Be careful on here gentlemen. There are subs watching this and trying to make this a hate group for making fun of THEIR bad choices. But you can talk crap about men in every form of media tho.

[removed]

OK, so, get this: She has to work until she's 70 and then live on a social security budget. By the time she's 50 she is never having a baby and can't even get cougar sex anymore. She will have to pay men to do everything she can't do herself.

Well boys, looks like it's time to ask for a pay raise. Ladies, need a male influence in your son's life? Call rent-a-dad and pay $100/hr. Need sex with a hot guy? Call rent-a-chad for $400/hr. I'm pretty sure most mechanics charge $100+/hr.

As for me? I'm gonna catch all the "Eat, Pray, Love" women coming to Bali and have them fund my retirement and keep my third leg polished.

Blah, blah, blah I'm so happy until she needs help on her acquired property. She will screw the plumber for free service.

Written by the same women who, next month, will be wailing "where are all the good men" and "why is my dildo my best friend".

Written by the same women who, next year, will be complaining about having shitty jobs and having to work like men.

Who, in 10 years, in their 50s, will be complaining about not being able to retire because "401k? Roth IRA? Huh? What's that? All I need is social security. My Obama money. Or my niece. Or my nephew. The government will take care of it. It's Biden money now."

Female Cope. Big time.

This is just long screed of projection. ANY Women who seriously write "Men hit the wall at 30" is just projecting.

This Inspin read about MGTOW and tried to adopt it to Women. Sorry but more and more Men are focusing on building their lives, wealth and happiness and focusing less on "woman on his arm" This drives Inspins crazy, cause those are Men they rejected in their 20s while riding the CC. Now that want to "settle down" the Men they rejected are now rejecting them.

It would be sad if it was not so much fun to read...

I've seen plenty of posts here and elsewhere from men about how much happier they are living single. They would be unlikely to get published as articles on sites however. Firstly, nobody generally cares about what happens to men. Secondly, a man claiming he is happier without women would be considered evidence of "toxic masculinity" and "MRA and MGTOW culture". I'm sure the term "incel" would get thrown in there somewhere too, because any [straight] man without a women must actually be a bitter reprobate, no matter what he claims otherwise.

wow, the misandry in there, like the comment saying [paraphrasing] "men are privileged, they don't even realize they can take their time their whole lives without pressure..."

I'm sorry you hate men because you hold them responsible for your biology, and it's a shame you think it's "easy for men", when the reality is they have to be providers, and pursue women, risking rejection every single time, etc.

Maybe men should blame women for prostate cancer, testicular cancer, colon cancer, and bitch about "female privilege" ?

Then there's the comment saying [paraphrasing] "20,30,40,50 years ago women couldn't dream of this, we're living the dream!"

Yes, women "dreaming" of being single mothers, and raising a child that will grow up with only one parent, what a perfect society we live in....

the weapons-grade copium is astounding o.O

I know a 27 year old who would fit in their club.

She seems ok, I'd even say cute.

I didn't understand at first why so many coworkers openly disliked her so much (mostly other women).

I've worked with this girl for a year now, we talk at least once a week to pass the time.

She literally only talks about herself.

She is incapable of having a conversation about something that isn't directly related to her. Art, politics, music... Immediately circles back to her somehow. (It's actually kind of fascinating seeing this in action).

Even though she is an "American average" she still boasts about guys asking her out.

But she's single and has been for several years.

"I have high standards"

Says the overweight 27 year old, living with her mom, that flunked another undergrad course.

And a realization hit me like a ton of bricks.

Our society is geared toward her narcissism. This hinders her from becoming fully self-actualized. That is to say, she hasn't made that final leap to see the world as something bigger than herself.

I take comfort in knowing that when I die, the world will keep creating wonderful things.

When she dies, her whole world dies because she is her whole world.

Whenever I read spinsters complain about men, I'm starting to believe it's not about her weight, her living situation, her accomplishments.

It's someone who can't form connections with other people.

So in an act of pure narcissism they create the closest thing to a clone, a child. Someone she can control completely, someone programmed to love her, someone to carry on her small and selfish world.

I'm not saying we should outlaw this but it should be looked at unfavorably.

I love how some women think saying something enough eventually makes it true and not delusion-inducing. To be fair, of course this type of article will attract the hags to come out of the woodworks.

Imagine projecting your personal insecurities onto and ENTIRE GENDER.

Please allow me to point some noteworthy areas of the linked article.

The author is a communist and an atheist. I'm not trying defame atheists. However, I believe communism is bad and founded on false principles.

Throughout the article she uses the word love as if it is a mystically force of emotional feeling. Atheists will often, while rejecting the existence of a god, attribute many things of existence to spiritual and mystically forces.

A week later, I saw him on a date with someone else in the park, a complete coincidence created by my damned cosmic pull.

Cosmic pull? She believes everything is controlled by universe juice. (Kung Fu Panda reference)

As 2016 rolled over into 2017, I resolved to find some way to be different. The stasis I’d been living in for six years of no romance had crept into other aspects of my life.

She describes six years of her life as "stasis". This is a typical perspective, but it is a wrong one. From your late twenties to your early forties, you are done with your growing and have a low likelihood of experiencing illnesses like "old people" do. When a person gets cancer in their thirties or forties, we think, "oh, my, that's young", but, when a person in their sixties gets cancer, people tend to think, "oh, well, that's expected". By this time, many people have achieved some plateau in living, and life becomes routine.

The problem is that what she described a "stasis" wasn't really stasis. Things did change. That six years was about 10% of her life expectancy. She may not have noticed it greatly, but she did get older with little to nothing really happening in her life.

I decided I could. Instead of running away, I would be going on more dates. Lots more. I set a goal to go on two dates a week, every week, no matter what.

She chose to go on more dates with less intention; she rejected fewer dates with more focus. This woman has too many options. However, she was never going to choose any of the options anyway.

At that point, I hadn’t been in a relationship for six years. I’d had sex once in that interim.

I went on a date with a woman who, it turned out, already had a girlfriend.

This woman has a low sex drive and is even sexually "flexible". Too frequently people will talk as if everyone is the same with regard to sexual interest and sex drive. If a woman goes six years and has sex only once despite the available options, it is because she have an incredibly low sex drive.

All the things that society sets aside for couples would be mine too – the plus-ones at weddings, the tax breaks, the legal protection of assets through marriage, getting invited on couples trips, splitting the rent, all sorts of stuff both stupidly petty and majorly beneficial to my quality of life.

This lady has no idea what she is talking about. She listed as a benefit of being in a relationship the superpower of going to a wedding with them. ? Furthermore, there are no tax breaks for married couples; this is a myth; you are more than likely to experience disadvantages in taxes being married. We know this is true because the IRS allows married couples - even if they're living together - to file taxes separately. Legal protection of assets? What is she talking about? Does getting married in NY provide some type of special protection for assets?

However, the biggest clarity is shown within the last phrase: "beneficial to my quality of life." She is selfish and focused on me, me, me.

In theory, the best way to live a healthy, happy life is to move forward, to forgive and forget, ...

This is a communism principle: nothing matters. No matter what, if you want to a healthy and happy life, just "move forward, ... forgive and forget". Someone robs you: move forward, forgive, and forget. Someone murders your family: move forward, forgive, and forget. This way of thinking is important in communism, because the state and society is more important than individuals, whether that's you, your property, or your family. It is sold as a benefit of communism, but most people conflict with it at their core.

Common advice for the broken-hearted is to “work on yourself” or “love yourself” and that advice has been manipulated by capitalism to mean “buy things” and “constantly optimise for productivity”.

More commie talk: capitalism evil!! Evil capitalism manipulates love and the goodness of you.

But the pressure of obligatory couple hood should be alleviated. People should be able to find validation and connection in all sorts of relationships. They should be able to trust their community to value public health. They should not fear ageing alone because they won’t be alone, even if they never find someone to marry and have children with.

Where is this pressure coming from? The evil western society? Well, it should be alleviated. Everything should be good and awesome! We just don't trust other people enough. Capitalism is preventing us from living in communistic heaven, err.. utopia.

Here we also see the pitch for communistic healthcare. Where did that come from in an article about coupling? You "should not fear ageing alone", because the great leader will order that all the elderly be housed together. The great leader will also designate someone to watch over you in your dying years. You won't have need for possessions or money. The great leader will provide.

The stress of staying solvent and planning for a rapidly declining future has increased drastically with Covid-19. While individualism is considered a particularly nasty American sensibility, it’s kind of a natural outlook for people everywhere realising that during a worldwide disaster, they’re on their own.

She describes the responsible management of her personal finances and planning for her future as stressful and that individualism is a nasty American sensibility. Individualism and personal responsibility is bad. /s

In the spring of 2021, soon after getting vaccinated, I ran into someone else from my past, just a guy I’d once lived with briefly in the same commune in my early twenties.

She felt it very important to let you know that she's vaccinated. We should all do what the great leader tells us to do.

In the last phrase she says it directly. She lived in a commune. She's a communist.

PS. Why my focus on her communism? Communism is anti-family and based on lies.

I read this fantasy drivel and then i look at the reality and stats and shake my head. Vast majority of criminals come from single mother households and crime has exploded, alchoholism in women has increased a lot along with antidepressant use. More women are becoming homeless, more women than ever are selling themselves online, women are dying from "broken heart syndrome" of being miserable and alone the rest of their life asking the big question this sub represents. More women than ever are complaining about bad boys, births are down, marriage is at an all time low.

Tell me again how happy they are and how it's working out for them.

Grown men create inventions and contribute to the community as they get older.

Grown women make stupid articles revolving around penises and sex.

We'll all be cavemen in the 21st century if women have their way with governing society, it seems.

> Their status as men is based on two things: (...) 2) The woman that they have on their arm.

This caught my eyes because its blatant falsehood. As a man, after your early twenties at most, your status is definitely higher if you are single. Because when single, you can work harder, accept jobs overseas, etc., and definitely you'll earn more, so your access to women will be, generally speaking, higher. They are completely out of touch with reality.

When I dropped a whole carton of eggs on the floor it didn't matter......because I said "I meant to do that".

Single mothers on average are leeching off tax payers money. There is nothing empowering about it. It’s stealing from others to raise their bastards.

Self-delusion is the tool with which aging women hold at bay soul-crushing depression. It allows them to retcon their former expectations, bringing them into closer alignment with reality.

To men, this seems like madness. To women, it's a survival mechanism.

Fabulous post. Thank you!

They must be on a near fatal amount of copium

Please treat the cats well. They didn't choose to be left alone to deal with your crazy.

Since there are about 25-30 years between generations and IVF has been available for more than 40, "needing no man" clearly needed not either to be the dream of her "ancestresses".

Plus, there are plenty "living the dream" and sharing online their hands-on single mom experience; over 99% of the time complaining what a shit deal they got, the sort of bad news incounsciously swept under the rug.

It baffles me how does someone get stuck in this 100% theoretical freeze-her-eggs circlejerking, spewing it online to whoever may read it, without the slightest regard for what happens next - spite of it being equally just a couple clicks away.

She's happy now, but who will go check out the bump in the night? And when she's 50 and childless...gets pretty lonely.

[deleted]

the delusion is strong with these ones. this is some straight idiocracy stuff right here

At least she doesnt have kids. Only ruined her own life

[deleted]

This is just sad. The seethe, the cope.

Thanks to the internet, we can listen the talk, ladies to ladies and boy they're dropping red pills. Very superficial (being annoyed by an ugly man), entitled, not willing to compromise, deluded.

She wants children so freezes 2 batches of eggs . The cost of one cycle of IVF tratment in the UK is 5000 pounds, not to mention the cost of egg retrieval from her and storage costs. Her chances of carrying to term is greatly reduced because of geriatric pregnancy. Add to the fact being nearly forty the chances of the eggs she had removed have a birth defect built into them is really high .

She's had twenty years to catch and marry a man but chased Chad or Tyrone and a career now Chad and Tyrone have moved onto younger models or maybe wifed up more suitable candidate to be a housewife . She says I don't need a man but in a couple of years she'll be cougaring around while trying to lock down silverfox Chad or Tyrone, Then she'll accuse the Silverfox of being a nonce because he looks past her as if she doesn't exist because llike all men he prefers fit, feminine fertile women in their twenties and he can bang them .

I think she'll be a lonely cat lady with no children and a bitter lonley man hater. If she does have a child or children I feel sorry for them.

The ticking clock has disappeared and I can actually see the life that I was so desperately trying to create in these relationships

LMAO

Hamster wheel in distress because it's been spinning in overdrive.

Reddit is a Scary Place.

Waaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhh!!!!!!

This is exactly the age after they become useless sexually. 30+. What keeps a relationship and family together is mutual respect,love. If we start rejecting people on physical attraction, most wives would have been divorced. Men age too but not like women. 30+ men is still attractive for fair share of 20s girls.

I had read a comment somewhere " if I'm not attracted to someone should I have sex with him just to make him feel good?" Probably in Twoxchromosomes. That being said why should men have to keep their wives when they are 30+? I'm sure she's pretty right but men should do the same.

Olympic-level hamster wheeling going on here.

It’s so funny to see cope on display lol. Bet most of them are on heavy antidepressants to boot.

My summary: Dating was fun when I was young and winning but now I’m 37 and losing and it’s not any fun anymore. So I wrote this article to help my hamster rationalize.

One of them complained about her ex-husband being a "hobo".

She insults him now but apparently she will fuck and marry hobos/losers.

But when men do essentially the same with groups like MGTOW they do everything they can to shut that shit down.

Original article here: https://archive.is/NUTfC

Some excerpts from “[The maturity myth]( https://www.reddit.com/r/WhereAllTheGoodMenAre/comments/awomug/the_maturity_myth/)” post below:

These days, when women are expected to go through the process of maturity, they are expected to date around, define their taste by trial and error, get some maturity based on their experiences and then settle to build a family. Women, being sexual creatures (in that, that is their primary worth), define their entire process of maturity through fucking. This is true for the majority of women. Seen through this lens, a girl who goes through a series of short term relationships is not much different from a girl who goes through a series of one night stands before deciding to settle down. The minority that tries to follow the traditional male maturity process of power and resource acquisition, ends up becoming masculine and can only attract feminine men. This is the fate of career women.

While every woman wants to fulfill her hypergamous objective of getting a higher value guy than herself, feminism has made it uncool to be submissive to men or to do anything pleasing to any man. The outlined maturation process serves as an act of defiance to her patriarchy-defined-rules to femininity. Women use this maturation process to try to prove to themselves and to men that they're as capable as men before finally settling down to be a wife. This entire process is a rebellion against being completely feminine or even desirably feminine. It's a statement of, "I can do man stuff too. Now that I've used my youth to do man stuff, which I expect impressed you, I want your respect (not as a woman but as one of your equals: a man) and I want a better contract than what I would have gotten under the oppressive patriarchy."

When women get to the end of their maturation process, which is conveniently right after their party years, they frantically start looking to settle down not because of other women alone, but because everyone around her expects her to have become mature and capable of settling down. This is usually when friends and family members who dismissed her party years as her finding herself will start openly asking questions like when will she finally act like an adult and settle down. Girls go for betas around this time not just to extract resources but also to win social points. A beta serves the exact same purpose as that of a trophy wife. He is there to make her look good in society's eyes. She does not love him or care about his wellbeing. He is merely there to protect her and serve as a consolation prize. He is proof that she did mature and finally did become an adult. And if it does not work out, it was because he was not mature enough to make it work. It was by no fault of hers. After all, after having "made mistakes" and "maturing" because of that, she did become an adult. He just wasn't mature enough.

If she is not successful in her attempts to secure commitment, she will rationalize her maturity process to be one where she has discovered inner peace after having finally figured out that she's the prize. A good example: http://archive.is/6cbwo

I also want to point out a few things here:

1. Freezing eggs right before 40, buying a house and the potential to become a single mom at will are being sold as “empowering”, “inspiring”, “ancestress’ dreams” etc. One woman points out clearly what this is actually about: “this is what male privilege is” – the “luxury” to not worry about the biological clock.

2. Notice the woman who refuses to “lower her standards” because she does not want to be annoyed everyday by a man who isn’t “on her level” and does not look amazing to her. First of all, notice how she is mixing the demands of a woman and the demands of a man. Becoming masculine does not help women. It just makes things worse. A masculine woman can rarely attract a more masculine man. Masculine men want feminine women. They dislike women who are not women. Secondly, notice maturity for such women is not about becoming mature, but becoming more demanding and uncompromising.

3. Notice how according to a woman that being in a relationship is just “compromising”. Refer to point 2.

Edit:

1. Editing to add an old comment about egg freezing. TLDR: it is not very successful.

2. What the hell. For shits and giggles: https://www.reddit.com/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen/comments/gc16in/the_universe_did_not_abide_by_her_plans/