Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
- Main Forums
- What's Hot
- TRP.RED
- Tribe Forums
- TheRedPill
- Tribe Management
- Create New Tribe
- Manage My Tribes
- Find New Tribes
- Recent News
-
-
throwawayforsafety19 about a month ago
My bad on rule 6. Should be good now.
Honestly, debated reposting it because I figured all the good discussion was already had, but more receipts of wahmens is better lol
sean_karaya about a month ago
Ok Here is my breakdown.
1. Loves traveling : This is as generic as saying she loves eating. Trying to seek a common ground with this is as pointless as trying to seek common grounds with Adolf Hitler, 'cause I also speak German or have two hands. Over the years of traveling myself as a professional treasure hunter in countries where it is allowed, I have my own rhythm and my own procedures. In my time I have seen a lot of people who also "loves traveling". But all what they do is spend money in tourist traps. That doesn't excite me. Granted I do not know her exact details of traveling. In the Fresh and Fit show, and in the Pearlythings show, I have seen a lot of whamynz™ stay that a real man ™ "will get to know the details", and thus has to "spend money" on them for their time, to tell us the details of their traveling style. No thanks. Catholic church will also take my money to tell me about my sins. Also no thanks.
2. Been to 20+ countries : Good . I have been to 40+
3. And lived in 3 continents : Good so did I.
4. Lot of fun experiences : None of those fun experiences included me so far. Also, you got your fun doing what exactly ? Letting Chads, Tyrones, and Jamals rearrange your innards? Tasting the local cuisine? In either case, all that pleases your senses, and not mine. Why should I spend my money and time and energy just because you had your fun with others? That doesn't sound prudent to me. Usually here women would say that I am jealous. Sure, sure. But still, I have no reason to spend my money, time and energy on people who go their fun elsewhere. She can ask the men she was having her fun with to commit to her. Why should I pick her up now.
5. Definitely 8+ in terms of looks : Says who? Convince him to date you. Or clone him if he's taken. You have enough money.
6. Earn 850k : Cool, you are a millionaire. Buy a boy toy from Uganda
7. Own a house : Cool. I came far enough without your house. It does not interest me. It isn't something I would consider a motivation to commit to you. I own land in 8 countries in 3 continents. Trying to force your house ownership as something I should find attractive is gaslighting and thus psychological abuse.
8. Speak 5 languages : Cool. I speak 6. Don't you women talk about "love language". I dont see my love language listed in it. So your current proficiency in 5 languages for 5 other people does not interest me.
9. Have a fancy car : Cool. That car's fanciness is agreed upon by others. Not by me. I have my custom built car. Again trying to use that as a bargaining chip is a massive turn off.
10. Manage a team of 20+ person : How does that benefit me that I will not get without a relationship with you? Are you going to cut a special deal in your company for me if I am in a relationship with you? That's nepotism, and professionally dishonest. Regardless of how many others do it, like it, and whether I am getting the long end or the short end of the stick, I do not find that worthy of committing myself to. If I was already in a relationship with you,
11 Quality time with partners : A woman's view of "quality time" is when a man pays for everything platonicaly, after she gets sexual elsewhere. That is not a basis of a committed relationship. https://www.forums.red/p/whereareallthegoodmen/319178/i_m_really_happy_with_my_boyfriend_so_why_don_t_i_want_to_h
12 being out in nature : Doing what exactly? Again: Too nebulous.
What are you doing wrong:
LolTroll11 about a month ago
I never understand why women say I've had my fun if they're looking for a relationship. How exactly she thinks a man is going to pursue it ? Signal to Chad that she's fun and dtf, how is that signalling good relationship potential. It's as good as saying I am an avid enjoyer of the Disney Park for all I care.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians about a month ago
That saying ("I've had my fun") is always tied to the notion (often explicitly stated) that the woman now wants, "Something serious." In other words, the fun is over and now she wants to be an adult. There are at least two things wrong with that:
The first is that a "former" party girl's idea of being an adult in an adult relationship involves a lot more of those pesky "traditional gender roles" that she eschewed when she was riding the carousel. Not the ones that restrict her, mind you, or the ones that require her to get with your program and be a help-meet... but rather the ones where you have to protect and provide without hesitation while having no enforceable rights or authority.
The second is that she's no longer fun to be around. She's just told you that she's done with all that. So not only do you know that she gave her best to other men and you're not going to get any of that, but you're the one who has to deal with a woman who has accumulated all the baggage that comes with a decade or more of "having fun." Women who pursue the dual-mating strategy chase bad boys for "fun" then "settle" for the solid guys when that doesn't work out for them, even though they wouldn't give those guys a chance when they were young and hot. A few years ago I started advocating for those men to start saying, "I don't want to spend the rest of my life cleaning up after a party I wasn't invited to."
Of course then women and (many) TradCons berate the men as "Peter Pans" because they don't want to sign up for marriage to women who don't want to have fun with them, and pose significant divorce risk. Never mind that they were being adults and getting their act together while the women who want them after they've been flung from the carousel belatedly realize that growing up is no longer optional.
I've told this story before, but for those who haven't heard it: I met my wife a few weeks after she had turned 20, and she was the prototype for the Debt Free Virgin With No Tattoos that is the gold standard for wife-grade women. I was 25 and established in a good career, so she got to leapfrog into a much higher income bracket and have her fun and adventures in her 20s... with me.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed about a month ago
They never seem to consider/realize that if a man is having to pay with his most successful years that maybe a woman should reciprocate with equivalent value.
And showing up to the negotiating table as a damaged and haggard near-crone dripping with the bodily fluids, baggage, and obligations of past failed relationships in no way whatsoever counts as equivalent value!
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed about a month ago
I chuckle about her standard trope about men "intimidated" by her. The men "intimidated" by her are those Powerful men she desires who don't put up with her guff. It's projection in that she DOESN'T intimidate them and when they tell her off, she lashes out. I have a successful, pretty female relative like this who doesn't want her alpha males "dominating" her and when they stand up to her, she goes "independent" and moves on to the next. She's in her early 20's. Just got a nose ring.
She begs for advice, but she clearly won't take it. I know a woman similar to this who bemoans her lack of social skills and inability to find an educated mate and I suggested a number of excellent game books for her (because the techniques work on a variety of situations including just meeting people.) I find it fascinating that a typical red pilled man probably has more empathy and social skills than my two grandmothers put together. When I look at old European films, I'm flabbergasted at the natural (and cultivated) charm those foreign women from the 1950's had. I befriended such women in their golden years and they attended my wedding.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla about a month ago
Those women still exist, but not within current Western generation.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed about a month ago
I point out here that there are ways that even a 40 year old single mother could outfox a 25 year old zoomer in that if she dressed and acted feminine (kind, soft spoken, well mannered, thoughtful, friendly) and cherished and respected men while making an effort to meet the men she desired and wrangled them appropriately, she'd be more desirable than the unfeminine 25 year olds. 30 years ago, I found that older women interested in younger men often were nicer to be around.
The problem is that the "boss babes" of my generation, back in the 1990's, are now the older, single women of today leaving young men with NO generation of (local) (single) women that's decent companionship.
Vermillion-Rx Jr. Hamster Analyst about a month ago
Gonna take a stab at translating this misguided career woman's "Career man" bio
I'm in a field mostly for men look at myself, me go girl! Also, I'm post wall.
If you make less than this I probably won't date you. I FEEL proud about my earnings though and I want you to know how successful I am.
Every man who does this life path is successful so why aren't I getting those results too? What gives? I should be killing it out there and yet no one wants me. Everyone told me to shoot for the stars and not let society tell me what to do with my life.
For three years I've been either:
1) unwilling to settle
2) wanting just sex
3) not wanted by other men
4) eating ice cream alone and crying some nights
Or any combination of those four for the last 3 years
I like excitement and adventure and by the way all these places have exotic foreign cock that no one will find out about when I fucked them
There have been 20+ countries I may or may not have been dicked down in. I kept doing it because of how addicting the adventure was
Not only was I dicked down in different countries, but I also was long-term dicked down by foreign men because exotic, that's why.
Congrats.
Excluding sex, what exercise do you do?
Guys who I might have possibly shot down might be giving me overvalued ratings or compelled to answer highly because they're my friends
Apart from the genuinely low quality profiles, I just think most men are beneath me. I'm a goddess with 850k TC
Men instinctively don't like me being the breadwinner because they know I'll lose interest in them rapidly if anything actually develops between us in spite of me having more success than them
I run imaginary boyfriend scenarios through my head and I'm also referring to some of the men I've settled to spend some time with her and there
I followed feminist advice and became a pseudo man in the career world and I don't understand men enough to see what the problem with that is
I just need to reiterate the most obvious deal-breakers I have again, I actually believe they are my greatest strengths if you ask me
LolTroll11 about a month ago
Squatting her bodyweight and the stair master.
DextroShade about a month ago
I'm guessing she won't even consider dating a guy with less money than her, which means she will die alone because men at that income level aren't looking for boss bitches in their 30's. If she really wants a partner she should pick her best orbiter because that's the best she can get.
Pic889 about a month ago
850K? You fucked up real bad there, girl. Only 0.02% of unmarried men make 850K or more per year. Which means you have excluded 99.98% of the male population in the US before you even start considering things like age, height, BMI, appearance, and all the other things in your laundry list of requirements.
And that less than 0.02% of the male population meeting your requirements has lots of better dating options (younger, hotter, tighter, less confrontational).
--
Of course, she could always downmarry like her male peers are willing to do and take the risk of being taken to the cleaners after a divorce like Adelle was (and countless men too, let's not forget), but that would be disempowering, so she can't have that.
And this is the problem here: She wants equality on her terms, aka only when it suits her.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians about a month ago
You've hit on the very essence of what she's doing wrong: she's trying to live as a man and date as a woman. Leaving aside the fact that the vast majority of her compensation comes in the form of non-monetary options... a man who makes more than 99.98% of workers is "economically attractive" to nearly every woman on Earth. If she were a man and dating as a man, she would be in the catbird seat.
But she's not a man. We men understand that we have to make more than the women we're pursuing in order to be "economically attractive" to them (I didn't make that phrase up - I encountered it in an article derived from a peer-reviewed sociological study). Why?... Because women generally don't go for men who earn less than they do (even if their own "income" and "net worth" are just 1s and 0s in some database).
It doesn't take much to figure out that a man's options are restricted to women who make less than he does, while a woman's options are restricted to men who make more than she does. Because of her privileged spot on the diversity scale, she makes more than 99.98% of men.... all of whom are unavailable to her because of her own hypergamy. That leaves her standing at the altar with a bunch of dubious assets that men don't care about, vying for commitment from a miniscule number of men who can have anyone they want.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla about a month ago
Very succinct description of the career girl dilemma.
Women might go for men who make less than they do, but they will not get respect for it and without that respect, the relationship is on borrowed time.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. about a month ago
I've known a handful of men who brought home less money than their wives, and for whom it has worked so far (all in double-digits years together; no newlyweds). In fact, I was one such man at a couple of points in my marriage (I have since left her in the dust).
What they all have in common: an abundance of other factors (both in the alpha and beta category) that make them highly desirable, and just being all-around great dudes married to all-around great women.
But these were lucky outliers. Exceptions.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla about a month ago
As a rule, your respect has to come from somewhere else. If it doesn't, you're bound to be left in the dust or abused pretty soon.
[deleted]
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. about a month ago
Dude, the whole reason the previous version of this post got taken down was because of personal info being revealed in the OP and in the thread.
Don't do that.
Comment Stickied by Moderator
whytehorse2021 about a month ago
This isn't reddit. She's a public figure with a public profile posting on a public forum. This isn't like doxxing some hoe on Tinder. But your forum your rules. I think it's gate-keeping as a carry-over from being conditioned to gate-keep on reddit. What you should really be asking is if someone's privacy is being violated and how that could come back as a violation of their right to privacy instead of anonymizing publicly available info, especially when it comes to published articles.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla about a month ago
Consider this angle: We're not bitches gossiping with the intention to bring down someone's social standing. As men, who she is makes no difference. What we need to focus on is the lessons that can be learned from this mess and for that lesson, her identity is irrelevant.