42 year old Lisa has spent a large sum of money to find a "partner" to settle down and have biological kids with.
she rented a dozen digital billboards in California’s Bay Area to advertise a website where men could apply to date her.
She said she did not take dating seriously in her 20's and early 30's.
Then she met her fiancé whom she was with for several years but he sadly died of cancer.
She then was with a man for a couple of years and he would not commit to her.
Her non negotiables:
Must be on board with a monogamous relationship, and dating with the intent for marriage. Must be alright with a timeframe of marriage and starting a family within the next 2-3 years.
College educated. Bachelor's degree at a minimum.
Generally healthy lifestyle is a must. No marijuana, tobacco, psychedelics, or recreational drug use. Good hygiene.
Must be Democratic or liberal or left leaning politically.
Looking for someone who is not particularly religious. Okay with spiritual or non-religious or along those lines.
35-45 age. Flexible within a year or two at most.
Preference is for never married, no kids.
Generally speaking, Lisa is attracted to more clean-cut looking men, slim to medium build, no or minimal tattoos/piercings. She has no height requirement.
Where do i sign up boys?

Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 3d ago Stickied
I swear this was posted before, but I can't find it. Anyway, I'm sure it's been over 6 months, so you're good there. Also, I reflaired it "leftovers". The "off topic" flair shouldn't even be an option, but we can't remove it.
However, please edit out the direct links and make them archive.is links instead as required by rule 7 (relevant portion in bold):
I also need to take this moment to remind readers of rule 4:
Do not contact this woman. If she reaches out to us with proof that any of you contacted her, the offender will be banned.
hhhhdmt 3d ago
i removed the links. I assumed since she is a public figure, it would be ok. But i have removed all the links.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 3d ago
She's not a celebrity. I get the thought, and I had thought similar until I started moderating and saw how some of this stuff actually works out. Unfortunately, it frequently falls to us to make up for the bad decision-making of many of the Carols we post, such as when we blur out the faces of their children they include in their OLD profiles.
Anyway, without the context of those links, the post is meaningless. Can you not edit in archive.is versions? If you need me to generate those for you, just DM me the original links and I'll send you the archive.is versions.
hhhhdmt 3d ago
Thank u. I don't know how to archive but i have dm'd u the links.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 3d ago
Much better!
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 4d ago
And of course nowhere in that list is any reason why a man able to meet that criteria would want to bother with her. It's not like perimenopausal AWFLs are in short supply or in any sort of demand.
OldHeadNewBusiness 22h ago
A few years ago I started getting the women who openly were just looking to get panic pregnant. You'd think that'd be a ripe hunting ground, but they're in that position for a reason. No man is good enough, or ever has been, and you won't be either. She might have baby fever but she's not going to fuck you because in her panic the next dick has be her perfect baby daddy.
I'm sure this cohort is going to be one of the more promiscuous varieties of Missed The Bus Broads.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 13h ago
Once more for the hunters of post-wall unicorns in the back.
Every single woman that made it to 30+ while being single is that way for any number of reasons, and none of them are good (for a man). At best it's something neutral like being kept captive in a lesbian nunnery until 29 re-enacting late night 90's Skinemax movies, and the reasons only get quickly worse from there.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 4d ago
Wait she likes holidays. She has photos forma lot of holidays. If you want to holiday with an older woman with a stuck on smile that looks the same in nearly every photo, then she's a good pick.
Don't know if she can keep a house though, not sure if she would make a good mother or anything but she likes to travel.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 3d ago
Cheaper long term to go to Vegas and rent a decent looking whore that doesn't mind photo ops. Or some sort of convention booth girl.
Those are generally one time fees and you aren't stuck with their expenses for the rest of the year. This bitch is angling for a retirement plan she has done nothing to earn.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 4d ago
All this of course relies on her actually being fertile post wall. starting a family 42 to 45 is not a given by any means even if you are a rich liberal Californian and have had everything your way all your life. The wall might say "no".
But go get stuck in boys. Its a high risk of marrying a barren woman but you might get lucky and end up changing diapers at night for a perimenopausal queen who will tell you every day that she gave up her great single life of travel and work to be your wife and suffer this drudgery.
I feel genuinely sorry for her. We all make bad choices but there are no second choices post wall. Women are just not educated well enough these days to know the things that actually matter.
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 4d ago
Translation: cock carousel.
Lucky escape!
Translation: would not sign a one-sided government-enforced provisioning contract.
Preference is for $$$, but she can filter that out later without having to state it.
ogrilla99 Pez "The Pussy Dispenser" Pimp 3d ago
Now let's add on the stuff that's not said: At 42, she will likely require extensive IVF and other fertility treatments to even have a chance for a baby. For anyone who's gone through it, each attempt (including multiple rounds of harvesting eggs, etc) is about $100k. Most of which will not be paid by insurance. And that's if you're lucky and it works. If it doesn't work, then depending on your desperation to have kids, you may go through multiple rounds before giving up. So, you should have at least a few hundred thousand -- not part of retirement or other necessary uses, just free cash lying around -- to blow on IVF within the 2-3 year time frame that she's looking at (which will put her at 45, when the chances are even less)
She is a vintage clothing store seller, meaning her "work" is basically a rich woman's hobby. She has no savings, and her income is barely enough to feed herself in the Bay Area. Possibly, she may still have student debt depending on when she completed her useless bachelors / masters and how many loan deferments she got due to her low income. You will be expected to pay off her loans and pay for her "needs" with your shitty 60-80hr/wk job while she can find "purpose in life" by basically pursuing her hobbies while pretending it's a career.
And about those needs. First and foremost, you will need to buy her a house. In the Bay Area. Where a crapshack next to a drug den costs a million dollars. Which would never do for this princess anyway. Given that she wants kids, she will be expecting to buy at least a 3 bedroom house in a good school district. In the Bay Area. This will be at minimum $3million. Did I mention housing costs in the Bay Area?
She has no retirement funds, no rainy day savings, nothing. Because again, she's working as a vintage clothing retailer in the highest cost living region of the country. In 20 years, she'll be looking to retire from... her glorified WalMart clerk job. If you've been diligently saving for retirement, unexpected health care expenses, building up a 6 month savings cushion in case you lose your job, all those things that financially responsible men do, guess what: double it. Because she's not bringing any resources of her own, and your estimated costs now must cover 2 people. And since she's in her forties and likely you are too, you have less time (about 20 yrs) to do this than someone who's marrying and starting out in their twenties who still has the power of compound interest on his side. And you must make up the shortfall with your own income, since again, she's basically a minimum wage retail worker being outearned by teenagers working at McDonald's.
So to summarize the financial needs that are left unsaid: several hundred thousand in free cash to pursue IVF treatments for the kid she and (presumably) you want. The ability to take on a crushing mortgage for a modest house in the most insanely expensive housing market in the country. And on top of that, double / triple whatever you've been setting aside for retirement and savings to accommodate a middle aged person with no savings herself who will be needing those bailouts fairly soon. All while your costs explode due to having an additional mouth to feed immediately, and possibly another 1 or 2 in the near future.
Making all of this work in the Bay Area requires a minimum of $500k/yr or higher, and really, that's the minimum given that you're starting so late and she's not coming in with anything to help. The only way this normally works is if you're earning $500k and the woman is earning at least $200k/yr in her own job, then she'll at least be able to take care of her own expenses and retirement planning while you take on the mortgage and the household stuff.
The truth is, believe it or not, those guys exist in SF. But the problem is that they're "boring nerds". The women in SF have a saying "the odds are good, but the goods are odd." it's they're entitled way of saying that even living in an area where you can throw a rock and hit a millionaire, or someone about to cash out their stock options to an 8-figure net worth, it's not enough to feed their hypergamy. Those guys must also have the personality of the most charming PUA artist, and the body of a guy who does nothing but surf all day. The fact that to hit their payday, they must spend their entire adult lives staring at a screen in a dark room doesn't really matter to them. Nevermind that the women themselves are mostly boring and definitely less good looking than their counterparts in SoCal or NYC. They'll still demand Chad looks and personality with a computer geek's salary and stock options. And then moan about where are all the good men in a city where men vastly outnumber the women.
So there you have it: someone who makes at least a half mil a year, with about a million dollars in free cash to spend on IVF and a down payment within a few years, enough retirement savings to take on a middle age woman with none herself and catch her up by the time she needs that money, while simultaneously having the personality and body of someone who doesn't make that type of money (at least not in SF). Those are her real requirements. The rest is just window dressing.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 3d ago
Yup. And every single one of those men can do better than her.
cundardunfinished Jr. Hamster Analyst 3d ago
Every guy needs to learn about women's biological clocks. I admit I didn't know much but it's actually kinda wild how women over 35 are simply unsuitable partners to have children with, and even 30-35 starts to get dodgy.
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 3d ago
So, billboards have become the latest dating app. Go to a website, fill out an application, and see if you qualify. Kind of like going to a website to fill out a loan application or apply for a job. The only difference here is that you're applying to lose money instead of applying to gain money.
MarkedAliveS 3d ago
I think Bill gates is free, mybe not the age bracket but. The gap is getting covered by yearly income in (b)millions 1:1.
The rest is pretty much spot on.
He probably needs to release some stress due to W11 being in a shitter so she might get a shot at a prenup.
If it doesn't work she can do some escorting, apparently if she could blow well then some client might get tempted to save her. After all it all sounds like a transaction.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 3d ago
From her website, this is recent @Typo-MAGAshiv That said, firstly, her statement of no height requirement is rather extraordinary. Either she's sincere OR she's smart enough to know that putting a height requirement will subject her to mutual judgement of appearance. Then again, her explicit statement of no height requirement implies that she's enforcing one quietly (otherwise, why say so? hmmm?)
Next, her bachelor degree requirement screams hypergamy. In Sili Valley, plenty of successful men don't have them. Bill Gates and Steve Jobs were college dropouts. She's severely limiting her pool with that alone. Perhaps she's also using it as a filter in that she doesn't want (ick!) PLUMBERS to send in an "application" even as she's a Vintage Clothing store owner.
In her defense, @mattyanon I dated corporate nuns and they didn't ride the CC but rather were just lazy waiting for men to ask them out even thinking this is virtuous because "men like being the pursuer". She appears to have had multiple relationships where the guy didn't commit including amazingly the fiance who died. Think about it: he didn't put a ring on her EVEN AS HE WAS DYING. She's the classical definition of leftover: She was too proud to make an effort to pursue men and her biological clock ran out.
Our society, including many in the RP community, shames incels who don't improve themselves or live in their mother's basements, blah blah blah but this is no worse than such women who sit around with entitlement attitudes for a man with options to approach her and pass her shit tests AND take the steps for commitment.
Looking at her full website, if we didn't pull her apart she'd look otherwise ok (Rule 3) BUT when we consider the above, what happened becomes clear. She got 3800 applications. Here's the thing: Even though it appears she blew 42 years of her life, I'm impressed with what she did here. This is a legitimate effort she made to market herself and maximize what is left of her potential. She's reasonably pretty and with IVF (hey @ogrilla99 ) she has a chance.
I'm reminded of this woman who did something similar: A meh woman who put in an effort and landed a pretty good catch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6wG_sAdP0U
I think if more women did this, it would signal to other women to "move out of the basement", so to speak. I wish her well.
We should follow up in about 6 months to see if she actually does land anyone.
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 1d ago
It means "no height requirement if you're rich enough."
This is 99% of women.
The 1% of the time they do put in efforts to pursue, it's only for the same top 1% men that all the other women are pursuing.
I would agree, except she is overtly provider hunting.
So she is putting in effort, belatedly, at age 42, and that effort is not going into dating a man. That effort is going into getting as many men as possible to jump through hoops for her.
And what is she actually offering? Mediocre sex after a 12 month application process and the promise if m'lady's hand?
I'd fuck her. I wouldn't date her.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 2d ago
That was an interesting watch. She does present well and she wasn't too picky based on the guy's pictures. Probably gave it all she had once she picked him too. Most wouldn't pick her but she did well.
Yeah lets check back on the other one. It was a little disappointing to hear she was dating some guys and was taking applications again "by popular demand" If I was one of the guys who had applied and got through the very demanding paper sift, I would be pretty pissed if she was seeing other guys at the same time or taking other applications in case she wanted to trade me up. At this point the guy has made a big effort to put himself through that process and waited to hear and she has had all the choice. She should see a guy exclusively until it fails or what chance is she giving it? There will always be another guy who is in some way better.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago
Here's what's astonishing about that, isn't it? She got nearly 4,000 responses. Let's assume 3/4's are "catfish": Tech bros with $200k/year jobs but (ick!) don't have BACHELOR degrees! Or Trump voters. Whatever. Just a straight 1,000 guys who put in an "application".
Sheesh! Think about the wording! She made it sound like they're applying for a FUCKING JOB with her as BOSS as @No-Stress-Cat put it.
Us men are lucky if we get, say, 20 leads in our lifetime to pick a mate. In the old days, my parents maybe dated a total of 5 people. As in going to the drugstore for a vanilla coke. 1000. Astonishing. And yet she'll probably blow it.
Because in the end, isn't this just like a dating app but with extra steps? Couldn't she get 1000 "applicants" on PlentyOFish?
Here's why I think she may yet fail: She'll go out on dates and she'll "next" the applicant about 5 minutes in. He didn't game her enough. His clown act failed. So she just makes BS small talk and he gets depressed and, let's say 1/4 men at least say "OK, it was nice but I guess it's not a match. Split checks, yes?"
Now this isn't a BIG DEAL to us men. We have no problems paying for our own way but for women, it's like picking up cat vomit while eating dinner. Women gripe about "bad dates" which is to mean, they don't get treated like kids at a Chuck-E-Cheese party. She'll sulk about how dating isn't 100% easy mode. And she'll get frustrated. Or worse, sometimes the guy gets turned off by her meaning she isn't just sitting in the driver's seat.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 3d ago
Unfortunately the modern woman is just as much likely to learn the wrong lesson from any success that this one has and think that they too can wait until the final buzzer is going off to start playing the game to win.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 3d ago
I appreciate that point but consider this: Previously leftovers such as this either saved face by proclaiming "Men were such jerks" or "It wasn't meant for me!" or "I'm happy it worked out this way" to crab-bucket the young women into following her lead.
Younger women seeing this at least see that if they don't want to have to put up billboards and possibly have stalkers pay a visit to maybe do something about it earlier in life.
I read this article and the first thing I thought to myself is that with women saying all this nonsense about fearing for their lives on dinner dates, blah blah blah, here's a woman literally putting out a mating call on the highway UTTERLY destroying the standard passive-aggressive ambivalent approach to dating women have played for the past few centuries.
It will be interesting to see if this woman follows through in that she wants commitment and a family quickly, but oftentimes either she, or the guy, blows it as the pressure undermines the "serendipitous" romance desired.
hhhhdmt 3d ago
yes that is fair. Hopefully younger women can learn a positive lesson from this and start taking care of things earlier.
I do think this woman rode the cc. Even if she was passive, guys back then would regularly approach women. From the time she was 18 until her early 30's, she would have slept with at least 3 men per year. That would be at least 40 bodies. Minimum.
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 3d ago
Also, there's all the "abuse" that they get on Tinder. It's just constant insults and dick-pics and meanness from every corner.
I remember seeing some article where the author was interviewing a woman about her experiences on Tinder, and she was "OHHH IT'S HORRIBLE! THE ABUSE! THE INSULTS! THE DICK-PICS! OHH HORRIBLE! NO MAN SHOULD EVER DO THAT!!" and then the interviewer said "Okay, but surely you've gotten some polite messages too? How did those go?" And her tone changed.
"Well.. uh... yeah... uh... we didn't have a lot in common...? like... I...? they just weren't, like, uh... very interesting..."
Uh huh. You seem to relish talking about the abuse, Miss. let's go back to that then.
hhhhdmt 3d ago
this reminds me when women deny the biological clock by talking about how their friend or some celeb woman had a bio kid at 45.
For every woman who can conceive in her 40's, there is at least one who can't.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 3d ago
FTFY.
hhhhdmt 3d ago
true. i was being overly generous.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 3d ago
That's pretty much what WAATGM has been saying since before you or I even landed in it!
First and foremost I wish everyone well, but not if it comes at someone else's cost. If she gets what she's after, she's going to make that man's life suck. We all know it. I hope I'm wrong, but we all know I'm not.
And like @Overkill_Engine said, but paraphrased: she waited too fucking long, looks too fucking desperate, and if she pulls this off younger women are likely to learn the wrong lesson ("I can fornicate away my twenties and thirties and still stick the landing! Yaaaaasssss!").
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 3d ago
The notion of "looking desperate" is something women hold against beta males even as they want to leverage men's thirstiness for personal benefit. Men don't mind "desperate" women if they're otherwise good catches because that indicates submissiveness. This paradox may be her undoing as she still largely seeks hypergamy and to get a baby put into her with such a massive influx of choices. "looking desperate" is something women typically shame each other for "selling out" too "cheaply" to men.
Here's the narrative I think is MORE damaging to such women than the "she's too old to find anyone to wife/baby her up": Such women STILL have multiple options to them. A man who ran an ad like this might find, sadly, hundreds of catfishes and scammers or psychopathic women looking to take advantage of him. If a woman at that age makes a true, serious, effort I think they can find happiness. The question is whether she's so spoiled, her soul so far gone, that she can't help but sabotage it like a lottery winner blowing 40 million at the strip club.
That's far more humiliating IMO. Pretty women or otherwise who still wind up alone and childless is like a millionaire starving to death in a food court because they can't be troubled to learn how to use the ATM.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1d ago
I've seen women shame each other for it many times all the way back to my childhood and media from earlier, and I've also seen women fret about "looking desperate". Remember the comic strip "Cathy"? She frequently worried about looking desperate, and sometimes admitted that post-30 is desperate by default for women. This was back in the 1980s and 1990s though, before they circled the wagons so to speak.
It depends.
Your recent post shows a man who is rather put off by her desperation ("I mean, this is our first date...") and yeah, other things too lol ("yeah, I'm picturing a lot of things right now...").
Most guys are a bit put off by desperation in women, in most circumstances. Stonetoss illustrates it nicely here. It can be a great way to get laid, but beyond that, they're usually psychotic. Any "submissiveness" is usually a facade to get what they want (commitment).
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago
How can I put this? There are ways to express "desperation", I suppose, and this woman epitomizes the entitlement attitude of "desperation":
Imagine you're desperate to get in shape. You NEED to get in shape NOW! Ok. Do you exercise or diet? No. You just NEED to get in shape now! Without changing ANYTHING.
I suppose you're confused, or perhaps I am, in that this woman doesn't connect "desperation" with action. "Desperate" people who have a basic notion of cause-effect take actions that they ordinarily wouldn't do to get what they need. This woman in that example doesn't. Well, not entirely. OK, she did say she was willing to date him "settle" but otherwise showed absolutely no appreciation for him whatsoever.
On the other hand, doing things simply to be "nice" can be misconstrued as desperation: A man is nice and compliments a woman beyond her minimum. Sort of like petting a cat ONCE too many times and getting scratched. :-). Women judge each other as "desperate" if they are too nice to a man even if she otherwise has many options and isn't in a rush.
This is because they view relationships as a sexual transaction.
What's amusing is that they find "desperate" men undesirable as wimps but simultaneously, they want a transaction so the problem is... the men who are attractive won't overpay. Hence they want "self-confident" (handsome man who can have anyone) but "sensitive"/"chivalrous" who enjoys doing things for her because he's some magic robot who pays because he "enjoys" it.
Jesus such women are pathological. Not even selfish. Pathological.