different men are meant for different purposes

I am sure that the type of man this woman will eventually try to get a commitment from when she is ready to "settle down" will be real happy to hear that she sees his "purpose" as being the guy that is expected to pay the brand new price for a beater of a car. That is, if he were to find out about her past. And considering how women like this operate, I would doubt she would be open about that.

And as for her wishing things were simpler, I have a solution: genuine patriarchal rules. Women are expected to settle down and marry sooner and not be making up exclusivity rules only to break them for attractive men, but rather they marry a man and have him as their only sexual partner. And she has to have approval from her father before any marriage goes through in the likely event that her judgement cannot be trusted. In many patriachal cultures, women don't even get this choice! And divorce is far less common, as well as broken families being less common, so I don't think it is such an extreme view when you consider outcomes to be the most important standard. Otherwise, you get a whole lot more of this crap.

Female logic at rejecting 80% of men

Western women and girls are positively bombarded with affirmation from the moment they're born. They have been told that masculinity is "toxic' that "Boys are stupid" and to "Throw rocks at them.", “The future is Female, You go Girl” and “Smash the Patriarchy.” Is it any wonder that so many women think that their only real challenge in life is weeding out men they don't want?

From her perspective, she looks at herself and sees a goddess. She thinks, "I am absolutely fabulous, which means that I can have any man I want." Then she looks at all the men around her and thinks, "Gross! Only a few of them are worthy of me."

So how does she navigate through her dating life? She rejects most men as being unworthy of her. She ignores the "bottom" 80% of men. Why bother with the those bottom feeders? She deserves nothing but the best. They should be beating a path to her door, right?

She's so wonderful that all she has to do is make the "top" men aware of her existence and availability, and they'll fight to qualify themselves to her. Isn't that how it's supposed to work?

There are exceptions though. Its not about how many boxes he checks on her list. Its about how many boxes she is willing to remove from her list for him. She may say he needs to have at least 80% of requirements in her 10 point list. If she finds him hot but he only meets 4 requirements, she will gladly remove 5 for him to meet her 80% threshold. And if he is a Chad or a Bad Boi, what requirements?

In her fun years, she fucked for fun, but now it's time to "get serious" and put out an ad for daddy applications. Up until now, she'd ask dudes at bars for free drinks or appetizers and they'd give them to her. So why not do the same for a provider daddy-type? His needs, as always, are immaterial. A Good Man is there to provide. It's what he should want to do, unquestioningly, no matter how little there is in the deal for him. It's what he should scramble to do, and if he doesn't want to, then he's not a Good Man. He's not supposed to be acting in rational self-interest, he's supposed to be acting in HER interest, like the unthinking, self-sacrificing, non-human workhorse he should be.

Hi all, my first post.

I have been reading the threads on TRP.red, about the difference(s) of being a dildo AND a Wallet, and being just a wallet.

That discussion reminded me on this.

In a somewhat related note:

I am compiling everything where women would happily have sex with random people, but will use it as a manipulation tactic to control the men they say they want. To that end, please feel free to reply to this thread with all memes, images, videos, posts, confessions etc (within the rules of this forum - of course).

I remember a meme, a social media post where the woman is saying that she uses sex to "train her boyfriend" who is supposedly sweet, but has no problem to itch her scratch by a side dude, even if the side piece sees her as slut.

Does anyone have the post/meme saved and is willing to share with me? If you send a private message, then you dont have to trim anything, but if you choose to - you still can. I am ok either way.

Thanks.

What's funny is it can be far simpler and she almost hit directly upon it, but that would require her to not be a dumb slut with no ability or willingness to reign in her base urges.

Men can nuke her entire strategy with "no hymen, no diamond".

If a woman indeed wrote this, she clearly explained her beliefs that the rules concerning about no sex until a relationship has been achieved should not apply to really hot men without any plausible deniability written in.

The OP also puts into clear terms that the major reason women enjoy hookup culture is because it gives mid-tier women sexual access to high-tier men while it giver the top-tier men plenty of no-strings attached sex without the social expectation to marry her even if she becomes pregnant.

Perhaps we just need to accept that different men are meant for different purposes

But whenever a man comments about a "dual-mating strategy," it is just a stupid misogynist myth.

The way I have rationalized and learned to see the positive in this...

She knows she's being an outright slut and knows there are consequences to being an outright slut, yet she proves once again that there's no defeating 1) The Wall and 2) The Hamster.

TLDR "I perfectly know I'm 100% rationalizing but I don't think I'm a slut."

equality is such a mind-virus

any mention of equality between men and women should be seen as concerning

I've probably let some good girls go by the wayside because you can never tell if they're one of these types. So be it - I'd rather slam my dick in a cybertruck frunk than prove anything to a mediocre madam.

Until she ages out of getting these men and dies alone with her cats

Dual mating stratagy.. every guy walking the planet should be aware of this. Instead they have BP doctrine rammed down their throat.

when she says on equal terms what she means is we can't manipulate these guys like the relationship, niceguy or BP average man. Or the home depot guy. Or the church going dude (who let's face it has deluded himself). Translation. These guys don't give a fuck. They don't bend to our demands. They walk away. This is something every average joe can imitate.

"We need to accept different men for different purposes" -- This is what theyve done instictually going back before the pyramids. The prettier they are the easier it is to work this gameplan. Weight gains, age, and enlighted men (still a long way to go) are the enemy.

Yeah this is classic Female Dating Strategy reddit crap. The stuff that keeps women single and being pumped and dumped by Chad.

Perhaps we just have to accept that different women are meant for different purposes.

I know that it's sad that as men we have to make these difficult choices and tradeoffs. I wish it was simpler.