Visit the WAATGM forum to view and post content.
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this tribe is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
- 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate tribe.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Content Archive:
Related forums:

ScribhneoirIldanach Sr. Hamster Analyst 3y ago
Gaelige-Béarla Translations:
SpiritualEnema Jr. Hamster Analyst 3y ago
Only 56+ partners, she must have held back.
goodmansaysfuckyou Big Dick Energy Misogynist 3y ago
I remember this one. Just goes to show that Truth never dies.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 3y ago
I find it interesting that her rate of change in N increases in her ages 27-34 vs her 18-27, but this could very well be true. In the former, she could have boyfriends who stick around for awhile and mostly dates within a social circle or meeting men in person. 27-on it’s probably a lot more online dates and hookups with dudes who have no intention, nor social pressure, to stick around.
Boar_excrement Jr. Hamster Analyst 3y ago
This is the reality and privileges they fought so hard to win. Congratulations laydeez, you won. Cats, you won lots of cats.
To paraphrase Dalrock, the feminists made the same mistake as aging generals: they were prepared to fight the next war with the tactics that won them the last war. Well, men have adapted and now the battlefield is slowly morphing into a new landscape. I am hearing more young men actively speaking against marriage. They know it is the worst mistake they could make. It is one of the few things to give me hope for the future.
If I had to guess what the future would hold, it would be women voting for more privileges from the government at the expense of men.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 3y ago
A couple of thoughts on all these... First I'll start with women as a voting bloc: Back about in the 1980's, TERF feminists were there strongest voting bloc particularly since the electorate was still largely white in both political parties. With modern fractioning of race along with transgender and gay lobbies taking off since then and the tech oligarchs largely calling the shots, times have changed.
I think the primary privilege women wanted was the female version of The Playboy Philosophy: They could pick ANY man they wanted and have any CAREER they wanted as well. It's a libertarian ideal, but there's a tyranny in it that nobody tells kids who all say they want to be astronauts, politicians, or CEO's that most are going to be store clerks or garbagemen. Women simply don't understand the concept of settling: The harsh reality that we have to learn how to be happy with less, particularly if you grow older and you have less to bargain with.
When I came of age, I had friends who became entrepreneurs and most of them failed miserably. It was sad and it took them decades to recover. The American Dream sounds great on paper, and we admire the winners, but the costs are hidden.
Back about 30 years ago, I had blue pilled men telling me to conform or die alone and sexless. Just give women what they want, and you can have sex and marriage. Just ignore the risks. If you even try to think independently, the women would reject you. But now, there's little benefit in being blue pilled. Either such men are cruelly exploited out the gate or they're not given anything. We don't need to shame or punish blue pilled men: women do that task for us quite well.