question what might be the correlation - what happened in the past two years? Surely it must have been her moving out of the city?

When I hit 30 these were the types of women I would get matched with. I bought into the man-shaming language that I should get with someone my age. I was also kinda forced into it because I wanted a wife and kids but none of the younger women do because they're careerists.

What she's leaving out is that she's an insufferable cunt and failed to lock down a man 75 times. She has no idea what men want. There is no room for another person in a relationship with her. She would make a terrible wife and mother. This is exactly why I dated outside the US.

When I got with my wife it was like day and night between her and Western women. Zero demands. She immediately started draining my balls, feeding me, looking after our place, pleasant company, friendly, sexy, etc.

So my take on it is guys are either bowing out like I did, choosing to not get married, or they're blue pilled autistic simps like I was before bowing out. And that's why she can't find a non-deal-breaker guy at her age and with her notch count.

It's like she decided to stack every negative modifier to her odds of getting commitment and then is shocked when she fails to get it.

Women would do good to understand that while they start out in their teens and 20's having good baseline odds of finding a match, it is also really goddamn easy to stack multiplicative penalties and complety tank their final results. Even having a single child alone probably cuts a woman's odds by 50-75%.