It seems like incels were effectively silenced, under the guise of ‘policies against hate’ …Even though incels are literally a bunch of men with an absence of a crucial human need, and, surprise surprise, they're in pain and use these communities to cope....Wow. Shocker. Such hate. Such threat.

All they were doing was coping with their ailments and commiserating together….

A single Incel was responsible for a shooting and that was all they needed to paint the entire group as dangerous men who are a threat to society. I think this is not only stupid but very wrong to do, especially when done by Western Society who is supposedy so tolerant and virtuous and accepting of disenfranchised communities. These supposedly liberal tolerant people saw a group of men suffering, couldn't immediately relate to their pain, and instead of trying to see where they were coming from, deemed them monsters.

Deemed them monsters for being different. And then subsequently used arbitrarily enforced standards to erase them from society, and take away the one coping mechanism they had. That right there is what makes mainstream Western Liberals so disgustingly hypocritical, and the fact that no one sees it, less a select few, is enraging.

To claim that these men were a danger to anyone but themselves is pathetic, and so obviously untrue. They had to take the actions of one guy and use that to fear-monger, and paint incels as some violent gang that is an immediate danger to society. I wonder why boogiemen like Proud Boys and Incels are so concerning to Western Society, but actual criminal gangs that commit violence in impoverished communities on a daily basis are ignored. It's more of that good 'ol Liberal Hypocrisy.

The notion that a bunch of sad, depressed, and resentful men are a bunch of violent gun-weilding thugs is so far a reach, that it's almost sci-fi level far fetched. But then when you take into account the fact that the majority of American people will listen to anything the media tells them, no matter how illogical it is--then it goes from being laughable to being enraging.

But I really do want to know. Where do the incels go now that the Virtuous liberals have silenced them into extinction? I’m a writer and a podcaster and although I am not a bona fide Incel, I commiserate with the movement and I understand the pain. I just can’t technically call myself one because I'm married to someone that I love which is exactly contrary to being an incel. But I recall almost a decade of pain and rejection brought on by women and their treatment of men like me. One thing I do have in common with incels is that I lost the genetic lottery. I’m short, fat, and ugly. No level of confidence will ever fix my level of hideousness. I know this because I’ve developed a noticeable level of confidence over the years, so much so that it’s often the first thing others mention to describe me.

I still have a lot of anger towards society for how they treat men like us—men who have physical attributes out of their control. Society will feel bad for a woman who struggles with her weight and calling her fat or being harsh is socially unacceptable. But when a man is short and ugly, two things he had no control over, girls

will be disgusted by him, creeped out, and won't feel bad to act this way to his face. This starts in grade school and carries on into adulthood. When a man is short and he's in any type of confrontation, he's not taken seriously, treated like a child, oftentimes taken advantage of. The fact that "virtuous" peopel will help a wounded puppy or a lost little child, but will scoff at a short man who is in pain, and even actively partipate in causing him pain, shows me that the world is very ugly, and that people only feel sympathy for things with exterior beauty. People try to deny this all the time. They try to hide from it. They try to overcompensate with stories and anecdotes. But it's true. It's absolutely true.