Visit the WAATGM forum to view and post content.
We're just a bunch of clueless NiceGuys™ with kindness coins that don't seem to work in women's holes so that the sex we're "entitled to" falls out. Because apparently we weren't demonstrating good relationship material through the attention, respect and stability that women demand. We were only "pretending" to be nice just to get laid.
In response to r/niceguys, this tribe is dedicated to exposing all the women who complain about wanting a "good man" after dating jerks and riding the cock carousel in the prime of their youth, and think they're deserving of commitment and financial stability when all they have left to offer is their depreciating looks, narcissistic mentality, used-up vaginas, and another man's kids.
Women in their 20s have numerous opportunities to date the decent men they claim to want, but many reject or friendzone these men for jerks and promiscuity. She takes advantage of a good dude's kindness for attention and favors, then accuses him of being a bad person who thinks he's entitled to sex.
But when she's in her 30s with depreciating looks, jerks who won't commit, the likelihood of being a single mom, and the social pressure from her married friends, she asks "Where have all the good men gone?"[1][2] Funny how back when she was chasing the bad boys "Being nice is the bare minimum", but now that she's past her prime and needs a bailout, she wants a man with nice guy traits.
Furthermore, dating jerks and riding the carousel before settling down with a good man is planned by many women, and encouraged by feminists. They then come to the dating market with unreasonable standards while offering little to no value themselves. Such women are totally unaware that the mature, stable men they now need are the same decent men they rejected, except these men remember the rejection and are responding in kind to avoid unstable, unappreciative women who view them more as ATMs than romantic partners.
The reason women end up here is because their behavior is not exposed as the lucid, self-destructive, feminist ideology that it is. And we're here to help Good Men guard their commitment and resources by exposing women who would make poor life partners and mothers of their children. Providing observations and opinions on the posts here allows us to better understand women's psyche and later depressive/miserable state when they are not held to a moral standard required for healthy, functioning relationships.
Rules of conduct:
-
1. No shaming men for any reason.
- 2. No white-knighting or NAWALT. This is not a debate tribe.
Recommended reading:
-
Dating profiles showing women's Dual-Mating strategy and unreasonable standards
-
OkCupid study shows women reject 80% of men based on looks alone
-
Milo - The Sexodus: The Men Giving Up On Women And Checking Out Of Society
-
Women Want to Know Why Men Don't Want to Marry Anymore...Allow Me
-
WAATGM mod explains why promiscuous women can't get good men to commit.
-
Okay, I get it. You're sick of hearing men complain about girls only dating assholes.
-
Dear Girls Who Are (Finally) Ready To Date Nice Guys: We Don’t Want You Anymore
-
Dear Single Moms: I wasn't your type then, why am I all of a sudden your type now?
-
The Truth About Single Moms Who Bring Young Children To The Dating Market
-
Carol asks WAATGM for the harsh truth after riding the carousel
- Complete list of resources here.
Content Archive:
Related forums:

[deleted] 3y ago
[--removed--]
goodmansaysfuckyou Big Dick Energy Misogynist 3y ago
It's still there...on the other lesser platform.
It is a street interview where the guy asks a bunch of people, "If the grim reaper shows up and gives you a choice between taking you or your lover, what do you choose?"
The first half is a compilation of women all saying take their husband or lovers. The second half is a compilation of men saying take them and spare their wife/girlfriend.
Just another example of many that shows women's selfishness and men's selflessness.
Overkill_Engine WAATGM Endorsed 3y ago
That and we live in a society that treats men so poorly that they want to die, and just haven't found a good enough excuse yet in the face of their obligations.
DextroShade 3y ago
Reminds me of when I triggered a bunch of simps on reddit by saying that if I were on the Titanic I would kill everyone between me and a life boat or die trying. They were offended that I wouldn't forfeit my life for strangers on the basis of age and gender. To paraphrase Top G: "Why would I lay my life on the line for a woman when she's not even sucking dick?"
deeplydisturbed FDS Dinner Donor 3y ago
You are not wrong. When it comes to life or death, there are MANY women and men who would toss your ass in the freezing water without a second thought. One of the points in the movie was the notion of class privilege - the workers were trapped in lower deck.
When I was in the military, I worried about misidentifying enemy and friendly tanks, vehicles and aircraft. But a SGT said to me "I don't care who owns the tank, if it is pointing at me I am eliminating the target."
That shocked me at the time. But he's right. Why the fuck should I die because some other idiot from Norway or UK got his targeting wrong. Fuck that guy - this is war and I am happy to help other men die for their country.
[deleted]
whytehorse2021 Jr. Hamster Analyst 3y ago
This comes from evolution, not some modern woman stuff. It's our basic instinct to preserve women and children over ourselves. I can't imagine a species doing well by preserving men over women and children.
hornetsfalcons12 Sr. Hamster Analyst 3y ago
Yeah, ultimately men have been the ones to sacrifice for a reason. Children are the future of the species, and women are in charge of keeping them healthy and functional. Even today, when does daddy really matter for a kid? You don’t really see the effects until after puberty, when kids need someone strong that they can look up to for guidance and leadership. Ultimately in a lot of those ancient cultures, someone else could come in and play the role of guide and mentor for those kids, if something happened that meant daddy wasn’t around anymore. That’s not to say it’s a good solution, but for pure survival of a kid, it was more important to preserve the life of the woman.
Karenzza 3y ago
Maybe the time has come to reevaluate gene pool. Man contributes only half after all. Woman to perish has to fuck up real bad so she carries whatever diseases.
By omission if someone would get funny ideas