Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
polishknight
Posted 5d ago in inspin tears - celebrity edition! - Permalink - 829 Views
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
user84893093748959 Jr. Hamster Analyst 2d ago
Jennifer Aniston
February 11, 1969 (age 56)
The article says she's 56, so I calculate that she was born in 1969. She's the only child between her parents with 2 half brothers (one older and one younger). From the research I was able to perform from public sources, at age 9 she moved from LA to NYC with her mother coinciding with her split from her father. Her father was an actor on a few TV shows that definitely didn't film in NYC. Her mother - an actor too - doesn't show many acting roles after the move to NYC.
Her father went on to remarry and have another son, her younger half brother. Her father's marriage continued until his death. BTW. When her father married Jennifer's mother, she was already a single mother. Mothers will frequently move to take children away from fathers thereby establishing control by distance. Single motherhood is a cancer in society.
Jennifer began acting at 19, and at 25 was cast in Friends (TV Series 1994–2004). During this time she was also in several movies. Money and resources were not a barrier.
Jennifer was married to Brad Pitt from 2000 to 2005. So she had resources and the structure of marriage, but Brad began a relationship with Angelina Jolie, whom likely was simply more pleasant to be with. Brad and Angelina had a child together in 2006, so Brad's sperm is not in question.
In 2014, Aniston became a practitioner of Buddhism. Buddhism is an Indian philosophy of focusing on self, striving for awakening (self) and full liberation (self).
Me. Me. Me.
Her mentioning the idea of freezing eggs indicates she likely was fertile with viable eggs.
This is not selfish. This is natural biological law.
Past 20 years? So since age 36? Yeah... no... this is very late in life to begin thinking of having children - not to mention what else she might have engaged in contrary to fertility.
BTW, Sex in the City ran from 1998 to 2004. This was just the mentality of the era - boss babe having sex and definitely NOT focusing on family.
Conclusion: she chose career over family believing the latter was always an option she could pull from the back of the storage shed.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 5d ago
This is at least the 2nd time that this friend has appeared on Celebrity Edition. Will there be a 3rd? In the meantime, if someone could kindly post this to the reddit site since, due to an injustice, I am unable, it would be appreciated.
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 4d ago
I couldn't give two shits about celebrity bitches. They live in a completely different world than we do. The comparison to regular Jane Schmane women is apples and oranges. She could probably buy a 20-year-old uterus and swap parts and have 3-4 kids of her own if she really wanted to.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 3d ago
Yeah, but it's still simultaneously funny and educational.
Oddest-One-Here Jr. Hamster Analyst 3d ago
I wonder if that would work, but even if it did, she would be having another woman's baby as she suffers pregnancy.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 4d ago
She says she would have given anything to have someone tell her to freeze her eggs but I bet you dozens of people suggested it in conversation, particularly other wealthy women talking about their own worries. She just knew better back then. She was a goddess and she listened to no one but herself.
I actually feel sorry for her. She had all that success and influence, all that access to hot men with great genes and still drew a blank, still failed to get her genes into the next generation, while trailer trash who have never done a day of work can have a dozen grandchildren by her age. I know that in the end people are sovereigns in their own lives and she messed up but this is the problem women today have. They are not often able to steer their lives well. They are by nature drawn to enjoy immediate delights. This is why women really do need male guardians. If her male guardian had married her off by 24, she would not be as famous or wealthy but she would probably be soon set to be grandmother to many good quality grandchildren and have a real stake in the future. She was the sort of young woman who could have had a high quality man (as of course she did a number of times, just never accepted success for a woman comes in submitting to her nature).
The one great thing about feminism is that it is the agent that cleanses the disease it causes. It weeds out a large percentage of go getting career women from the future gene pool. Feminism is the wolf that makes the over sized and weak human herd strong again.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 4d ago
I don't buy into social-darwinism (at least as practiced) because, as you say, it is tragic. The west is undergoing an existential crisis for several reasons and it shouldn't be. Humanity is better off because, not in spite of, the humanistic value of caring for each other.
"This is my museum. It is difficult to associate these horrors with the proud civilizations that created them: Sparta, Rome, The Knights of Europe, the Samurai. They worshipped strength, because it is strength that makes all other values possible. Nothing survives without it. Who knows - what delicate wonders have died out of the world, for want of the strength to survive." -- Han, Enter the Dragon
it astonishes me how otherwise conservative men can't be honest with their daughters. Let's take agency and empowerment for what we can do about this. "Spoiling" women, either in the form of chivalry or feminism, is the issue. I looked up Jennifer Anniston's father and he apparently was divorced from her mother and she had "daddy issues". Fathers should explain to their daughter their biological clock and, therefore, a need to be pro-active about finding a good mate.
Note that the problem is due to that "sleeping beauty" paradigm where women sit around waiting for the perfect man to not only approach her, but then wine, dine, and entertain her with Academy Award level acting. Modern women have developed sexual pathologies. There was a time when young women were OBSESSED with marriage and children and that was transformed into "cringe" about a half century ago.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 2d ago
Yes. And we live in a society where too man men give into that impulse - so unless one has the power to directly force the near totality of men into quitting with that shit, (we both know men will never be allowed to force women to stop) the only viable route left is the social darwinism of withdrawing, saving yourself and what family you can, and letting the chips fall where they may until the inevitable collapse and hard reset.
The result is always needing to rule with an iron fist. The only choice is the size of the kingdom in question.
user84893093748959 Jr. Hamster Analyst 2d ago
Is that Enter the Dragon as in the 1973 movie https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070034/ ?
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 4d ago
Yes, good quote. Nothing survives without strength. Our ancestors were strong enough that we could coast a few generations. That time is up now. We either re-awaken or we will be superseded in coming generations.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 3d ago
Good shit.
Lone_Ranger Live by the pork sword, die by the pork sword 2d ago
VERY good shit
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 4d ago
That's what I'm planning on, except that's way too old. Peak fertility in women is ten years earlier than your figure!
Yup, one of my main talking points. For thousands of years marriage was a property transfer, and the vestiges of this remain even today. It's also the reality of my household.
Good quote
Lone_Ranger Live by the pork sword, die by the pork sword 2d ago
Women and girls have always needed male guardians, in one way shape or form.
Those very same women that proclaim about their strength and independence can ALWAYS be found to be loudly demanding their man when the going gets rough, usuall after 33, when the freebies dry up.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 4d ago
I think we need to be realistic 24 should be the latest in today's society.
I am not sure when peak fertility is but its not just the ability to conceive. I have had a fair amount of contact with a culture where early marriage is practised and had a wife from that culture who was a nurse (married her quite late at 23). My wife used to explain that it is not ideal for very young girls to get pregnant. The body is still developing. This point was also reiterated to me by a very old nurse who is a client of mine and has worked a lot in East Africa. She felt that it was best if girls did not conceive before 16. They body is just not fully developed and the pregnancy can damage the girl in rare cases. Plenty of girls have been married younger than this but I think there are many things to consider in marrying off a daughter and it is always best to try for the all round best position.
Mental maturity really is an issue too. Young people are getting less and less mature according to science. Their brains are maturing later because they have not been stimulated by science. I do not think women need to vote (if only we could soon reverse the clock on that huge mistake) but men should not be voting before 21 these days, maybe 25 would be ideal. I look at some of my daughters and they are simply not mature enough to hold down a job at 14 and wife is a more involved job than say check out girl.
My first wife was western in culture and I married her at 18, first child came along when 19. She was quite immature really. It was OK. But only just and I think it might have been better in her case 2 years later when she had more concept of the responsibility to be reasonable and thoughtful gained from interaction in the wider world. It was like having a teenage daughter sometimes but I had of course never had one of those before nor had a sister so I could have managed the problem better.
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 3d ago
It's been mentioned several times here, but it's a fun read: "Woman: The Most Responsible Teenager In The House"
When I personally got my act together ready for marriage at the age of 30, I was shocked how many of the biological clock tickers were utterly either still thinking literally like the phrase "overgrown teenagers" or basically bitter and baggage-laden teenagers who were angry about their adult experiences but not having learned from them.
This is because, aside from biology, they lacked a foundation of personal responsibility: 1) Something bad happens to you or you mess up. 2) You deal with it, best you can, learn from it, and strive to be a better person. Overgrown teenagers, on the other hand, want "daddy" to "fix" it and make it better. The man should just "handle" her baggage for her as it's some kind of gift. It's like an infant, not a teenager, pooping and expecting to be congratulated for doing so. That's why we see so many of these "bailout" dating profiles including "damaged goods" thinking a man should enjoy it.
Perhaps the point of the article and the saying "women mature faster than men" is that if a woman isn't taught during her formative years before puberty about personal responsibility and all that, it won't make a difference later.
I see well disciplined girls who are actually far more easy to get along with than many women I met during dating in their 20's and 30's.
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 4d ago
I agree, 14 is a bit young for today's world. But 18 is very reasonable if you have a mature daughter who has been kept out of the world as much as possible. I suppose it depends on how you define "maturity". Whatever it is, public school and college don't seem to help much.
I was married at 20 and knew nothing, but then not all knowledge is good. In some ways our ignorance was a good thing.
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 4d ago
Very true. Not all knowledge is good.
It is a great gift if a young couple can discover things together, without pre-learned vices or just even pre learned ideas. To shape your habits and ideals a little for the other is a great thing if it comes back in equal measure. Even then the advice of elders is important as there are some things you just don't work out between you without some explanation or guidance.
Gosh how broken some things are in the west!
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 4d ago
Lol, gee, maybe a certain someone should have not let their career go to their head clear back in the late 90's and they'd have the family they wanted now. You know, back when they actually had some fertility left.
hhhhdmt 4d ago
If she had genuine fertility issues, i do feel bad for her but i doubt she had actual fertility issues.
My favourite aunt is a few years older than Aniston and she got married at 23 and despite trying for years, she and her husband were unable to have children.
Its possible Aniston had fertility issues from a young age but my impression is that she didn't really properly try until it was too late.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 3d ago Stickied
It's this. Conception is not guaranteed even under optimal fertility for both parties. The odds are significantly worse when the woman wastes her peak fertility years on a career if a family is what she ultimately wanted.
One of the besetting sins of female empowerment is the misapprehension that just because a woman in a first world society has the freedom to do anything, that they have the ability to do everything no matter what on whatever arbitrary timeline they desire.
Like, no, you silly bitches. That's not true. You actually have to make choices with exclusionary elements. Men have to make choices to give up elements of freedom all the fucking time if they want certain things out of life. Many men do not in any way shape or form enjoy back breaking manual labor, corporate rat races, confining their sexual appetites to a singular aging woman, the effort and discipline to stay in shape, fiscal responsibility, or the various social rituals that must be regularly undergone, but those are the choices they make to obtain the things that they want that result from those.
hhhhdmt 3d ago
True. My aunt did everything right in getting married at 23 and immediately trying to conceive and it never happened. I feel bad for her but i do everything i can to be a good nephew to her. Women like my aunt deserve sympathy because they didn't waste their 20's sleeping around and instead became wives.
Aniston had 10 years on Friends and she could likely have kids at any time during the duration of the show. I doubt she was properly trying. I am sure she was on the pill during that time. Because getting pregnant in her 20's would have slowed down her career.
By the time she started properly trying, she would have been well into her 30's.
Women live in a parallel universe. Sheryl Sandberg advised women to spend their 20's sleeping around with irresponsible men instead of marriage minded men. Then these 30 something women, after years of getting banged by irresponsible men, expect responsible men to come and deal with their baggage.
Sandberg is an idiot but there are millions of Sheryl Sandberg's out there. Spending their 20's sleeping around, then freezing their eggs and blaming men in their 30's. Madness.
Lone_Ranger Live by the pork sword, die by the pork sword 2d ago
The SS viewpoint is now totally mainstream.
I was at a funeral recently, and some older women that I know very well were chatting about life. One of them, that had a very succesful like (married young, almost certaintly as a virgin, had a wonderful marriage, 4 kids, big house, lots of sucess) was looking back on life, and bemoaned the fact that she had 'settled down' too young - her advice for young women was to sleep around as much as possible and then try to settle down.
I was gobsmacked. I didn't say anything. I just sat there in silence.
The issue is that young women are getting very bad advice from everyone. Even women that do it right (get married young, have plenty of kids, body count of 1 or very low digits) are giving advice that its best to slut around for your fertile years, and then try and stick the landing.
hhhhdmt 2d ago
unbelievable. Jesus. Jenna Bush Hager is also lamenting not having slept around more. No hope now.
[deleted]