• Register
  • Sign In
  • Main Forums
  • What's Hot
  • TRP.RED
  • Tribe Forums
  • TheRedPill
  • Tribe Management
  • Create New Tribe
  • Manage My Tribes
  • Find New Tribes
  • Recent News
    • Forums in BETA!
      Visit our Development Updates tribe to discuss redesign, features, or bugs!
Sort By Hot
  • Hot Score
  • Newest Comments
  • Old Comments
  • Top Comments

Forums.Red / WhereAreAllTheGoodMen / WAATGM In The Making

When they put "nice" in double quotes...
5

polishknight

Posted 1d ago in WAATGM In The Making - Permalink - 575 Views



Permalink

    
Permalink
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1d ago

Someone please post to the Reddit site because I cannot.

3
    
Permalink
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1d ago

"Emotionally available" and "emotionally unavailable" are such fucking retarded nonsense terms lol.

4
    
Permalink
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 15h ago

"Actually looking for a relationship" and "Only looking to smash" More accurate but less plausible deniability

3
    
Permalink
[deleted]
1
    
Permalink
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 22h ago

What's especially interesting about her diatribe is that she complains about how the hot guys are not willing to "feel" but the "nice guys" are losers who want "emotional support animals". An interesting term because an "emotional support animal" merely has to express basic empathy.

The way she expresses terms about emotion while demonstrating a lack of empathy suggests she's a clinical psychopath. Highly recommend the book "The Wisdom of Psychopaths". She's probably not a psychopath but rather a sociopath.

4
    
Permalink
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 17h ago

She's probably not a psychopath but rather a sociopath.

Frankly a large number of women that are having issues finding/keeping a man fit this. Modern society does a poor job of socializing women out of the human baseline sociopath state that is the natural default of children. Arguably to the point that some of them don't even reach "teenager" level actualization where they not only realize that there are "other people" with their own wants and needs, but that they themselves will also need to fulfill those wants and needs to fit in and get anything in return.

Which is why they end up complaining about their lack of getting what they want, with absolutely no thought given to the fact that the people they were wanting it from weren't getting anything they wanted in return.

TLDR; Chad isn't going to emotionally engage/commit with a vapid hoe because the vapid hoe has done nothing to deserve that effort.

5
    
Permalink
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 8h ago

See @Durek_The_Bald comment below. When a “nice guy” loses it and becomes “dangerous” because he’s angry that being “nice” (as in doing what women claimed they want from men) doesn’t get him laid, he’s shamed for it. “Nice guys” getting angry and expressing anger is actually the first stage to RP awareness as they realize that what they were told isn’t true: Giving women a lot of stuff up-front only encourages such women to exploit and discard him.

You used the analogy of a clothing catalog: Imagine a Costco samples tray where they handed out not just tiny bites but entire bags of product for people to “try”. For the shopper, there’s no incentive then to actually buy the product, is there?

This works both ways: For hot guys, there’s zero reason for commitment which carries legal liabilities when he can get sex with one woman after another.

As I said, I chuckle when she laments that the hot guys lack empathy (that’s who she cares about, after all) when she lacks empathy herself but, most importantly, an awareness of her lack of empathy. That’s the hallmark of Narcissistic Personality Disorder: A delusional state of superiority to others. Babies and small children are naturally narcissistic and good parenting is about gently but firmly guiding them out of that mental state: That throwing their toys on the floor isn’t “cute”.

The hallmark of a pathological psychological state is when someone lacks an awareness of it or an ability to process a resolution.

2
    
Permalink
RegisterSignIn 1d ago

I can appreciate the image she created with the roof top and the shades. I think this is this hypnotic power of words women have, and can use on men and altho it means nothing it have charming effect.

It seems she fails trials despite.

3
    
Permalink
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1d ago

Let me translate: my choice is chads who pump and dump, or simpy losers.

3
    
Permalink
Wintergreen 22h ago

I don’t get why these women act like it’s impossible to find a hot guy who wants a relationship. It’s actually very easy. The problem is that they are looking for a guy who likes steaks, but they are steaming piles of shit.

I’m convinced that 99% of guys want a relationship in general. The reason that they don’t want one with this girl is because they get intimacy within the trial period and realize that they got all that the woman has to offer, for free, and there is no recurring benefit of using the service. Who the fuck pays for a subscription to a candy bar they’ve already eaten?

8
    
Permalink
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 13h ago

Most (almost all) women do not provide relationship quality anything, they provide a dwindling frequency of sex over time and a list of demands for something other men have previously rented out for less

They charge their boyfriends more for less service than the sloppy guy at the bar the night they are lonely and horny and then think they are hot shit when in reality they were just the ones who happened to open their legs that night

So many women want a wedding but they don't want to be a wife. They think their sloppy loose vagina is a sufficient bargaining chip for love when can't even cook or give a man 5 seconds of peace

They can't offer a single thing a man couldn't get from a harem

5
    
Permalink
Wintergreen 9h ago

Yes this is exactly true.

I also want to add another thing, since a lot of women think that making men wait so that they DON’T get intimacy within the trial period, and instead have to pay for a subscription to get intimacy, is a good move. This makes logical sense if you have Down Syndrome, but what they fail to realize (or maybe just fail to admit), is that for multiple other guys, their premium package was offered for free, with a ‘cancel anytime, no obligation’ policy. Then, they go and try to get a guy to pay without offering him the sale terms. Only a sucker would accept that bullshit.

4
    
Permalink
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 7h ago

When my parents met and married back in 1958, when women denied men sex until marriage it was assumed that she wasn’t sleeping with some other guy at the bar although that was a possibility but it was rare. Women worried about getting pregnant out-of-wedlock and, back then, being a single mother got one shamed. Also, dates weren’t going out to expensive dinners but rather bowling or a Vanilla Coke at the drugstore.

As someone who was born previous to the modern era, I marvel at how many single mothers are out there. It’s like seeing so many people die from not wearing seat belts. Either the practical results from oral contraception are oversold or women lack the ability to use it properly. With men, this is less of a factor in that even if 95% of men understand you shouldn’t have sex with a woman you aren’t engaged to without a condom, period, the other 5% can still create all these single mothers. It’s how Idiocracies are born.

Since it’s now common knowledge to men that even smarter women who know how to use contraception effectively are sleeping around, it’s now assumed that if she’s denying you sex, it’s not because she’s saving it up for marriage but rather will regard you as a chump if you pay for dinners for months and she friend zones you anyway. I recall in the 1980’s when that term actually become part of the public lexicon. At first, it was a term that women used to dump men, but it was largely reserved for after the 1st date. By the 4th date in my parent’s time, at most, people would go “steady”.

2
    
Permalink
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 27m ago

women lack the ability to use it properly.

Willingness. This ties into tho whole political fracas around abortion. See, women past puberty damn well know one of the most powerful socioeconomic tools they have is their ability to get pregnant because: child support laws.

Problem for women is, this set of tools has a flaw - Chad is far more willing and able to ignore the laws and skip town or otherwise make them ineffective for the woman's goal of securing provisioning/commitment from a top tier male via pregnancy. And by default a good chunk of the non-Chads who are stable provisioners are going to balk at a single mom as a prospect, and rightfully so.

And so they screech and wail for a literal abort button to fall back on when it doesn't work out instead of developing the self discipline to not act like a cat in heat.

1
    
Permalink
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 17h ago

What's funny is women like her create the first group of men by rejecting the second group.

Architects of their own personal hell, and they fuckin' deserve it.

5
    
Permalink
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 15h ago

Spot on. They have done it to themselves by being prepared to settle for being used by hot guys. This is the real settling women do. The settling they complain about later is when they pick one of the lower value guys and settle down with him. However if they had actually valued themselves more, they would not have created the dichotomy of behaviour between the top 20 % and the remainder. The behaviour is a reaction to the market. The men are just acting either resource rich or resource poor.

3
    
Permalink
mustangfrank1 Sr. Hamster Analyst 11h ago

Women are both accomplishes and victims in their own misery.

3
    
Permalink
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 7h ago

Your wording combines both the sacred and propane.

2
    
Permalink
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 3h ago

[Hank Hill voice]: and propane accessories!

@mustangfrank1:

Women are both accomplishes *accomplices and victims in their own misery.

FTFY.

2
    
Permalink
First-light Jr. Hamster Analyst 15h ago

I think this young lady has perfectly described from a female point of view the phenomenon of Chad and Beta.

Through the phenomenon of "Dating" women have created a medium through which they can get men on a purchase or return basis. The apps, particularly, are just like a clothing catalogue. She orders, it turns up at her door, she tries it on and sends back, often even if it was a nice garment because, well she can at no cost and there is lots more in the catalogue to try.

Now some men can use women the same way -the top 80%. That's all it is.

The problem madam is dating. Dating sucks. Don't date. Look for someone to fall in love with -not by trawling the catalogue of men for sale or rent but by actually meeting a man in real life, not out in a bar or in a club, in real life. Talk to him and see if you like him, spend some time with him and you might fall in love.

4
    
Permalink
Wintergreen 9h ago

Honestly though, it goes farther than just “not meeting in a bar or club”.

She has to be a woman who wouldn’t ever be found in a bar or club.

Where you meet has less to do with anything than where you have been or where you habitually go.

Because, if two people go to bars/clubs but meet at a library, how is that really any different than meeting at a bar or club? They both go to bars and clubs, so they’re the same people regardless.

3
    
Permalink
Durek_The_Bald 15h ago

She's not wrong though. Guys with the "nice" persona are often:

  • resentful, as a result of all their covert contracts, and unfulfilled give-to-get expectations.

  • fundamentally dishonest about their wants and needs, who/what they are, and what it means to be a man.

  • boring, as a result of trying to be liked by everyone, which also ties back to the previously mentioned fundamental dishonesty about themselves.

  • energy vampires due to their neediness and default to butthurtedness.

  • at times unpredictably dangerous, due to being emotionally needy, and having weak boundaries. These are the guys who suddenly snap when stuff on the inside has reached a boiling point.

Women have good subconscious reasons to get creeped out at "nice" (which btw is not the same as being "kind"). Women are also acutely aware that Nice Guys just want their dicks sucked as much as the next guy, despite doing their best to hide their sexuality (which is creepy and unattractive in and of itself for obvious reasons).

5
    
Permalink
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 3h ago Stickied

@Durek_The_Bald and @polishknight:

While I thoroughly enjoyed reading your discussion, I must remind both of you that WAATGM's rules and focus are not the same as either TRP or askTRP.

Primarily, I need to remind you both of rule 1:

no shaming men for any reason.

Humans have this innate tendency to immediately put all the responsibility onto men, thus absolving women of their decisions.

At WAATGM, we have shaped our rules to prevent this taking place, and to keep the focus on the woman rightly suffering the consequences of her decisions.

While neither one of you actually violated that rule, you are both skirting really close at times.

Additional reading, from WAATGM founder @Kevin32:

Understanding the Purpose of WAATGM


[Here ends moderator notes, and begins the joining of the discussion]


1) You're both talking past each other a bit, because Durek is using Dr. Robert Glover's definition of NiceGuy™, but Polishknight is just using the classic definition.

2) a lot of NiceGuys get justifiably frustrated because what they've been doing their entire lives hasn't returned the results they want, and they had been advised to do that way [ie lied to] their entire lives. "Just be yourself!" and "just be a gentleman!" is some of the worst advice ever, but it's the most prevalent.

Their frustration is akin to this: you follow a recipe for chocolate chip cookies. You follow the instructions to the letter. When the timer goes off and you open your oven, instead of the promised chocolate chip cookies, you find a pile of dog shit.

It's less entitlement, and more of a perplexed and frustrated "what the hell is going on here? I did everything I was supposed to do!"

2
    
Permalink
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 1h ago

I was considering reminding him of Rule 1 so thank you for doing so. I was pointing out that the shaming ploys against nice guys are often unjustified and explaining why. Perhaps it would be best if I asked the poster to edit the comment accordingly and bring up the topic over at the TRP forum.

1
    
Permalink
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 8h ago

Largely agreed, with these caveats (to your points)

1) If they are NOT resentful after their "give to get" is unfulfilled, they'd be what is referred to as a "SIMP": Someone who goes their whole lives pleasing women while getting nothing in return. "give to get" is fundamental to human survival. We don't work for free.

2) Women are dishonest and routinely tell men to be "gentlemen". These men treat women like "ladies". In the past, "nice guys" would have gotten married and stayed married, for life. These men, sadly, are behind the times sort of like wearing bell-bottoms of a job interview.

3) Niceness is "boring" but in a good way. Finding a rat hair in your soup is certainly NOT boring. Modern women often mistake drama from "bad boys" as exciting and then complain when it turns out to mean their relationships are toxic.

4) "Nice guys" are actually the opposite of needy. They flood women with attention, validation, and goodies. Women such as this interpret authentic emotional expression as "needy".

5) I chuckle at this point because women actually find unpredictably dangerousness ATTRACTIVE. Note that nice guys snapping is entirely predictable and preventable: Just give him sex. It's like complaining that a loyal dog is "unpredictably dangerous" when you don't feed it.

That being said, Nietzsche famously observed that "niceness" or meekness without strength is merely submission, not morality, and that's unattractive to women, obviously.

3
    
Permalink
Durek_The_Bald 7h ago

1) Potato, pötöttis. Simps, Nice Guys, white knights, it's all part of the same general theme. The simps I've known in my life have had a tendency to be resentful towards men who fuck (they're "bad men").

2) True. Women either lie about, or are oblivious to, what they really want. The red pill literature is full of reasons as to why that is, and how men who listen to women get led astray by it. So I'm not going to get into all that. But yes, absolutely.

3) Naw, it's just boring, not in a good way. There's a lot of space between "nice", and "drama" (or the equivalent of a rat's hair in your soup). He who is afraid to offend a woman won't be able to flirt, push/pull, DARE, or maintain a healthy level of dread either. And that's a bedroom killer, which nobody likes.

4) It is needy, because there's an underlying covert contract about getting sex and validation in return.

5) There's a different between being a danger to those who could threaten her and her kids, and being a danger to her and her kids. Assertive men are "safe", because she knows there isn't a problem if he hasn't expressed anything. Unassertive, passive-agressive guys are "unsafe", because she never knows what he's quietly seething about.

I like that Nietzsche observation. Don't know much about him, but that's definitely something observable in many different contexts.

3
    
Permalink
polishknight WAATGM Endorsed 7h ago

1) Anecdotal claim. I concur that (many) simps often hold a low level of resentment towards women, but they often are unconscious about it (hence why they can’t break out of it.). This will tie into number 5 later. I’ve seen MANY Simps go through their whole lives being sincerely nice though and it’s kind of sad.

2) Men who lie about being “nice” to women because women lied to them is part of a vicious circle initiated by the women. This will tie into number 3.

3) I politely disagree. Women who allow “niceness” to become a “bedroom killer” have a psychological disorder. In other words, we learned to pretend to enjoy rat hairs in our soup because that’s the only way restaurants would serve the soup to us.

This notion of a “good drama” reminds me of Inspector Clouseau’s relationship with Kato, whom he hired to attack him unpredictably to keep him “on his toes”. It made for some of the funniest scenes in movie history. If you haven’t seen The Pink Panther Returns, please do so.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FbUD7FRStbY

But who would really want to live like this for long? Who would want to marry “Kato?”

I prefer boredom to having to clown-game mentally undeveloped teenagers. I can’t speak for all men though, so I invite others to comment.

4) Again, humans have needs. It’s not a bad thing. It is amusing, though, that women who complain that Chad isn’t “chivalrous” can only hope to try to force “niceness” from Chad via the tool she uses on beta males: withholding sex, but Chad is immune to such emotional blackmail.

5) This is how women like to think it should work in that a “real man” should be happy to accept her shit-tests. A Chad who has options, but nonetheless will stay with her because she (and her kids) are “special”).

“White knights” are just that: they threaten other men to protect “damsels in distress” and yet, women regard such men as “nice guys” and weak when he fails her shit-tests where she actually attacks HIM and he doesn’t respond that it’s not a big deal.

A man who refuses to defend himself is ultimately a lousy protector similar to why the stewardess advises you to put on your own oxygen mask first before assisting children next to you.

Hence, why women who think this way often fall for “bad boys” and become single mothers or “damaged goods” or other pathologies we observe here.

Nietzsche has been overrated at times and hence become a joke trope, but he did say many wonderful things and he’s on my (re) reading list. The challenge to reading him is that the text I originally had was a poor translation from German. I recently did a reread of the Bible and found the NIV version was a lot more readable than King James.

2
    
Permalink
No-Stress-Cat Jr. Hamster Analyst 2h ago

Notice that in this description there are only extremes. Her choices are either Chad Thundercock or Billy Beta, no in between. They're either "The One" (who don't want them) or "The None" (who won't stop drooling over them). She doesn't even acknowledge the guy who does pretty good for himself, but will show her a good time without simping over her.

1
    
Permalink
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 14m ago

I strongly suspect that she is being such a shallow bitch in her dating choices while not being hot enough to get away with it that she is naturally filtering those guys out or at least giving them every reason to not engage with her at all.

Standard woman dating issue basically. The kind you see in high school/college where she gets train ran on her by the jocks, and her homework done by the nerds, but whines that she can't find or keep a boyfriend when the problem is her behavior is utterly repellent to men that are relationship oriented, who have standards, and have options that aren't dis stoopid bitch!

TLDR; the men that have everything she wants can get a woman that gives them everything they want, instead of...her.

2
    
Permalink
NotaBene Sr. Hamster Analyst 22m ago

It's either

Dual mating strategy in her own words.

The more "experience" with men a woman has, the less she becomes unable to enjoy a relationship with one. She has ruined her ability to be impressed and satisfied with any one man, like tape that has been stuck/unstuck too many times; fit for nothing.

My own pet theory is that a key component of a successful marriage is a husband who is both alpha/beta to his wife. You may think this impossible. It's certainly very rare, but an inexperienced woman has nothing to compare to - she is ignorant to her own advantage.

Comparison is the thief of joy

2
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

Created By kevin32

Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.


703 Members

Public Tribe

Unsubscribed
Post to WhereAreAllTheGoodMen
Chatroom
TRP.RED Tribe

WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar

We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.

In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.

Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.

But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.

Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.

The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.


Rules of conduct:

  • 1. No shaming men for any reason.

  • 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.

  • 3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.

  • 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.

Rules for submission:

  • 5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)

  • 5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)

  • 6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.

  • 7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.

  • 8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.

  • 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.

Recommended reading:

  • Understanding The Purpose of WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

  • Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards

  • OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone

  • Mate Selection for Modernity: Studies show that the more a woman achieves and the higher her expectations grow, the lesser the pool of eligible mates available to her.

  • r/FemaleDatingStrategy advises women to delay sex with good men but freely give themselves to fuckboys

  • Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society

  • Dalrock - They’re back in your 20s where you left them.

  • Kevin Samuels - You're Average At Best

  • Paul Elam - Where the Good Men Went

  • Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me

  • WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.

  • Michael's Story

  • u/where_muh_good_mens' Story

  • "What Happened to All the Nice Guys?"

  • Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.

  • Feminism has succeeded

  • Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore

  • Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?

  • "I’m 43 and Alone – Can I Find a Good Man?"

  • To The Guy I Left In The Friend Zone For Too Long

  • To The Man Who Will Love Me Next

  • The Truth Behind the Increasing Social and Economic Disparity of Modern Society and Why Good Men Are The First To Leave

  • The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market

  • Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel

  • The Life Story of Carol

  • Memes

  • Complete list of resources here.

Link Flair:

  • The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"

  • Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.

  • Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.

  • Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.

  • Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.

  • Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.

  • New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.

Content Archive:

  • https://theredarchive.com/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen

Related forums:

  • WhereAllTheGoodMenAre
Back to Top © 2025 Forums.RED All Right Reserved | Page generated in 0.0248 seconds.