Anyone notice the giant b.s alert going off in their heads after reading this?

Men are bashed for chasing younger women online yet the article ends with encouraging older women to do the same!

Article really should read women whinging at guys doing fun shit realizes theres no fucking law stopping them doing the same instead of moaning about it!

48?

Not on the market as I am a happily married 62 year old. 6'1" and when I retire in a couple of years should be pulling in double the average income for my age, without touching my savings.

That being said, hell no.

There is a new demographic of confident and experienced women, at their sexual peak as far as science is concerned, who would like to find a partner.

Fuckin LOL.

Single women in their 40s and 50s are increasingly feeling that their love lives are over as men their own age use online dating to cherry-pick younger models.

Apex fallacy. Only 40-50 yr old men able to pick up younger models (aka top men) exist in their eyes.

2 things: they are the ones who want the top men in their 40s and 50s and men that are at the peaks of their career and so they can suck it, I have 0 sympathy And 2nd of all why do they think they should be dating at that age, they should be fulfilling other goals, either career wise and or family wise. Wild ho phase has a limit for a reason, otherwise humanity would have been torn down way before we even learnt how to use tools

In the article the Broom chick is the only one who gets it:

"when I'm out selling at farmers' markets I talk to lots of lovely men, with their lovely wives and children beside them."

Leftover empty egg cartons sometimes as ask where are all the good men, but at least this individual women gets it, those good men are standing next to their wives they married years ago. She's too late to the party.

If you're bored you can visit certain toxic subreddits where the crab-pot-ers screech in anger at any women suggesting marriage at an age before she's too old to get married, LOL. Get back in the crab pot with me LOL!

If you're in an auction market and your biddable resource is dropping every year (youthful good looks) and there are fewer bidding items each year (guys married off), its inevitable there will be bidders whom were too picky and took too long to put in a bid and ended up with NOTHING but boxed wine and cats.

Another way to look at it, is you can draw a graph of the hottest guy a woman can "catch" by marriage by age. It don't go up forever LOL... I'd say arguably it peaks around 20 to 22, after that its all downhill. Actually its more a graph vs woman's weight, which in the standard high carb diet always goes up over time, but same difference. If a woman's minimum acceptable man-value drops more slowly than her woman-value, she simply will never get married no matter how hot she was at 21 or whatever her woman-value peak was.

One interesting thing the article missed is old women can do some things pretty well that MIGHT lure in a guy if they changed their strategy. The standard online dating profile for women is a picture of their tits and a list of ways she wants to spend a guy's money, the oldest business transaction ever. This Broom chick, whom is apparently a successful professional baker, would probably get a lot more action if her online dating profile had a nice clean table for two with amazing food on it and a caption "want to come home to this every day?" I mean, I like my wife, but if she posted a picture of a steak dinner and a slice of pecan pie and a tasteful salad, nice glass of wine, maybe some kind of appetizer ... There's lots of hungry guys on online dating, in more ways than one... but nah, chicks profiles are always "tits for trade, here's my shopping list" and I bet that Broom lady has the same type of profile, just maybe they got flour dusted on them a bit or she wants to spend your money to get a nicer stand mixer for her kitchen or whatever.

Its The Guardian, a left wing uk 'newspaper' that positively hates men.

It's a shame men aim for the younger age range because women of 45 and 55 are arguably much more sexually mature and able to give a lot more pleasure than, say, a woman of 25.

If only men's erections were better at debate. Women everywhere, aged 45 to 55, agree they are much better than women aged 25.

"I am," she wrote, "a plankton on the food chain of sexuality and the prospect of a relationship."

Yup.. more or less.

But according to many singles, even getting invited to the dinner party can be tricky when people tend to socialise with other couples as they get older and settled into marriages and parenthood.

Because married women hate single women around their high value men. They know their single friend would stab them in the back in a heart beat for a chance to take her man.

I have never know a guy to chase after his married friends wives but women have no problems. they will smile and be besties to your wife, all the while they are giving you the 'eye'.

I find it amusing how the article is kind of on the truth until they do the usual „we have to give them hope“ Immelmann turn, (young man go after old women for their maturity)

"It's a shame men aim for the younger age range because women of 45 and 55 are arguably much more sexually mature and able to give a lot more pleasure than, say, a woman of 25."

That's a massive cope and also, gross. What's pleasurable to a man is a fit and enthusiastic partner, and worn out spinsters that can barely conceal their resentment (and desperation for a retirement plan) offer neither.

"It hard to find men especially in london"

I also struggle to meet people in one of the most populous and densely packed cities on the planet... Fuck off author!

This blog was at planktonlife.wordpress.com

Dalrock did at least one piece about her.

She says she's the plankton in today's dating ecology, but that's not true. The plankton are eaten.

Men in their 20s: Women date all the older guys. It sucks but trudge through and make the best of it

Women in their 40s: Why do men insist on dating younger women? Why can't they see us and value us and date someone their own age? This is a major issue. Articles need to be written and studies conducted in order to right this grievous wrong.

Hey gentlemen! What’s the matter with you? This woman is confident and sexually mature! Why would you ever choose a young woman over someone so confident and sexually mature? You must not be real men! For shame!

[deleted]

And of course it ends of the hopeful note of some exceptional circumstance where it worked out anyhow. Happy fantasies for the kids.

This is old news. This was covered to death in the manos here. She either:

A) Divorced a good man, because he was too boring and stable. She just had to ride the carousel.

B) She banged a ton of chads, and she never found her prince charming.

So what I was able to understand:

As soon as you - as a woman - hit 40+, your difficulty in the dating scene rises to roughly half the difficulty men have to endure for their entire life?

Thats hard to accept, I can fully understand that. /s

You always bring inner values and outer values into a relationship. When your outer values deteriorate over the years, you should have built some inner value until then. When I read stuff like "years ago everyone wanted to date me but now nobody wants any more" then guess what: You were only beautiful on the outside.

I’m really going to need to see this “science” that shows that women in their 40s are in their sexual prime. I’m a compounding pharmacist who makes hormone replacement products for this age demographic and I’ll call bullshit on this. What a load of rubbish. If they were in their prime they wouldn’t need hormones to maintain.

[deleted]

Gaelige—Béarla Translations:

• cadairní caisirníneach = "shrivelled scrotums"

There's a lot of men who are privy to the game and how stacked the courts are if you have to pay alimony or child support but there's a percentage that are willing to take those arrows and barbs because they want their genetics to pass on. For these men, women like this are literally invisible.

Ugh! She’s 48? My Mom who is 75 looks better than her!

women of 45 and 55 are arguably much more sexually mature and able to give a lot more pleasure than, say, a woman of 25

doubt

A 25yo is easier to train than a 55yo. Simple fact. Then of course there are all the usual red flag aspects that come with all that.

Looks like an editor didn't look closely at a quote and can be interpreted as something that isn't pro-woman relationship wise:

"Women are more loyal to a company than men, they don't follow the biggest pay cheque and companies are starting to wake up to that and to develop and look after those kind of women. And they will have got where they are in their careers by juggling far fewer balls on the way up."

If they stopped and looked at what "Women are more loyal to a company than men" really says about those women I'm sure they wouldn't have printed that quote.

I love how these articles always play it like men in their 40s and 50s just go out and effortlessly attract 25 year old girls.

No. That shit takes some serious effort. 80 percent or more of the men will never be able to pull that off.

Jesus many a hamster ran an ultra marthon in writing that article.

Ah, this is some old school propaganda. I think I remember reading this one.

Women really need to ask what they can offer a man, that a man can’t either get himself, get from friends, or pay for. The answer: kids. Men value younger women because they can have kids. Then they value their wives, because they help each other in raising the kids. So, for example, what benefit would a 50 year old man have in combining his life and finance to a 50 year old woman? Assuming the man is doing well in that regard. Wouldn’t it make more sense for that man to remain single, date women and stick with one who fits his lifestyle at the time (and remain single when they don’t), or marry a woman 20 years younger who could potentially have kids?

Also, the idea that age = maturity is crap. And this isn’t me picking on women; it’s for men, too. I’ve seen many men who, in their 20’s, are hungry, hard working, and disciplined. Get older and begin to give in to their vices as they gain more certainty in their life, their finances, their profession, and so on. Or maybe got burned in younger relationships and now have no desire to commit to women. Or maybe they just had Peter Pan syndrome.

It’s also ridiculous to claim that someone is wrong for being attracted to certain things (assuming it’s not degenerate and disgusting, like being interested in children). People like what they like. If a 50 year old man only wants to date women 20-25, then I see no issue here. It’s like how women tend to all be attracted to exclusively the top 10% guys. It’s silly to be mad about it, it just is how it is.

Quality jojoke detected.

Did she write this ass backwards? Women had their pick in their twenties. Ignoring that the tables turn doesn't help her argument. Watching the show is very entertaining.

My favorite line:

Susan Broom is a bubbly woman with a ready laugh who is 48, single, and has now given up actively looking for a man, certainly online, and is not afraid to admit that she does feel the sadness of that.

"I gave up internet dating when I realised it was only older men who were contacting me, which doesn't really interest me. I prefer men of my own age. But a lot of those men my age are only looking at women in their 20s or 30s.

Beldams can't be choosers. She would rather die old and alone with than "settle" for someone below her standards. She should feel lucky that someone...anyone...was even willing to give her the time of day. Even with one foot in the grave and no options, she's still holding out for "The One."

It read like a lot of whining about sprained ankles. Sounds like the laydeez could not stick the landing of the cock carousel or the divorce rollercoaster. You wanted the ride, now pay the price.

The really sad part is they were repeatedly warned this would end badly for them. All of them. There is no shortage of examples of how this could go wrong. But that does not matter because Cosmo told them they could have it all. Their romance fiction novels assured them they could land an upgrade to their current man. But it rarely works that way.

And now, they are back on the scene marketing themselves as 'sexually mature.' Sorry, but we get the most juice out of fresh fruit. You have already been squeezed and I don't want the dregs.

NEXT.

"There are a lot of women out there who are in their late 40s and early 50s who don't have children, but would happily have had them if they'd met the right person.”

So close, yet so far away.

"Susan Quilliam, a relationships expert"

Translation: seasoned CC rider.

"I do feel it's not really talked about very openly," said Broom. "There are a lot of women out there who are in their late 40s and early 50s who don't have children, but would happily have had them if they'd met the right person."

They had thousands of options and passed on every one of them.

"It's an invisible band of women, they don't complain and they just get on with their lives, but actually it's tough for them."

They complain incessantly, anyone who's been on the internet knows this.

Unless she frames time in >2 decade chunks, both sides of 45 are wrong…

Women divorce in their 40s and 50s, encouraged by their "friends", and are astonished to find they aren't as desirable as they were when they got engaged in their 20s.

It is interesting how a common critique of men is that they are obsessed with porn and get the wrong ideas about sex and desirability from it

And yet we get comments in this article about women in their 40s having a lot to offer sexually

Apart from just outright lying to themselves (which of course we can’t rule out) a very real explanation is how much MILF porn there is out there and how it always appears very high on popular search terms (I think usually below Teen but there you go).

So maybe women are also being (at least indirectly) influenced by this despite all their criticism

I think a lot of the largest mainstream sites prioritise these “milf” types over young natural looking girls and the theory is that this is algorithm driven. I saw a discussion thread on this somewhere

Difference is that porn actually considers a MILF to be in their 30s and they very much have their weight under control. Some go into 40s. But 50s - not really

Yeah, thats the deal you got by being a woman. The world basically lies at your feet until you are 30 and as long as you keep yourself safe, you will only win win win no matter what.

After that, however...

There is a new demographic of confident and experienced women, at their sexual peak as far as science is concerned

??? say what now?

Sexual peak for women is NOT in the range this article is talking about. Not even fucking close.

Not even for men. The actual PEAK when it comes to physical potential (so also sexual imo) is actually fairly similiar for men and women. IIRC 26 for men, 24 women? Don't quote me on that.

Jesus christ they are actually serious:

It's a shame men aim for the younger age range because women of 45 and 55 are arguably much more sexually mature and able to give a lot more pleasure than, say, a woman of 25

Yeah OK I'm willing to believe a 45 year old has learned more stuff than a 25 year old. Hell, maybe she is even more motivated because she knows she has to compensate. But every man knows that the differences between a 25 year old and a 45 year old are unsurmountable. You could be an actual sex goddess and a 25 year old will still be more attractive to men than you.

Edit: Once again, this also goes for men. I'm 32 and most 23 year old men will build up muscle, recover from injuries etc. faster than me.

News flash: Getting old sucks and you'll be past your (physical) prime faster than you can blink.

Always the victims…