Dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man", to show women's poor dating behavior and unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves.
mustangfrank1
Posted 1mo ago in Dual Mating Strategy - DENIED! - Permalink - Locked - 7.4K Views
WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Sidebar
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this forum is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
-
2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate forum.
-
3. No comments such as "Her profile looks decent", "She's not asking for much", "At least she's honest". No comments saying a post is fake without proof. Proof must be sent via modmail.
- 4. No brigading, doxxing or witch-hunting. Do not look for the individuals posted here, nor ask or give their personal info/social media, nor ask or give the source or you will be banned and reported to the admins. See here and here.
Rules for submission:
-
5. Submissions must show a woman who is looking for commitment while also either complaining about jerks or promiscuity, needing her kids provided for, being entitled or unreasonable, or complaining that she "can't find a decent guy". (Examples, details)
-
5b. No posts of women who are merely fat, post-wall, unattractive, seeking sex or money, nor women merely behaving badly. (Examples NOT allowed)
-
6. No personal information in dating profiles or social media accounts. Take a screenshot and censor all names, social media, hometown, school, and place of work. Additionally, censor any children's faces if their mommy included them in any profile photos.
-
7. No links to any subreddits or websites, nor crossposts where the OP is a woman. For articles use archive.is. For Reddit use a censored screenshot. Screenshots must contain the full story. No links to any women's Youtube, TikTok, etc. videos. Use Streamable.com to upload videos after censoring them through Musicaldown.com.
-
8. We accept images from Imgur, Postimage, and ImgBB.
- 9. Other content may be posted on the weekends. See the types of content we allow.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Link Flair:
-
The Big Question- Carol asks "Where are all the good men?", "Why can't I find a decent guy?", "What happened to chivalry and respect?"
-
Bailout- Carol wants a man to help raise her kids and provide financial stability.
-
Leftovers- Carol whines about how hard dating is as an older woman.
-
Dual-Mating Strategy- Carol admits to promiscuity and dating jerks but now wants a good guy to settle down with. Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
-
Cock Carousel Rider: Carol complains about being single while having a history of promiscuity.
-
Entitlement Princess- Carol has unreasonable standards while offering little to no value herself.
- New Carols Unlocked!- A list of all the Carols we've identified.
Content Archive:
Related forums:
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1mo ago Stickied
Good find, @mustangfrank1. I re-flaired it "Dual Mating Strategy - DENIED!" making this one only the second of its kind.
If one of my fellow mods who still has access at reddit would re-flair it there as well, I'd appreciate it.
Oddest-One-Here 1mo ago
Wouldn't the Dual Mating Strategy still count as somewhat successful since he paid for her child for at least 5 years, and unless the Family Court decides in his favour, he will still have to pay for that child via child support?
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
False paternity is a very strong defense. It would depend on his local laws.
Typo-MAGAshiv asshole. giga-shitlord. worst mod EVAR. 1mo ago
Time will tell
Weightyboy 2w ago
Abdul, fetch the rocks!
Land_of_the_losers the-niceguy.com 1mo ago
"I'm currently fucking other women, but I still let you live in this house. You still have the engagement ring on your finger. Plus, you enjoyed the wedding cake. Really hon, has anything tangible changed about our marriage at all? It's not like I painted the ceiling purple suddenly!"
reignoferror00 1mo ago
and while we're inviting God into 'our house', how about we also invite a live in mistress for your husband. Nothing will really change, just think of her as a new member of your family that you're not biologically related to. Hell, you can get a job to help out financially for the increased household.
wswZtyqNGQ 1mo ago
Inviting God to this house? Let me go check the Old Testament about what God said to do with this type of woman...
sean_karaya 1mo ago
Inviting God generally means getting rid of the Opposing force, namely Satan. You ma'am are the Satan
You have no empathy to him. You want to continue things the way they are. You want to punish him after you break his heart. You are not a reforming sinner. The more you keep him tied around your unilaterally decided child, you continue to sin.
As such the only way to invite God to your house would necessitate getting rid of you.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
Where was that attitude when you were getting a fresh shot of zinc yogurt from the man that you really wanted to be with within months of getting married?
Frankly, he has every right to divorce you. In a sane society, you’d be facing criminal charges for defrauding him if he wanted to press charges.
It also highlights why it’s way worse for women to cheat vs men. If he cheated and had a child out of wedlock, she would never have to interact with that child. But when she does it, he’s tricked into raising it.
Solezhtyn 1mo ago
The consequences should be much more extreme than for simple fraud. They should involve hot branding as well.
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
Women really don't understand male jealousy, and why we really really want to have children that are actually ours.
If I had to explain it to them, I would say this;
"Imagine you are have a husband that works at the post office. He works all the hours delivering mail, so its a hard life for not much money. You are not able to have children because of Ovarian problems. You get by as a couple, even though you rarely see each other. Then one day, you find out that he is living a double life. He is actually a multi millionaire, and has a fancy house over the other side of town, where he keeps a young wife and a young child. This is why he made up the story of the busy postman, to explain where he was all the time. Do you still love your husband?"
ElliotPagesLeftTit 1mo ago
I’ve always pointed out that hospitals go to extreme measures to ensure the baby a mother interacts with is hers - checking wristbands, checking id, etc. Babies switched at birth are so rare they make the news.
Yet at a minimum, 3% of babies leaving the hospital are attributed to the wrong father. Hospitals refuse to do mandatory paternity testing. In my state there are 43 required tests that must be performed on a newborn. Some are for genetic conditions as rare as 1-10,000.
Would you be ok if 3% of the time the hospital sent a mother home with the wrong child?
Lone_Ranger Sr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
In france, they go one step further.... The state prohibits paternity testing.
They are smart to do so - because its more like 10% of kids are not from the 'father'. And this would lead to more divorce and more 'wards of the state' as the (now)signle moms live on handouts to provide for their bastard kids.
mattyanon TRP Endorsed 1mo ago
haha love the piousness from this cheating liar.
Boar_excrement Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
Looking at the math, I would guess a baby trap. Marriage of 6 years and a child of 5 years? And then it isn't even his....
Jamal, bring the stones!
houseoftolstoy Unchivalrous Christian 1mo ago
Good observation. That would make the situation even worse, as the husband most likely would not have married such a woman without the premise that he had a sense of obligation to take responsibility for knocking up a woman. But if he was not the one who got her pregnant? Well, then what exactly was the point of the marriage?
To further theorize, I would suspect the biolgical father was not one who had much in terms of finances (or at least not as much as the current husband), otherwise she would have sought to baby trap him instead.
Oddest-One-Here 1mo ago
While it is almost certainly impossible, but if they did the DNA test and it proved it was his child but not hers, you can be sure she will be raging about being tricked into raising a child that wasn't actually hers.
mustangfrank1 Sr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
You are correct. Lets says she was drugged, and some other woman's eggs were implanted while she was not awake. She gives birth thinking the kids are hers only to discover it was her husband's sperm with the other woman's eggs. I doubt she would be just fine with supporting and caring for the kids.
DonDripp 1mo ago
nice role reversal, technically the only time it happens [except super rare mistakes] is when woman consciously chooses to raise strange DNA.
Vermillion-Rx Penchant for plastic dolls 1mo ago
The lack of self awareness here is astounding.
Yeah like your husband's resources the past few years
What a shitty friend! So wrong of them to snitch rather than of you to cheat rawdog
GimmeTheUsual Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
As we know, a woman's friends will cover for her no matter what. This is why she feels betrayed, of course.
I don't think there's a good reason to continue the sham either, I commend the guy for pulling the ripcord. I suspect there are a lot of cases where "but look, the kid, sooooo cute" gets applied and if the guy doesn't have any self-respect, they would cave.
This is the prime example of why "girls night out" and other un-escorted excursions to "travel" should be huge red flags for guys to pay attention to.
houseoftolstoy Unchivalrous Christian 1mo ago
It is not a "mere test," it is proof that he is not the biological father. A paternity test is as much of a "mere test" as a pregnancy test is. And I know full well most women do not see a pregnancy test as something insignificant either, especially if they get an unexpected result. If I was in this husband's situation, I would be livid too. So he is most certainly not overreacting.
Says the woman who does not have any worry about the child not being biologically hers.
Invoking God at a time like this is really something, considering that she had been lying for years to her husband and would have kept lying if she was not caught in her lie. She does not seem one bit sorry that she was lying about the paternity of her child, and trying to play the Christianity card only at this moment tells me everything I need to know about how seriously she takes her faith. Which is to say not at all. And speaking of Christianity, can you guess who said these words here?
"And I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery."
If you guessed Jesus, you are correct( Matthew 19:9). I emphasized one important detail, as even the Son of God when speaking against divorce found infidelity to be an exception. So the wife should understand that her husband is justified in ending things when she refused to uphold her end of the marriage vows.
NotaBene Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
Personally I like the "adultery test" in Numbers 5. All that was required to put a wife through that ordeal was a husband's suspicion. And if she was found to be a cheater, the penalty was rightfully harsh.
"When he has made her drink the water, then it shall come about, if she has defiled herself and has been unfaithful to her husband, that the water which brings a curse will go into her and cause bitterness, and her abdomen will swell and her thigh will waste away, and the woman will become a curse among her people."
houseoftolstoy Unchivalrous Christian 1mo ago
I prefer to use New Testament passages for handling moral questions as that more directly corresponds with the morals most Christians (should) follow. Much of what Jesus taught went deeper into the morality, as we saw with Jesus talking about Moses permitting divorce because of "the hardness of your hearts" (as seen in the previous verse Matthew 19:8). In cases such as this, it is going beyond the previous standards and asking for a higher standard of morality. Which is why most Christians place more emphasis on the New Testament over the Old Testament.
So with that in mind, I find that referencing the New Testament tends to be more effective at making the case for other Christians.
NotaBene Jr. Hamster Analyst 1mo ago
"The NT is in the OT concealed, the OT is in the NT revealed."
"More emphasis" is not how I would put it, but I get the point.
You can't understand that part of Matthew unless you understand the Law, culture, the situation that was being responded to, and the language/translation issues that verse is rife with. There are literal books on that topic because it's not immediately clear what it means or where it applies. Since this isn't a site for theology I won't argue it further here, but PM me if you want.
I like that particular part of the Law because it provides an early and effective solution for cheating women, and how God literally provides a way for a suspicious husband to feel better, much the same as a paternity test would today. If he did the process correctly, he would know supernaturally if his wife had cheated, and if she had she would become barren, ugly, and shunned. It's a perfect solution.
First-light 1mo ago
Got to love the appeal to god. She needs to read her bible before she wishes that on herself.
Let us all pray for this guy -that he may be rid of his wife and her bastard as cheaply as possible. He deserved a lot of compensation for raising a cuckoo but under the gynocracy, its sadly impossible, may he just be rid.
[deleted]
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1mo ago
I am going to remove this comment as it is bordering on the "No violence" rule.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1mo ago
The analogous solution (if he decides to keep the wife for the sake of his legitimate children), would be to send the bastard child to live with her father.
Obviously the wife would never be permitted to interact with her affair partner (even through intermediaries), and that might well mean that she never sees her daughter again, but such is the price of paternity fraud.
Yeah… it’s THAT serious.
moorekom Urban Hoe Guerrilla 1mo ago
I wonder what good that will do to a family that is broken anyway. This might even make it worse. In the past, it might have made sense. But in these times, it will be better to just cut her loose and fight hard (and dirty if necessary) to make sure he gets his kids.
lurkerhasarisen A Strategist Among Tacticians 1mo ago
I’m not suggesting that he should keep the whore around. I’m just saying that since lions and humans are different, the human analog to what male lions do to the cubs of the previous “alpha” lion would be to send the child to live with her family.
I was being descriptive, not prescriptive.