Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
Created by kevin32
Visit the WAATGM forum to view and post content.
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this tribe is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
- 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate tribe.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
Pilgrim 1w ago
The article is a PR placement, probably with the aid of Bumble, but it shows how things have changed so much.
Many years back the speed dating companies were planting actually unavailable women to make their events look more balanced - of course the real candidates were still 30+ and mid at best. Men had better chances (or thought they did), enough to go through the traditional hoop-jumping. Seems like now they know what's up.
ogrilla99 Pez "The Pussy Dispenser" Pimp 6d ago
I have a theory that online dating broke singles events, but not because they're more convenient. They're only more convenient for the top guys who get plenty of matches. My theory is that OLD gives you a painfully accurate assessment of where you stand on the dating hierarchy (for guys at least).
In the old days, let's say you were not high in the SMV for whatever reason (looks, lack of money, charisma, etc), you could still maybe convince yourself that if you just had a better social circle, you could cast your net wider, and maybe find someone amazing who would still fall for you. Which is why singles events were appealing: they widened your social network.
But now, with OLD, if you're not successful, you can't say it's because of lack of a wide network. There are literally millions of people on these sites, and if you can't get matches with the type of women you want, then you must come to the realization that it's because you're not capable of attracting them, even when they're available. You can't keep clinging to the hope that it's just your limited social circle. (Now, what you do with that information, whether you use it to improve yourself, or to withdraw and go it alone, is up to you).
So when singles events are advertised, you already know that you're going to be unsuccessful, so why bother? I mean, every single woman at these events is on OLD. And if you are as well, then either they've already seen your profile and passed, or the algorithm never even showed you to them because you didn't match their filter criteria. Either way, going into that room and spending a few hours in their vicinity isn't going to improve your odds.
I've also noticed this in tourist spots. Some of my guy friends no longer bother going out to meet women. They'll still have dinner or hang out with the guys, but as soon as they get off the airplane, they turn on their OLD apps, and start matching with other women (either locals or other tourists), and by the time dinner with the guys is over, they already have women lined up either to bring back to the hotel, or at least to come hang out at the bar with us. Either way, the first few steps of meet-n-greet "Hi how are you? My name is Bill" are already done. No need to bother doing it IRL anymore.
Second note, specifically about this woman's "hook". Making the women bring along a guy is not as appealing as it sounds. They're not "vetted". Every woman there will know that "this woman knows this man, and rejected him." No one wants leftovers. Social proof is about bringing members of the opposite sex along to improve your own standing, not improving the standing of the person you're bringing along. So what possible appeal could that have for the man? Either he's a completely smitten orbiter who's willing to debase himself (going to an event where the love of your life looks for some other man to date), or the woman must be bribing him (promising him a dinner afterwards, or something). The actual event itself would not be at all desirable.
Heck, I'd rather go to such an event as my own man, buying my own ticket. I'd have a bigger chance of scoring, not to mention at least maintaining my self respect. Not brought there on a leash by a woman who's desperate enough to try a singles event but still not desperate enough to date me.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 6d ago
I politely disagree. I think it's largely a consensus that women don't understand technology or logic very well. They see a hundred guys hit on them in OLD so they mistakenly believe they're entitled to Chad although, of course, the feminine hivemind has kicked in causing them to overall have crazy standards. Nonetheless, OLD women veterans are usually more deranged than IRL.
At the same time, having gone to dating events even 30 years ago, I noticed that the women going to these things acted sort of like in high school where if a normie guy approached them, they didn't want to look 'weak" in front of the other women they had bonded with and formed a clique to cock-block each other.
At least with OLD, being rejected by hundreds of women is less painful than having it happen in public.
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 6d ago
Men don't bother with singles events anymore because the men women wish would show up to the events, don't want or need to go to those events, while the non-Chads have figured out that the women at these events will not be interested in them anyway, so why bother?
user84893093748959 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Chad explains it to her right here - although he's catering to their female perspective.
He's in the group that is getting the sex he wants easily from dating apps.
Here he caters to their female perspective in positing the reason as a lack of confidence; instead, it is just a health and objective prediction of reality considering cost/benefit and probabilities based on experience.
Here is an admission that "things like speed dating" are stupid and definitely not enjoyable.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1w ago
It's a lack of confidence that the men have, see. It's their fault.
But-- don't be cocky! Because being cocky is a turn-off. Be confident but don't be cocky.
Okay, so what's the difference? Well, Chad is confident for being full of himself and groping ass, while schlubs like you are cocky for thinking you can go in public.
In my senior year of high school, there was this sophomore gal who was an acquaintance of my brother. She would occasionally annoy me by complaining that her dreamboat crush on the football team "didn't notice her" and "guys don't ask me out." This was a recurring complaint of hers. Finally, just because I wanted to shut her up, I said "Fine, let's see a film this weekend. What time should I pick you up?" And she's all "Whuhhhhh?" "You heard me. Want to see a film this weekend? ... You were complaining that no one asks you out, so I'm asking you out now."
She immediately went and complained to my younger brother about how I "act(s) like God's gift to women!" How "arrogant" and "full of myself" I was. Naturally, my brother took her side and told me not to talk to her again.
So there you go, I was "arrogant" for not being her silent, agreeable emotional Maxi-pad. Girls like that don't have issues with getting heterosexual attention--oh, of course not-- they just want it from their dreamboat crush alone, and everyone else needs to fuck off.
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Still blaming the men. Men know these events are a waste of time. A man could be a pilot or an athlete, making 6 figures, and be average-looking and women will be like, "Ew...I'm not settling for that." Women are too full of themselves. If a man doesn't look like Henry Cavill, is built like Captain America, and has the fortune of Elon Musk, they're too good for the likes of him. Bitches can just fuck off.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
Irony is that any woman that has an issue finding suitors is and needs to rely on a dating venue is by definition a massive loser of some sort.
Having a working vagina is basically being born holding a royal flush.
Just a straight up self inflicted skill issue if they still manage to lose despite that.
Skimming the article, one notices that these events are filled with 30+ year old AWFLs. There is a reason why most men are avoiding these events. These are not the kind of women you want to give out your real name or occupation to, much less any form of commitment.
Maybe these women should have considered not being undesirable adherents to ideologies innately hostile to men if they wanted a retirement plan to show up once the free shit for being young and hot dried up.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1w ago
The whole thing could be boiled down to some variant of "Women are too awesome for men to keep-up with"
...But the younger, hotter women are pick-me's and sluts and bimbos that men would not prefer if they knew what "awesomeness" means.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
I mined a "strong and independent" women's forum in read-only for content for this forum about 2 years ago. I wish someone on there had asked the obvious question: "If a woman is so awesomely strong and independent, why doesn't she approach multiple men she physically desires and ask them out?"
Thinking you're awesome while standing around with your friends or going back-and-forth from work, school, and the grocery store is easy. It's an essential component to being a healthy single.
Going up to someone and trying to form a relationship with them is difficult particularly if there are a significant number of people who will shame or mock you for doing so. The person being approached has all the power. I get the feeling of "ick" that women get being approached when I go to Costco and walk past the AT&T booth. I came up with a nice line similar to "I have a boyfriend" which is: "I'm already on AT&T, thank you!" It's a white lie and perhaps they've heard it hundreds of times before, but I think it does spare them the indignity of being ignored like a street person.
That said, continuing the analogy... I pro-actively responded to an advertisement to get my mobile service cheaper and better and I researched AT&Ts rates. I was a pro-active consumer so I didn't NEED to be physically approached.
The paradigm that's broken down for them is that being a spoiled "confident" teenage girl worked when most people of my parents' age met and married when they were literally teenagers and had both large social networks (their entire school) but also limited (to their school, not thousands of listings on a dating app).
To this woman's credit, she actually put in an effort to find a man way out of her league. It's cringe how she rationalizes herself but it worked out for her: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6wG_sAdP0U
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1w ago
Because it's no fun being in that position.
Back when I was living in the US, there was a commercial which appeared on TV. There was this well dressed (business-)woman in a pricey luxury sedan who was going through a dry-cleaning pickup. She looks in her rear-view mirror, sees some handsome, square-jawed stud sitting in the car behind her, drives up and collects her dry cleaning. She says to the attendant "Let me take care of his pickup. And give him my card..."
I think the commercial was for the car she was driving.
My wife burst out laughing and said "THAT WOULD NEVER HAPPEN!"
I had to point out to her: the woman in the ad clearly has money. That means she don't need no man, and she's therefore free to fuck for pleasure. It's an empowerment fantasy that involves a compartmentalization of seeing one group of men as income and another group of men as sexual: The two should never be mixed. Being on MillionaireMatch, there are well-heeled women in their 40s on that site, and they still wanna stay passive. And they all deny fucking for pleasure on the side. The very hint of sex seems to be a turnoff. It just all seems so painfully phony.
There was one woman-- some European professional-looking woman in her 30s who had some incredible fashion in her pictures-- said in her profile something like her man should have "no tattoos". As a joke, I wrote her: "So your ex-boyfriends all had tattoos, huh?" and her reply was some variant of "That's the most disgusting thing I've ever heard in my life, I would never have an ex-boyfriend, no wonder you're still single, etc etc etc" ... the reaction was rather a bit more intense than what I expected. I think I hit a nerve.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
In the movie American Gigilo, Richard Gere's character had to play act as if he was coming home from work and they were a married couple having sex. I chuckle because it reminds me of my own married life (well, what they were play acting out at least).
Granted, men have this role play as well called "The Girlfriend Experience" but this is about at least simulating intimacy rather than pretending that he's not paying for sex.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Quite a bit of cope there. -Women adapting faster than men to a tidal surge in the dating market -yeah right, that's why they are losing because they are adapting so well, right?
Lovely picture of her looking so pickable with that beer bottle in her hand. Gosh I want one like that! (Not)
Still I love it. Men getting free tickets to these dreadful events is a bit like night clubs used to be when girls got in for free and boys paid. Its just the reverse.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
I like her idea of the women being forced to find a man to bring although my pop-psychologist friend of mine held similar parties at her house which were unofficially referred to as "leftover parties".
After all, what's likely happening?
The women bringing a man is likely going to be a guy in her friendzone similar to going to a used car lot with a trade-in hoping someone else's trade-in is a good deal unlike the clunker you're unloading.
The over 30 singles events I attended back in the 1990's were depressing: Mostly women sitting at the tables talking to each other ignoring all the men around them not sending any IOI. (I did pick up a MILF though! Didn't follow through unfortunately.)
Keep in mind that women like to go to events to go out. Dating is the purpose for many of them: They get to be seen by other women with their makeup on. Yes, it sounds strange, but it wouldn't surprise me if many of them can't figure out why "it's not working" as they go and spend hours putting on makeup and then cattily looking at what other women wear and how they're made up.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1w ago
They're not losing! There are just No Good Men anywhere!
All the men you run into don't deserve to be called such. They have black, plastic-framed glasses which are wrapped with masking tape, and pocket-protectors, and wheezing through their asthma medication, and their mismatching plaid-and-polka dot outfits and various titanium rods poking through their bodies and jaws to compensate for their skeletal birth defects and dental disorders. Those are the kinds of barely-human freaks that ladies always run into. How they managed to swim in from the leper colony off the coast is a miracle in of itself.
I mean, sure, maybe the ladies can grab some-- I dunno-- person like that? Throw a net over him and knock him on the head so they can show-up with a man-shaped being who barely qualifies as such. And do so very reluctantly-- he's no prize catch, more of a radioactive mutation than a human. And then, once his unconscious form is thrown on the pile, the ladies can cluster at their tables and drink wine and gossip and flaunt their newest jewelry and shoes at each other. But whoever they brought is not one of those super-rare, super-endangered, desirable Real Men who nonetheless can't seem to actually be found alive anywhere.
The pile in the corner is starting to stink now. Time to bulldoze it into the septic tank.
Seagram7 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
That is basically what they are bitching about: where is Chad? As in the archetype I imagine is Patrick Bateman from American Psycho, not the psycho part, but a guy that graduated from and Ivy league school, is a VP making 350K+, penthouse apartment in Manhattan, and looks line Christian Bale. Let's be real, it's not just about looks but socioeconomic class too. Those guys dont inhabit their world. They dont go to lame dating mixers or speed date. If one of those women by the the grace of luck somehow do end up at a party those type of guys attend, she is in the pump and dump category. There was a poster here that knew this hot blonde that orbited around the Texas petroleum industry and she was able to party with those type of young executives but was never able to latch any of them down. She was basically the party favor.
So the type of guy that USE to be naïve enough to possibly spend money on those events realized that this was a huge waste of time and money. All we got from these humiliation rituals was a way to boost their ego at our expense. The power women feel when they have guys hit on them and orbit around them, then to turn a guy down must be such a dopamine rush. Well we caught on and stopped going and Patrick Bateman never go to those things, so what you have is the situation they are complaining about in this article: no men.
hhhhdmt 1w ago
Lol
If single women are happier, why host the events at all? If this idiot writer thinks she can shame men into attending, she is going to fail miserably.
BobbingForBunions Sr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Here's the impression I get from single guys and single gals under 40:
Single guys would like to date. Most have realized it won't happen for them because they don't meet single gals' current standards. But they've made their peace with it. Plus, they have hobbies and other interests. And many have learned to treasure peace and quiet and solitude.
Single gals would like to date. They're baffled by why it's not happening for them. Many claim they're fine with it, but deep down they haven't made peace with it. Worse, they lack hobbies and other interests (watching true crime docs on Netflix doesn't count). So there's a growing sense of frustration among them. There are even signs of desperation.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1w ago
I keep hearing that women get desperate around age 30, but they never got desperate enough to consider Yours Truly. Not unless they had kids to feed and clothe.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
And that latter scenario is arguably predation instead of desperation. Just callously harvesting hapless schmucks to pay for Chad's offspring.
JudgeSmales 1w ago
If that's not enough, he can be sure the women will quickly make him feel like a failure, no matter what his non-obvious traits might be (personality, salary, occupation, etc.).
Women (not so cleverly) hide the truth about singles events, which is that no woman would truly respect any man who shows up. He would immediately be labeled a try-hard loser. So even if a non-Chad man confidently attended, he would quickly be notified that there is no "pecking order." Even if he's the best guy there (grading on a curve), for women it's not a sliding scale. It's a binary decision: yes or loser?
Singles events are little more than Girls Night Out for dopamine-addicted woman who relish putting men through their paces. "Sweep me off my feet. You've got 15 seconds. Go!" What man would volunteer for such a humiliation ritual? If all goes well, I get to be added to a girl's friend zone? Sure, where do I sign?
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
Someone reposted a comment about his Chad friend who went to Singles Events to add to his roster. He'd usually pick out the top 1 or 2 for his plate spinning collection. It's a funny story because it illustrates that these women likely have zero chance of actually landing a man at these events that satisfy them.
Bozza 6d ago
I went to a few of these back in the summer and this is exactly what I did.
Some of the women there were pretty damn hot. I went to the under 35s ones and it was mostly women in the 23 - 28 age range who wanted the whole fantasy/flex of claiming they met their husband at a bar or whatever, rather than OLD.
If you're decent SMV and you dress well you get your pick of the bunch.
But yeah some of the women are crazy. I got one girls number and she had a full crash out at the bar in front of everyone and stormed out because I refused to take her to one of the most expensive restaurants in town for a first date.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 6d ago
I chuckle about the girl's "crazy" reaction because when you rejected her "offer" to take her out to an expensive restaurant, she lashed out because you triggered a painful realization: She couldn't make demands of men she found attractive. She could have maybe gotten something like that from some OLD guy she didn't have the feels for, but you shot her down.
It was her first (of many) actual, important experiences of rejection.
Us men never get the privilege of hundreds of "ugly" women hitting on us. Imagine a room full of Rosie ODonnells saying they want to sleep with us or buy us dinner.
A century ago, women outside of high school dated with intent to marry so rejection did hit them differently back then. It's not until they date with intent that the emotional stakes are real.
Bozza 6d ago
You'll find the whole story funnier:
So I was at this dating event. I turned up at the time stated (7pm).
As I walk upto the venue there a group of women. One of the women starts cat calling me (she will persist for the entire night). I ignore and walk inside.
No women to be seen. I walk into a room full of dudes. I walk up to the bar, grab a beer and start working the room. Worst case I'm gonna make some friends. And tbf i did get a few dudes numbers who turned out to be chill asf.
About an hour later, the girls show up. I start working the room. Single in on the two Canadian HB9s, get their numbers. Continue working. Soon as I left, they left. I fucked one of them later.
I continue working my way round everyone there. And get a few more numbers. Cat girl girl keeps annoying me.
It gets to near the end of the evening. I go to the bar for another drink. This girl approaches me and starts talking to me - you get the story, number etc. She then says do you want to take me on a date - sure, she was good looking. "What's it going to be?" I said we'll go for some drinks and take it from there. She tries to push dinner at one of the most expensive places in town - I said no.
After realising I wasn't going to buckle. She then LOSES HER SHIT. Claims im just trying to fuck her - shouting and screaming in the bar. Looks at me like I'm going to buckle. I continue to stare. She then storms out of the bar.
Little while later i leave.
Next day 4/5 of the girls message me for plate status.
But yeah after that I thought I'd take a wide berth in case she was there. Haven't been back since but may got back soon.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 6d ago
Great story. Sounds like you have excellent looks, game, and frame. Staring her down when she lost if AFTER you had procured numbers from other women only escalated your pre-selection to massive levels. Heck, I wonder if a real woman "friend" would be useful to stage such a scene to get "bad boy" vibes!
That said, I've heard another story that involved a girl asking a guy for a drink/date and it was her trolling him as a sucker. Think about it: The whole point of "asker pays" BS "lady" logic is the man is supposed to ask to give it to her.
I may as well share the story: 30 years ago, our company had an excellent Christmas party at Long Beach, CA where we had 1/2 price subsidized hotel rooms so we could all get wasted. After nearly everyone had gone up for spouse/girlfriend post-party sex, a tough guy who worked in the mail room grabbed the leftover booze for an after party.
Getting in the elevator, a team of about 2 longshoremen (note: Long Beach!) and one's trashy girlfriend also got on and noticed the booze. It turns out there was a weekend rule in Long Beach to not sell bottled booze after a certain time to avoid, well, what was about to happen...
Trashy girlfriend flirts with him and says: "Give us one bottle of that and you might get lucky!" He responded with something less than flattering perhaps saying he didn't want that luck or something like that.
A longshoreman takes a swing at him. In the closed elevator. He somehow takes on 2 of the guys and beats them to a pulp but is a bit dazed (note he probably also had consumed a lot of booze by then like most of us).
He pushes the elevator button to try to get off and it opens the door to...
Long Beach PD.
He's somewhat agitated at this point calling the cops pussies. They throw him in a cell to sleep it off and he woke up and the duty officer said he'll be released at 11AM. He refuses breakfast thinking he'll get out for lunch.
Then the cops said at noon their "computer had issues" and he had to stay until 4PM.
In the meantime, we all enjoyed breakfast that morning wondering what happened to him.
What a great party!
Afterwards, it turns out, the longshoremen didn't appear to testify because they didn't want to admit he had beaten them both half wasted.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1w ago
Hey, being in her friend zone means you get to hear her complain about all of the other men she's fucking. It's living vicariously! Plus, you get to take her to new and expensive restaurants that her fuck-buddies won't take her to.
GeorgeIII Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
Not that he is at all paragon of red pill wisdom, but I remember watching Asmongold talk about singles events once. Similar background to what this article describes: only women go to these events, men aren't interested in going, the men who do go are mid, boo hoo these events are dying, bla bla bla.
The main question he posited to his audience: are the girls going to these events hot?
I don't get how more people aren't bringing this up. If these chicks going were 21 year old supermodels, guys would be there. But naturally, this is never directly addressed. And by directly addressed, I don't mean by calling the girls there 'beautiful' and 'intelligent', everyone says that same shit.
PS: The number of times the author mentioned HER event and how great/different HER event is... Has she thought about exactly who or what she is writing this for? Solipsism at its finest.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1w ago
I've never been to one of those events and I don't think I would ever like to. Regardless of how hot the women might be.
I'm not really a big fan of entering rigged competitions.
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 1w ago
It is an information challenge when one group doesn't show - you cannot get information from the absent group because they are not there to ask.
I don't believe the premise. The media has been so dishonest and anti-male for decades that the whole article was probably made up out of thin air to try and sell papers.
But let's do our own research into Oliva Petter's dating site.
Ok, here we go.... Olivia Petter has "RED LIPS dating"..... "the singles party that puts women who date men first."
Now let's see if we can work out what's going on here.
I dread to think what "puts women first" might mean.
Let's read out more.
So it's for a woman with a hot male friend. So I need to be a woman with a hot male friend to attend. A hot male friend I want to share, which seems unlikely, but let's continue.
Ok, so I have to be able to flirt, dance and put up with speed dating.
Right. So as a man I can't sign up. I need to find a female friend and get her to bring me, so I can be "vetted".
Ok..... so..... women first .... so that means men are dragged along as second class citizens. Men are second, by definition.
The original article claims men are the rarity, yet women are put first "because it's what we deserve".
I swear they hit 30, their value plummets and their demand sckyrocket. Every single time.
I wonder what would happen if I claim to be female for the purpose of signing up. Because deep down I've always felt like a lesbian, and it's what's on the inside that matters.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1w ago
The thing about being "vetted" by a woman: I've been "vetted," I don't think it ever helped me. Or, at the very least, it didn't have the same appeal for a woman as being told "stay away from him, he'll break your heart!"
You know what kinds of men don't need vetting? Sports stars. Movie stars. Publicly-known billionaires. They're all pre-vetted by appearing on TV or in films. Don't ask me how that works, I just calls 'em as I see 'em.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1w ago
I wish Seinfeld had taken the extra 50 million or so they were willing to throw at him for one more season: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zA2WaLA8qzs
GeorgeIII Jr. Hamster Analyst 1w ago
WAIT, I figured out why there aren't enough men. I totally glossed over the problem.
So there are AT MOST the same number of men as women. And if several guys bail, literally not enough men to go around, because men who aren't orbiting one of these chicks are banned.
And I too, am surprised that men don't want to go to a feminist-oriented event. Shocker!
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 1w ago
Mostly the article is there to drum up interest in her weird dating thing.
The article says roughly: "there weren't enough men so I created my own events where women had to do my job of finding men to attend". And she complains that men dip out more than women, so that she can keep the same thrust of the article. It's all a bit convoluted.